nach oben

Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)

Erschienen in:

01.02.2012

Building Urban Narratives: Collaborative Site-Seeing and Envisioning in the MR Tent

verfasst von: Ina Wagner

Erschienen in: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) | Ausgabe 1/2012

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The focus of this paper is on studying mixed teams of urban planners, citizens and other stakeholders co-constructing their vision for the future of a site. The MR Tent provides a very specific collaborative setting: an assembly of technologies brought outdoors onto the site of an urban project, which offers vistas onto the site as well as a multiplicity of representations of the site to work with, in different media and taken from different perspectives. The prime focus of this paper is on the complex narratives participants co-constructed in three participatory workshops, with the aim to understand how the core aspects of the MR Tent—spatiality, representation and haptic engagement—shape these narratives. Main findings of this research concern: how the design of the multi-layered space of the MR-Tent supports spatial story-telling; how the different representations of the site of an urban project offer the opportunity to choreograph a ‘site-seeing’ that helps participants understand the site and plan interventions; how the ‘tangibles’ in the MR-Tent encourage a different way of contributing to a shared project and ‘building a vision’.

Nächster Artikel Pursuing Leisure: Reflections on Theme Park Visiting

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

We do not address the ‘space-place’ debate within CSCW, since it is not of particular relevance to our arguments in this paper.

IPCity (FP6-2004-IST-4-27571) “Integrated Project on Interaction and Presence in Urban Environments” funded by the European Commission.

As it was winter we did not use the tent in the Oslo workshop but a windowless studio.

Arias, E., Eden, H., Fischer, G., Gomann, A., & Sharff, E. (2000). Transcending the indvidual human mind—creating shared understanding through collaborative design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(1), 84–113.CrossRef

Arnheim, R. (1976). The perception of maps. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 1, 5–10.CrossRef

A. Telier: Binder, T., Ehn, P., Jacucci, G., De Michelis, G., Linde, P., & Wagner, I. (2011). Design things. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Basile, M., & Terrin, J.-J. (2009). Le projet IP city. Une recherche sur la place des technologies de réalité mixte dans les représentations du projet urbain. Flux (Oct–Dec 2009)

Binder, T., De Michelis, T., Jacucci, G., Matcovic, K., Psik, T., & Wagner, I. (2004). Supporting configurability in a tangibly augmented environment for design students. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8, 310–325.CrossRef

Bratteteig, T., & Wagner, I. (2010). Spaces for participatory creativity. In PDC 2001. Proceedings of PDC 2010, Sydney, AUS, November 29 to December 3, 2010, pp. 51–60.

Bruno, G. (2002). Atlas of emotion: journeys in art, architecture, and film. New York: Verso Books.

Büscher. (2006). Vision in motion. Environment and Planning A, 38, 281–299.CrossRef

Djajadiningrat, T., Overbeeke, K., & Wensveen, S. (2002). But how, Donald, tell us how? In DIS’02 proceedings of the 4th conference on designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (pp. 285–291). New York: ACM.

Dicks, B., Soyinka, B., & Coffey, A. (2006). Multimodal ethnography. Qualitative Research, 6(2), 77–96.CrossRef

Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Fisher, J. (2002). Tactile affects. Tessera, vol. 32 (été) https://pi.library.yorku.ca/ojs/index.php/tessera/article/view/25273/23467

Farnell, B. (1999). Moving bodies, acting selves. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, 341–373.CrossRef

Gaver, B., Dunne, T., Pacenti, E. (1999). Cultural probes. Interactions, January+February, pp. 21–29.

Gibson, J. (1996). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Goodwin, C. (2003). Pointing as situated practice. In S. Kita (Ed.), Where language, culture and cognition meet (pp. 217–242). Mahwah, New Jersey, United States: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1996). Seeing as a situated activity: formulating planes. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 61–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Haviland, J. B. (2000). Pointing, gesture spaces, and mental maps. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 13–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Heath, C. (1986). Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRef

Heath, C., Luff, P., Lehn, D. V., Hindmarsh, J., & Cleverly, J. (2002). Crafting participation: designing ecologies, configuring experience. Visual Communication, 1, 9–33.CrossRef

Hindmarsh, J., & Pilnick, A. (2002). The tacit order of teamwork: collaboration and embodied conduct in anesthesia. The Sociological Quarterly, 43(2), 139–164.CrossRef

Hornecker, E. (2005). A design theme for tangible interaction: embodied facilitation. In H. Gellersen, K. Schmidt, M. Beaudouin-Lafon, & W. Mackay (Eds.), ECSCW’05 Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Paris, France, September 18–22, 2005 (pp. 23–43). London/New York: Springer.

Hornecker, E., & Buur, J. (2006). Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction. In Proceedings of CHI 2006, Montréal, Québec, Canada, April 22 to 28, 2006. New York: ACM Press, pp. 437–446

Hornecker, E., Marshall, P., Sheep Dalton, N., Rogers, Y. (2008). Collaboration and interference: awareness with mice or touch input. In Proceedings of CSCW’08, San Diego, California, USA, November 8 to 12, 2008. New York: ACM Press, 167–176.

Hurdley, R., & Dicks, B. (2011). In-between practice: working in the ‘thirdspace’ of sensory and multimodal methodology. Qualitative Research, 11(3), 277–292.CrossRef

Iedema, R. (2000). Analysing film and television. In T. van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 183–204). London: Sage.

Iedema, R. (2003). Multimodality, resemiotization: extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2, 29–57.CrossRef

Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment. London: Routledge.CrossRef

Ishii, H., Ben-Joseph, E, Underkoffler, J., Yeung, L., Chak, D., Kanji, Z., Piper, B. (2002). Augmented urban planning workbench: overlaying drawings, physical models and digital simulation. In ISMAR’02. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, September 30 to October 01, 2002. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, pp. 203–213

Jacucci, G., & Wagner, I (2007). Performative roles of materiality for collective creativity In C&C’07 Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity & Cognition, Washington, DC, USA, June 13–15, 2007. New York: ACM Press, pp. 73–82

Kirsh, D. (1995). The intelligent use of space. Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 73(1–2), 31–68.CrossRef

Jacucci, G., Spagnolli, A., Chalambalakis, A., Morrison, A., Liikkanen, L., Roveda, S., & Bertoncini, M. (2009). Bodily explorations in space: social experience of a multimodal art installation. In T. Gross et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of INTERACT 2009, Part II, LNCS 5727 (pp. 62–75). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.

Knoblauch, H., Baer, A., Laurier, E., Petschke, S., Schnettler, B. (2008). Visual analysis. New developments in the interpretative analysis of video and photography. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, vol. 9, no. 3.

Kress, G., & Ogborn, J. (1998). Modes of representation and local epistemologies: the presentation of science in education. Subjectivity in the School Curriculum (Working Paper 2, Institute of Education). London: University of London.

Larssen, A. T., Robertson, T., & Edwards, J. (2007). The feel dimension of technology interaction: exploring tangibles through movement and touch. In B. Ullmer, A. Schmidt, E. Hornecker, C. Hummels, R. J. K. Jacob, & E. van den Hoven (Eds.), TEI’07 Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA, February 15 to 17, 2007 (pp. 271–278). New York: ACM Press.

Latour, B. (1986). Visualization and cognition. Thinking with eyes and hands. Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present, 1–40

Lee, Y.-Y. (2010). The roles of haptic perception in visual arts. Master Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Maquil, V., et al. (2010). Final prototype of urban renewal applications. FP6-2004-IST-4-27571 IPCity, Brussels 2010 (www.ipcity.eu).

Maquil, V. (2010). The ColorTable: an interdisciplinary design process. PhD thesis, Vienna University of Technology.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception, trans. C. Smith, London/New York: Routledge.

Mondada, L. (2003). Working with video: how surgeons produce video records of their actions. Visual Studies, 18(1), 58–73.CrossRef

Mondada, L. (2006). Video recording as the reflexive preservation and configuration of phenomenal features for analysis. In H. Knoblauch, J. Raab, H.-G. Soeffner, & B. Schnettler (Eds.), Video analysis (pp. 51–68). Bern: Lang.

Mondada, L. (2008). Using video for a sequential and multimodal analysis of social interaction: videotaping institutional telephone calls. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(3) Art. 39.

Mondada, L. (2009). Emergent focused interactions in public places: a systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1977–1997.CrossRef

Murphy, K. M. (2003). Building meaning in interaction: rethinking gesture classifications. Crossroads of Language, Interaction, and Culture, 5, 29–47.

Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multmodal interaction. London: Routledge.

O’Halloran, K. L. (2008). Systemic functional-multimodal discourse analysis (SF-MDA): constructing ideational meaning using language and visual imagery. Visual Communication, 7(4), 443–475.CrossRef

Paterson, M. (2009). Haptic geographies: ethnography, haptic knowledges and sensuous dispositions. Progress in Human Geography Online, 2009, 1–23.

Piper, B., Ratti, C., Ishii, H. (2002). Illuminating clay: a 3D tangible interface for landscape analysis. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Changing Our World, Changing Ourselves, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, April 20 to 25, 2002, pp. 355–362.

Röhl, T., & Herbrik, R. (2008). Mapping the imaginary—maps in fantasy role-playing games. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(3): Art. 25.

Schmidt, K., & Wagner, I. (2004). Ordering systems. Coordinative practices and artifacts in architectural design and planning. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 13, 349–408.CrossRef

Schnettler, B., & Raab, J. (2008). Interpretative visual analysis developments, state of the art and pending problems. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(3), Art. 31.

Söderström, O. (1996). Paper cities: visual thinking in urban planning. Cultural Geographies, 3(3), 249–287.CrossRef

Springgay, S. (2003). Cloth as intercorporeality: touch, fantasy, and performance and the construction of body knowledge. International Journal on Education & the Arts 4,5 (2003) Retrieved [19/11/2011] from http://ijea.asu.edu/v4n5/

Sugimoto, M., Kazuhiro, H., Hashizume, H. (2004). Caretta: a system for supporting face-to-face collaboration by integrating personal and shared spaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vienna, Austria, April 24–29, 2004). CHI’04. New York: ACM Press, pp. 41–48.

Stewart, S. (1999). From the museum of touch. In M. Kwint, C. Breward, & J. Aynsley (Eds.), Material memories: design and evocation (pp. 17–36). Oxford: Berg.

Underkoffler, J., & Ishii, H. (1999). Urp: a luminous-tangible workbench for urban planning and design. In CHI’99. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: the CHI Is the Limit. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, May 15 to 20, 1999. New York: ACM Press, pp. 386–393.

Verbeek, P. P., & Kockelkoren, P. (1998). The things that matter. Design Issues, 14(3), 28–47.CrossRef

Wagner, I., Basile, M., Ehrenstrasser, L., Maquil, V., Terrin, J.-J., Wagner, M. (2009). Supporting community engagement in the city: urban planning in the MR-Tent. In C&T’09 Proceedings of the Fourth international Conference on Communities and Technologies, University Park, PA, USA, June 25 to 27, 2009. New York: ACM Press, pp. 185–194.

Williams, A., Kabisch, E., & Dourish, P. (2005). From interaction to participation: configuring space through embodied interaction. In M. Beigl et al. (Eds.), UbiComp 2005, LNCS 3660 (pp. 287–304). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef

Wimmer, G. (2011). Quantitative analysis of gestures in relation to activity categories when working with the ColorTable. Master Thesis: Vienna University of Technology.

Yamashita, N., Kaji, K, Kuzuoka, H., Hirata, K. (2011). Improving visibility of remote gestures in distributed tabletop collaboration. In Proceedings of CSCW 2011, Hangzhou, China, March 19 to 23, 2011. ACM Press: New York, pp. 95–104

Titel: Building Urban Narratives: Collaborative Site-Seeing and Envisioning in the MR Tent
verfasst von: Ina Wagner
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2012
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) / Ausgabe 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0925-9724
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7551
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-011-9152-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner