Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
International Journal of Social Robotics
Erschienen in: International Journal of Social Robotics 5/2015

01.11.2015

Can a Social Robot Stimulate Science Curiosity in Classrooms?

verfasst von: Masahiro Shiomi, Takayuki Kanda, Iris Howley, Kotaro Hayashi, Norihiro Hagita

Erschienen in: International Journal of Social Robotics | Ausgabe 5/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This study investigates whether the presence of a social robot and interaction with it raises children’s interest in science. We placed Robovie, our social robot, in an elementary school science class where children could freely interact with it during their breaks. Robovie was tele-operated and its behaviors were designed to answer any questions related to science. It encouraged the children to ask about science by initiating conversations about class topics. Our result shows that even though Robovie did not influence the science curiosity of the entire class, there were individual increases in the children who asked Robovie science questions.
Vorheriger Artikel Are Children with ASD more Prone to Test the Intentions of the Robonova Robot Compared to a Human?
Nächster Artikel Capturing Expertise: Developing Interaction Content for a Robot Through Teleoperation by Domain Experts

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Chioccariello A, Manca S, Sarti L (2001) Children’s playful learning with a robotic construction kit. In: Siraj-Blatchford J (ed) Developing new technologies for young children. Trentham Books, Nottingham, pp 93–174
2.
Howard A, Graham E (2007) To encourage and excite the next generation of engineers through human-robot interaction projects for space exploration, American society for engineering education annual conference
3.
Hussain S, Lindh J, Shukur G (2006) The effect of LEGO training on pupils’ school performance in mathematics. Probl Solving Abil Attitude 9:182–194
4.
Han J, Jo M, Park S, Kim S (2005) The educational use of home robots for children, IEEE Int. Workshop on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN2005), pp. 378–383
5.
Kanda T, Hirano T, Eaton D, Ishiguro H (2004) Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: a field trial. Human Comput Interact 19:61–84CrossRef
6.
Saerbeck M, Schut T, Bartneck C, Janse MD (2010) Expressive robots in education: varying the degree of social supportive behavior of a robotic tutor, ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI2010), pp. 1613–1622
7.
Tanaka F, Matsuzoe S (2012) Children teach a care-receiving robot to promote their learning: field experiments in a classroom for vocabulary learning. J Human Robot Interact 1:78–95CrossRef
8.
Kanda T, Shimada M, Koizumi S (2012) Children learning with a social robot, ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI 2012)
9.
Kanda T, Sato R, Saiwaki N, Ishiguro H (2007) A two-month field trial in an elementary school for long-term human-robot interaction. IEEE Trans Robot 23:962–971CrossRef
10.
Harty H, Beall D (1984) Toward the development of a children’s science curiosity measure. J Res Sci Teach 21:425–436CrossRef
11.
Jirout J, Klahr D (2012) Childrenfs scientific curiosity: in search of an operational definition of an elusive concept. Dev Rev 32:125–160CrossRef
12.
Sun H, Chen A (2010) A pedagogical understanding of the self-determination theory in physical education. Quest 62:364–384CrossRef
13.
Henderson BB, Gold SR, McCord MT (1982) Daydreaming and curiosity in gifted and average children and adolescents. Dev Psychol 18:576–582CrossRef
14.
Spektor-Levy O, Baruch YK, Mevarech Z (2011) Science and scientific curiosity in pre-school? The teacher’s point of view. Int J Sci Educ 35:2226–2253CrossRef
15.
Edelson DC, Gordin DN, Pea RD (1999) Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. J Learn Sci 8:391–450CrossRef
16.
Maxwell R, Fogarty K, Noble W, Midgley P, Gibbings AA (2013) Kist and W. Midgley, Robot RAL-ly international—promoting STEM in elementary school across international boundaries using remote access technology, REV2013: 10th international conference on remote engineering and virtual instrumentation, pp. 1–5
17.
Burgard W, Cremers AB, Fox D, Hahnel D, Lakemeyer G, Schulz D, Steiner W, Thrun S (1998) The interactive museum tour-guide robot, national conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI1998), pp. 11–18
18.
Thrun S, Bennewitz M, Burgard W, Cremers AB, Dellaert F, Fox D, Hahnel D, Rosenberg C, Roy N, Schulte J, Schulz D (1999) MINERVA: a second-generation museum tour-guide robot, IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA1999), pp. 1999–2005
19.
Siegwart R, Arras KO, Bouabdallah S, Burnier D, Froidevaux G, Greppin X, Jensen B, Lorotte A, Mayor L, Meisser M, Philippsen R, Piguet R, Ramel G, Terrien G, Tomatis N (2003) Robox at Expo. 02: a large scale installation of personal robots. Robot Auton Syst 42:203–222CrossRefMATH
20.
Shiomi M, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2007) Interactive humanoid robots for a science museum. IEEE Intell Syst 22:25–32CrossRef
21.
Pereira A, Martinho C, Leite I, Paiva A (2008) iCat, the chess player: the influence of embodiment in the enjoyment of a game, international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent aystems (AAMAS2008), pp. 1253–1256
22.
Bickmore TW, Picard RW (2005) Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships. ACM Trans Comput Human Interact (TOCHI) 12:293–327CrossRef
23.
Kidd CD (2008) Designing for long-term human-robot interaction and application to weight loss. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
24.
Howley I, Kanda T, Hayashi K, Rose C (2014) Potential Harmful Effects of Social Presence and Social Role on Help-Seeking, HRI2014 (accepted)
25.
26.
Kawai H, Toda T, Ni J, Tsuzaki M, Tokuda K (2005) XIMERA: A new TTS from ATR based on corpus-based technologies. ISCA speech synthesis workshop, pp 179–184
27.
Iwamura Y, Shiomi M, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2011) Do elderly people prefer a conversational humanoid as a shopping assistant partner in supermarkets?, ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI2011), pp. 449–456
28.
Shiwa T, Kanda T, Imai M, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2008) How quickly should communication robots respond?, ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI2008), pp. 153–160
29.
Powers A, Kiesler S, Fussell S, Torrey C (2007) Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot, ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI2007), pp. 145–152
30.
Shinozawa K, Naya F, Yamato J (2005) Differences in effect of robot and screen agent recommendations of human decisionmaking. Int J Human Comput Stud 62:2–19CrossRef
31.
Bainbridge WA, Hart J, Kim ES, Scassellati B (2008) The effect of presence on human-robot interaction. In: IEEE int symposium on robot and human interactive communication, pp 701–706
32.
Shiomi M, Shinozawa K, Yoshiyumi N, Miyashita T, Sakamoto T, Terakubo T, Isiguro H, Hagita N (2013) Recommendation effects of a social robot for advertisement-use context in a shopping mall. Int J Social Robot 5(2):251–262CrossRef
33.
Howley Iris K, Kanda Takayuki, Hayashi Kotaro, Rose Carolyn Penstein (2014) Effects of social presence and social role on help-seeking and learning. International conference on Human-robot interaction, pp 415–422
34.
Glas DF, Miyashita T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2009) Laser-based tracking of human position and orientation using parametric shape modeling. Adv Robot 23:405–428CrossRef
35.
Shiomi M, Sakamoto D, Kanda T, Ishi CT, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2011) Field trial of a networked robot at a train station. Int J Soc Robot 3:27–40CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Can a Social Robot Stimulate Science Curiosity in Classrooms?
verfasst von
Masahiro Shiomi
Takayuki Kanda
Iris Howley
Kotaro Hayashi
Norihiro Hagita
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2015
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Journal of Social Robotics / Ausgabe 5/2015
Print ISSN: 1875-4791
Elektronische ISSN: 1875-4805
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0303-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2015

International Journal of Social Robotics 5/2015 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Individuals’ Evaluations of and Attitudes Towards Potentially Uncanny Robots

OriginalPaper

Capturing Expertise: Developing Interaction Content for a Robot Through Teleoperation by Domain Experts

OriginalPaper

Measuring Communication Participation to Initiate Conversation in Human–Robot Interaction

OriginalPaper

Gestures for Manually Controlling a Helping Hand Robot

OriginalPaper

Emotion-Age-Gender-Nationality Based Intention Understanding in Human–Robot Interaction Using Two-Layer Fuzzy Support Vector Regression

OriginalPaper

Impacts of Robot Head Gaze on Robot-to-Human Handovers

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise