nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.03.2024 | Original Article

Can extreme climatic and bioclimatic indices reproduce soy and maize yields in Latin America? Part 1: an observational and modeling perspective

verfasst von: Diego Portalanza, Vanesa C. Pántano, Cristian Felipe Zuluaga, Marcos Roberto Benso, Arturo Corrales Suastegui, Natalia Castillo, Silvina Solman

Erschienen in: Environmental Earth Sciences | Ausgabe 6/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

According to the IPCC, most regions worldwide will be gradually exposed to the amplification of the duration, frequency, and intensity of extreme climatic events, and the effects that extreme events can cause on human well-being and the economy. This study aims to develop linear regression models to estimate the soy and maize yields from extreme climatic and bioclimatic indices in three geographical subregions of Latin America (Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina) between 1979 and 2005. We used daily datasets from observations (CPC), reanalysis (ERA5), and regional climate model (RCM) simulations from the Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX) to investigate the impact of extreme events of temperature and precipitation on maize and soy yields over the CORDEX Central America and South America domains. We first assessed the RCMs’ performance in reproducing extreme indices by comparing them against observations. The validation process evidenced the need for applying bias correction techniques to simulate daily precipitation and temperature for a better performance of the indices. The results show a higher correlation between the daily temperature range (DTR), cold nights and warm nights for soy production in Argentina (R2: − 0.74, − 0.80 and 0.75, respectively) and Mexico (R2: − 0.80, − 0.81, 0.70) for maize. Regionally, the linear model (simulated with observed data) using these indices presented an agreement with observed yield data in Mexico and Brazil, with explained variances exceeding 70% for maize in these subregions, while Argentina presented a better performance for soy yield. An intriguing finding was the superior performance of linear models when used with CPC-corrected RCM data compared to ERA5. Taken together, our results highlight the capabilities and constraints of linear models as valuable tools for developing adaptation and mitigation strategies, enabling precise yield forecasting, and informing policy decisions.

Vorheriger Artikel Study on the influence of input variables on the supervised machine learning model for landslide susceptibility mapping

Nächster Artikel Experimental research on optimum freezing temperature of sandy gravels in artificial ground freezing

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Abrahao GM, Costa MH (2018) Evolution of rain and photoperiod limitations on the soybean growing season in Brazil: the rise (and possible fall) of double-cropping systems. Agric for Meteorol 256–257:32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.02.031CrossRef

Alexandri G, Georgoulias AK, Zanis P, Katragkou E, Tsikerdekis A, Kourtidis K et al (2015) On the ability of RegCM4 regional climate model to simulate surface solar radiation patterns over Europe: an assessment using satellite-based observations. Atmos Chem Phys. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13195-2015

Almazroui M, Islam MN, Saeed F, Saeed S, Ismail M, Ehsan MA et al (2021) Projected changes in temperature and precipitation over the United States, Central America, and the Caribbean in CMIP6 GCMs. Earth Syst Environ. 5(1):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-021-00199-5CrossRef

Anderson R, Bayer PE, Edwards D (2020) Climate change and the need for agricultural adaptation. Curr Opin Plant Biol 56:197–202CrossRefPubMed

Arata L, Fabrizi E, Sckokai P (2020) A worldwide analysis of trend in crop yields and yield variability: evidence from FAO data. Econ Model 8(90):190–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.05.006CrossRef

Arce-Romero A, Monterroso-Rivas AI, Gomez-Dıaz JD, Palacios-Mendoza M, Navarro-Salas EN, Lopez-Blanco J et al (2020) Crop yield simulations in Mexican agriculture for climate change adaptation. Atmosfera. https://doi.org/10.20937/ATM.52430CrossRef

Avila-Diaz A, Abrahao G, Justino F, Torres R, Wilson A (2020) Extreme climate indices in Brazil: evaluation of downscaled earth system models at high horizontal resolution. Clim Dyn 54(11–12):5065–5088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05272-9CrossRef

Balmaceda-Huarte R, Olmo ME, Bettolli ML, Poggi MM (2021) Evaluation of multiple reanalyses in reproducing the spatio-temporal variability of temperature and precipitation indices over southern South America. Int J Climatol 41(12):5572–5595. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7142CrossRef

Barlow KM, Christy BP, O’Leary GJ, Riffkin PA, Nuttall JG (2015) Simulating the impact of extreme heat and frost events on wheat crop production: a review. Field Crops Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.11.010CrossRef

C3S CCCS (2017) ERA5: Fifth generation of ECMWF atmospheric reanalyses of the global climate. Copernicus Climate Change Service Climate Data Store (CDS), accessed 2018–05–04

Cabre MF, Quenol H, Nunez M (2016) Regional climate change scenarios applied to viticultural zoning in Mendoza Argentina. Int J Biometeorol 60(9):1325–1340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-015-1126-3CrossRefPubMed

Caetano JM, Tessarolo G, de Oliveira G, Souza KDSE, Diniz-Filho JAF, Nabout JC (2018) Geographical patterns in climate and agricultural technology drive soybean productivity in Brazil. PLoS ONE 13(1):e0191273. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191273CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cannon AJ, Piani C, Sippel S (2020) Bias correction of climate model output for impact models. Climate extremes and their implications for impact and risk assessment. Elsevier, pp 77–104CrossRef

Cavazos T, Luna-Nino R, Cerezo-Mota R, Fuentes-Franco R, Mendez M, Pineda Martinez LF et al (2020) Climatic trends and regional climate models intercomparison over the CORDEX-CAM (Central America, Caribbean, and Mexico) domain. Int J Climatol 40(3):1396–1420. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6276CrossRef

Ceddia MG (2019) The impact of income, land, and wealth inequality on agricultural expansion in Latin America. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116(7):2527–2532. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814894116CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ceron WL, Kayano MT, Andreoli RV, Avila-Diaz A, Ayes I, Freitas ED et al (2021) Recent intensification of extreme precipitation events in the La Plata Basin in Southern South America (1981–2018). Atmos Res 249:105299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105299CrossRef

Challinor AJ, Watson J, Lobell DB, Howden S, Smith D, Chhetri N (2014) A meta-analysis of crop yield under climate change and adaptation. Nat Clim Change 4(4):287–291CrossRef

Chen M, Shi W, Xie P, Silva VBS, Kousky VE, Wayne Higgins R et al (2008) Assessing objective techniques for gauge-based analyses of global daily precipitation. J Geophys Res 113(D4):D04110. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009132CrossRef

Cheruy F, Dufresne JL, Hourdin F, Ducharne A (2014) Role of clouds and land-atmosphere coupling in midlatitude continental summer warm biases and climate change amplification in CMIP5 simulations. Geophys Res Lett 41(18):6493–6500. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061145CrossRef

Coppola E, Raffaele F, Giorgi F, Giuliani G, Xuejie G, Ciarlo JM et al (2021) Climate hazard indices projections based on CORDEX-CORE, CMIP5 and CMIP6 ensemble. Clim Dyn 57(5–6):1293–1383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05640-zCrossRef

Cucchi M, Weedon G, Amici A, Bellouin N, Lange S, Schmied HM et al (2020) WFDE5: bias adjusted ERA5 reanalysis data for impact studies. Earth Syst Sci Data Discuss. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2020-28

De Sales F, Xue Y (2011) Assessing the dynamic-downscaling ability over South America using the intensity-scale verification technique. Int J Climatol 31(8):1205–1221. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2139CrossRef

Delerce S, Dorado H, Grillon A, Rebolledo MC, Prager SD, Patino VH et al (2016) Assessing weather-yield relationships in rice at local scale using data mining approaches. PLoS ONE 11(8):e0161620. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161620CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Devanand A, Roxy MK, Ghosh S (2018) Coupled land-atmosphere regional model reduces dry bias in Indian Summer Monsoon rainfall simulated by CFSv2. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1002/2018GL077218CrossRef

Do Vale TMC, Spyrides MHC, Andrade LDMB, Bezerra BG, da Silva PE (2020) Subsistence agriculture productivity and climate extreme events. Atmosphere. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11121287CrossRef

Eakin H, Sweeney S, Lerner AM, Appendini K, Perales H, Steigerwald DG et al (2018) Agricultural change and resilience: agricultural policy, climate trends and market integration in the Mexican maize system. Anthropocene. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2018.08.002CrossRef

Eck MA, Murray AR, Ward AR, Konrad CE (2020) Influence of growing season temperature and precipitation anomalies on crop yield in the southeastern United States. Agric for Meteorol 291:108053CrossRef

Elguindi N, Bi X, Giorgi F, Nagarajan B, Pal JS, Solmon F, et al. Regional climatic model RegCM user manual. The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics. 6(May).

Essou GRC, Brissette F, Lucas-Picher P (2017) The use of reanalyses and gridded observations as weather input data for a hydrological model: comparison of performances of simulated river flows based on the density of weather stations. J Hydrometeorol. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0088.1CrossRef

FAOSTAT (2023) FAOSTAT: statistical database

Feng P, Wang B, Liu DL, Xing H, Ji F, Macadam I et al (2018) Impacts of rainfall extremes on wheat yield in semi-arid cropping systems in eastern Australia. Clim Change 147(3–4):555–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2170-xCrossRef

Feng L, Wang H, Ma X, Peng H, Shan J (2021) Modeling the current land suitability and future dynamics of global soybean cultivation under climate change scenarios. Field Crops Res 4(263):108069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108069CrossRef

Ferrero R, Lima M, Gonzalez-Andujar JL (2018) Crop production structure and stability under climate change in South America. Ann Appl Biol 172(1):65–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12402CrossRef

Firth R, Kala J, Lyons TJ, Andrys J (2017) An analysis of regional climate simulations for Western Australia’s wine regions—model evaluation and future climate projections. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 56(7):2113–2138. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0333.1CrossRef

Fraga H, Malheiro AC, Moutinho-Pereira J, Santos JA (2012) An overview of climate change impacts on European viticulture. Food Energy Secur. 1(2):94–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.14CrossRef

Frank EH (2015) Regression modeling strategies with applications to linear models, logistic and ordinal regression, and survival analysis. Springer

Giorgi F, Gutowski WJ (2015) Regional dynamical downscaling and the CORDEX initiative. Ann Rev Environ Resour. 40(1):467–490. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021217CrossRef

Gutowski JW, Giorgi F, Timbal B, Frigon A, Jacob D, Kang HS et al (2016) WCRP COordinated Regional Downscaling EXperiment (CORDEX): a diagnostic MIP for CMIP6. Geosci Model Dev. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4087-2016

Hauke J, Kossowski T (2011) Comparison of values of Pearson’s and spearman’s correlation coefficients on the same sets of data. Quaestiones Geographicae. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10117-011-0021-1CrossRef

Hersbach H, Bell B, Berrisford P, Hirahara S, Horanyi A, Munoz-Sabater J et al (2020) The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q J R Meteorol Soc 146(730):1999–2049. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803CrossRef

Hof C (2021) Towards more integration of physiology, dispersal and land-use change to understand the responses of species to climate change. J Exp Biol 224(Suppl 1):jeb238352CrossRefPubMed

Hood R (2019) Global warming. A companion to applied ethics. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, pp 674–684. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996621.ch50CrossRef

Iizumi T, Ramankutty N (2016) Changes in yield variability of major crops for 1981–2010 explained by climate change. Environ Res Lett 11(3):034003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034003CrossRef

Ines AVM, Hansen JW (2006) Bias correction of daily GCM rainfall for crop simulation studies. Agric for Meteorol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.03.009CrossRef

IPCC (2019) Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report. Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. pp 1–864

Jager W, Edmonds B (2015) Policy making and modelling in a complex world. Policy practice and digital science: integrating complex systems social simulation and public administration in policy research. Springer, pp 57–73CrossRef

James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R et al (2013) An introduction to statistical learning, vol 112. SpringerCrossRef

Jones JW, Antle JM, Basso B, Boote KJ, Conant RT, Foster I et al (2017) Brief history of agricultural systems modeling. Agric Syst 155:240–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.05.014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kim YH, Min SK, Zhang X, Sillmann J, Sandstad M (2020) Evaluation of the CMIP6 multi-model ensemble for climate extreme indices. Weather Clim Extremes 9(29):100269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2020.100269CrossRef

Leng G, Zhang X, Huang M, Asrar GR, Leung LR (2016) The role of climate covariability on crop yields in the conterminous United States. Sci Rep 6(1):33160. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33160CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lin F, Chhapekar SS, Vieira CC, Da Silva MP, Rojas A, Lee D et al (2022) Breeding for disease resistance in soybean: a global perspective. Theor Appl Genet 135(11):3773–3872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-022-04101-3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Liu XS (2019) A probabilistic explanation of Pearson’s correlation. Teach Stat. https://doi.org/10.1111/test.12204CrossRef

Lizaso JI, Ruiz-Ramos M, Rodrıguez L, Gabaldon-Leal C, Oliveira JA, Lorite IJ et al (2018) Impact of high temperatures in maize: phenology and yield components. Field Crops Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.11.013CrossRef

Lobell DB, Schlenker W, Costa-Roberts J (2011) Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science 333(6042):616–620. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204531CrossRefPubMed

Lorenz R, Argueso D, Donat MG, Pitman AJ, Hurk B, Berg A et al (2016) Influence of land–atmosphere feedbacks on temperature and precipitation extremes in the GLACE-CMIP5 ensemble. J Geophys Res: Atmos. 121(2):607–623. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024053CrossRef

Mamalakis A, Langousis A, Deidda R, Marrocu M (2017) A parametric approach for simultaneous bias correction and high-resolution downscaling of climate model rainfall. Water Resour Res 53(3):2149–2170. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019578CrossRef

Mann HB (1945) Mann nonparametric test against trend. Econometrica 13:245MathSciNetCrossRef

Maraun D (2016) Bias correcting climate change simulations—a critical review. Curr Clim Change Reports. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-016-0050-xCrossRef

Martinez-Melendez LA, Bennett EM (2016) Trade in the US and Mexico helps reduce environmental costs of agriculture. Environ Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/055004CrossRef

Mathieu JA, Aires F (2018) Assessment of the agro-climatic indices to improve crop yield forecasting. Agric for Meteorol 253:15–30CrossRef

Mendoza-Mendoza CG, Mendoza-Castillo MDC, Castillo-Gonzalez F, Sanchez-Ramırez FJ, Delgado-Alvarado A, Pecina-Martınez JA (2019) Agronomic performance and grain yield of Mexican purple corn populations from Ixtenco, Tlaxcala. Maydica 64(3):9

Mistry MN (2019) A high-resolution global gridded historical dataset of climate extreme indices. Data. https://doi.org/10.3390/data4010041CrossRef

Moore FC, Lobell DB (2015) The fingerprint of climate trends on European crop yields. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112(9):2670–2675. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1409606112CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mueller B, Seneviratne SI (2014) Systematic land climate and evapotranspiration biases in CMIP5 simulations. Geophys Res Lett 41(1):128–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058055CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Naveendrakumar G, Vithanage M, Kwon HH, Chandrasekara S, Iqbal M, Pathmarajah S et al (2019) South Asian perspective on temperature and rainfall extremes: a review. Atmos Res 225:110–120CrossRef

Nogueira M (2020) Inter-comparison of ERA-5, ERA-interim and GPCP rainfall over the last 40 years: process-based analysis of systematic and random differences. J Hydrol 583:124632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124632CrossRef

Noia Junior RDS, Sentelhas PC (2019) Soybean-maize succession in Brazil: impacts of sowing dates on climate variability, yields and economic profitability. Eur J Agron 103:140–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2018.12.008CrossRef

Parry L, Radel C, Adamo SB, Clark N, Counterman M, Flores-Yeffal N et al (2019) The (in)visible health risks of climate change. Soc Sci Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112448CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Perera ATD, Nik VM, Chen D, Scartezzini JL, Hong T (2020) Quantifying the impacts of climate change and extreme climate events on energy systems. Nat Energy 5(2):150–159. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0558-0CrossRef

Pratap A, Gupta SK, Kumar J, Mehandi S, Pandey VR (2015) Soybean. Breeding oilseed crops for sustainable production: opportunities and constraints. Elsevier

Qian Y, Yang Z, Feng Z, Liu Y, Gustafson WI, Berg LK et al (2020) Neglecting irrigation contributes to the simulated summertime warm-and-dry bias in the central United States. Npj Clim Atmos Sci. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-020-00135-wCrossRef

Ramirez-Villegas J, Challinor AJ, Thornton PK, Jarvis A (2013) Implications of regional improvement in global climate models for agricultural impact research. Environ Res Lett 8(2):024018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024018CrossRef

Ray DK, Ramankutty N, Mueller ND, West PC, Foley JA (2012) Recent patterns of crop yield growth and stagnation. Nat Commun 3(1):1293CrossRefPubMed

Ray DK, West PC, Clark M, Gerber JS, Prishchepov VA, Chatterjee S (2019) Climate change has likely already affected global food production. PLoS ONE 14(5):e0217148. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217148CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Reboita MS, Gan MA, da Rocha RP, Ambrizzi T (2010) Regimes de precipitacaona America do Sul: uma revisao bibliografica. Revista Brasileira De Meteorologia. 25(2):185–204. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-77862010000200004CrossRef

Rebolledo M, Ramirez-Villegas J, Graterol E, Hernandez-Varela C, Rodrıguez-Espinoza J, Petro-Paez E, et al. (2018) Modelacion del arroz en Latinoamerica: Estado del arte y base de datos para parametrizacion. Luxembourg

Reyer CPO, Adams S, Albrecht T, Baarsch F, Boit A, Canales Trujillo N et al (2017) Climate change impacts in Latin America and the Caribbean and their implications for development. Reg Environ Change 17(6):1601–1621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0854-6CrossRef

Ruscica RC, Sorensson AA, Menendez CG (2015) Pathways between soil moisture and precipitation in southeastern South America. Atmos Sci Lett. 16(3):267–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/asl2.552CrossRef

Saravia-Matus S, Saravia Matus J, Sotomayor O, Rodriguez A (2018) Investment strategies in the Latin American agri-business sub-sectors of agricultural commodities, biofuels and meat chains. J Agribus Dev Emerg Econ. 8(2):320–338. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-09-2014-0036CrossRef

Schauberger B, Ben-Ari T, Makowski D, Kato T, Kato H, Ciais P (2018) Yield trends, variability and stagnation analysis of major crops in France over more than a century. Sci Rep 8(1):16865. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35351-1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Sillmann J, Kharin VV, Zwiers FW, Zhang X, Bronaugh D (2013) Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 2. Future climate projections. J Geophys Res: Atmos. 118(6):2473–2493. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50188CrossRef

Solman SA, Blazquez J (2019) Multiscale precipitation variability over South America: analysis of the added value of CORDEX RCM simulations. Clim Dyn 53(3–4):1547–1565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04689-1CrossRef

Solman SA, Nunez MN, Cabre MF (2008) Regional climate change experiments over southern South America. I: present climate. Clim Dyn 30(5):533–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0304-3CrossRef

Solman S, Cabre M, Gonzalez M, Nunez M (2018) Bioclimatic zoning of Argentinian Malbec grape productivity regions by means of a unique combined index. Clim Res. 74(3):185–199. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01498CrossRef

Sorensson AA, Menendez CG (2011) Summer soil—precipitation coupling in South America. Tellus a: Dyn Meteorol Oceanogr. 63(1):56–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2010.00468.xCrossRef

Sweeney S, Steigerwald DG, Davenport F, Eakin H (2013) Mexican maize production: evolving organizational and spatial structures since 1980. Appl Geogr 39:78–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.12.005CrossRef

Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93(4):485–498. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1CrossRef

Teasdale JR, Cavigelli MA (2017) Meteorological fluctuations define long-term crop yield patterns in conventional and organic production systems. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00775-8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Troy TJ, Kipgen C, Pal I (2015) The impact of climate extremes and irrigation on US crop yields. Environ Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/5/054013CrossRef

Turco M, Llasat MC, Herrera S, Gutierrez JM (2017) Bias correction and downscaling of future RCM precipitation projections using a MOS-analog technique. J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025724CrossRef

Ummenhofer CC, Meehl GA (2017) Extreme weather and climate events with ecological relevance: a review. Philos Trans R Soc b: Biol Sci. 372(1723):20160135. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0135CrossRef

UNFCCC . Climate Change: Impacts, Vulnerabilities and Adaptation in Developing Countries. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006289

Valenzuela Solano C, Ruiz Corral JA, Ramırez Ojeda G, Hernandez MR (2018) Efectos del cambio climatico sobre el potencial vitıcola de Baja California Mexico. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Agrıcolas. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v0i10.1043CrossRef

Viteri F, Takahashi B (2020) Use of learning frames in climate change communication: a study of organizations in Latin America. Int Commun Gaz. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048519827728CrossRef

Vogel E, Donat MG, Alexander VL, Meinshausen M, Ray DK, Karoly D et al (2019) The effects of climate extremes on global agricultural yields. Environ Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab154bCrossRef

Wang L, Ma W, Zhou D, Chen Q, Liu L, Li L (2023) Bioclimatic drivers of forage growth and cover in alpine rangelands. Front Ecol Evol 10:1076005CrossRef

Wani SH, Samantara K, Razzaq A, Kakani G, Kumar P (2022) Back to the wild: mining maize (Zea mays L) disease resistance using advanced breeding tools. Mol Biol Rep 49(6):5787–5803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06815-xCrossRefPubMed

Xie P, Chen M, Shi W (2010) CPC unified gauge-based analysis of global daily precipitation. In: Preprints, 24th Conf. on Hydrology, Atlanta, GA, Amer. Meteor. Soc. vol. 2

Zhu X, Guo R, Liu T, Xu K (2021) Crop yield prediction based on agrometeorological indexes and remote sensing data. Remote Sens 13(10):2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13102016CrossRef

Titel: Can extreme climatic and bioclimatic indices reproduce soy and maize yields in Latin America? Part 1: an observational and modeling perspective
verfasst von: Diego Portalanza
Vanesa C. Pántano
Cristian Felipe Zuluaga
Marcos Roberto Benso
Arturo Corrales Suastegui
Natalia Castillo
Silvina Solman
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2024
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Environmental Earth Sciences / Ausgabe 6/2024
Print ISSN: 1866-6280
Elektronische ISSN: 1866-6299
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11461-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2024

Seismic hazard assessment and site-specific response spectrum at bed rock level for Ongole city, India: a deterministic framework

Study on the relationship between matric suction, unconfined compressive strength, and uniaxial tensile strength for compacted expansive soils

Hg distribution and risk assessment in soil–Bozhou peony system

Evaluation of the impact of coal mining on surface water in the Boesmanspruit, Mpumalanga, South Africa

Study on the influence of input variables on the supervised machine learning model for landslide susceptibility mapping

Failure characteristics of thick hard roof stratum under hydraulic pre-splitting and its application in a coal mine, Dongsheng mining area