Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction to the Edited Volume Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Can Open Source Hardware Disrupt Manufacturing Industries? The Role of Platforms and Trust in the Rise of 3D Printing

verfasst von : Sebastian Spaeth, Piet Hausberg

Erschienen in: The Decentralized and Networked Future of Value Creation

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The costs of 3D printing have rapidly fallen and have thus provoked new interest in this technology, which per se does not pose a revolutionary challenge. Prima facie, it seems to present a fitting analogy to the extreme price declines in computing that Christensen described as the “Innovator’s Dilemma”. We argue that it is necessary to look beyond the direct increased possibilities a 3D printer provides and focus on the disruptions in workflows and processes that will follow. Similarly to how the development of common open source software tools and infrastructure enabled start-ups to cheaply build on existing knowledge, the creation of common knowledge pools and tools will shape the way in which many companies will interact and source knowledge on physical artifacts in the future. We argue that its impact and success crucially depends on how the available platforms develop and support the creation of trust in the relevant communities.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Bottom-up Economics. Foundations of a Theory of Distributed and Open Value Creation
Nächstes Kapitel A Critical View of 3D Printing Regarding Industrial Mass Customization Versus Individual Desktop Fabrication
Fußnoten
5
Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) appears to be a term protected by Stratasys Ltd. (see www.​stratasys.​com/​legal/​legal-information), while Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) is the non-protected term spawned by the RepRap developers for the same 3D-printing approach.
 
Literatur
Aksulu, A., & Wade, M. (2010). A comprehensive review and synthesis of open source research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(11), 576.
Anderson, C. (2012). Makers: The new industrial revolution. New York: Crown Business.
Bechky, B. A. (2003). Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science, 14(3), 312–330.
Boutellier, R., Gassmann, O., Macho, H., & Roux, M. (1998). Management of dispersed product development teams: the role of information technologies. R&D Management, 28(1), 13–25.CrossRef
Bradshaw, S., Bowyer, A., & Haufe, P. (2010). The intellectual property implications of low-cost 3D printing. SCRIPTED, 7(1), 5–31.
Carlile, P. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442–455.CrossRef
Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555–568.CrossRef
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press.
Christensen, C. M., & Bower, J. (1996). Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 197–218.
Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The Innovator’s Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth. Harvard Business School Press.
Crowston, K., Wei, K., Howison, J., & Wiggins, A. (2012). Free/libre open source software: What we know and what we do not know. ACM Computing Surveys, 44(2), Article.
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.CrossRef
Dalle, J.-M., David, P. A., Ghosh, R. A., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2005). Advancing Economic Research on the Free and Open Source Software Mode of Production. In M. Wynants & J. Cornelis (Eds.), How open is the future?. Brussel, Belgium: Vrjie Universiteit Brussels Press.
Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 451–495.
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9–30.
Hinds, P. J., & Mortensen, M. (2005). Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organization Science, 16(3), 290–307.CrossRef
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(4), 0.
Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. (1982). Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D Project Groups. R&D Management, 12(1), 7–19.CrossRef
Lerner, J., & Tirole, J. (2002). Some simple economics of open source. Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(2), 197–234.CrossRef
Levy, S. (1984). Hackers: Heroes of the computer revolution. Doubleday: Anchor Press.
Markides, C. (2006). Disruptive Innovation: In Need of Better Theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 19–25.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.
Priem, R. L., & Nystrom, P. C. (2011). Exploring the dynamics of workgroup fracture: Common ground, trust-with-trepidation, and warranted distrust. Journal of Management.
Rayna, T., & Striukova, L. (2014). The impact of 3D printing technologies on business model innovation. In Digital Enterprise Design & Management (pp. 119–132). Springer International Publishing.
Robson, M. J., Katsikeas, C. S., & Bello, D. C. (2008). Drivers and performance outcomes of trust in international strategic alliances: The role of organizational complexity. Organization Science, 19(4), 647–665.CrossRef
Sanchez, R., & Mahoney, J. T. (1996). Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Special issue), 63–76.
Spaeth, S., Stuermer, M., & von Krogh, G. (2010). Enabling knowledge creation through outsiders: Towards a push model of open innovation. International Journal of Technology Management, 52(3/4), 411–431.CrossRef
Stewart, K. J., & Gosain, S. (2006). The impact of ideology on effectiveness in open source software development teams. MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 291–314.
The Economist (2008). Open sesame. The Economist.
von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: MIT Press.
von Hippel, E., & von Krogh, G. (2003). Open source software and the “Private-Collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization Science, 14(2), 209–223.CrossRef
von Krogh, G., Haefliger, S., Spaeth, S., & Wallin, M. W. (2012). Carrots and rainbows: Motivation and social practice in open source software development. MIS Quarterly, 36(2), 649–676.
Metadaten
Titel
Can Open Source Hardware Disrupt Manufacturing Industries? The Role of Platforms and Trust in the Rise of 3D Printing
verfasst von
Sebastian Spaeth
Piet Hausberg
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Buch
The Decentralized and Networked Future of Value Creation

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31684-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-31686-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31686-4_4

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise