Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
In an analysis of an evolutionary approach to innovation Suenaga examines how several countries and firms in the Asia Pacific move from imitating developed countries to generating innovation? Neo-classical economics often assumes that only one production curve exists for the whole economy of a country, when actually there are various production curves depending on the industry, product, and process, and the introduction of a new production curve involves high risk. Innovative, risk-taking entrepreneurs are required for the introduction of a new production curve, even in developing countries. With reference to the production capability required to improve productivity, i.e., to shift the production curve upwards, when workers and technicians accumulate production experience, they develop increased expertise, resulting in improved productivity. Economies and firms in the Asia Pacific have realized technological changes by engaging not only in simple imitation but also in ‘creative imitation’ (Kim and Nelson 2000). An example involves adapting technologies to their environments and applying them to other industries. What is the relationship between innovation and the division of labour? Smith (1776: 9) points out the following three effects of the division of labour: (1) an increase in productivity, (2) saving time, and (3) the invention of machines. Smith’s discussion specifically concerns the division of labour in a workshop, however the division of labour between factories or industries also stimulates an increase in productivity and the invention of machines. The ideas of Smith and Schumpeter appear to contradict one another at first glance: Smith’s ‘division of labour’ and the ‘new combinations’ which Schumpeter regards as a key factor in economic development. Suenaga inquires whether the main factor involved in economic development is a ‘dividing’ or a ‘combining’ one? The views of Smith and Schumpeter are not contradictory he argues but complementary. Specialization in particular processes is made possible by the division of labour, yet the possibility of a new combination is also born during these processes, and this encourages a further division of labour by extending the market. Suenaga (2015a) refers to this pattern of economic development as ‘Smithian = Schumpeterian development.’
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Abramovitz, M. (1986). Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind. The Journal of Economic History,46, 385–406. CrossRef
Abramovitz, M. (1989). Thinking about growth: And other essays on economic growth and welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Abramovitz, M. (1995). The elements of social capability. In B. H Koo & D. H. Perkins (Eds.), Social capability and long-term economic growth (Ch. 3, pp. 19–47). St. Martin’s Press.
Akamatsu, K. (1945). Keizai Shin Titsuzyo no Keisei Genri. Risosya (in Japanese).
Akamatsu, K. (1961). A theory of unbalanced growth in the world economy. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv,86, 196–217.
Akamatsu, K. (1965) Sekai Keizai Ron. Kunimoto Shobo (in Japanese).
Amsden, A. H. (1989). Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Aoki, M., et al. (Eds.). (1996). The role of government in East Asian economic development: Comparative institutional analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Baldwin, C. Y., & Kim B. C. (2000). Design Rules, vol.1: The Power ofModularity. MIT Press.
Baumol, W. (1986). Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare: What the long-run data show. American Economic Review,76, 1072–1085.
Chang, H.-J. (2011). Industrial policy: Can we go beyond an unproductive confrontation? Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 2010, Global (pp. 83–109). The World Bank.
Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: A new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Corporation.
Dahlman, C. J., et al. (1987). Managing technological development: Lessons from the newly industrializing countries. World Development,15, 759–775. CrossRef
Dasgupta, P., & David, P. A.. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy,23, 487–521. CrossRef
Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy,11, 147–162. CrossRef
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National systems and ‘‘Mode 2’’ to a triple helix of university—industry—government relations. Research Policy,29, 109–123. CrossRef
Fagerberg, J. (1987). A technology gap approach to why growth rates differ. Research Policy, 16, 87–99.
Fagerberg, J., & Godinho, M. M. (2006). Innovation and catching-up. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press.
Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1997). The economics of industrial innovation (3rd ed). Routledge.
Gerschenkron, A. (1962). Economic backwardness in historical perspective. Berkeley and Los Angeles: Harvard University Press.
Hobday, M. (1995). Innovation in East Asia: The challenge to Japan. Edward Elgar.
Itoh, M., et al. (1991). Economic analysis of industrial policy. Academic Press.
Jones, R. W., & Kierzkowski, H. (1990). The role of service in production and international trade: A theoretical framework. In Jones, R. & Krueger, A. (Eds.), The political economy of international trade (Ch. 3, pp. 31–48).Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Kemanai, Y. (1998). Keizai Seisaku no Kihon Mondai to Akamatsu Keizai Seisaku ron. The Review of Economics and Political Science,66, 127–162. (in Japanese).
Kim, L., & Nelson, R. R. (2000). Introduction. In L. Kim & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), Technology, learning, and innovation (Ch. 1, pp. 1–9). Cambridge University Press.
Khan, M. H., & Jomo, K. S. (2000). Rents, rent-seeking and economic development: Theory and evidence in Asia. Cambridge University Press.
Krugman, P. (1994). The fall and rise of development economics. In L. Rodwin & D. A. Schon (Eds.), Rethinking the development experience. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
Kuznets, S. (1966). Modern economic growth: Rate, structure and spread. : New Haven and London, Yale University Press.
Langlois, Richard N. (2003). The vanishing hand: The changing dynamics of industrial capitalism. Industrial and Corporate Change,12, 351–385. CrossRef
Lee, K., (2013). Schumpeterian analysis of economic catch-up: knowledge, path-creation, and the middle-income trap. Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, A. W. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies,22, 139–191. CrossRef
Lundvall, B.-A. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.
Nakamura, F. (1999). Higashi Asia Keizai no Kiseki to Pakkege gata Gaikoku Tyokusetsu Toshi. The Review of Economics and Political Science,67(5–6), 23–41. (in Japanese).
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ranis, G., & Fei, J. C. (1961). A theory of economic development. American Economic Review,51, 533–558.
Romer, P. M. (1993). Idea gaps and object gaps in economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics,32, 543–573. CrossRef
Rosenbloom, R. S., & Spencer W. J. (Eds.) (1996). Engines of innovation: U.S. industrial research at the end of an era. Harvard Business Press.
Ross, M. L. (2001). Timber booms and institutional breakdown in Southeast Asia. Cambridge University Press.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Oxford University Press.
Shi, Z. (1996). Reengineering acer. Tai bei: Tian xia wen hua chu ban gong si. (in Chinese).
Smith, A. (1920). . An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Ltd: Methuen & Co.
Stiglitz, J. E. (1987). Learning to learn, localized learning and technological progress. In P. Dasgupta & P. Stoneman (Eds.), Economic policy and technological performance (Ch. 5, pp. 125–153). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Suenaga, K. (1997). An analysis of catch-up in abramovitz model. Journal of Economics,7, 201–216. (in Japanese).
Suenaga, K. (2002). Economic development and government: toward a theory of economic structural change (Ph. D. thesis). Meiji University (in Japanese).
Suenaga, K. (2010). Vertical disintegration and catch-up in the semiconductor industry. Informatics,3(2), 5–20.
Suenaga, K. (2012a). The flying-geese theory, division of labor, and catching-up. The Review of Economics and Political Science,80, 303–322. (in Japanese).
Suenaga, K. (2012b). The role of local government in an era of open innovation: An analysis based on the example of a flemish government-funded NPO. Journal of Urban Management and Local Government Research, 27, 1–10.
Suenaga, K. (2015a). The division of labour and economic development: An evolutionary approach. Research Paper of Japan academy for international trade and business, 4, 1–20.
Suenaga, K., (2015b). The emergence of technological paradigms: The evolutionary process of science and technology in economic development. In A. Pyka & J. Foster (Eds.), The evolution of economic and innovation systems (pp. 211–227). Springer.
Suenaga, K. (forthcoming). The division of labour and economic development: The evolution of the division of labour between the cotton and machine industry in Great Britain in the era of the ‘Invisible Hand’.
Wade, R. (1990). Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton University Press.
Westphal, L. E., et al. (1985). Reflections on the republic of Korea’s acquisition of technological capability. In N. Rosenberg & C. Frischtak (Eds.), International technology transfer: Concepts, measures, and comparisons (Ch. 6, pp. 167–221). Praeger, New York.
World Bank. (1991). World development report 1991. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
World Bank. (1993). The East Asian miracle: Economic growth and public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Yamaguchi, E. (2006). Innovation: Paradigm disruptions and fields of resonance. NTT publishing (in Japanese).
- Catching up and Innovation in the Asia-Pacific: An Evolutionary Approach
- Springer Singapore
- Chapter 4
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, Wissenstransfer im Outsourcing/© WrightStudio | stock.adobe.com