Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Cluster Computing 2/2021

09.09.2020

Cloud services security-driven evaluation for multiple tenants

verfasst von: Sarah Maroc, Jian Biao Zhang

Erschienen in: Cluster Computing | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Cloud Computing has become a reliable solution for outsourcing business data and operation with its cost-effective and resource-efficient services. A key part of the success of the cloud is the multi-tenancy architecture, where a single instance of a service can be shared between a large number of users, also known as tenants. Service selection for multiple tenants presents a real challenge that has not been properly addressed in the literature so far. Most of the existing cloud services selection approaches are designed for a single-user, and hence are inefficient when applied to the case of a large group of users with different, and often, conflicting requirements. In this paper, we propose a multi-tenant cloud services evaluation framework, whereby service selection is carried out per group of tenants that can belong to different service classes, rather than per a single user. We formulate the cloud services selection for multi-tenants as a complex multi-attribute large-group decision-making (CMALGDM) problem. Skyline method is initially applied to reduce the search space by eliminating the dominated services regardless of tenants’ requirements. Tenants are clustered based on their profiles characterized by different personal, service, and environmental features. Each tenant is assigned a weight to reflect its importance in the decision-making. The weight of a tenant is determined locally based on its closeness to the group decision and globally by combining its local weight with its corresponding cluster weight to reflect its total contribution to the overall decision-making. The final ranking of the alternatives is guided by a dynamic consensus process to reach a final solution with the highest level of agreement. The proposed framework supports multiple types of information, including deterministic data, interval numbers, and fuzzy numbers, to realistically represent the heterogeneity and uncertainty of security information.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Badger, L., Patt-corner, R., Voas, J.: NIST cloud computing synopsis and recommendations. Nist Spec. Publ. 800(146), 81 (2012) Badger, L., Patt-corner, R., Voas, J.: NIST cloud computing synopsis and recommendations. Nist Spec. Publ. 800(146), 81 (2012)
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Salesforce. [online]. https://.salesforce.com Salesforce. [online]. https://​.​salesforce.​com
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hawedi, M., Talhi, C., Boucheneb, H.: Multi-tenant intrusion detection system for public cloud (MTIDS), vol. 74. Springer, New York (2018) Hawedi, M., Talhi, C., Boucheneb, H.: Multi-tenant intrusion detection system for public cloud (MTIDS), vol. 74. Springer, New York (2018)
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen, X.H.: Complex large-group decision-making methods and application. Press, Beijing, Sci (2009). in Chinese Chen, X.H.: Complex large-group decision-making methods and application. Press, Beijing, Sci (2009). in Chinese
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Garg, S.K., Versteeg, S., Buyya, R.: A framework for ranking of cloud computing services. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 29(4), 1012–1023 (2013)CrossRef Garg, S.K., Versteeg, S., Buyya, R.: A framework for ranking of cloud computing services. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 29(4), 1012–1023 (2013)CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar, R.R., Kumari, B., Kumar, C.: CCS-OSSR : A framework based on hybrid MCDM for optimal service selection and ranking of cloud computing services”. Cluster Comput. 3, 1–17 (2020) Kumar, R.R., Kumari, B., Kumar, C.: CCS-OSSR : A framework based on hybrid MCDM for optimal service selection and ranking of cloud computing services”. Cluster Comput. 3, 1–17 (2020)
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ding, S., Yang, S., Zhang, Y., Liang, C., Xia, C.C.C.: Combining QoS prediction and customer satisfaction estimation to solve cloud service trustworthiness evaluation problems. Knowledge-Based Syst. 56, 216–225 (2014)CrossRef Ding, S., Yang, S., Zhang, Y., Liang, C., Xia, C.C.C.: Combining QoS prediction and customer satisfaction estimation to solve cloud service trustworthiness evaluation problems. Knowledge-Based Syst. 56, 216–225 (2014)CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hammadi, A., Hussain, O.K., Dillon, T., Hussain, F.K.: A framework for SLA management in cloud computing for informed decision making. Cluster Comput. 16(4), 961–977 (2013)CrossRef Hammadi, A., Hussain, O.K., Dillon, T., Hussain, F.K.: A framework for SLA management in cloud computing for informed decision making. Cluster Comput. 16(4), 961–977 (2013)CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sundara, M.A.S., Avudaiappan, P.T.: Priority-based prediction mechanism for ranking providers in federated cloud architecture. Cluster Comput. 22(s4), 9815–9823 (2019)CrossRef Sundara, M.A.S., Avudaiappan, P.T.: Priority-based prediction mechanism for ranking providers in federated cloud architecture. Cluster Comput. 22(s4), 9815–9823 (2019)CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun, L., Ma, J., Zhang, Y., Dong, H., Hussain, F.K.: Cloud-FuSeR: fuzzy ontology and MCDM based cloud service selection. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 57, 42–55 (2016)CrossRef Sun, L., Ma, J., Zhang, Y., Dong, H., Hussain, F.K.: Cloud-FuSeR: fuzzy ontology and MCDM based cloud service selection. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 57, 42–55 (2016)CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun, L., Dong, H., Hussain, O.K., Hussain, F.K., Chang, E.: Cloud service selection: state-of-the-art and future research directions. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 45(October), 134–150 (2014)CrossRef Sun, L., Dong, H., Hussain, O.K., Hussain, F.K., Chang, E.: Cloud service selection: state-of-the-art and future research directions. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 45(October), 134–150 (2014)CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Alabool, H., Kamil, A., Arshad, N., Alarabiat, D.: Cloud service evaluation method-based multi-criteria decision-making: a systematic literature review. J. Syst. Softw. 139, 161–188 (2018)CrossRef Alabool, H., Kamil, A., Arshad, N., Alarabiat, D.: Cloud service evaluation method-based multi-criteria decision-making: a systematic literature review. J. Syst. Softw. 139, 161–188 (2018)CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Taha, A., Trapero, R., Luna, J., Suri, N.: AHP-based quantitative approach for assessing and comparing cloud security. In: Proc. - 2014 IEEE 13th Int. Conf. Trust. Secur. Priv. Comput. Commun. Trust. 2014, pp. 284–291 (2015) Taha, A., Trapero, R., Luna, J., Suri, N.: AHP-based quantitative approach for assessing and comparing cloud security. In: Proc. - 2014 IEEE 13th Int. Conf. Trust. Secur. Priv. Comput. Commun. Trust. 2014, pp. 284–291 (2015)
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Modic, J., Trapero, R., Taha, A., Luna, J., Stopar, M., Suri, N.: Novel efficient techniques for real-time cloud security assessment. Comput. Secur. 62, 1–18 (2016)CrossRef Modic, J., Trapero, R., Taha, A., Luna, J., Stopar, M., Suri, N.: Novel efficient techniques for real-time cloud security assessment. Comput. Secur. 62, 1–18 (2016)CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Halabi, T., Bellaiche, M.: Towards quantification and evaluation of security of Cloud Service Providers. J. Inf. Secur. Appl. 33, 55–65 (2017) Halabi, T., Bellaiche, M.: Towards quantification and evaluation of security of Cloud Service Providers. J. Inf. Secur. Appl. 33, 55–65 (2017)
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohammad, H., Ahmad, A., Bin, K.: A novel evaluation framework for improving trust level of Infrastructure as a Service. Cluster Comput. 19(1), 389–410 (2016)CrossRef Mohammad, H., Ahmad, A., Bin, K.: A novel evaluation framework for improving trust level of Infrastructure as a Service. Cluster Comput. 19(1), 389–410 (2016)CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, Y., He, Q., Zhang, X., Ye, D., Yang, Y.: Efficient QoS-aware service recommendation for multi-tenant service-based systems in cloud. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 1374, 1–14 (2017) Wang, Y., He, Q., Zhang, X., Ye, D., Yang, Y.: Efficient QoS-aware service recommendation for multi-tenant service-based systems in cloud. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 1374, 1–14 (2017)
20.
Zurück zum Zitat He, Q., Han, J., Yang, Y., Grundy, J., Jin, H.: QoS-driven service selection for multi-tenant SaaS. In: Proc. - 2012 IEEE 5th Int. Conf. Cloud Comput. CLOUD 2012, pp. 566–573 (2012). He, Q., Han, J., Yang, Y., Grundy, J., Jin, H.: QoS-driven service selection for multi-tenant SaaS. In: Proc. - 2012 IEEE 5th Int. Conf. Cloud Comput. CLOUD 2012, pp. 566–573 (2012).
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu, S., Chan, F.T.S., Ran, W.: Decision making for the selection of cloud vendor: an improved approach under group decision-making with integrated weights and objective/subjective attributes. Expert Syst. Appl. 55(2016), 37–47 (2016)CrossRef Liu, S., Chan, F.T.S., Ran, W.: Decision making for the selection of cloud vendor: an improved approach under group decision-making with integrated weights and objective/subjective attributes. Expert Syst. Appl. 55(2016), 37–47 (2016)CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Maroc, S., Zhang, J.B.: Cloud services security evaluation for multi-tenants. In: 2019 IEEE Int. Conf. Sig. Proces, Com. and Comp. (ICSPCC) (2019). Maroc, S., Zhang, J.B.: Cloud services security evaluation for multi-tenants. In: 2019 IEEE Int. Conf. Sig. Proces, Com. and Comp. (ICSPCC) (2019).
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Skoutas, D., Sacharidis, D., Simitsis, A., Kantere, V., Sellis, T.K.: Top-k dominant web services under multi-criteria matching. In: EDBT, ACM Inte. Conf. Procd., vol. 360, pp. 898–909 (2009). Skoutas, D., Sacharidis, D., Simitsis, A., Kantere, V., Sellis, T.K.: Top-k dominant web services under multi-criteria matching. In: EDBT, ACM Inte. Conf. Procd., vol. 360, pp. 898–909 (2009).
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Aghajani-Bazzazi, A., Osanloo, M., Karimi, B.: Deriving preference order of open pit mines equipment through MADM methods: application of modified VIKOR method. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(3), 2550–2556 (2011)MATHCrossRef Aghajani-Bazzazi, A., Osanloo, M., Karimi, B.: Deriving preference order of open pit mines equipment through MADM methods: application of modified VIKOR method. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(3), 2550–2556 (2011)MATHCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoon, K., Hwang, C.L.: TOPSIS (Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution)-A multiple attribute decision making (1980) Yoon, K., Hwang, C.L.: TOPSIS (Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution)-A multiple attribute decision making (1980)
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Yue, Z.: A method for group decision-making based on determining weights of decision-makers using TOPSIS. Appl. Math. Model. 35(4), 1926–1936 (2011)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Yue, Z.: A method for group decision-making based on determining weights of decision-makers using TOPSIS. Appl. Math. Model. 35(4), 1926–1936 (2011)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma, H., Hu, Z., Yang, L., Song, T.: User feature-aware trustworthiness measurement of cloud services via evidence synthesis for potential users. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 25(6), 791–799 (2014)CrossRef Ma, H., Hu, Z., Yang, L., Song, T.: User feature-aware trustworthiness measurement of cloud services via evidence synthesis for potential users. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 25(6), 791–799 (2014)CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Alrifai, M., Skoutas, D., Risse, T.: Selecting Skyline Services for QoS-Based Web Service Composition, pp. 11–20. ACM, New York (2010) Alrifai, M., Skoutas, D., Risse, T.: Selecting Skyline Services for QoS-Based Web Service Composition, pp. 11–20. ACM, New York (2010)
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Saaty, T.L.: Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process, 2nd edn. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (2001) Saaty, T.L.: Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process, 2nd edn. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (2001)
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu, X.H., Zhang, L.Y., Wan, Q.F.: A variation coefficient similarity measure and its application in emergency group decision-making. Syst. Eng. Proc. 5, 119–124 (2012)CrossRef Xu, X.H., Zhang, L.Y., Wan, Q.F.: A variation coefficient similarity measure and its application in emergency group decision-making. Syst. Eng. Proc. 5, 119–124 (2012)CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Palomares, I., Estrella, F.J., Martínez, L., Herrera, F.: Consensus under a fuzzy context : taxonomy, analysis framework AFRYCA and experimental case of study. Francisco J. Estrella 20, 252–271 (2014) Palomares, I., Estrella, F.J., Martínez, L., Herrera, F.: Consensus under a fuzzy context : taxonomy, analysis framework AFRYCA and experimental case of study. Francisco J. Estrella 20, 252–271 (2014)
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Ben-Arieh, D., Chen, Z.: Linguistic-labels aggregation and consensus measure for autocratic decision making using group recommendations. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man, Cybern. Part A Syst Hum. 36(3), 558–568 (2006)CrossRef Ben-Arieh, D., Chen, Z.: Linguistic-labels aggregation and consensus measure for autocratic decision making using group recommendations. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man, Cybern. Part A Syst Hum. 36(3), 558–568 (2006)CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, S., Hsu, C., Liang, Z.: Multi-user web service selection based on multi-QoS prediction. Inf Syst Front. 16, 143–152 (2014)CrossRef Wang, S., Hsu, C., Liang, Z.: Multi-user web service selection based on multi-QoS prediction. Inf Syst Front. 16, 143–152 (2014)CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu, X., Fan, Y., Zhang, J. Lin, H., Zhang, J.: QF-RNN: QI-matrix factorization based RNN for time-aware service recommendation. In: Proc. - 2019 IEEE Int. Conf. Serv. Comput. SCC 2019 - Part 2019 IEEE World Congr. Serv., pp. 202–209 (2019). Wu, X., Fan, Y., Zhang, J. Lin, H., Zhang, J.: QF-RNN: QI-matrix factorization based RNN for time-aware service recommendation. In: Proc. - 2019 IEEE Int. Conf. Serv. Comput. SCC 2019 - Part 2019 IEEE World Congr. Serv., pp. 202–209 (2019).
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Yadav, N., Goraya, M.S.: Two-way ranking based service mapping in cloud environment. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 81, 53–66 (2018)CrossRef Yadav, N., Goraya, M.S.: Two-way ranking based service mapping in cloud environment. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 81, 53–66 (2018)CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Major, N., Goraya, S., Singh, D.: Satisfaction aware QoS-based bidirectional service mapping in cloud environment. Cluster Comput. 7 (2021). Major, N., Goraya, S., Singh, D.: Satisfaction aware QoS-based bidirectional service mapping in cloud environment. Cluster Comput. 7 (2021).
Metadaten
Titel
Cloud services security-driven evaluation for multiple tenants
verfasst von
Sarah Maroc
Jian Biao Zhang
Publikationsdatum
09.09.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Cluster Computing / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 1386-7857
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7543
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-020-03178-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Cluster Computing 2/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner