Skip to main content

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Coalition Congruence in India’s Federal System

verfasst von : Eswaran Sridharan

Erschienen in: Coalition Politics and Federalism

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper will analyse coalition politics in India over the period of coalition and/or minority governments from 1989 to the present, from the points of view of institutionalization, congruence and decentralization. India’s federal, bicameral parliamentary democracy, which uses a single-member, simple-plurality (SMSP) or first-past-the-post electoral system, has seen since 1989, a series of coalition and/or minority governments, mainly minority coalitions until the present surplus majority coalition since 2014. A large number of Indian states—in a federal system that has become increasingly decentralized since the mid-1990s—have also experienced coalition politics. Three questions naturally arise: (1) have coalitions become institutionalized at the federal and state levels, as least as far as the core formateur parties are concerned, or do they keep varying with changes of partners? This is the institutionalization question. The paper will argue that some practices have become institutionlised at the federal level and to a lesser extent at the state level. (2) What is the degree of congruence between coalitions at the federal level and those in various states, given the major role played by single-state regional parties in India’s system? This is the congruence question. The paper will argue that congruence is very limited and partial given the role of regional parties but that two broad coalitions are emerging, one led by the BJP, the other by the Congress. (3) How has coalition politics interacted with Indian federalism’s degree of decentralization? This is the decentralization question. The paper will argue that coalition politics has contributed to the further decentralization of power due to the fact that the two major national parties need regional parties as coalition partners to be able to form governments at the federal level and to pass legislation in both houses of parliament.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Jammu and Kashmir is only required to hold state assembly elections every 6 years.
 
3
For the estimate of upper castes, including dominant castes, see Government of India (1980, Vol. I, Part I, p. 56).
 
4
See Ansari (2006, Appendix, pp. 404–413) and Rudolph and Rudolph (1987), 196, Table 16, both for constituency estimates.
 
5
Planning Commission, Government of India (2010).
 
6
The account of the Congress in this section draws on several standard works including Kothari (1970), Weiner (1967), Kochanek (1968), Sisson and Roy (1990), Manor (1988).
 
7
Brass (1997).
 
8
This section draws heavily on Sridharan (2010).
 
9
A measure of the fragmentation of the opposition space represented by the percentage share of the largest non-Congress (in today’s terms, non-ruling party) vote in the total opposition vote. The higher the IOU the less fragmented the opposition space.
 
10
Regional party is something of a misnomer as it implies a party strong in two or more states in a region. All the regional parties, however, are single state-based parties except the Janata Dal (United), strong in Bihar and Karnataka, and the CPI(M), strong in West Bengal, Tripura and Kerala, if one considers them regional parties. These sets of states do not constitute recognizable regions. The JD(U) and the CPI(M) are really national parties with a limited geographical spread, the former being a rump of the once much larger Janata Dal.
 
11
Yadav (1996).
 
12
For the BJP’s use of coalitions as a strategy to expand its base across states, see Sridharan (2005).
 
13
For details of the alliances, pre- and post-election in 1998, see Arora (2000).
 
14
For details of the argument and figures, see Sridharan (2004).
 
15
For detailed accounts of coalition dynamics see Sridharan (2002, 2004), Ruparelia (2015), Diwakar (2017). This section draws heavily upon, with modifications, Sridharan (2010).
 
16
For a detailed overview of state-level coalition politics in India, see Sridharan (1999, , 2002, , 2003). For a detailed state-wise analysis of the BJP’s coalition strategies since 1989, Sridharan (2005). For a detailed analysis of the Congress’ coalition strategies and their criticality in the 2004 elections, see Sridharan (2004).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Ansari, I. A. (2006). Political representation of Muslims in India, 1952-2004. New Delhi: Manak. Ansari, I. A. (2006). Political representation of Muslims in India, 1952-2004. New Delhi: Manak.
Zurück zum Zitat Arora, B. (2000). Negotiating differences: Federal coalitions and national cohesion. In F. Frankel, Z. Hasan, R. Bhargava, & B. Arora (Eds.), Transforming India. Delhi: Oxford University Press. Arora, B. (2000). Negotiating differences: Federal coalitions and national cohesion. In F. Frankel, Z. Hasan, R. Bhargava, & B. Arora (Eds.), Transforming India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Brass, P. (1997). The politicisation of the peasantry in a North Indian State. In S. Kaviraj (Ed.), Politics in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Brass, P. (1997). The politicisation of the peasantry in a North Indian State. In S. Kaviraj (Ed.), Politics in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Diwakar, R. (2017). Party system in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Diwakar, R. (2017). Party system in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Golder, S. N. (2006). Pre-electoral coalition formation in parliamentary democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 36(2), 193–212.CrossRef Golder, S. N. (2006). Pre-electoral coalition formation in parliamentary democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 36(2), 193–212.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Government of India. (1980). Report of the Backward Classes Commission (Mandal Commission Report) Government of India. (1980). Report of the Backward Classes Commission (Mandal Commission Report)
Zurück zum Zitat Government of India. (2010). Planning commission, Report of the expert group on methodology for estimation of poverty, planning commission Government of India. (2010). Planning commission, Report of the expert group on methodology for estimation of poverty, planning commission
Zurück zum Zitat Kochanek, S. (1968). The congress party of India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Kochanek, S. (1968). The congress party of India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kothari, R. (1970). Politics in India. New Delhi: Orient Longman. Kothari, R. (1970). Politics in India. New Delhi: Orient Longman.
Zurück zum Zitat Manor, J. (1988). Parties and the party system. In A. Kohli (Ed.), India’s democracy. Princeton University Press: Princeton. Manor, J. (1988). Parties and the party system. In A. Kohli (Ed.), India’s democracy. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
Zurück zum Zitat Rudolph, L., & Rudolph, S. (1987). In pursuit of Lakshmi: The political economy of the Indian state. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Rudolph, L., & Rudolph, S. (1987). In pursuit of Lakshmi: The political economy of the Indian state. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruparelia, S. (2015). Divided we govern: Coalition politics in Modern India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Ruparelia, S. (2015). Divided we govern: Coalition politics in Modern India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sisson, R., & Roy, R. (1990). Diversity and dominance in Indian politics: Changing bases of congress support (Vol. 1). New Delhi: Sage. Sisson, R., & Roy, R. (1990). Diversity and dominance in Indian politics: Changing bases of congress support (Vol. 1). New Delhi: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Sridharan, E. (2010). The party system. In N. J. Gopal & P. Mehta (Eds.), The Oxford companion to politics in India (pp. 119–129). New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Sridharan, E. (2010). The party system. In N. J. Gopal & P. Mehta (Eds.), The Oxford companion to politics in India (pp. 119–129). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Sridharan, E. (2005). Coalition strategies and the BJP’s expansion, 1989-2004. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 43(2), 194–221.CrossRef Sridharan, E. (2005). Coalition strategies and the BJP’s expansion, 1989-2004. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 43(2), 194–221.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sridharan, E. (2004). Electoral coalitions in the 2004 general elections: Theory and evidence. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(51), 5418–5425. Sridharan, E. (2004). Electoral coalitions in the 2004 general elections: Theory and evidence. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(51), 5418–5425.
Zurück zum Zitat Sridharan, E. (2003). Coalitions and party strategies in India’s Parliamentary Federation. Publius, 33(4), 135–152.CrossRef Sridharan, E. (2003). Coalitions and party strategies in India’s Parliamentary Federation. Publius, 33(4), 135–152.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sridharan, E. (2002). The fragmentation of the Indian Party System, 1952-1999: Seven competing explanations. In Z. Hasan (Ed.), Parties and party politics in India (pp. 475–503). New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Sridharan, E. (2002). The fragmentation of the Indian Party System, 1952-1999: Seven competing explanations. In Z. Hasan (Ed.), Parties and party politics in India (pp. 475–503). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Sridharan, E. (1999). Principles, power and coalition politics in India: Lessons from theory, comparison and recent history. In D. Khanna & G. Kueck (Eds.), Principles, power and politics (pp. 270–290). Macmillan: New Delhi. Sridharan, E. (1999). Principles, power and coalition politics in India: Lessons from theory, comparison and recent history. In D. Khanna & G. Kueck (Eds.), Principles, power and politics (pp. 270–290). Macmillan: New Delhi.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiner, M. (1967). Party building in a new nation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Weiner, M. (1967). Party building in a new nation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Yadav, Y. (1996). Reconfiguration in Indian politics: State Assembly Elections 1993-1995. Economic and Political Weekly, 31(2-3), 95–104. Yadav, Y. (1996). Reconfiguration in Indian politics: State Assembly Elections 1993-1995. Economic and Political Weekly, 31(2-3), 95–104.
Metadaten
Titel
Coalition Congruence in India’s Federal System
verfasst von
Eswaran Sridharan
Copyright-Jahr
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75100-9_5

Premium Partner