nach oben

Small Business Economics

Erschienen in:

26.04.2021

Committed to the venture or the family? A study of entrepreneurial persistence in distressed ventures

verfasst von: Karlien Coppens, Mirjam Knockaert

Erschienen in: Small Business Economics | Ausgabe 1/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The entrepreneurial journey is a complex and challenging process, and many entrepreneurs experience venture distress, i.e., they realize that their venture is underperforming based on the threshold they had set for it. While it is generally acknowledged that distressed ventures should be exited, preferably as fast as possible, many entrepreneurs face difficulties in letting go of the venture they are often so committed to. Building on embeddedness and escalation of commitment, this study investigates under which conditions entrepreneurs are more or less likely to persist with their distressed venture. In particular, it assesses the impact of internal and external venture stakeholders on entrepreneurial persistence and the extent to which family factors mitigate these relationships. To do so, the study uses a sample of 231 entrepreneurs in Belgium who called upon help from a support agency for distressed ventures in 2016. We find that persistence is particularly strong for entrepreneurs of ventures with (more) employees and with lower levels of operating debts. As the venture’s level of operating debts increases, the probability of persistence decreases for entrepreneurs with no alternative family income and with dependents in the family household. We discuss implications for theory and practice.

Plain English Summary Entrepreneurs often persist with a distressed venture, especially when having (more) employees and lower operating debts. Yet, in the presence of increasing operating debts and dependents requiring household income, venture exit becomes more likely. Entrepreneurs’ persistence with their distressed ventures thus seems to be driven by their commitment toward venture stakeholders (such as employees and creditors), one the one hand, and their family household, on the other hand. These insights into when and why entrepreneurs in distress are more or less likely to persist enable business advisors and policy makers to better understand and support the needs of these entrepreneurs. In addition, this study advances academic knowledge on a highly prevalent yet understudied phenomenon in entrepreneurship, namely venture distress.

Vorheriger Artikel Organizational capabilities and SME exports: the moderating role of external funding intentions and managerial capacity

Nächster Artikel Are cooperative firms more agile? A contingency perspective on small and medium-sized enterprises in agglomerations and peripheral areas

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

We would like to thank Reviewer 2 for pointing us to this particularly relevant theoretical perspective.

Wiersema and Bowen (2009) pointed to the intrinsic nonlinearity of limited dependent variable (LDV) models, implying that an explanatory variable’s marginal effect (i.e., the effect of a one-unit change in the explanatory variable on the dependent variable) does not always equal to the variable’s model coefficient. Therefore, we also report the findings of a supplementary analysis that examines the value and significance of the explanatory variable’s marginal effect.

Adomako, S., Danso, A., Uddin, M., & Damoah, J. O. (2016). Entrepreneurs’ optimism, cognitive style and persistence. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 22(1), 84–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-07-2015-0158.CrossRef

Agle, B., Mitchell, R., & Sonnenfeld, J. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507–530. https://doi.org/10.5465/256973.CrossRef

Aldrich, H. E., & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. In: Sexton, D., Smilor, R. (Eds.), The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship. Ballinger, New York, pp. 3–23.

Aldrich, H. E., & Cliff, J. E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of business venturing, 18(5), 573–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9.CrossRef

Allen, S., & Truman, C. (1992). Women, business and self-employment: A conceptual minefield. In Women and working lives (pp. 162–174). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21693-2_11.

Allen, S., & Truman, C. (1993). Women in business: Perspectives on women entrepreneurs. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315271811.

Arregle, J. L., Batjargal, B., Hitt, M. A., Webb, J. W., Miller, T., & Tsui, A. S. (2015). Family ties in entrepreneurs’ social networks and new venture growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(2), 313–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12044.CrossRef

Balcaen, S., Manigart, S., & Ooghe, H. (2011). From distress to exit: Determinants of the time to exit. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 21(3), 407–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-010-0192-2.CrossRef

Baron, R. (1998). Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: Why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(4), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00031-1.CrossRef

Baù, M., Chirico, F., Pittino, D., Backman, M., & Klaesson, J. (2019). Roots to grow: Family firms and local embeddedness in rural and urban contexts. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(2), 360–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258718796089.CrossRef

Baum, J. R., & Locke, E. A. (2004). The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. Journal of applied psychology, 89(4), 587. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.587.CrossRef

Becue. (2018). Falen: een les op weg naar success! Itinera Institute.

Boulding, W., Morgan, R., & Staelin, R. (1997). Pulling the plug to stop the new product drain. Journal of Marketing research, 34(1), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379703400114.CrossRef

Brockner, J. (1992). The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: Toward theoretical progress. Academy of Management Review, 17(1), 39–61. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1992.4279568.CrossRef

Brüderl, J., & Preisendörfer, P. (1998). Network support and the success of newly founded business. Small business economics, 10(3), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007997102930.CrossRef

Brush, C. G., Greene, P. G., & Hart, M. M. (2001). From initial idea to unique advantage: The entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base. Academy of Management Perspectives, 15(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2001.4251394.CrossRef

Byrne, O., & Shepherd, D. A. (2015). Different strokes for different folks: Entrepreneurial narratives of emotion, cognition, and making sense of business failure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(2), 375–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12046.CrossRef

Cardon, M. S., & Kirk, C. P. (2015). Entrepreneurial Passion as Mediator of the Self–Efficacy to Persistence Relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(5), 1027–1050. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12089.CrossRef

Cardon, M. S., Zietsma, C., Saparito, P., Matherne, B. P., & Davis, C. (2005). A tale of passion: New insights into entrepreneurship from a parenthood metaphor. Journal of business venturing, 20(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.01.002.CrossRef

Chang, S.-J., Chung, C.-N., & Mahmood, I. P. (2006). When and how does business group affiliation promote firm innovation? A tale of two emerging economies. Organization Science, 17(5), 637–656. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0202.CrossRef

Coad, A., Frankish, J., Roberts, R. G., & Storey, D. J. (2013). Growth paths and survival chances: An application of Gambler's Ruin theory. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(5), 615–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.06.002.CrossRef

Collins, W. A., Maccoby, E. E., Steinberg, L., Hetherington, E. M., & Bornstein, M. H. (2000). Contemporary research on parenting: The case for nature and nurture. American psychologist, 55(2), 218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.2.218.CrossRef

Cooper, J. (1971). Personal responsibility and dissonance: The role of foreseen consequences: An integration and extension of the “forced compliance” literature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030995.CrossRef

Cruz, C., Justo, R., & De Castro, J. O. (2012). Does family employment enhance MSEs performance? Integrating socioemotional wealth and family embeddedness perspectives. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.07.002.CrossRef

Dahl, M., & Sorenson, O. (2009). The embedded entrepreneur. European Management Review, 6(3), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1057/emr.2009.14.CrossRef

Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management review, 22(1), 20–47. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258.CrossRef

Decker, C., & Günther, C. (2017). The impact of family ownership on innovation: evidence from the German machine tool industry. Small Business Economics, 48(1), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9775-0.CrossRef

Dess, G. G., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. (1990). Industry effects and strategic management research. Journal of management, 16(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639001600102.CrossRef

DeTienne, D. R., Shepherd, D. A., & De Castro, J. O. (2008). The fallacy of “only the strong survive”: The effects of extrinsic motivation on the persistence decisions for under-performing firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(5), 528–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2007.09.004.CrossRef

Dyzo. (2017). Jaarverslag Dyzo vzw 2016. https://dyzo.be/Jaarverslag/Webversie.pdf. Accesses 5 Dec 2018.

European Commission. (2017). Annual report on European SMEs in 2016/2017. https://doi.org/10.2873/742338.

Gatewood, E. J., Shaver, K. G., & Gartner, W. B. (1995). A longitudinal study of cognitive factors influencing start-up behaviors and success at venture creation. Journal of business venturing, 10(5), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(95)00035-7.CrossRef

Gimeno, J., Folta, T. B., Cooper, A. C., & Woo, C. Y. (1997). Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative science quarterly, 750–783. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393656.

Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1381.CrossRef

Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American journal of sociology, 91(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311.CrossRef

Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76–88. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4277352.CrossRef

Heath, C. (1995). Escalation and de-escalation of commitment in response to sunk costs: The role of budgeting in mental accounting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1029.CrossRef

Hess, M. (2004). ‘Spatial’relationships? Towards a reconceptualization of embedded ness. Progress in human geography, 28(2), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph479oa.CrossRef

Hillman, A., & Keim, G. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200101).CrossRef

Holland, D. V., & Garrett, R. P. (2015). Entrepreneur start-up versus persistence decisions: A critical evaluation of expectancy and value. International Small Business Journal, 33(2), 194–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242613480375.CrossRef

Holland, D. V., & Shepherd, D. A. (2013). Deciding to persist: Adversity, values, and entrepreneurs’ decision policies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(2), 331–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00468.x.CrossRef

Hsu, D. K., Wiklund, J., Anderson, S. E., & Coffey, B. S. (2016). Entrepreneurial exit intentions and the business-family interface. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(6), 613-627.

Jaskiewicz, P., Combs, J. G., Shanine, K. K., & Kacmar, K. M. (2017). Introducing the family: A review of family science with implications for management research. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 309–341. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0053.CrossRef

Jenkins, A. S., Wiklund, J., & Brundin, E. (2014). Individual responses to firm failure: Appraisals, grief, and the influence of prior failure experience. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.10.006.CrossRef

Jennings, J. E., & Brush, C. G. (2013). Research on women entrepreneurs: challenges to (and from) the broader entrepreneurship literature? The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 663–715. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2013.782190.CrossRef

Jennings, J. E., & McDougald, M. S. (2007). Work-family interface experiences and coping strategies: Implications for entrepreneurship research and practice. Academy of management review, 32(3), 747–760. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275510.CrossRef

Justo, R., DeTienne, D. R., & Sieger, P. (2015). Failure or voluntary exit? Reassessing the female underperformance hypothesis. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(6), 775–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.04.004.CrossRef

Khelil, N. (2016). The many faces of entrepreneurial failure: Insights from an empirical taxonomy. Journal of business venturing, 31(1), 72–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.08.001.CrossRef

Kirby, S. L., & Davis, M. A. (1998). A study of escalating commitment in principal–agent relationships: Effects of monitoring and personal responsibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 206. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.206.CrossRef

Kivetz, R., & Simonson, I. (2002). Self-control for the righteous: Toward a theory of precommitment to indulgence. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1086/341571.CrossRef

Leaptrott, J. (2005). An institutional theory view of the family business. Family Business Review, 18(3), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00043.x.CrossRef

Lee, S. H., Yamakawa, Y., Peng, M. W., & Barney, J. B. (2011). How do bankruptcy laws affect entrepreneurship development around the world? Journal of Business Venturing, 26(5), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.05.001.CrossRef

Lord, C., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098.CrossRef

Lowe, R. A., & Ziedonis, A. (2006). Overoptimism and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Management Science, 52(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0482.CrossRef

Martynovich, M. (2017). The role of local embeddedness and non-local knowledge in entrepreneurial activity. Small Business Economics, 49(4), 741–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9871-9.CrossRef

McCarthy, A., Schoorman, F., & Cooper, A. (1993). Reinvestment decisions by entrepreneurs: Rational decision-making or escalation of commitment? Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(93)90008-S.CrossRef

McNamara, G., Moon, H., & Bromiley, P. (2002). Banking on commitment: Intended and unintended consequences of an organization's attempt to attenuate escalation of commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069358.CrossRef

Michelacci, C., & Silva, O. (2007). Why so many local entrepreneurs? Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(4), 615–633. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.89.4.615.CrossRef

OECD. (2017). Entrepreneurship at a Glance 2017. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/entrepreneur_aag-2017-en.

Pfeffer, J., & Veiga, J. (1999). Putting people first for organizational success. Academy of Management Executive, 13(2), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1999.1899547.CrossRef

Rothbard, N. P. (2001). Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Administrative science quarterly, 46(4), 655–684. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094827.CrossRef

Schelling, T. C. (1978). Egonomics, or the art of self-management. The American Economic Review, 68(2), 290–294.

Schelling, T. C. (1984). Self-command in practice, in policy, and in a theory of rational choice. The American Economic Review, 74(2), 1–11.

Shepherd, D. (2003). Learning from business failure: propositions of grief recovery for the self-employed. Academy of Management Review, 28, 318–328. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.9416377.CrossRef

Sleesman, D., Lennard, A., Mcnamara, G., & Conlon, D. (2018). Putting escalation of commitment in context: A multilevel review and analysis. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 178–207. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0046.CrossRef

Smith, S. R., Hamon, R. R., Ingoldsby, B. B., & Miller, J. E. (2009). Exploring family theories. Oxford University Press.

Statbel. (2017a). Aantal btw-plichtige ondernemingen volgens jaar en plaats maatschappelijke zetel. https://bestat.statbel.fgov.be/bestat/crosstable1. Accessed June 2019.

Statbel. (2017b). Aantal faillissementen voor België en gewesten. https://bestat.statbel.fgov.be/bestat/crosstable2. Accessed June 2019.

Staw, B. M. (1980). Rationality and justification in organizational life. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 2 (pp. 45–80). JAI.

Staw, B. (1981). The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 577–587. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1981.4285694.CrossRef

Steier, L. P., Chua, J. H., & Chrisman, J. J. (2009). Embeddedness perspectives of economic action within family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(6), 1157–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00338.x.CrossRef

Thornhill, S., & Amit, R. (2003). Learning about failure: Bankruptcy, firm age, and the resource-based view. Organization science, 14(5), 497–509. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.5.497.16761.CrossRef

Ucbasaran, D., Shepherd, D. A., Lockett, A., & Lyon, S. J. (2013). Life after business failure: The process and consequences of business failure for entrepreneurs. Journal of Management, 39(1), 163–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312457823.CrossRef

Walker, W. (2000). Entrapment in large technology systems: Institutional commitment and power relations. Research Policy, 29(7), 833–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00108-6.CrossRef

Wiersema, M. F., & Bowen, H. P. (2009). The use of limited dependent variable techniques in strategy research: Issues and methods. Strategic management journal, 30(6), 679–692. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.758.CrossRef

Wigren-Kristofersen, C., Korsgaard, S., Brundin, E., Hellerstedt, K., Agnete Alsos, G., & Grande, J. (2019). Entrepreneurship and embeddedness: dynamic, processual and multi-layered perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2019.1656868.CrossRef

Wu, S., Matthews, & Dagher, G. K. (2007). Need for achievement, business goals, and entrepreneurial persistence. Management Research News, 30(12), 928–941. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170710833358.CrossRef

Yamakawa, Y., & Cardon, M. S. (2017). How prior investments of time, money, and employee hires influence time to exit a distressed venture, and the extent to which contingency planning helps. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.002.CrossRef

Zacharakis, A. L., Meyer, G. D., & DeCastro, J. (1999). Differing perceptions of new venture failure: A matched exploratory study of venture capitalists and entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Management, 37(1), 1–14.

Hsu, D. K., Wiklund, J., Anderson, S. E., & Coffey, B. S. (2016). Entrepreneurial exit intentions and the business-family interface. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(6), 613-627.

Titel: Committed to the venture or the family? A study of entrepreneurial persistence in distressed ventures
verfasst von: Karlien Coppens
Mirjam Knockaert
Publikationsdatum: 26.04.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Small Business Economics / Ausgabe 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0921-898X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0913
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00486-5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

Procurement policy and SME participation in public purchasing

Strong client orientation, little leverage in nonprofit firms?

Corporate taxes and high-quality entrepreneurship

David B. Audretsch: Clarivate Citation Laureate 2021

Entrepreneurship in the twenty-first century

Does gender still matter? An examination of small business performance