nach oben

Erschienen in:

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

19. Communicating Sustainability Through Language Differences with Rich Point Pedagogy

verfasst von : Stephanie Jo Kent, Glynis Anna Jones, Sulu Zhambyl, Jeffrey A. Kappen

Erschienen in: The Palgrave Handbook of Social Sustainability in Business Education

Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The organic skills of communication performed spontaneously by humans will increase in significance as machine translations powered by generative artificial intelligence (AI) begin to spread. Businesses will likely adopt AI as a solution for language difference inside organizations, for cost savings and presumed efficiencies, particularly when facing fairly simple tasks. In this context, AI translation could continue a linear (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1I-gVLMnTB_Xp1EJJdmgRZi2Zxe3Cb8AB5BIiPKLZK9U/edit) bias in corporate language policies that assumes information sharing equals understanding. However, when dealing with complex issues like the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), misunderstandings can occur for many reasons, requiring immediate, nonlinear, adaptive recognition and repair. Rich point pedagogy supports languaging: teaching business students to navigate linguistic diversity as normal variation in language use. Learning to recognize the ubiquitous communication feature (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zQuG6_9pmsaAUuOwKk9Z7SnoNcLEYXL0Xtiu6wZvYbg/edit?usp=sharing) of misunderstanding and applying robust processes (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zQuG6_9pmsaAUuOwKk9Z7SnoNcLEYXL0Xtiu6wZvYbg/edit) of repair are fundamental to achieving the SDGs because transformation is prefigured through communication. A rich point pedagogy builds collaborative communication skills to support creative working relationships for designing and implementing business priorities to end poverty (SDG1), ensure good health and well-being (SDG3), improve gender equality (SDG5), provide decent work and economic growth (SDG8), and reduce inequalities overall (SDG10). Maximizing rich points during communication builds capacity to align business strategies that support the environment with the needs of stakeholders, localized customers and suppliers, and especially language-diverse employees within teams and across organizations.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Gamification for Teaching Social Responsibility in Business Schools

Nächstes Kapitel Teaching Action Research for Social Sustainability in the Workplace

In general, 对牛弹琴 can be used when a speaker or writer has over-estimated the intelligence or readiness of listeners or readers, i.e., talking to a brick wall.

“To build castles in Spain”, meaning to take on unachievable dreams or projects that are not viable.

“To travel in mayonnaise”, meaning to say things that do not make sense or be in la-la land.

https://chat.openai.com/share/311072ce-769f-4902-a0d5-67d030cb8106.

Most of the links and more activities are available at https://docs.google.com/document/d/18S-dzbaNhjA6CinJ5zbiQXUm_fHOQZF5i4ILeigM7Uk/edit?usp=sharing.

Agar, M. (1994). The intercultural frame. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 18(2), 221–237. https://doi-org-ssl.oca.korea.ac.kr/10.1016/0147-1767(94)90029-9

Agar, M. (2000). Border lessons: Linguistic “rich points” and evaluative understanding. New Directions for Evaluation, 86(Summer 2000), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1175

Bregman, R. (2020). Humankind. Bloomsbury. https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/rutger-bregman/humankind/9780316418553/

Boromisza-Habashi, D. (2020). Intercultural communication: Pathways to better interactions. Cognella Academic Publishing.

Botla, L., & Kondur, H. (2018). Socio technical systems of a company: The dimensionality of SocioTechnical Systems. PURSHARTHA, 11(1).

Canagarajah, S. (2007). Lingua Franca English, Multilingual Communities, and Language Acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 923–939. JSTOR.

Carey, J. W. (2008). Communication as Culture, Revised Edition: Essays on media and society. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.kz/books?id=qhGRAgAAQBAJ

Chow, W. Y., MacMillan, G., Shah, S., Kurenkov, I., Lau, E., & Phillips, C. (2014). Partial use of available information in the early stages of verb prediction. CUNY Human Sentence Processing Conference, Columbus, OH.

Ciuk, S., James, P., & Śliwa, M. (2019). Micropolitical dynamics of interlingual translation processes in an MNC Subsidiary. British Journal of Management, 30(4), Article 4.

Córdova, M., & Schmitz, M. (2022). Incorporating sustainability in business management in higher education: How educators and students need to adapt? Notas Académicas, 58. https://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/185813

Coste, D., Moore, D., & Zarate, G. (2009). Plurilingual and pluricultural competence. Studies towards a common European framework of reference for language learning and teaching. Language Policy Division. Council of Europe. https://www.coe.int/lang

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. Springer Netherlands. https://doi-org-ssl.oca.korea.ac.kr/10.1007/978-94-017-9085-7_4

Fantinuoli, C. (in press). Towards AI-enhanced computer-assisted interpreting. In G. C. Pastor & B. Defrancq (Eds.), Interpreting technologies—Current and future trends (pp. 46–71). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Gaibrois, C. (2018). “It crosses all the boundaries”: Hybrid language use as empowering resource. European Journal of International Management, 12(1–2), 82–110.

Godelnik, R. (2022, March 17). Why companies need to ditch the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [Blog post]. https://razgo.medium.com/why-companies-need-to-ditch-the-sustainable-development-goals-sdgs-e0692de53182

Graeber, D., & Wengrow, D. (2021). The Dawn of Everything. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374157357/thedawnofeverything

House, J. (2003). English as a lingua franca: A threat to multilingualism? Journal of Sociolinguistics, Special Issue: Sociolinguistics and Globalization, 7(4), 556–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2003.00242.xCrossRef

Karhunen, P., Kankaanranta, A., Louhiala-Salminen, L., & Piekkari, R. (2018). Let’s talk about language: A review of language- sensitive research in International Management. Journal of Management Studies, 55(6), 980–1013.CrossRef

Keltner, D. (2023). Awe. Penguin Press. https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/453075/awe-by-keltner-dacher/9780241603901

Kent, S. J. (2010, May 11). Implementing an organizational vision through thinking in time. Reflexivity. https://www.reflexivity.us/2010/05/implementing-an-organizational-vision-through-thinking-in-time/

Kent, S. J. (2014). Interpreting [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts]. https://doi.org/10.7275/n04n-bv72

Kent, S. J. (2014, February 25). The real value of interpreting [Video file]. https://vimeo.com/120645676

Kent, S., & Kappen, J. (2017). Interpreting and translation. In C. R. Scott & L. Lewis (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication (pp. 1–7). Wiley-Blackwell.

KUDO. (2023 August 8) KUDO’s AI Speech Translator Generally Available & Free to Test. (2023, August 8). [Press release]. https://kudoway.com/press-release/kudo-gains-a-patent-for-systems-and-methods-for-automatic-speech-translation/

Mäkelä, K., Kalla, H. K., & Piekkari, R. (2007). Interpersonal similarity as a driver of knowledge sharing within multinational corporations. International Business Review, 16(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2006.11.002CrossRef

Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In C. K. Ogden & I. A. Richards (Eds.), The meaning of meaning (pp. 296–336). K. Paul.

Neustadt, E., & May, E. R. (1986). Thinking in time: The uses of history for decision makers.

Open AI & Kent, S. (2023, July 12). “SDG Interpreting and AI Project.” ChatGPT (Mar 14 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/share/311072ce-769f-4902-a0d5-67d030cb8106

Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press.

Piekkari, R., Gaibrois, C., & Johansson, M. (2022). A review of language-sensitive research in international business: A multi-paradigmatic reading. Journal of Comparative International Management, 25(1), 144–174. https://doi.org/10.55482/jcim.2022.32906

Sakai, N. (1997). Translation and subjectivity: On Japan and cultural nationalism (NED-New edition, Vol. 3). University of Minnesota Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttsxtv

Sanden, G. R. (2018). Ten reasons why corporate language policies can create more problems than they solve. Current Issues in Language Planning, 21(1), 22–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2018.1553914CrossRef

Scollon, R., & Wong-Scollon, S. (1990). Athabaskan-English interethnic communication. In Cultural communication and intercultural contact (pp. 259–286). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Seidlhofer, B. (2009). Common ground and different realities: World Englishes and English as a lingua franca. World Englishes, 28, 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2009.01592.xCrossRef

Šilenskytė, A., & Smale, A. (2020). Multilevel theorizing in international business: The case of research on strategy implementation in MNCs. Critical Perspectives on International Business. https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-08-2019-0060CrossRef

Slater. (2022). Translation and Localization Industry Grows 11.8% in 2021 to USD 26.6bn. https://slator.com/translation-localization-industry-grows-in-2021-to-usd-26bn/

Steyaert, C., Ostendorp, A., & Gaibrois, C. (2011). Multilingual organizations as ‘linguascapes’: Negotiating the position of English through discursive practices. Journal of World Business, 46(3), 270–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2010.07.003CrossRef

Taha, M. C. (2019). Confusion and frustration as catalysts for change: ‘Rich points’ in multicultural education. Ethnography and Education, 14(3), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2019.1578982CrossRef

Tannen, D. (2012). Turn-Taking and intercultural discourse and communication. In The handbook of intercultural discourse and communication (pp. 135–157). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118247273.ch8

Tietze, S., Back, H., & Piekkari, R. (2021). 20 Managing communication in multilingual workplaces. In F. Cooren & P. Stücheli-Herlach (Eds.), Handbook of management communication (pp. 373–388). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501508059-020

Weizman, E., & Blum-Kulka, S. (1992). Ordinary misunderstanding. In M. Stamenov (Ed.), Current advances in semantic theory (pp. 417–432). John Benjamins.

Westney, D. E., Piekkari, R., Koskinen, K., & Tietze, S. (2022). Crossing borders and boundaries: Translation ecosystems in international business. International Business Review, 31(5), 102030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2022.102030CrossRef

Wine, L. (2008). Towards a deeper understanding of framing, footing, and alignment. Teachers College, Columbia University, Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 8(2).

Titel: Communicating Sustainability Through Language Differences with Rich Point Pedagogy
verfasst von: Stephanie Jo Kent
Glynis Anna Jones
Sulu Zhambyl
Jeffrey A. Kappen
Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland
Buch: The Palgrave Handbook of Social Sustainability in Business Education
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-50167-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-50168-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50168-5_19

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner