nach oben

Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery

Erschienen in:

03.03.2022 | Review Article

Comparative analysis of conventional to biomass-derived adsorbent for wastewater treatment: a review

verfasst von: Zubair Hashmi, Abdul Sattar Jatoi, Saad Nadeem, Amna Anjum, Syed Mazhar Imam, Haroon Jangda

Erschienen in: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery | Ausgabe 1/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Water resources are of crucial significance to mutually ecosystem and human developments. Growing ecological toxic waste from industry like metallic ion presents in metal coating, mining, tanneries, etc. These are non-biodegradable and tend to accrue in living creatures triggering disorders. Numerous production units as dye, textile, paper, and plastics utilize dyes to shade their products and utilize significant quantities of water. Therefore, they produce a substantial quantity of effluent. The existence of little quantity of dyes (less than 1 ppm) is extremely noticeable. Consequently, to deal with the poisonous effluents before being expelled into the waterbodies, numerous physico-chemical techniques like coagulation/flocculation are accessible for eradication. Foremost disadvantages of these techniques are high sludge creation, processing and removal difficulties, high cost, etc. Additionally, cost-efficient and ecologically perfect management for effluents is needed. Adsorption is one of the most effective and economical approaches to handle effluents. Adsorbents are presently employed which are by-products from agriculture and industries, which comprise seaweeds, bacteria, crab shells, and agricultural products such as wool, rice, straw, coconut husks, and waste tea leaves. Sorption/biosorption using low-cost sorbents could be techno-economically feasible for the treatment of effluents. Low-cost sorbents are nothing but materials that are plentiful in the environment or are by-products or waste material from another industry. Due to effectiveness of sorption, various adsorbents have been developed and categorized as conventional and non-conventional adsorbents. To investigate the effectiveness of both categories, this review will be aided because it shows the comparative study of the removal efficiency, adsorption capacity, and techno-economical aspects of both sorbent classes.

Graphical abstract

Vorheriger Artikel A review of the recent trend in the synthesis of carbon nanomaterials derived from oil palm by-product materials

Nächster Artikel Efficient removal of Cd(II) from aqueous environment by potassium permanganate-modified eucalyptus biochar

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Datta A, Nayak D, Smith JU, Sharma PC, Jat HS, Yadav AK, and M. L. Jat (2022) Climate Smart agricultural practices improve soil quality through organic carbon enrichment and lower greenhouse gas emissions in farms of bread bowl of India. Soil Research

Dsikowitzky L, Schwarzbauer J (2014) Industrial organic contaminants: identification, toxicity and fate in the environment. Environ Chem Lett 12(3):371–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-014-0467-1CrossRef

Mudakkar SR, Zaman K, Khan MM, Ahmad M (2013) Energy for economic growth, industrialization, environment and natural resources: living with just enough. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 25:580–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.024CrossRef

Khan Jadoon IB, Ali S, Jadoon QBK, Shakoor MB, Bharwana SA, M. A. (2013) Farooq, “Effects of irrigation with waste water from different industries on vegetables grown in vicinity of Faisalabad. Pakistan. Int. Res. J. Plant Sci 4(6):144–148

Rasheed HU, Rasheed B, Khan A, Ali N (2013) Management of Hattar Industrial Estate’s effluent by phytoremediation technology. Int J Sci Eng Res 4(8)

Du B et al (2014) Comparison of contaminants of emerging concern removal, discharge, and water quality hazards among centralized and on-site wastewater treatment system effluents receiving common wastewater influent. Sci Total Environ 466–467:976–984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.126CrossRef

Kakade SM (2021) Environmental Enforceability. NYU Environmental Law Journal, Forthcoming, U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper 2021–11

Sahu P (2021) A comprehensive review of saline effluent disposal and treatment: conventional practices, emerging technologies, and future potential. J Water Reuse Desalin 11(1):33–65. https://doi.org/10.2166/wrd.2020.065CrossRef

Davis C (2021) Sustainable water use by industry: what can we do? Sustainable Industrial Water Use: Perspectives, Incentives, and Tools 181

10.

Vahabisani A, An C (2021) Use of biomass-derived adsorbents for the removal of petroleum pollutants from water: a mini-review. Environ Syst Res 10(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-021-00229-1CrossRef

11.

Yu J et al (2021) Exploring spent biomass-derived adsorbents as anodes for lithium ion batteries. Mater Today Energy 19:100580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2020.100580CrossRef

12.

Jiao GJ et al (2021) Recent advances and challenges on removal and recycling of phosphate from wastewater using biomassderived adsorbents. Chemosphere 278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130377

13.

Gupta VK, Jain R, Saleh T, Nayak A, Malathi S (2011) Agarwal. Equilibrium and Thermodynamic studies on the removal and recovery of Sfranine-T dye from industrial effluent separation. Science and Technology 46(5):839–846

14.

Bui XT, Vo TPT, Ngo HH, Guo WS, Nguyen TT (2016) Multicriteria assessment of advanced treatment technologies for micropollutants removal at large-scale applications. Sci Total Environ 563–564:1050–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.191CrossRef

15.

Morin S, Cordonier A, Lavoie I, Arini A, Blanco S, Duong TT, Tornés E et al (2012) Consistency in diatom response to metal-contaminated environments.". Emerging and priority pollutants in rivers. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 117–146CrossRef

16.

Richardson SD, Kimura SY (2017) Emerging environmental contaminants: challenges facing our next generation and potential engineering solutions. Environ Technol Innov 8:40–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2017.04.002CrossRef

17.

I. H. Ali, M. K. Al Mesfer, M. I. Khan, M. Danish, and M. M. Alghamdi, “Exploring adsorption process of lead (II) and chromium (VI) ions from aqueous solutions on acid activated carbon prepared from Juniperus procera leaves,” Processes, vol. 7, no. 4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7040217.

18.

J. Paz-Ferreiro, A. Nieto, A. Méndez, M. P. J. Askeland, and G. Gascó, “Biochar from biosolids pyrolysis: a review,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 15, no. 5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050956.

19.

A. J. Domb, NANOTECHNOLOGY FOR WATER. Elsevier Inc., 2017.

20.

Kamali M, Suhas DP, Costa ME, Capela I, Aminabhavi TM (2019) Sustainability considerations in membrane-based technologies for industrial effluents treatment. Chem Eng J 368(February):474–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.02.075CrossRef

21.

Rathi BS, Kumar PS (2021) Application of adsorption process for effective removal of emerging contaminants from water and wastewater. Environ Pollut 280:116995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116995CrossRef

22.

Crini G (2005) Recent developments in polysaccharide-based materials used as adsorbents in wastewater treatment. Prog Polym Sci 30(1):38–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.11.002CrossRef

23.

Fang Y-J, Xiao W-D (2004) Experimental and modeling studies on a homogeneous reactive distillation system for dimethyl carbonate synthesis by transesterification. Sep Purif Technol 34(1–3):255–263CrossRef

24.

Grégorio G, Badot P-M (eds) (2010) Sorption processes and pollution: conventional and non-conventional sorbents for pollutant removal from wastewaters. Presses Univ, Franche-Comté

25.

Saeed A, Sharif M, Iqbal M (2010) Application potential of grapefruit peel as dye sorbent: kinetics, equilibrium and mechanism of crystal violet adsorption. J Hazard Mater 179(1–3):564–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.03.041CrossRef

26.

E. Worch, 5 Adsorption kinetics. 2012.

27.

Worch E (2021) Adsorption technology in water treatment. de Gruyter

28.

W. C. Koskinen and S. S. Harper, “The retention process: mechanisms,” Pestic. Soil Environ. Process. Impacts, Model., no. 2, pp. 51–77, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser2.c3.

29.

Singh N, Gupta SK (2016) Adsorption of heavy metals: a review. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol 5(2):2267–2281

30.

Yang RT (2013) Adsorbents: fundamentals and applications. John Wiley & Sons

31.

Kannan N, Sundaram MM (2001) Kinetics and mechanism of removal of methylene blue by adsorption on various carbons—a comparative study. Dye Pigment 51(1):25–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-7208(01)00056-0CrossRef

32.

Haldorai Y, Shim J (2014) Applied surface science an efficient removal of methyl orange dye from aqueous solution by adsorption onto chitosan / MgO composite : a novel reusable adsorbent. Appl Surf Sci 292:447–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.11.158CrossRef

33.

S. Boudesocque, E. Guillon, M. Aplincourt, and U. De Reims, “Use of a low-cost biosorbent to remove pesticides from wastewater,” pp. 631–638, 2008, https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2007.0332.

34.

M. Rao, A. V Parwate, and A. G. Bhole, “Removal of Cr 6 + and Ni 2 + from aqueous solution using bagasse and fly ash,” vol. 22, pp. 821–830, 2002

35.

V. Herna and M. A. Pe, “Removal of heavy metals and arsenic from aqueous solution using textile wastes from denim industry,” pp. 1657–1668, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0553-8.

36.

N. Taoufik, W. Boumya, F. Z. Janani, A. Elhalil, F. Z. Mahjoubi, and N. Barka, “Removal of emerging pharmaceutical pollutants: a systematic mapping study review,” J. Environ. Chem. Eng., vol. 8, no. 5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104251.

37.

Hossain MA, Ngo HH, Guo WS, Setiadi T (2012) Adsorption and desorption of copper (II) ions onto garden grass. Bioresour Technol 121:386–395CrossRef

38.

Ibisi NE, Asoluka CA (2018) Use of agro-waste (Musa paradisiaca peels) as a sustainable biosorbent for toxic metal ions removal from contaminated water. Chem Int 4(1):52

39.

Gaballah I, Goy D, Allain E, Kilbertus G, Thauront J (1997) Recovery of copper through decontamination of synthetic solutions using modified barks. Metall Mater Trans B 28(1):13–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-997-0122-3CrossRef

40.

Nakajima A, Sakaguchi T (1990) Recovery and removal of uranium by using plant wastes. Biomass 21:55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-4565(90)90047-NCrossRef

41.

Özer A, Özer D, Özer A (2004) The adsorption of copper (II) ions on to dehydrated wheat bran (DWB): determination of the equilibrium and thermodynamic parameters. Process Biochem 39(12):2183–2191CrossRef

42.

Ajmal M, Rao RAK, Ahmad R, Ahmad J (2000) Adsorption studies on Citrus reticulata (fruit peel of orange): removal and recovery of Ni (II) from electroplating wastewater. J Hazard Mater 79(1–2):117–131CrossRef

43.

Annadurai G, Juang R-S, Lee DJ (2003) Adsorption of heavy metals from water using banana and orange peels. Water Sci Technol 47(1):185–190CrossRef

44.

Bhakte NJ, Suryavanshi AA, Tirthakar SN (2015) Removal of heavy metal lead (pb) from electrochemical industry waste water using low cost adsorbent. Int J Res Eng Technol 4(4):731–733CrossRef

45.

Parmar M, Thakur LS (2013) Heavy metal Cu, Ni and Zn: toxicity, health hazards and their removal techniques by low cost adsorbents: a short overview. Int J plant Anim Environ Sci. 3(3):143–157

46.

F. Noli, A. Avgerinou, E. Kapashi, and M. Kapnisti, “Uranium and thorium retention onto sorbents from raw and modified pomegranate peel,” Water. Air. Soil Pollut., vol. 232, no. 10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-021-05384-w.

47.

Olasehinde EF, Adegunloye AV, Adebayo MA, Oshodi AA (2019) Cadmium (II) adsorption from aqueous solutions using onion skins. Water Conserv Sci Eng 4(4):175–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41101-019-00077-2CrossRef

48.

Chen Y, Chen Q, Zhao H, Dang J, Jin R, Zhao W, Li Y (2020) Wheat straws and corn straws as adsorbents for the removal of Cr(VI) and Cr(III) from Aqueous solution: kinetics, isotherm, and mechanism. ACS Omega 5(11):6003–6009CrossRef

49.

Jatoi AS et al (2021) Recent trends and future challenges of pesticide removal techniques - a comprehensive review. J Environ Chem Eng 9(4):105571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105571CrossRef

50.

Sharma N, Tiwari DP, Singh SK (2014) The efficiency appraisal for removal of malachite green by potato peel and neem bark: isotherm and kinetic studies. Int J Chem Environ Eng 5(2):83–88

51.

T. C. Lee et al., “Tea stem as a sorbent for removal of methylene blue from aqueous phase,” Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 2019, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9723763.

52.

Martínez M, Miralles N, Hidalgo S, Fiol N, Villaescusa I, Poch J (2006) Removal of lead(II) and cadmium(II) from aqueous solutions using grape stalk waste. J Hazard Mater 133(1–3):203–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.10.030CrossRef

53.

P. V. H. Nhatet al., “Can algae-based technologies be an affordable green process for biofuel production and wastewater remediation ? Joint Research Centre for Protective Infrastructure Technology and Environmental,” Bioresour. Technol., 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.02.031

54.

Cai N, Peak D, Larese-Casanova P (2015) Factors influencing natural organic matter sorption onto commercial graphene oxides. Chem Eng J 273:568–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.03.108CrossRef

55.

Azam A, Shafique M (2017) Agriculture in Pakistan and its impact on economy-a review. Int J Adv Sci Technol. 10(June):47–60. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijast.2017.103.05CrossRef

56.

Li Y et al (2011) A new method of comprehensive utilization of rice husk. J Hazard Mater 186(2–3):2151–2156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.013CrossRef

57.

Sattar H, Muzaffar I, Munir S (2020) Thermal and kinetic study of rice husk, corn cobs, peanut crust and Khushab coal under inert (N2) and oxidative (dry air) atmospheres. Renew Energy 149:794–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.020CrossRef

58.

Srivastava VC, Mall ID, Mishra IM (2006) Characterization of mesoporous rice husk ash (RHA) and adsorption kinetics of metal ions from aqueous solution onto RHA. J Hazard Mater 134(1–3):257–267CrossRef

59.

Streat M, Patrick JW, Perez MJC (1995) Sorption of phenol and para-chlorophenol from water using conventional and novel activated carbons. Water Res 29(2):467–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(94)00187-CCrossRef

60.

Volesky B (2007) Biosorption and me. Water Res 41(18):4017–4029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.062CrossRef

61.

Mckay G (1996) Use of adsorbents for the removal of pollutants from wastewater, CRC, Press. Inc, USA

62.

Varma AJ, Deshpande SV, Kennedy JF (2004) Metal complexation by chitosan and its derivatives: a review. Carbohydr Polym 55(1):77–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2003.08.005CrossRef

63.

Crini G (2006) Non-conventional low-cost adsorbents for dye removal: a review. Bioresour Technol 97(9):1061–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.05.001CrossRef

64.

Gerente C, Lee VKC, Le Cloirec P, McKay G (2007) Application of chitosan for the removal of metals from wastewaters by adsorption—mechanisms and models review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 37(1):41–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380600729089CrossRef

65.

O’Connell DW, Birkinshaw C, O’Dwyer TF (2008) Heavy metal adsorbents prepared from the modification of cellulose: A review. Bioresour Technol 99(15):6709–6724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.01.036CrossRef

66.

Gadd GM (2009) “Biosorption: critical review of scientific rationale, environmental importance and significance for pollution treatment.” J Chem Technol Biotechnol Int Res Process Environ Clean Technol. 84(1):13–28

67.

Elwakeel KZ (2010) Environmental application of chitosan resins for the treatment of water and wastewater: a review. J Dispers Sci Technol 31(3):273–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/01932690903167178CrossRef

68.

Sanghi R, Verma P (2013) Decolorisation of aqueous dye solutions by low-cost adsorbents: a review. Color Technol 129(2):85–108CrossRef

69.

G. Crini et al., Adsorption-oriented processes using conventional and non-conventional adsorbents for wastewater treatment To cite this version : HAL Id : hal-02065600 Adsorption-Oriented Processes Using Conventional and Non-conventional Adsorbents for Wastewater Treatmen, vol. 18. 2019.

70.

Thomaidis NS, Asimakopoulos AG, Bletsou AA (2012) “Emerging contaminants a tutorial mini-review. Glob. Nest J. 14(1):72–79. https://doi.org/10.30955/gnj.000823CrossRef

71.

Díaz-Garduño B et al (2017) Environmental risk assessment of effluents as a whole emerging contaminant: efficiency of alternative tertiary treatments for wastewater depuration. Water Res 119:136–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.04.021CrossRef

72.

Devi P, Saroha AK (2017) Science of the total environment utilization of sludge based adsorbents for the removal of various pollutants : a review. Sci Total Environ 578:16–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.220CrossRef

73.

Ali A, Saeed K, Mabood F (2016) Removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous medium using chemically modified banana peels as efficient low-cost adsorbent. Alexandria Eng J 55(3):2933–2942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2016.05.011CrossRef

74.

Zhou K, Yang Z, Liu Y, Kong X (2015) Kinetics and equilibrium studies on biosorption of Pb(II) from aqueous solution by a novel biosorbent: Cyclosorus interruptus. J Environ Chem Eng 3(3):2219–2228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2015.08.002CrossRef

75.

Derylo-Marczewska A, Blachnio M, Marczewski AW, Swiatkowski A, Buczek B (2017) Adsorption of chlorophenoxy pesticides on activated carbon with gradually removed external particle layers. Chem Eng J 308:408–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.09.082CrossRef

76.

Hu X, Chen C, Zhang D, Xue Y (2021) Kinetics, isotherm and chemical speciation analysis of Hg (II) adsorption over oxygen-containing MXene adsorbent. Chemosphere 278:130206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130206CrossRef

77.

Kumar A, Jena HM (2017) Adsorption of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution by prepared high surface area activated carbon from Fox nutshell by chemical activation with H3PO4. J Environ Chem Eng 5(2):2032–2041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.03.035CrossRef

78.

Bose P, Aparna Bose M, Kumar S (2002) “Critical evaluation of treatment strategies involving adsorption and chelation for wastewater containing copper zinc and cyanide.” Adv Environ Res 7(1):179–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1093-0191(01)00125-3CrossRef

79.

F. V. Cendon, A. S. Carvalho, R. M. M. Jorge, and A. L. Mathias, “Comparative thermostability of whey protein and alginate hydrospheres complexed with divalent cations,” J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., no. 0123456789, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-021-11057-x.

80.

Huang WJ, Cheng YL (2008) Effect of characteristics of activated carbon on removal of bromate. Sep Purif Technol 59(1):101–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2007.05.034CrossRef

81.

Halasz I, Kim S, Marcus B (2001) Uncommon adsorption isotherm of methanol on a hydrophobic Y-zeolite. J Phys Chem B 105(44):10788–10796. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0103530CrossRef

82.

Rathi A, Basu S, Barman S (2019) Adsorptive removal of fipronil from its aqueous solution by modified zeolite HZSM-5: equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic study. J Mol Liq 283:867–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.02.140CrossRef

83.

Piera E, Salomón MA, Coronas J, Menéndez M, Santamaría J (1998) Synthesis, characterization and separation properties of a composite mordenite/ZSM-5/chabazite hydrophilic membrane. J Memb Sci 149(1):99–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00184-7CrossRef

84.

Mansouri N, Rikhtegar N, Ahmad Panahi H, Atabi F, Shahraki BK (2013) “Porosity characterization and structural properties of natural zeolite - clinoptilolite - as a sorbent.” Environ Prot Eng 39(1):139–152. https://doi.org/10.5277/EPE130111CrossRef

85.

Mohammad-Khah A, Ansari R (2009) Activated charcoal: preparation, characterization and applications: A review article. Int J ChemTech Res 1(4):859–864

86.

Izutsu H, Mizukami F, Nair PK, Kiyozumi Y, Maeda K (1997) Preparation and characterization of porous silica spheres by the sol-gel method in the presence of tartaric acid. J Mater Chem 7(5):767–771. https://doi.org/10.1039/a607333fCrossRef

87.

D. Tessier, “Behaviour and microstructure of clay minerals,” pp. 387–415, 1990, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2611-1_14.

88.

Bohdziewicz J, Kamińska G (2013) Kinetics and equilibrium of the sorption of bisphenol A by carbon nanotubes from wastewater. Water Sci Technol 68(6):1306–1314. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.373CrossRef

89.

Anastopoulos I, Anagnostopoulos VA, Bhatnagar A, Mitropoulos AC, Kyzas GZ (2017) A review for chromium removal by carbon nanotubes. Chem Ecol 33(6):572–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/02757540.2017.1328503CrossRef

90.

Ding C et al (2016) “Competitive sorption of Pb(II) Cu(II) and Ni(II) on carbonaceous nanofibers a spectroscopic and modeling approach.” J Hazard Mater 313(Ii):253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.04.002CrossRef

91.

Rocky KA, Pal A, Rupam TH, Palash ML, Saha BB (2021) “Recent advances of composite adsorbents for heat transformation applications Therm.” Sci. Eng. Prog. 23(December2020):100900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2021.100900CrossRef

92.

Y. T. Gebreslassie, “Equilibrium, kinetics, and thermodynamic studies of malachite green adsorption onto fig (Ficus cartia) leaves,” J. Anal. Methods Chem., vol. 2020, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7384675.

93.

Teshale F, Karthikeyan R, Sahu O (2020) “Synthesized bioadsorbent from fish scale for chromium (III) removal. Micron 130(December2019):102817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2019.102817CrossRef

94.

Ahalya N, Kanamadi RD, Ramachandra TV (2010) Removal of hexavalent chromium using coffee husk. Int J Environ Pollut 43(1–3):106–116. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEP.2010.035917CrossRef

95.

M. Francoeur et al., “Activated carbon synthetized from Sargassum (sp) for adsorption of caffeine: understanding the adsorption mechanism using molecular modeling,” J. Environ. Chem. Eng., vol. 9, no. 1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104795.

96.

K. O. Iwuozor and J. O. Ighalo, “Do adsorbent pore size and specific surface area affect the kinetics of methyl orange aqueous phase adsorption ?,” pp. 1–14, 2021.

97.

Şişmanoğlu T, Pozan GS (2016) Adsorption of Congo red from aqueous solution using various TiO2 nanoparticles. Desalin Water Treat 57(28):13318–13333. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1056834CrossRef

98.

Wong KT, Yoon Y, Snyder SA, Jang M (2016) Phenyl-functionalized magnetic palm-based powdered activated carbon for the effective removal of selected pharmaceutical and endocrine-disruptive compounds. Chemosphere 152:71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.02.090CrossRef

99.

Han W, Luo L, Zhang S (2012) Adsorption of bisphenol A on lignin: effects of solution chemistry. Int J Environ Sci Technol 9(3):543–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-012-0067-1CrossRef

100.

Aljohani MMH, Almizraq JMJ, Albalawi AM, Alshammari ASA, Albalawi NOS, Albalawi ANSA, Alatwi QAQ, Keshk AA, Althaqafy AD, Al-Aoh HA (2021) Efficient dye discoloration of modified Lamiaceae leaves. Mater Res Express 8(3):035503

101.

Mas Haris MRH, Abdul Wahab NA, Reng CW, Azahari B, Sathasivam K (2011) “The sorption of cadmium(II) ions on mercerized rice husk and activated carbon Turkish.” J Chem 35(6):939–950. https://doi.org/10.3906/kim-1103-62CrossRef

102.

Mohamed MM (2004) Acid dye removal: Comparison of surfactant-modified mesoporous FSM-16 with activated carbon derived from rice husk. J Colloid Interface Sci 272(1):28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2003.08.071CrossRef

103.

L. S. Rocha, D. Pereira, É. Sousa, M. Otero, V. I. Esteves, and V. Calisto, “Recent advances on the development and application of magnetic activated carbon and char for the removal of pharmaceutical compounds from waters: a review,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 718, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137272.

104.

Murray A, Örmeci B (2012) Application of molecularly imprinted and non-imprinted polymers for removal of emerging contaminants in water and wastewater treatment: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19(9):3820–3830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-1119-2CrossRef

105.

Cruz-Lopes LP, Macena M, Esteves B, Guiné RPF (2021) Ideal pH for the adsorption of metal ions Cr6+, Ni2+, Pb2+in aqueous solution with different adsorbent materials. Open Agric 6(1):115–123. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2021-0225CrossRef

106.

M. Benjelloun, Y. Miyah, G. Akdemir Evrendilek, F. Zerrouq, and S. Lairini, “Recent advances in adsorption kinetic models: their application to dye types,” Arab. J. Chem., vol. 14, no. 4, p. 103031, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103031.

107.

AbdulRahim AR, Mohsin HM, Chin KBL, Johari K, Saman N (2021) Promising low-cost adsorbent from desiccated coconut waste for removal of Congo Red Dye from aqueous solution. Water Air. Soil Pollut. 232(9):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-021-05308-8CrossRef

108.

Kiran Kumar A, Venkata Mohan S (2012) “Removal of natural and synthetic endocrine disrupting estrogens by multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) as adsorbent: kinetic and mechanistic evaluation. Sep Purif. Technol. 87:22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.11.015CrossRef

109.

A. Morone, P. Mulay, and S. P. Kamble, Removal of pharmaceutical and personal care products from wastewater using advanced materials. Elsevier Inc., 2019.

110.

Naushad M et al (2016) Synthesis and characterization of a new starch / SnO 2 nanocomposite for efficient adsorption of toxic Hg 2 + metal ion. Chem Eng J 300:306–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.04.084CrossRef

111.

S. M. Kharrazi, N. Mirghaffari, M. M. Dastgerdi, and M. Soleimani, A novel post-modification of powdered activated carbon prepared from lignocellulosic waste through thermal tension treatment to enhance the porosity and heavy metals adsorption, vol. 366. Elsevier B.V, 2020.

112.

Pourbeyram S (2016) Effective removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions by graphene oxide-zirconium phosphate (GO-Zr-P) nanocomposite. Ind Eng Chem Res 55(19):5608–5617. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b00728CrossRef

113.

Kratochvil D, Volesky B (1998) Advances in the biosorption of heavy metals. Trends Biotechnol 16(7):291–300CrossRef

114.

Alov NV (2005) Determination of the states of oxidation of metals in thin oxide films by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J Anal Chem 60(5):431–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10809-005-0114-xCrossRef

115.

El-Shafey EI (2007) Sorption of Cd (II) and Se (IV) from aqueous solution using modified rice husk. J Hazard Mater 147(1–2):546–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.051CrossRef

116.

Gu Y et al (2019) Adsorption and photocatalytic removal of Ibuprofen by activated carbon impregnated with TiO2 by UV–Vis monitoring. Chemosphere 217:724–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.068CrossRef

117.

Gan D et al (2020) “Bioinspired functionalization of MXenes (Ti3C2TX) with amino acids for efficient removal of heavy metal ions. Appl Surf Sci 504(November):144603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144603CrossRef

118.

Priyadarshanee M, Das S (2021) Biosorption and removal of toxic heavy metals by metal tolerating bacteria for bioremediation of metal contamination: a comprehensive review. J Environ Chem Eng 9(1):104686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104686CrossRef

119.

Baidya KS, Kumar U (2021) “Adsorption of brilliant green dye from aqueous solution onto chemically modified areca nut husk.” South African J Chem Eng 35:33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajce.2020.11.001CrossRef

120.

Rambabu K, AlYammahi J, Bharath G, Thanigaivelan A, Sivarajasekar N, Banat F (2021) “Nano-activated carbon derived from date palm coir waste for efficient sequestration of noxious 24-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid herbicide.” Chemosphere 282:131103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131103CrossRef

121.

Sui Q et al (2011) Rapid removal of bisphenol A on highly ordered mesoporous carbon. J Environ Sci 23(2):177–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(10)60391-9CrossRef

122.

M. J. F. Jasni et al., Electrospun nylon 6,6 membrane as a reusable nano-adsorbent for bisphenol A removal: adsorption performance and mechanism. 2017.

123.

Khattri SD, Singh MK (2009) Removal of malachite green from dye wastewater using neem sawdust by adsorption. J Hazard Mater 167(1–3):1089–1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.101CrossRef

124.

Gupta K, Khatri OP (2017) Reduced graphene oxide as an effective adsorbent for removal of malachite green dye: plausible adsorption pathways. J Colloid Interface Sci 501:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2017.04.035CrossRef

125.

Wei F et al (2021) Removal of tetracycline hydrochloride from wastewater by Zr/Fe-MOFs/GO composites. RSC Adv 11(17):9977–9984. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ra01027aCrossRef

126.

Rao A, Kumar A, Dhodapkar R, Pal S (2021) Adsorption of five emerging contaminants on activated carbon from aqueous medium: kinetic characteristics and computational modeling for plausible mechanism. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(17):21347–21358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12014-1CrossRef

127.

Liu D et al (2018) As(III) and As(V) adsorption on nanocomposite of hydrated zirconium oxide coated carbon nanotubes. J Colloid Interface Sci 511:277–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2017.10.004CrossRef

128.

Cui H, Li Q, Gao S, Shang JK (2012) Strong adsorption of arsenic species by amorphous zirconium oxide nanoparticles. J Ind Eng Chem 18(4):1418–1427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2012.01.045CrossRef

129.

S. Thapa and M. R. Pokhrel, 2013, “Removal of As(III) from aqueous solution using Fe(III) loaded pomegranate waste,” J. Nepal Chem. Soc., vol. 30, no. (Iii):29–36 https://doi.org/10.3126/jncs.v30i0.9332.

130.

Dhoble RM, Lunge S, Bhole AG, Rayalu S (2011) Magnetic binary oxide particles (MBOP): a promising adsorbent for removal of As (III) in water. Water Res 45(16):4769–4781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.06.016CrossRef

131.

Upadhyay U, Sreedhar I, Singh SA, Patel CM, Anitha KL (2021) “Recent advances in heavy metal removal by chitosan based adsorbents. Carbohydr Polym. 251(August2020):117000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117000CrossRef

132.

Biswas FB et al (2021) Highly selective and straightforward recovery of gold and platinum from acidic waste effluents using cellulose-based bio-adsorbent. J Hazard Mater 410:124569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124569CrossRef

133.

Dobrowolski R, Oszust-Cieniuch M, Dobrzyńska J, Barczak M (2013) Amino-functionalized SBA-15 mesoporous silicas as sorbents of platinum (IV) ions. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp 435:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.12.001CrossRef

134.

Mosai AK, Chimuka L, Cukrowska EM, Kotzé IA, Tutu H (2021) Batch and flow-through column adsorption study: recovery of Pt4+ from aqueous solutions by 3-aminopropyl(diethoxy)methylsilane functionalised zeolite (APDEMSFZ). Environ Dev Sustain 23(5):7041–7062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00903-xCrossRef

135.

Aktas S, Morcali MH (2011) Adsorption of chromium (Cr) from tannery wastewater using low-cost spent tea leaves adsorbent Platinum recovery from dilute platinum solutions using activated carbon. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China (English Ed) 21(11):2554–2558. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(11)61091-1CrossRef

136.

Nur-E-Alam M, Abu Sayid Mia M, Ahmad F, Mafizur Rahman M (2018) Adsorption of chromium (Cr) from tannery wastewater using low-cost spent tea leaves adsorbent. Appl Water Sci 8(5):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-0774-yCrossRef

137.

Tu B et al (2020) Efficient removal of aqueous hexavalent chromium by activated carbon derived from Bermuda grass. J Colloid Interface Sci 560:649–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.10.103CrossRef

138.

Wang XS, Li ZZ, Tao SR (2009) Removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous solution using walnut hull. J Environ Manage 90(2):721–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.01.011CrossRef

139.

Thabede PM, Shooto ND, Xaba T, Naidoo EB (2020) Adsorption studies of toxic cadmium(II) and chromium(VI) ions from aqueous solution by activated black cumin (Nigella sativa) seeds. J Environ Chem Eng 8(4):104045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104045CrossRef

140.

Zazycki MA, Godinho M, Perondi D, Foletto EL, Collazzo GC, Dotto GL (2018) New biochar from pecan nutshells as an alternative adsorbent for removing reactive red 141 from aqueous solutions. J Clean Prod 171:57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.007CrossRef

141.

Al-Salihi S, Jasim AM, Fidalgo MM, Xing Y (2022) Removal of Congo red dyes from aqueous solutions by porous γ-alumina nanoshells. Chemosphere 286(P2):131769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131769CrossRef

142.

F. Ashrafi, M. Firouzzare, S. javad Ahmadi, M. reza Sohrabi, and M. Khosravi, “Preparation and modification of forcespun polypropylene nanofibers for adsorption of uranium (VI) from simulated seawater,” Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., vol. 186, no. August, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109746

143.

Kavakli PA, Seko N, Tamada M, Güven O (2005) A highly efficient chelating polymer for the adsorption of uranyl and vanadyl ions at low concentrations. Adsorption 10(4):309–315CrossRef

144.

Doǧan V, Aydin S (2014) Vanadium(V) removal by adsorption onto activated carbon derived from starch industry waste sludge. Sep Sci Technol 49(9):1407–1415. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2013.879312CrossRef

145.

He Z, Huang D, Yue G, Zhu J, Zhao P (2021) Ca2+ induced 3D porous MXene gel for continuous removal of phosphate and uranium. Appl Surf Sci 570(May):150804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150804CrossRef

146.

Wu J, Wang T, Wang J, Zhang Y, Pan WP (2021) A novel modified method for the efficient removal of Pb and Cd from wastewater by biochar: enhanced the ion exchange and precipitation capacity. Sci Total Environ 754:142150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142150CrossRef

147.

Zhao H, Song F, Su F, Shen Y, Li P (2021) Removal of cadmium from contaminated groundwater using a novel silicon/aluminum nanomaterial: an experimental study. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 80(1):234–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-020-00784-1CrossRef

148.

Hashem A, Nasr MF, Fletcher AJ, Mohamed LA (2021) Aminated acrylic fabric waste derived sorbent for Cd(II) ion removal from aqueous solutions: mechanism, equilibria and kinetics. J Polym Environ 29(1):175–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-020-01863-zCrossRef

149.

Zhu C, Luan Z, Wang Y, Shan X (2007) Removal of cadmium from aqueous solutions by adsorption on granular red mud (GRM). Sep Purif Technol 57(1):161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2007.03.013CrossRef

150.

S. Guiza, F. Brouers, and M. Bagane, “Environmental technology & innovation fluoride removal from aqueous solution by montmorillonite clay : kinetics and equilibrium modeling using new generalized fractal equation,” Environ. Technol. Innov., no. xxxx, p. 101187, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101187.

151.

Gai W-Z, Zhang S-H, Yang Y, Zhang X, Deng Z-Y (2021) Separation of excess fluoride from water using amorphous and crystalline AlOOH adsorbents. ACS Omega 6(25):16488–16497CrossRef

152.

Ahmadi S et al (2021) Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering Sono electro-chemical synthesis of LaFeO 3 nanoparticles for the removal of fluoride : optimization and modeling using RSM, ANN and GA tools. J Environ Chem Eng 9(4):105320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105320CrossRef

153.

Talat M, Mohan S, Dixit V, Singh DK, Hasan SH, Srivastava ON (2018) Effective removal of fluoride from water by coconut husk activated carbon in fixed bed column: Experimental and breakthrough curves analysis. Groundw Sustain Dev 7:48–55

154.

Uddin MK, Baig U (2019) Synthesis of Co3O4 nanoparticles and their performance towards methyl orange dye removal: characterisation, adsorption and response surface methodology. J Clean Prod 211:1141–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.232CrossRef

155.

Lv SW et al (2019) Simultaneous adsorption of methyl orange and methylene blue from aqueous solution using amino functionalized Zr-based MOFs. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 282(94):179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.03.017CrossRef

156.

Zhi Ma Y, Feng Zheng D, Ye Mo Z, Jing Dong R, Qing Qiu X (2018) Magnetic lignin-based carbon nanoparticles and the adsorption for removal of methyl orange. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng. Asp. 559(226):234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.09.054CrossRef

157.

Aydin H, Bulut Y, Yerlikaya Ç (2008) Removal of copper (II) from aqueous solution by adsorption onto low-cost adsorbents. J Environ Manage 87(1):37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.005CrossRef

158.

Sudha Rani K, Srinivas B, Gourunaidu K, Ramesh KV (2018) “Removal of copper by adsorption on treated laterite.” Mater Today Proc 5(1):463–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.106CrossRef

159.

A. G. Morozova et al., “Insights into sorption – mineralization mechanism for based on nanosized adsorption centers and its effect on aqueous Cu ( II ) removal,” 2022.

160.

Hong J et al (2022) Highly efficient removal of trace lead (II) from wastewater by 1,4-dicarboxybenzene modified Fe/Co metal organic nanosheets. J Mater Sci Technol 98:212–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2021.05.021CrossRef

161.

Goel J, Kadirvelu K, Rajagopal C, Garg VK (2005) Removal of lead (II) by adsorption using treated granular activated carbon: batch and column studies. J Hazard Mater 125(1–3):211–220CrossRef

162.

Cataldo S, Lazzara G, Massaro M, Muratore N, Pettignano A, Riela S (2018) Functionalized halloysite nanotubes for enhanced removal of lead(II) ions from aqueous solutions. Appl Clay Sci 156(January):87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2018.01.028CrossRef

163.

Shi Z et al (2018) Magnetic metal organic frameworks (MOFs) composite for removal of lead and malachite green in wastewater. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp 539(2010):382–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.12.043CrossRef

164.

Khanniri E, Yousefi M, Mortazavian AM, Khorshidian N, Sohrabvandi S, Arab M, Koushki MR (2021) Effective removal of lead (II) using chitosan and microbial adsorbents: Response surface methodology (RSM). Int J Biol Macromol 178:53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.02.065CrossRef

165.

Alkherraz AM, Ali AK, Elsherif KM (2020) Removal of Pb (II), Zn (II), Cu (II) and Cd (II) from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto olive branches activated carbon: equilibrium and thermodynamic studies. Chem Int 6(1):11–20

166.

Ramos RL, Jacome LAB, Barron JM, Rubio LF, Coronado RMG (2002) Adsorption of zinc ( II ) from an aqueous solution onto activated carbon. J Hazard Mater B90:27–38CrossRef

167.

Mustapha S et al (2019) Adsorption isotherm, kinetic and thermodynamic studies for the removal of Pb(II), Cd(II), Zn(II) and Cu(II) ions from aqueous solutions using Albizia lebbeck pods. Appl Water Sci 9(6):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1021-xCrossRef

168.

Almeida CAP, Debacher NA, Downs AJ, Cottet L, Mello CAD (2009) Removal of methylene blue from colored effluents by adsorption on montmorillonite clay. J Colloid Interface Sci 332(1):46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2008.12.012CrossRef

169.

Ghosh I, Kar S, Chatterjee T, Bar N, Das SK (2021) Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution using Lathyrus sativus husk: adsorption study, MPR and ANN modelling. Process Saf Environ Prot 149:345–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.11.003CrossRef

170.

Farghali MA, Abo-Aly MM, Salaheldin TA (2021) Modified mesoporous zeolite-A/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite for dual removal of methylene blue and Pb2+ ions from wastewater. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 126(January):108487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2021.108487CrossRef

171.

Nazir R et al (2015) Accumulation of heavy metals (Ni, Cu, Cd, Cr, Pb, Zn, Fe) in the soil, water and plants and analysis of physico-chemical parameters of soil and water collected from Tanda Dam Kohat. J Pharm Sci Res 7(3):89–97MathSciNet

172.

Kayalvizhi K et al (2022) Adsorption of copper and nickel by using sawdust chitosan nanocomposite beads – a kinetic and thermodynamic study. Environ Res 203(May2021):111814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111814CrossRef

173.

Kandah MI, Meunier JL (2007) Removal of nickel ions from water by multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J Hazard Mater 146(1–2):283–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.12.019CrossRef

174.

Shah N, Sohani S, Thakkar S, Doshi H, Gupta G (2022) Potential of live Spirogyra sp. in the bioaccumulation of copper and nickel ions: a study on suitability and sustainability. J Appl Microbiol 132(1):331–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.15188CrossRef

175.

Elhafez SEA, Hamad HA, Zaatout AA, Malash GF (2017) Management of agricultural waste for removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution: adsorption behaviors, adsorption mechanisms, environmental protection, and techno-economic analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(2):1397–1415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7891-7CrossRef

176.

Vreysen S, Maes A, Wullaert H (2008) Removal of organotin compounds, Cu and Zn from shipyard wastewaters by adsorption - flocculation: a technical and economical analysis. Mar Pollut Bull 56(1):106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.09.044CrossRef

177.

Munawar MA et al (2021) Challenges and opportunities in biomass ash management and its utilization in novel applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 150(January):111451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111451CrossRef

178.

Kołodyńska D (2011) Chitosan as an effective low-cost sorbent of heavy metal complexes with the polyaspartic acid. Chem Eng J 173(2):520–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.08.025CrossRef

179.

Smital T et al (2011) Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety Assessment of toxicological profiles of the municipal wastewater effluents using chemical analyses and bioassays. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 74(4):844–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.11.010CrossRef

180.

Jiang W, Li Z, Jean J (2015) Research & reviews : Journal of Antibiotic tetracycline in the environments — a review. J Pharm Anal 4(3):86–111

181.

MejiasCarpio IE, Mangadlao JD, Nguyen HN, Advincula RC, Rodrigues DF (2014) “Graphene oxide functionalized with ethylenediamine triacetic acid for heavy metal adsorption and anti-microbial applications. Carbon N. Y. 77:289–301CrossRef

182.

Rasheed T, Bilal M, Nabeel F, Adeel M, Iqbal HMN (2019) “Environmentally-related contaminants of high concern: potential sources and analytical modalities for detection, quantification, and treatment. Environ Int 122(November2018):52–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.038CrossRef

183.

Rasheed T, Bilal M, Nabeel F, Adeel M, Iqbal HMN (2019) “Environmentally-related contaminants of high concern: potential sources and analytical modalities for detection, quantification, and treatment. Environ Int 122(September2018):52–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.03CrossRef

184.

A. Tripathi and M. Rawat Ranjan, “Heavy metal removal from wastewater using low cost adsorbents,” J. Bioremediation Biodegrad., vol. 06, no. 06, 2015 https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6199.1000315

185.

Pitarch E, Medina C, Portolés T, López FJ, Hernández F (2007) Determination of priority organic micro-pollutants in water by gas chromatography coupled to triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 583(2):246–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2006.10.012CrossRef

186.

Tomczyk A, Sokołowska Z, Boguta P (2020) Biochar physicochemical properties: pyrolysis temperature and feedstock kind effects. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 19(1):191–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-020-09523-3CrossRef

187.

Eloussaief M, Benzina M (2010) Efficiency of natural and acid-activated clays in the removal of Pb ( II ) from aqueous solutions. J Hazard Mater 178(1–3):753–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.02.004CrossRef

188.

M. T. Amin, A. A. Alazba, and U. Manzoor, “A review of removal of pollutants from water / wastewater using different types of nanomaterials,” vol. 2014, 2014.

189.

P. Taylor, Y. C. Sharma, V. Srivastava, V. K. Singh, S. N. Kaul, and C. H. Weng, “Nano ‐ adsorbents for the removal of metallic pollutants from water and wastewater,” no. July 2012, pp. 37–41, https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330902838080.

190.

I. Ali, “New Generation Adsorbents for Water Treatment,” 2012, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300133d.

191.

Bolzonella D, Papa M, Da Ros C, Muthukumar LA, Rosso D (2019) Critical Reviews in Biotechnology Winery wastewater treatment : a critical overview of advanced biological processes. Crit Rev Biotechnol 0(0):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2019.1573799CrossRef

192.

C. Sophia A. and E. C. Lima, “Removal of emerging contaminants from the environment by adsorption,” Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., vol. 150, no. December 2017, pp. 1–17, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.12.026.

193.

Ahammad TR, Gomes SZ, Sreekrishnan J (2008) Wastewater treatment forproductionofH2S-free biogas. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 83(May):1163–1169. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctbCrossRef

194.

Namasivayam C, Kanchana N, Yamuna RT (1993) Technical notes waste B a N a N a pith as adsorbent for the removal of R H O D a M I N E - B from a Q U E O U S solutions. Waste Manag 13:89–95CrossRef

195.

“scholar (2).” .

196.

Demirbas A (2009) Agricultural based activated carbons for the removal of dyes from aqueous solutions: a review. J Hazard Mater 167(1–3):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.12.114CrossRef

197.

Teixeira RA et al (2021) Preparation of hybrids of wood sawdust with 3-aminopropyl-triethoxysilane. Application as an adsorbent to remove Reactive Blue 4 dye from wastewater effluents. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 125:141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2021.06.007CrossRef

198.

Chojnacka K (2006) Biosorption of Cr(III) ions by wheat straw and grass: a systematic characteristics of new biosorbents. Polish J Environ Stud 15(6):845–852

199.

Bouaziz F, Koubaa M, Kallel F, Ghorbel RE, Chaabouni SE (2017) Adsorptive removal of malachite green from aqueous solutions by almond gum: kinetic study and equilibrium isotherms. Int J Biol Macromol 105:56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.06.106CrossRef

200.

Bouaziz F et al (2015) Efficiency of almond gum as a low-cost adsorbent for methylene blue dye removal from aqueous solutions. Ind Crops Prod 74:903–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.06.007CrossRef

201.

Hoseinzadeh E, Samarghandi MR, McKay G, Rahimi N, Jafari J (2014) Removal of acid dyes from aqueous solution using potato peel waste biomass: a kinetic and equilibrium study. Desalin Water Treat 52(25–27):4999–5006. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.810355CrossRef

202.

Pamula ASP, Hung YT, Paul HH (2020) Treatment of combined acid black 48 and coffee wastewater by low-cost adsorbents. Environ Res Eng Manag 76(3):47–61. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.76.3.25338CrossRef

203.

Mondal NK, Ghosh P, Sen K, Mondal A, Debnath P (2019) Efficacy of onion peel towards removal of nitrate from aqueous solution and field samples. Environ Nanotechnology Monit Manag. 11(March):100222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2019.100222CrossRef

204.

Luo X, Deng Z, Lin X, Zhang C (2011) Fixed-bed column study for Cu2+ removal from solution using expanding rice husk. J Hazard Mater 187(1–3):182–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.019CrossRef

205.

Sarma PJ, Kumar R, Pakshirajan K (2015) Batch and continuous removal of copper and lead from aqueous solution using cheaply available agricultural waste materials. Int J Environ Res 9(2):635–648

206.

Abbas MN, Abbas FS (2013) “Utilization of Iraqi rice husk in the removal of heavy metals from wastewater. Res J Environ Earth Sci. 5(7):370–380. https://doi.org/10.19026/rjees.5.5664CrossRef

207.

Sharma P, Kaur R, Baskar C, Chung WJ (2010) Removal of methylene blue from aqueous waste using rice husk and rice husk ash. Desalination 259(1–3):249–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.03.044CrossRef

208.

Rahman MA, Amin SMR, Alam AMS (2012) Removal of methylene blue from waste water using activated carbon prepared from rice husk. Dhaka Univ J Sci 60(2):185–189. https://doi.org/10.3329/dujs.v60i2.11491CrossRef

209.

Ponce J, da Silva Andrade GJ, Nunes dos Santos L, Bulla MK, Barros BCB, Favaro SL, Hioka N, Caetano W, Batistela VR (2021) Alkali pretreated sugarcane bagasse, rice husk and corn husk wastes as lignocellulosic biosorbents for dyes. Carbohydr Polym Technol Appl 2:100061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carpta.2021.100061

210.

El-Shafey EI (2010) Removal of Zn(II) and Hg(II) from aqueous solution on a carbonaceous sorbent chemically prepared from rice husk. J Hazard Mater 175(1–3):319–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.006CrossRef

211.

L. S. Rocha, C. B. Lopes, J. A. Borges, A. C. Duarte, and E. Pereira, “Valuation of unmodified rice husk waste as an eco-friendly sorbent to remove mercury: a study using environmental realistic concentrations,” Water. Air. Soil Pollut., vol. 224, no. 7, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-013-1599-9.

212.

Marshall Wayne E, Wartelle LH, Boler DE, Johns MM, Toles CA (1999) Enhanced metal adsorption by soybean hulls modified with citric acid.". Bioresource Technology 69(3):263–268CrossRef

213.

Malik PK (2003) Use of activated carbons prepared from sawdust and rice-husk for adsoprtion of acid dyes: a case study of acid yellow 36. Dye Pigment 56(3):239–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-7208(02)00159-6CrossRef

214.

Lataye DH, Mishra IM, Mall ID (2008) Pyridine sorption from aqueous solution by rice husk ash (RHA) and granular activated carbon (GAC): parametric, kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamic aspects. J Hazard Mater 154(1–3):858–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.111CrossRef

215.

Srivastava VC, Mall ID, Mishra IM (2009) Equilibrium modeling of ternary adsorption of metal ions onto rice husk ash. J Chem Eng Data 54(3):705–711. https://doi.org/10.1021/je8003029CrossRef

216.

Priya AK et al (2021) Investigation of mechanism of heavy metals (Cr6+, Pb2+& Zn2+) adsorption from aqueous medium using rice husk ash: kinetic and thermodynamic approach. Chemosphere 286(July):2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131796CrossRef

217.

Filipinas JQ, Rivera KKP, Ong DC, Pingul-Ong SMB, Abarca RRM, de Luna MDG (2021) Removal of sodium diclofenac from aqueous solutions by rice hull biochar. Biochar 3(2):189–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-020-00079-7CrossRef

218.

Nabieh KA, Mortada WI, Helmy TE, Kenawy IMM, AbouElReash YG (2021) “Chemically modified rice husk as an effective adsorbent for removal of palladium ions.” Heliyon 7(1):e06062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06062CrossRef

219.

G. Vidal and V. C. B. F. G. Go, “Characterization and recovery of phosphorus from wastewater by combined technologies,” vol. 1, pp. 389–418, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-020-09533-1

220.

Goh PS, Ismail AF (2018) A review on inorganic membranes for desalination and wastewater treatment. Desalination 434(April):60–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.07.023CrossRef

221.

D. Pooja, Sensors in water pollutants monitoring : role of material. .

222.

Ahmad M et al (2014) Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere 99:19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.071CrossRef

223.

Suriyanon N, Punyapalakul P, Ngamcharussrivichai C (2013) Mechanistic study of diclofenac and carbamazepine adsorption on functionalized silica-based porous materials. Chem Eng J 214:208–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.10.052CrossRef

224.

Mashayekh-Salehi A, Moussavi G (2016) Removal of acetaminophen from the contaminated water using adsorption onto carbon activated with NH4Cl. Desalin Water Treat 57(27):12861–12873. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1051588CrossRef

225.

Liu N, Charrua AB, Weng CH, Yuan X, Ding F (2015) Characterization of biochars derived from agriculture wastes and their adsorptive removal of atrazine from aqueous solution: a comparative study. Bioresour Technol 198:55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.129CrossRef

226.

Mandal A, Singh N (2017) Optimization of atrazine and imidacloprid removal from water using biochars: designing single or multi-staged batch adsorption systems. Int J Hyg Environ Health 220(3):637–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.02.010CrossRef

227.

Luo Z et al (2019) Current progress in treatment techniques of triclosan from wastewater: a review. Sci Total Environ 696:133990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133990CrossRef

228.

Wu Q, Lam JCW, Kwok KY, Tsui MMP, Lam PKS (2017) Occurrence and fate of endogenous steroid hormones, alkylphenol ethoxylates, bisphenol A and phthalates in municipal sewage treatment systems. J Environ Sci (China) 61:49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2017.02.021CrossRef

229.

Purceno AD, Teixeira APC, Souza AB, Ardisson JD, de Mesquita JP, Lago RM (2012) Ground vermiculite as catalyst for the Fenton reaction. Appl Clay Sci 69:87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2012.08.010CrossRef

230.

Tohidi A, Chaibakhsh N, Mohammadi A (2021) A novel functionalized chitosan nanoadsorbent for efficient elimination of malachite green from aqueous media. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 40(3):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13576CrossRef

231.

Rajapaksha AU et al (2014) Pyrolysis condition affected sulfamethazine sorption by tea waste biochars. Bioresour Technol 166:303–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.05.029CrossRef

232.

A. L. Cukierman, G. V. Nunell, and P. R. Bonelli, Removal of emerging pollutants from water through adsorption onto carbon-based materials. Elsevier Inc., 2019.

233.

H. Kaur, G. Hippargi, G. R. Pophali, and A. K. Bansiwal, Treatment methods for removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products from domestic wastewater. Elsevier Inc., 2019.

234.

Tsai YL et al (2016) Amitriptyline removal using palygorskite clay. Chemosphere 155:292–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.04.062CrossRef

235.

Ahmed MJ (2017) Adsorption of quinolone, tetracycline, and penicillin antibiotics from aqueous solution using activated carbons: review. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 50:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2017.01.004CrossRef

236.

Chen M, Ohman K, Metcalfe C, Ikonomou MG, Amatya PL, Wilson J (2006) Pharmaceuticals and endocrine disruptors in wastewater treatment effluents and in the water supply system of Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Water Qual Res J Canada 41(4):351–364. https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrj.2006.039CrossRef

237.

C. R. Ohoro, A. O. Adeniji, A. I. Okoh, and O. O. Okoh, “Distribution and chemical analysis of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in the environmental systems: a review,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 16, no. 17, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16173026.

238.

Haro NK, Del Vecchio P, Marcilio NR, Féris LA (2017) Removal of atenolol by adsorption – study of kinetics and equilibrium. J Clean Prod 154:214–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.217CrossRef

239.

Flores-Cano JV, Sánchez-Polo M, Messoud J, Velo-Gala I, Ocampo-Pérez R, Rivera-Utrilla J (2016) Overall adsorption rate of metronidazole, dimetridazole and diatrizoate on activated carbons prepared from coffee residues and almond shells. J Environ Manage 169:116–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.12.001CrossRef

240.

Salman JM (2014) Optimization of preparation conditions for activated carbon from palm oil fronds using response surface methodology on removal of pesticides from aqueous solution. Arab J Chem 7(1):101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.05.033CrossRef

241.

Islam MS, Tanaka M (2004) Impacts of pollution on coastal and marine ecosystems including coastal and marine fisheries and approach for management: a review and synthesis. Mar Pollut Bull 48(7–8):624–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2003.12.004CrossRef

242.

Mandal A, Singh N, Nain L (2017) “Agro-waste biosorbents effect of physico-chemical properties on atrazine and imidacloprid sorption. J Environ Sci Heal Part B Pestic Food Contam Agric Wastes 52(9):671–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2017.1331677CrossRef

243.

Van Nieuwenhove I, Renders T, Lauwaert J, De Roo T, De Clercq J, Verberckmoes A (2020) Biobased resins using lignin and glyoxal. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 8(51):18789–18809. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c07227CrossRef

244.

Song JY, Jhung SH (2017) Adsorption of pharmaceuticals and personal care products over metal-organic frameworks functionalized with hydroxyl groups: quantitative analyses of H-bonding in adsorption. Chem Eng J 322:366–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.04.036CrossRef

245.

Tagliavini M, Engel F, Weidler PG, Scherer T, Schäfer AI (2017) Adsorption of steroid micropollutants on polymer-based spherical activated carbon (PBSAC). J Hazard Mater 337:126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.03.036CrossRef

246.

Xu C, Chen H, Jiang F (2015) Adsorption of perflourooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) on polyaniline nanotubes. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp 479:60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.03.045CrossRef

Titel: Comparative analysis of conventional to biomass-derived adsorbent for wastewater treatment: a review
verfasst von: Zubair Hashmi
Abdul Sattar Jatoi
Saad Nadeem
Amna Anjum
Syed Mazhar Imam
Haroon Jangda
Publikationsdatum: 03.03.2022
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery / Ausgabe 1/2024
Print ISSN: 2190-6815
Elektronische ISSN: 2190-6823
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02443-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Graphical abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

Fractionation of Pinus radiata by ethanol-based organosolv process

Green extraction of pectin from Citrus limetta peels using organic acid and its characterization

Effect of hot water extraction process on schizophyllan from split gill mushroom

Non-catalyzed formic acid-based process for preparing thermally stable spherical cellulose nanocrystals from mango seed husk

Pyrolysis of lignin (De–alkaline) via TG/DSC–FTIR and TG–MS: pyrolysis characteristics, thermo-kinetics, and gas products

Efficient removal of Cu(II) from aqueous solution using pyrolyzed oyster shells by Taguchi method