nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

6. Comparing Mobilisation Strategies and Outcomes

verfasst von : Natasha Wunsch

Erschienen in: EU Enlargement and Civil Society in the Western Balkans

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This chapter provides a comparative discussion of the empirical findings regarding civil society mobilisation around rule of law issues in Croatia, Montenegro, and Serbia. It suggests that top-down approaches focusing exclusively on the impact of EU civil society support tend to overlook important dynamics that influence both the shape and effectiveness of civil society engagement. Instead, strategic mobilisation and deliberate choices by civil society organisations are key to the process of differential empowerment. Besides, transnational learning between civil society actors from different enlargement rounds crucially informed the timing of mobilisation and the development of specific mobilisation formats. Despite formal gains in terms of access and some influence on policy outcomes, an overreliance upon EU leverage and a lack of responsiveness at the domestic level limit the effective and sustainable empowerment of civil society actors as an outcome of the EU accession process.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Civil Society Mobilisation in Serbia

Nächstes Kapitel Conclusion: Civil Society Empowerment and Its Limits

Adam, Frane. 2008. “Civil Society Organisation in a Knowledgebased Society.” In Opening EU Governance to Civil Society: Gains and Challenges, CONNEX Report Series No. 5, edited by Beate Kohler-Koch and D. Maloney W. de Bièvre, 307–23.

Baumgartner, Frank R. 2007. “EU Lobbying: A View from the US.” Journal of European Public Policy 14 (3): 482–88.

Betsill, Michele M., and Elizabeth Corell. 2001. “NGO Influence in International Environmental Negotiations: A Framework for Analysis.” Global Environmental Politics 1 (4): 65–85.

Bežovan, Gojko, Siniša Zrinščak, and Marina Vugec. 2005. Civil Society in Croatia: Gaining Trust and Establishing Partnerships with the State and other Stakeholders. Zagreb: CIVICUS.

Bièvre, Dirk de. 2008. “Assessing Interest Group Politics in EU Governance.” In Opening EU Governance to Civil Society: Gains and Challenges, CONNEX Report Series No. 5, edited by Beate Kohler-Koch and D. Maloney W. de Bièvre, 1–8.

Böhmelt, Tobias, and Tina Freyburg. 2013. “The Temporal Dimension of the Credibility of EU Conditionality and Candidate States’ Compliance with the Acquis Communautaire, 1998–2009.” European Union Politics 14 (2): 250–72.

Bojičić-Dželilović, Vesna, James Ker-Lindsay, and Denisa Kostovicova. 2013. Civil Society and Transitions in the Western Balkans. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Börzel, Tanja A. 2010. “Why You Don’t Always Get What You Want: EU Enlargement and Civil Society in Central and Eastern Europe.” Acta Politica 45 (1): 1–10.

Chandler, David. 2004. “Democratization in Bosnia: The Limits of Civil Society Building Strategies.” In Civil society in Democratization, edited by Peter J. Burnell and Peter Calvert, 225–49. London: Cass.

Dür, Andreas, and Dirk de Bièvre. 2007. “Inclusion Without Influence? NGOs in European Trade Policy.” Journal of Public Policy 27 (1): 79–101.

Eising, Rainer. 2007. “Interest Groups and Social Movements.” In Europeanization: New Research Agendas, edited by Paolo R. Graziano and Maarten P. Vink, 167–81. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Elbasani, Arolda. 2013. “Europeanization Travels to the Western Balkans: Enlargement Strategy, Domestic Obstacles and Diverging Reforms.” In European Integration and Transformation in the Western Balkans: Europeanization or Business as Usual? edited by Arolda Elbasani, 3–21. New York: Routledge.

Epstein, Rachel A., and Ulrich Sedelmeier. 2008. “Beyond Conditionality: International Institutions in Postcommunist Europe After Enlargement.” Journal of European Public Policy 15 (6): 795–805.

Fagan, Adam. 2010a. Europe’s Balkan Dilemma: Paths to Civil Society or State-Building? London: I.B. Tauris.

Fagan, Adam. 2010b. “The New Kids on the Block—Building Environmental Governance in the Western Balkans.” Acta Politica 45 (1/2): 203–28.

Hahn-Fuhr, Irene, and Susanne Worschesch. 2014. “External Democracy Promotion and Divided Civil Society—The Missing Link.” In Civil Society and Democracy Promotion, edited by Timm Beichelt, Irene Hahn-Fuhr, Frank Schimmelfennig, and Susanne Worschesch, 11–41. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hann, Chris. 2004. “In the Church of Civil Society.” In Exploring Civil Society: Political and Cultural Contexts, edited by Marlies Glasius, David Lewis, and Hakan Seckinelgin, 44–50. London: Routledge.

Hughes, James, Gwendolyn Sasse, and Claire E. Gordon. 2005. Europeanization and Regionalization in the EU’s Enlargement to Central and Eastern Europe: The Myth of Conditionality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kelley, Judith. 2004. “International Actors on the Domestic Scene: Membership Conditionality and Socialization by International Institutions.” International Organization 58 (3): 425–57.

Ker-Lindsay, James. 2013. “Conclusion.” In Civil Society and Transitions in the Western Balkans, edited by Vesna Bojičić-Dželilović, James Ker-Lindsay, and Denisa Kostovicova, 257–64. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kohler-Koch, Beate. 1997. “Organized Interests in the EC and the European Parliament.” European Integration online Papers 1 (9).

Langbein, Julia. 2010. “Differential Empowerment for Institutional Change: The EU’s Impact on State and Non-State Actors in Eastern Europe.” In Civil Society in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Sabine Fischer and Heiko Pleines, 103–16. Stuttgart: ibidem-Verlag.

Maloney, William. 2008. “Social Capital as Catalyst of Civic Engagement and Quality of Governance.” In Opening EU Governance to Civil Society: Gains and Challenges, CONNEX Report Series No. 5, edited by Beate Kohler-Koch and D. Maloney W. de Bièvre, 19–24.

Mazey, Sonia, and Jeremy Richardson. 2015. “Shooting Where the Ducks Are: EU Lobbying and Institutionalized Promiscuity.” In European Union: Power and Policy-Making, edited by Jeremy Richardson and Sonia Mazey, 419–43. Abingdon: Routledge.

O’Brennan, John. 2013. “The European Commission, Enlargement Policy and Civil Society in the Western Balkans.” In Civil Society and Transitions in the Western Balkans, edited by Vesna Bojičić-Dželilović, James Ker-Lindsay, and Denisa Kostovicova, 29–46. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

O’Dwyer, Conor. 2010. “From Conditionality to Persuasion? Europeanization and the Rights of Sexual Minorities in Post-Accession Poland.” Journal of European Integration 32 (3): 229–47.

Parau, Cristina Elena. 2010. “East Side Story: How Transnational Coalitions Contested EU Conditionality.” Europe-Asia Studies 62 (9): 1527–54.

Pralle, Sarah B. 2003. “Venue Shopping, Political Strategy, and Policy Change: The Internationalization of Canadian Forest Advocacy.” Journal of Public Policy 23 (3): 233–60.

Steunenberg, Bernard, and Antoaneta L. Dimitrova. 2007. “Compliance in the EU Enlargement Process: The Limits of Conditionality.” European Integration online Papers 11 (5).

Stojanović, Maja. 2012. “Country Report: Serbia.” Paper Prepared for ECAS Conference, 26–28 September 2012, Zadar.

Sudbery, Imogen. 2010. “The European Union as Political Resource: NGOs as Change Agents?” Acta Politica 45 (1): 136–57.

Vidačak, Igor. 2011. “Impact of Europeanization on Interest Groups Access and Representation in the Policy Making Process in Croatia.” Etudes européennes. La revue perm@nente des professionnels de l’Europe. 9 December.

Vidačak, Igor, and Marina Škrabalo. 2014. “Exploring the Effects of Europeanization on the Openness of Public Administration in Croatia.” Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 14 (1): 149–87.

Wunsch, Natasha. 2016. “Coming Full Circle? Differential Empowerment in Croatia’s EU Accession Process.” Journal of European Public Policy 23 (7): 1199–217.

Wunsch, Natasha. 2018. “Transnational Learning and Civil Society Empowerment in the EU Enlargement Process.” Journal of Common Market Studies.

Titel: Comparing Mobilisation Strategies and Outcomes
verfasst von: Natasha Wunsch
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: EU Enlargement and Civil Society in the Western Balkans
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91844-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-91845-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91845-7_6