Skip to main content

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

7. Conclusion: Civil Society Empowerment and Its Limits

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter summarises the strategies and outcomes of civil society mobilisation related to the rule of law in Croatia, Montenegro, and Serbia. It claims that the EU accession process provides opportunities for civil society actors to mobilize strategically and to strengthen their positions at the domestic level. However, structural obstacles and a lack of government officials’ receptiveness poses serious limitations to empowerment. To overcome these limits, the chapter puts forward practical recommendations as to how the EU and other international donors could shift from instrumental towards strategic, long-term support for civil society actors in enlargement countries. For civil society actors themselves, it suggests that lasting empowerment hinges upon their ability to develop sustainable mobilisation formats and find constructive ways of engaging at the domestic level.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bennett, A. 2013. “Causal Mechanisms and Typological Theories in the Study of Civil Conflict.” In Transnational Dynamics of Civil War, edited by J. T. Checkel, 205–30. New York: Cambridge University Press. Bennett, A. 2013. “Causal Mechanisms and Typological Theories in the Study of Civil Conflict.” In Transnational Dynamics of Civil War, edited by J. T. Checkel, 205–30. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Bennett, A., and J. T. Checkel. 2015. “Process-Tracing: From Philosophical Roots to Best Practices.” In Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, edited by A. Bennett and J. T. Checkel, 3–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bennett, A., and J. T. Checkel. 2015. “Process-Tracing: From Philosophical Roots to Best Practices.” In Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, edited by A. Bennett and J. T. Checkel, 3–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Beyers, Jan, and Bart Kerremans. 2012. Domestic Embeddedness and the Dynamics of Multilevel Venue Shopping in Four EU Member States. Governance 25 (2): 263–290. Beyers, Jan, and Bart Kerremans. 2012. Domestic Embeddedness and the Dynamics of Multilevel Venue Shopping in Four EU Member States. Governance 25 (2): 263–290.
Zurück zum Zitat Bomberg, Elizabeth. 2007. “Policy Learning in an Enlarged European Union: Environmental NGOs and New Policy Instruments.” Journal of European Public Policy 14 (2): 248–68. Bomberg, Elizabeth. 2007. “Policy Learning in an Enlarged European Union: Environmental NGOs and New Policy Instruments.” Journal of European Public Policy 14 (2): 248–68.
Zurück zum Zitat Börzel, Tanja A. 2010. “Why You Don’t Always Get What You Want: EU Enlargement and Civil Society in Central and Eastern Europe.” Acta politica 45 (1): 1–10. Börzel, Tanja A. 2010. “Why You Don’t Always Get What You Want: EU Enlargement and Civil Society in Central and Eastern Europe.” Acta politica 45 (1): 1–10.
Zurück zum Zitat Börzel, Tanja A., and Aron Buzogany. 2010. “Governing EU Accession in Transition Countries: The Role of Non-State Actors.” Acta politica 45 (1/2): 158–82. Börzel, Tanja A., and Aron Buzogany. 2010. “Governing EU Accession in Transition Countries: The Role of Non-State Actors.” Acta politica 45 (1/2): 158–82.
Zurück zum Zitat Börzel, Tanja A., and Frank Schimmelfennig. 2017. “Coming Together or Drifting Apart? The EU’s Political Integration Capacity in Eastern Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy 24 (2): 278–96. Börzel, Tanja A., and Frank Schimmelfennig. 2017. “Coming Together or Drifting Apart? The EU’s Political Integration Capacity in Eastern Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy 24 (2): 278–96.
Zurück zum Zitat Börzel, Tanja A., and Thomas Risse. 2003. “Conceptualizing the Domestic Impact of Europe.” In The Politics of Europeanization, edited by Kevin Featherstone and Claudio M. Radaelli, 57–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Börzel, Tanja A., and Thomas Risse. 2003. “Conceptualizing the Domestic Impact of Europe.” In The Politics of Europeanization, edited by Kevin Featherstone and Claudio M. Radaelli, 57–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Börzel, Tanja A., and Thomas Risse. 2012. “When Europeanisation Meets Diffusion: Exploring New Territory.” West European Politics 35 (1): 192–207. Börzel, Tanja A., and Thomas Risse. 2012. “When Europeanisation Meets Diffusion: Exploring New Territory.” West European Politics 35 (1): 192–207.
Zurück zum Zitat Büthe, T. 2002. “Taking Temporality Seriously: Modeling History and the Use of Narratives as Evidence.” American Political Science Review 96: 481–93. Büthe, T. 2002. “Taking Temporality Seriously: Modeling History and the Use of Narratives as Evidence.” American Political Science Review 96: 481–93.
Zurück zum Zitat Closa, Carlos, and Dimitry Kochenov. 2016. Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Closa, Carlos, and Dimitry Kochenov. 2016. Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Cowles, Maria Green, and Thomas Risse. 2001. “Transforming Europe: Conclusions.” In Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change, edited by Maria G. Cowles, James A. Caporaso, and Thomas Risse, 217–37. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Cowles, Maria Green, and Thomas Risse. 2001. “Transforming Europe: Conclusions.” In Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change, edited by Maria G. Cowles, James A. Caporaso, and Thomas Risse, 217–37. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Della Porta, Donatella, and Manuela Caiani. 2009. Social Movements and Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Della Porta, Donatella, and Manuela Caiani. 2009. Social Movements and Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Dimitrova, Antoaneta L., and Aron Buzogany. 2014. “Post-Accession Policy-Making in Bulgaria and Romania: Can Non-State Actors Use EU Rules to Promote Better Governance?” Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (1): 139–56. Dimitrova, Antoaneta L., and Aron Buzogany. 2014. “Post-Accession Policy-Making in Bulgaria and Romania: Can Non-State Actors Use EU Rules to Promote Better Governance?” Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (1): 139–56.
Zurück zum Zitat Dür, Andreas, and Gemma Matteo. 2012. “Who Lobbies the European Union? National Interest Groups in a Multilevel Polity.” Journal of European Public Policy 19 (7): 969–87. Dür, Andreas, and Gemma Matteo. 2012. “Who Lobbies the European Union? National Interest Groups in a Multilevel Polity.” Journal of European Public Policy 19 (7): 969–87.
Zurück zum Zitat Elbasani, Arolda. 2013. “Europeanization Travels to the Western Balkans: Enlargement Strategy, Domestic Obstacles and Diverging Reforms.” In European Integration and Transformation in the Western Balkans: Europeanization or Business as Usual? edited by Arolda Elbasani, 3–21. New York: Routledge. Elbasani, Arolda. 2013. “Europeanization Travels to the Western Balkans: Enlargement Strategy, Domestic Obstacles and Diverging Reforms.” In European Integration and Transformation in the Western Balkans: Europeanization or Business as Usual? edited by Arolda Elbasani, 3–21. New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein, Rachel A., and Ulrich Sedelmeier. 2008. “Beyond Conditionality: International Institutions in Postcommunist Europe After Enlargement.” Journal of European Public Policy 15 (6): 795–805. Epstein, Rachel A., and Ulrich Sedelmeier. 2008. “Beyond Conditionality: International Institutions in Postcommunist Europe After Enlargement.” Journal of European Public Policy 15 (6): 795–805.
Zurück zum Zitat Fagan, Adam. 2004. Environment and Democracy in the Czech Republic: The Environmental Movement in the Transition Process. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Fagan, Adam. 2004. Environment and Democracy in the Czech Republic: The Environmental Movement in the Transition Process. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Zurück zum Zitat Fagan, Adam. 2010. Europe’s Balkan Dilemma: Paths to Civil Society or State-Building? London: I.B. Tauris. Fagan, Adam. 2010. Europe’s Balkan Dilemma: Paths to Civil Society or State-Building? London: I.B. Tauris.
Zurück zum Zitat Fontana, Marie-Christine. 2011. “Europeanization and Domestic Policy Concertation: How Actors Use Europe to Modify Domestic Patterns of Policy-Making.” Journal of European Public Policy 18 (5): 654–71. Fontana, Marie-Christine. 2011. “Europeanization and Domestic Policy Concertation: How Actors Use Europe to Modify Domestic Patterns of Policy-Making.” Journal of European Public Policy 18 (5): 654–71.
Zurück zum Zitat Grabbe, Heather. 2006. The EU’s Transformative Power: Europeanization Through Conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Grabbe, Heather. 2006. The EU’s Transformative Power: Europeanization Through Conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Imig, Doug, and Sidney Tarrow. 2000. “Political Contention in a Europeanising Polity.” West European Politics 23 (4): 73–93. Imig, Doug, and Sidney Tarrow. 2000. “Political Contention in a Europeanising Polity.” West European Politics 23 (4): 73–93.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Michael Blauberger. 2017. “Introducing the Debate: European Union Safeguards Against Member States’ Democratic Backsliding.” Journal of European Public Policy 24 (3): 317–20. Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Michael Blauberger. 2017. “Introducing the Debate: European Union Safeguards Against Member States’ Democratic Backsliding.” Journal of European Public Policy 24 (3): 317–20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ketola, Markus. 2013. Europeanization and Civil Society: Turkish NGOs as Instruments of Change? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Ketola, Markus. 2013. Europeanization and Civil Society: Turkish NGOs as Instruments of Change? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Klüver, Heike. 2012. “Biasing Politics? Interest Group Participation in EU Policy-Making.” West European Politics 35 (5): 1114–33. Klüver, Heike. 2012. “Biasing Politics? Interest Group Participation in EU Policy-Making.” West European Politics 35 (5): 1114–33.
Zurück zum Zitat Kochenov, Dimitry, Amichai Magen, and Laurent Pech. 2016. “Introduction: The Great Rule of Law Debate in the EU.” Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (5): 1045–49. Kochenov, Dimitry, Amichai Magen, and Laurent Pech. 2016. “Introduction: The Great Rule of Law Debate in the EU.” Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (5): 1045–49.
Zurück zum Zitat McAdam Doug, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. 2008. Methods for Measuring Mechanisms of Contention. Qualitative Sociology 31 (4): 307–331. McAdam Doug, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. 2008. Methods for Measuring Mechanisms of Contention. Qualitative Sociology 31 (4): 307–331.
Zurück zum Zitat McAdam, Doug, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. 2009. “Comparative Perspectives on Contentious Politics.” In Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, edited by Mark I. Lichbach and Alan S. Zuckerman, 260–90. New York: Cambridge University Press. McAdam, Doug, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. 2009. “Comparative Perspectives on Contentious Politics.” In Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, edited by Mark I. Lichbach and Alan S. Zuckerman, 260–90. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat McAdam, Doug, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of contention. New York: Cambridge University Press. McAdam, Doug, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Mische, Anne. 2003. “Interventions: Dynamics of Contention: Conversation with Charles Tilly about his Recently Published Book, Dynamics of Contention, Co-authored with Doug McAdam and Sidney Tarrow.” Social Movement Studies 2 (1): 85–96. Mische, Anne. 2003. “Interventions: Dynamics of Contention: Conversation with Charles Tilly about his Recently Published Book, Dynamics of Contention, Co-authored with Doug McAdam and Sidney Tarrow.” Social Movement Studies 2 (1): 85–96.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Brennan, John. 2013. “The European Commission, Enlargement Policy and Civil Society in the Western Balkans.” In Civil Society and Transitions in the Western Balkans, edited by Vesna Bojičić-Dželilović, James Ker-Lindsay, and Denisa Kostovicova, 29–46. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. O’Brennan, John. 2013. “The European Commission, Enlargement Policy and Civil Society in the Western Balkans.” In Civil Society and Transitions in the Western Balkans, edited by Vesna Bojičić-Dželilović, James Ker-Lindsay, and Denisa Kostovicova, 29–46. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Dwyer, Conor. 2012. “Does the EU Help or Hinder Gay-Rights Movements in Post-Communist Europe? The Case of Poland.” East European Politics 28 (4): 332–52. O’Dwyer, Conor. 2012. “Does the EU Help or Hinder Gay-Rights Movements in Post-Communist Europe? The Case of Poland.” East European Politics 28 (4): 332–52.
Zurück zum Zitat Parau, Cristina Elena. 2009. “Impaling Dracula: How EU Accession Empowered Civil Society in Romania.” West European Politics 32 (1): 119–41. Parau, Cristina Elena. 2009. “Impaling Dracula: How EU Accession Empowered Civil Society in Romania.” West European Politics 32 (1): 119–41.
Zurück zum Zitat Parau, Cristina Elena. 2010. “East Side Story: How Transnational Coalitions Contested EU Conditionality.” Europe-Asia Studies 62 (9): 1527–54. Parau, Cristina Elena. 2010. “East Side Story: How Transnational Coalitions Contested EU Conditionality.” Europe-Asia Studies 62 (9): 1527–54.
Zurück zum Zitat Radaelli, Claudio M., and Romain Pasquier. 2007. “Conceptual Issues.” In Europeanization: New Research Agendas, edited by Paolo R. Graziano and Maarten P. Vink, 35–45. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Radaelli, Claudio M., and Romain Pasquier. 2007. “Conceptual Issues.” In Europeanization: New Research Agendas, edited by Paolo R. Graziano and Maarten P. Vink, 35–45. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Raik, Kristi. 2006. “The Ambivalent Impact of Accession on Civil Society: The Case of Estonia.” In Das Erbe des Beitritts: Europäisierung in Mittel- und Osteuropa, edited by Amelie Kutter and Vera Trappmann, 317–38. Europäische Schriften. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Raik, Kristi. 2006. “The Ambivalent Impact of Accession on Civil Society: The Case of Estonia.” In Das Erbe des Beitritts: Europäisierung in Mittel- und Osteuropa, edited by Amelie Kutter and Vera Trappmann, 317–38. Europäische Schriften. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Zurück zum Zitat Schimmelfennig, Frank, and Ulrich Sedelmeier. 2005a. “Conclusions: The Impact of the EU on the Accession Countries.” In The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Frank Schimmelfennig and Ulrich Sedelmeier, 210–28. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Schimmelfennig, Frank, and Ulrich Sedelmeier. 2005a. “Conclusions: The Impact of the EU on the Accession Countries.” In The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Frank Schimmelfennig and Ulrich Sedelmeier, 210–28. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Schimmelfennig, Frank, and Ulrich Sedelmeier. 2005b. The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Schimmelfennig, Frank, and Ulrich Sedelmeier. 2005b. The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Sedelmeier, Ulrich. 2014. “Anchoring Democracy from Above? The European Union and Democratic Backsliding in Hungary and Romania after Accession.” Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (1): 105–21. Sedelmeier, Ulrich. 2014. “Anchoring Democracy from Above? The European Union and Democratic Backsliding in Hungary and Romania after Accession.” Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (1): 105–21.
Zurück zum Zitat Spendzharova, Aneta B., and Milada Anna Vachudova. 2012. “Catching Up? Consolidating Liberal Democracy in Bulgaria and Romania After EU Accession.” West European Politics 35 (1): 39–58. Spendzharova, Aneta B., and Milada Anna Vachudova. 2012. “Catching Up? Consolidating Liberal Democracy in Bulgaria and Romania After EU Accession.” West European Politics 35 (1): 39–58.
Zurück zum Zitat Sudbery, Imogen. 2010. “The European Union as Political Resource: NGOs as Change Agents?” Acta politica 45 (1): 136–57. Sudbery, Imogen. 2010. “The European Union as Political Resource: NGOs as Change Agents?” Acta politica 45 (1): 136–57.
Zurück zum Zitat Tarrow, S. 2011. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, 3rd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press. Tarrow, S. 2011. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, 3rd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, D. J., and S. A. Soule. 2012. “Social Movement Organizational Collaboration: Networks of Learning and the Diffusion of Protest Tactics, 1960–1995.” American Journal of Sociology 117 (6): 1674–722. Wang, D. J., and S. A. Soule. 2012. “Social Movement Organizational Collaboration: Networks of Learning and the Diffusion of Protest Tactics, 1960–1995.” American Journal of Sociology 117 (6): 1674–722.
Zurück zum Zitat Wunsch, Natasha. 2015. “Beyond Instrumentalisation: NGO Monitoring Coalitions in Croatia, Montenegro, and Serbia.” East European Politics 31 (4): 452–67. Wunsch, Natasha. 2015. “Beyond Instrumentalisation: NGO Monitoring Coalitions in Croatia, Montenegro, and Serbia.” East European Politics 31 (4): 452–67.
Metadaten
Titel
Conclusion: Civil Society Empowerment and Its Limits
verfasst von
Natasha Wunsch
Copyright-Jahr
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91845-7_7