Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
What Constitutes a Fair and Equitable Water Apportionment? Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Comparison of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Methods for Sandy Loam Soil with Different Land Uses

verfasst von : Aminul Islam, D. R. Mailapalli, Anuradha Behera

Erschienen in: Water Resources and Environmental Engineering I

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) is a quantitative measure of saturated soil properties and it is essential for designing irrigation, drainage and waste water systems, modelling studies for understanding and prediting rates of infiltration, runoff, erosion, seepage, upflux, solute transport and migration of pollutant to groundwater. However, the accuracy of Ks is highly dependent on the method used, soil and surface characteristics. The objective of the study was to compare Ks methods such as two in situ [Double ring infiltrometer (DRI), air entry permeameter (AEP)] and one pedotransfer function (PTF) based methods for four different land uses such as paddy field (PADF), mango field (MANF), cashew field (CASF) and playground (PLAG). The Ks obtained from the DRI, AEP and PTF methods were used to study the effect of the method and land use on Ks and suitability of a method for a land use. It was observed that the measured Ks data using AEP and DRI of different land uses follow a log-normal distribution. The mean Ks were significantly different for both measuring technique and the land use. The AEP resulted highest (2.64 mm/h) and PTF lowest (1.59 mm/h) values of Ks, respectively for all land uses, whereas the Ks was highest (2.47 mm/h) and lowest (1.75 mm/h) for the land uses CASF and PLAG, respectively. For all land uses, the mean Ks were highest for AEP followed by DRI, and PTF methods. The order of Ks obtained for the land uses were CASF (2.51 mm/h), MANF (1.87 mm/h), PADF (1.82 mm/h) and PLAG (1.71 mm/h). Spatial variability of Ks was observed for DRI method and the land use PLAG. The selection of best suitable method for a particular situation can be obtained by optimizing the interdependent parameters, including method to be used, accuracy in instrument and measurement methods, soil condition and the numbers of practical constraints of the investigation (e.g., cost, availability of manpower, time requirement, portability of estimate, simplicity in measuring technique, operating condition).

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Application of Foam and Sand as Dual Media Filter for Rooftop Rainwater Harvesting System
Nächstes Kapitel A Study on Assessment of Groundwater Quality at Certain Industrial Zones in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh
Literatur
1.
Reynolds, W.D.: Saturated hydraulic conductivity: Laboratory measurement. In: Carter, M.R. (ed.) Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, pp. 589–598 (1993)
2.
Shukla, M., Lal, R.: Transport of dissolve organic carbon through soil columns. Annual Meeting of ASA/SSSA Seattle, WA, p. 31 (2004)
3.
Prieksat, M.A., Kaspar, T.C., Ankeny, M.D.: Positional and temporal changes in pounded infiltration in corn field. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58, 181–184 (1994)CrossRef
4.
Lekamalage, W.B.: Characterization of surface soil hydraulic conductivity in sloping landscapes. Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in the Department of Soil Science University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, pp. 1–4 (2003)
5.
Lee, H.J.: Comparing the inverse parameter estimation approach with pedo-transfer function method for estimating soil hydraulic conductivity. Geosci. J. 9(3), 269–276 (2005)CrossRef
6.
Kechavarzi, C., Dawson, Q., Leeds-Harrison, P.B.: Physical properties of low-lying agricultural peat soils in England. Geoderma 154, 196–202 (2010)CrossRef
7.
Jarvis, N., Koestel, J., Messing, I., Moeys, J., Lindahl, A.: influence of soil, land use and climatic factors on the hydraulic conductivity of soil. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17, 5185–5195 (2013)CrossRef
8.
Holden, J., Burt, T.P.: Hydraulic conductivity in upland blanket peat. Measur. Var. Hydrological Process. 17, 1227–1237 (2003)CrossRef
9.
Rossiter, G.D., Jatten, G.V.: Effects of soil depth and saturated hydraulic conductivity spatial variation on runoff simulation by Limburg soil erosion model (LISEM). A Case Study in Faucon Catchment, France. Enschede, the Nederland’s (2011)
10.
Nielsen, D.R., Biggar, J.W., Erh, K.T.: Spatial variability of field-measured soil-water properties. Hilgardia 42, 215–259 (1973)CrossRef
11.
Darzi, A., Yari, A., Bagheri, H., Sabe, G., Yari, R.: Study of variation of saturated hydraulic conductivity with time. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 134, 479–484 (2008)CrossRef
12.
Bagarello, V., Provenzano, G., Sgroi, A.: Fitting particle size distribution models to data from burundian soils for the best procedure and other purposes. Biosys. Eng. 4, 435–441 (2009)CrossRef
13.
Dev, K.S., Shukla, K.M.: Variability of hydraulic conductivity due to multiple factors. Am. J. Environ. Sci. 8(5), 489–502 (2012)CrossRef
14.
Reynolds, D.W., Bowman, B.T., Brunke, R.R., Drury, C.F., Tan, C.S.: Comparison of tension infiltrometer, pressure infiltrometer, and soil core estimates of saturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64, 478–484 (2000)CrossRef
15.
Bagarello, B., Castellini, M., Di Prima, S., Giordano, G., Iovino, M.: Testing a simplified approach to determine field saturated soil hydraulic conductivity. Procedia Environ. Sci. 19, 599–608 (2013)CrossRef
16.
Klute, A.: Laboratory measurement of hydraulic conductivity of saturated soil. In: Black, C.A. (ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, pp. 210–221 (1965)
17.
Lee, M.D., Reynolds, D.W., Elrick, E.D., Clotheier, E.B.: A comparison of three field method for measuring saturated hydraulic conductivity. Can. J. Soil Sci. 65, 563–573 (1985)CrossRef
18.
Klute, A., Dirksen, C.: Hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity: laboratory methods. In: Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1—Physical and Mineralogical Methods, pp. 687–734 (1986)
19.
Grant, C.D., Groenevelt, P.H.: Weighting the differential water capacity to account for declining hydraulic conductivity in a drying coarse-textured soil. Soil Res. 53(4), 386–391 (2015)CrossRef
20.
Jačka, L., Pavlásek, J., Kuráž, V., Pech, P.: A comparison of three measuring methods for estimating the saturated hydraulic conductivity in the shallow subsurface layer of mountain podzols. Geoderma 219, 82–88 (2014)CrossRef
21.
Burgy, R.H., Luthin, J.N.: A test of the single and double ring type infiltrometers. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 37, 189–191 (1956)CrossRef
22.
Bagarello, V., Iovino, M., Lai, J.B.: Field and numerical tests of the two-ponding depth procedure for analysis of single-ring pressure infiltrometer data. Pedosphere 23(6), 779–789 (2013)CrossRef
23.
Elrick, D.E., Reynolds, W.D., Tan, K.A.: Hydraulic conductivity measurements in the unsaturated zone using improved well analyses. Groundw. Monit. Remediat. 9(3), 184–193 (1989)CrossRef
24.
Bouwer, H.: A double tube method for measuring hydraulic conductivity of soil in situ above a water table. In: Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, vol. 25, pp. 334–342 (1961)
25.
Perroux, K.M., White, I.: Designs for disc permeameters. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52, 1205–1215 (1988)CrossRef
26.
Bouwer, H.: Rapid field measurement of air entry value and hydraulic conductivity of soil as significant parameters in flow system analysis. Water Resour. Res. 2, 729–738 (1966)CrossRef
27.
Bagarello, V., Iovino, M., Elrick, D.: A simplified falling-head technique for rapid determination of field saturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68, 66–73 (2004)CrossRef
28.
Topp, G.C., Binns, M.N.: Field measurement of hydraulic conductivity with a modified air entry permeameter. Can. J. Soil Sci. 56, 139–147 (1976)CrossRef
29.
Mohanty, B.P., Kanwar, S.R., Everts, J.C.: Comparison of saturated hydraulic conductivity measurement methods for a glacial-till soil. soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58(3), 672–677 (1994)CrossRef
30.
Bodhinayake, W., Si, C.B.: Near-saturated surface soil hydraulic properties under different land uses in the St Denis National Wildlife Area, Saskatchewan, Canada. Hydrol. Process. 18, 2835–2850 (2004)CrossRef
31.
Fallico, C., Migliari, E., Troisi, S.: Comparison of three measurement methods of saturated hydraulic conductivity. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 3, 987–1019 (2006)CrossRef
32.
Bagarello, V., Sgroi, A.: Using the single-ring infiltrometer method to detect temporal changes in surface soil field saturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil Tillage Res. 76(1), 13–24 (2004)CrossRef
33.
Fodor, N., Sandor, R., Orfanus, T., Lichne, L., Rajkai, K.: Evaluation method dependency of measured saturated hydraulic conductivity. Geoderma 165, 60–68 (2011)CrossRef
34.
Ronayne, M.J., Houghton, T.B., Stednick, J.D.: Field characterization of hydraulic conductivity in a heterogeneous alpine glacial till. J. Hydrol. Eng. 458(459), 103–109 (2012)CrossRef
35.
Runbin, D.R., Fedler, B.C., Borrelli, J.: Comparison of methods to estimate saturated hydraulic conductivity in texas soils with grass. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 138(4), 322–327 (2012)CrossRef
36.
Bagarello, V., Baiamonte, G., Castellini, M., Di Prima, D., Iovino, M.: A comparison between the single ring pressure infiltrometer and simplified falling head techniques. Hydrol. Process. 28, 4843–4853 (2014)CrossRef
37.
Hall, D.G., Reeve, M.J., Thomasson, A.J., Wright, A.F.: Water Retention, Porosity and Density of Field Soils. Soil Survey of England and Wales. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, UK (1977)
38.
Campbell, G.S.: Soil Physics with Basic: Transport Models for Soil Plant Systems. Elsevier Science, New York (1985)
39.
Rawls, W.J., Gimenez, D., Grossman, R.: Use of soil texture, bulk density and slope of the water retention curve to predict saturated hydraulic conductivity. Am. Soc. Agric. Biol. Eng. 41(4), 983–988 (1998)CrossRef
40.
Smettem, K.R.J., Bristow, K.L.: Obtaining soil hydraulic properties for water balance and leaching models from survey data. 2. Hydraulic conductivity. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 50(7), 1259–1262 (1999)CrossRef
41.
Wösten, J.H.M., Pachepsky, Y.A., Rawls, W.J.: Pedotransfer functions: bridging the gap between available basic soil data and missing soil hydraulic characteristics. J. Hydrol. 251, 123–150 (2001)
42.
Wosten, J.H.M., Lilly, A., Nemes, A., Le Bas, C.: Development and use of a database of hydraulic properties of European soils. Geoderma 90, 169–185 (1999)CrossRef
43.
Schaap, M.G., Leij, F.J., Van Genuchten, M.T.: Rosetta: A computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions. J. Hydrol. 251, 163–176 (2001)CrossRef
44.
Wagner, B., Tarnawski, V.R., Hennings, V., Müller, U., Wessolek, G., Plagge, R.: Evaluation of pedo-transfer functions for unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity using an independent data set. Geoderma 102, 275–297 (2001)CrossRef
45.
Bouma, J.: Measuring the hydraulic conductivity of soil horizons with continuous macropores. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46, 438–441 (1983)CrossRef
46.
Nielsen, D.R., Wendroth, O.: Spatial and Temporal Statistics—Sampling Field Soils and Their Vegetation. Catena, Reiskirchen, Germany, p. 416 (2003)
47.
Bormann, H., Klaassen, K.: Seasonal and land use dependent variability of soil hydraulic and soil hydrological properties of two northern german soils. Geoderma 145, 295–302 (2008)CrossRef
48.
Hu, W., Shao, M., Wang, Q., She, D.: Effects of measurement method, scale, and landscape features on variability of saturated hydraulic conductivity. J. Hydrol. Eng. 18, 378–386 (2013)CrossRef
49.
Reynolds, W.D., Elrick, D.E., Young, E.G.: Ring or cylinder infiltrometers (vadose zone). In: Dane, J.H., Topp, G.C. (eds.) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 4: Physical Methods. Soil Science Society of America Journal Madison, pp. 818–843 (2002)
50.
Hu, W., Shao, M., Wang, Q., Fan, J., Horton, R.: Temporal changes of soil hydraulic properties under different land uses. Geoderma 149(3–4), 355–366 (2009)CrossRef
51.
Carter, M.R., Gregorich, E.G.: Soil Sampling and Methods of analysis. Canadian Society of Soil Science, Pinawa, Manitoba (2008)
52.
Rao, M.D., Raghuwanshi, N.S., Singh, R.: Development of a physically based 1d-infiltration model for irrigated soils. Agric. Water Manag. 85(1), 165–174 (2006)
53.
Nimmo, J.R., Schmidt, K.M., Perkins, K.S., Stock, J.D.: Rapid measurement of field-saturated hydraulic conductivity for areal characterization. Vadose Zone J. 8(1), 142–149 (2009)CrossRef
54.
Schaap, M.G.: Rosetta Version 1.0. U.S. Salinity Laboratory, ARS, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Riverside, CA. (1999)
55.
Alvarez-Acosta, C., Lascano, R.J., Stroosnijder, L.: Test of the Rosetta pedotransfer function for saturated hydraulic conductivity. Open J. Soil Sci. 2(3), 203–212 (2012)CrossRef
56.
Schaap, M.G., Van Genuchten, M.T.: A modified Mualem-Van Genuchten formulation. Vadose Zone J. 5, 27–34 (2006)CrossRef
57.
Aldabagh, A.S.Y., Beer, C.E.: Field measurement of hydraulic conductivity above a water table with air-entry permeameter. Am. Soc. Agric. Biol. Eng. 14(1), 29–31 (1971)
58.
Nemati, M.R., Caron, J., Banton, O., Tardif, P.: Determining air entry value in peat substrates. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66(2), 367–373 (2002)CrossRef
59.
Van Den Berg, J.A., Louters, T.: The variability of soil moisture diffusivity of loamy to silty soils on marl, determined by the hot air method. J. Hydrol. 97(3), 235–250 (1988)CrossRef
60.
Chapuis, R.P.: Predicting the saturated hydraulic conductivity of sand and gravel using effective diameter and void ratio. Can. Geotech. J. 41(5), 787–795 (2004)CrossRef
61.
Park, E., Smucker, A.: Saturated hydraulic conductivity and porosity within macro aggregates modified by tillage. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 69(1), 38–45 (2005)CrossRef
62.
Zhou, X., Lin, H.S., White, E.A.: Surface soil hydraulic properties in four soil series under different land uses and their temporal changes. CATENA 73(2), 18–188 (2008)CrossRef
63.
Matthews, G.P., Laudone, G.M., Gregory, A.S., Bird, N.R.A., Matthews, A.G., Whalley, W.R.: Measurement and simulation of the effect of compaction on the pore structure and saturated hydraulic conductivity of grassland and arable soil. Water Resour. Res. 10.1029/2009WR007720 (2010)
64.
Zhang, X.C., Norton, L.D.: Effect of exchangeable mg on saturated hydraulic conductivity disaggregation and clay dispersion of disturbed soils. J. Hydrol. 260(1–4), 194–205 (2002)CrossRef
65.
Lado, M., Paz, A., Ben-Hur, M.: Organic matter and aggregate size interactions in saturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68(1), 234–242 (2004)CrossRef
66.
Dusa, A.A.: Effect of bulk density on saturated hydraulic conductivity. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 5(1), 159–165 (2013)
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Methods for Sandy Loam Soil with Different Land Uses
verfasst von
Aminul Islam
D. R. Mailapalli
Anuradha Behera
Copyright-Jahr
2019
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Buch
Water Resources and Environmental Engineering I

Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2043-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-13-2044-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2019

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2044-6_10