Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

24. Conceptual Framework for Corporate Responsibility Management: A Critical Review of Sustainable Business Practice Based on a Case Study of a Leading Transnational Corporation

verfasst von : Prof. Dr. Linda O’Riordan, Prof. Dr. Piotr Zmuda

Erschienen in: New Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility

Verlag: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

As stakeholder expectations surrounding the role of business in society evolve, concepts of corporate responsibility (CR) and sustainable development (SD) become increasingly relevant. Significantly in this regard, a review of the latest literature suggests that the management tools for translating notions of sustainable responsible management into everyday business practice are limited. The instruments available inadequately provide feasible management solutions either because they are vague and under-developed, and accordingly lack comprehensiveness, or, in contrast, they are so overly complicated that management decision-makers view them as incomprehensible. The resulting lack of transparency for all stakeholders, but in particular for decision-makers facing the management challenge of identifying why and how to integrate CR and SD solutions into their business operations, is the “missing link” upon which this chapter focuses. It aims to address the identified lacunae by rigorously reviewing a recent conceptualisation (CR management framework) of corporate approaches to responsible stakeholder management. It applies problem-solving techniques both theoretically and empirically via qualitative evidence obtained in a case study of a leading transnational corporation’s CR activities. This study simultaneously tests the framework and, in doing so, critically examines the responsible activities of the company under investigation. The ensuing results highlight both the positive potential and eventual room for improvement in both the management framework and the company’s CR response.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel CSR Project: Cotton Made in Africa
Nächstes Kapitel CSR—A New Challenge for Universities? A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of German Universities
Fußnoten
1
In this case all life on this planet.
 
2
Although Corporate Social Responsibility is typically the most common label employed in Europe, in this chapter the word “social” has been deliberately omitted from this term in order to reflect the fact that not only social, but also ecological, moral, financial, and other key responsibilities are implied in this acronym of which “social” matters are merely one (albeit highly salient) component.
 
3
According to a recent study at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, the predominant focus on economic wealth worldwide has led to a web of corporate control in which 147 companies (who own inter-locking states of one another) together globally govern 40 % of the wealth in the network and 737 companies control 80 % of the total wealth created by business globally. To generate this data, three systems theorists utilised a database listing 37 million companies and investors worldwide and analysed all 43,060 transnational corporations and share ownerships linking them. They combine the mathematics long used to model natural systems with comprehensive corporate data to map ownership among the world's transnational corporations (TNCs). The resulting overview of the structure of global corporate control is being hailed as the first to go beyond ideology to empirically identify the world-wide network of corporate power (New Scientist 2014).
 
4
The primary research, which was completed between 2005 and 2010, focused on the pharmaceutical industry in the UK and Germany. It employed a range of research methods including the documentary analysis of 38 company websites and reports, a telephone survey of 46 companies, observation of the CR stakeholder management practices of 142 firms, and 18 in-depth interviews with senior managers from leading pharmaceutical companies (for further details see O’Riordan 2010).
 
5
Including a Board Member, Managing Director Johnson & Johnson Corporate Citizenship Trust & CSR Director EMEA.
 
8
Given the emphasis on the Johnson & Johnson Corporate Citizenship Trust as the object of analysis for this study, this investigation primarily focuses on the time period since the trust was established in 2007 to its strategic objective mandate in 2018. Nevertheless, it is relevant to note that the findings presented in this section have evolved within the context of the more general philanthropic activities which emerged 16 years ago that were pursued by Johnson & Johnson. Driven largely by broad-brush, universal principles of moral duty, these activities focused predominantly on corporate giving and an environmental programme which established the basis for a global strategic framework for corporate contributions that led to the adoption of the umbrella term “corporate citizenship” to convey all activities of this nature within the Johnson & Johnson family of companies.
 
9
This investigation primarily focuses on the time period since the trust was established in 2006 to its strategic objective mandate in 2018.
 
10
According to the Jonhnson & Johnson website, Robert Wood Johnson, a former chairman from 1932 to 1963 and a member of the Company’s founding family crafted the credo in 1943 just before Johnson & Johnson became a publicly traded company. This was long before the term “corporate social responsibility” became “popular”. The company considers this credo to comprise more than just a moral compass but rather a recipe for business success. They consider the fact that Johnson & Johnson is one of only a handful of companies that have flourished through more than a century of change to present the proof for this claim. For further details please refer to http://​www.​jnj.​com/​about-jnj/​jnj-credo#.
 
11
For further details please follow these links: http://​www.​jjcct.​org/​what-we-do/​ and the annual report which provides a financial overview http://​issuu.​com/​trust2013/​docs/​johnson-johnson-corporate-citizensh/​1?​e=​8440982/​2937331.
 
Literatur
Aguilar, F. J. (1967). Scanning the business environment. New York: Macmillan.
Andler, N. (2011). Tools for project management, workshops and consulting: A must-have compendium of essential tools and techniques. Erlangen: Publicis Publishing.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRef
Barney, J. B., & Hesterly, W. S. (2010). Strategic management and competitive advantage: Concepts and cases (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Berggren, E., & Bernshteyn, R. (2007). Organizational transparency drives company performance. Journal of Management Development, 26(5), 411–417.CrossRef
Biggs, D. (2010). Management consulting. A guide for students. Hampshire: Cengage.
Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Burchell, J., & Cook, J. (2006). It’s good to talk? Examining attitudes towards corporate social responsibility dialogue and engagement processes. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(2), 154–170.CrossRef
Campbell, D. J. (2000). Legitimacy theory or managerial reality construction? Corporate social disclosure in marks and spencer plc corporate reports, 1969–1997. Accounting Forum, 24(1), 80–100.CrossRef
Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2009). Business and society. Ethics and stakeholder management (7nd ed.). Mason: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2004). Business ethics, a European perspective: Managing corporate citizenship and sustaintability in the age of globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2007). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustaintability in the age of globalization (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustaintability in the age of globalization (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eisenführ, F., Weber, M., & Langer, T. (2010). Rational decision making. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–560.
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing.
Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(6), 301–325.CrossRef
Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrick, J., & Ferrell, L. (2013). Business ethics: Ethical decision-making and cases. Mason: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Fombrun, C. J., & Nevins, M. D. (2004). The advice business: Essential tools and models for management consulting (pp. 75–240). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield: Pitman Publishing.
Freeman, R. E., Martin, K., & Parmar B. (2007). Stakeholder capitalism. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 303–314.CrossRef
Friedman, M. (13 Sept 1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine.
Gray, R. H., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77.CrossRef
Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391–430.CrossRef
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.CrossRef
Hardin, G. (1994). The tragedy of the unmanaged commons. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9(5), 199.CrossRef
Holland, D., & Albrecht, C. (2013). The worldwide academic field of business ethics: Scholars’ perceptions of the most important issue. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(4), 777–788.CrossRef
Homann, K., & Lütge, C. (2005). Einführung in die Wirtschaftsethik [Introduction to business ethics]. Muenster: Lit-Verlag.
Hungenberg, H. (2010). Problemlösung und Kommunikation: Vorgehensweisen und Techniken [Problem solving and communication: Procedures and techniques] (3rd ed.). Munich: Oldenbourg.CrossRef
Interview. (2014). Face-to-face interview based on a structured questionnaire held with the two authors and two senior executives from the Johnson & Johnson Corporate Citizenship Trust at the Dorint Neuss Kongresshotel, Selikumerstrasse 25, Neuss, 41460, Germany on 22 Jan 2014.
ISO. (2010). Guidance on social responsibility. International Standard ISO/DIS 26000. Geneva: International Organization for Standardisation.
Jonker, J. (2012a). New business models. An exploratory study of changing transactions creating multiple value(s). Nijmegen: Nijmegen School of Management.
Jonker, J. (2012b). Sustainable thinking acting 2011–2035: An inspirational book for shaping our common future. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer.
Jonker, J., Stark, W., & Tewes, S. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility und nachhaltige Entwicklung: Einführung, Strategie und Glossar [Corporate social responsibility and sustainable development: Introduction, strategy and glossary]. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
Jonker, J., O’Riordan, L., & Marsh, N. (11–13 Sept 2013). Organising as the art of balancing values: Enabling the realisation of multiple and shared values through a generation of new business models. Paper presented at the Corporate Responsibility Research Conference, University of Graz (Austria).
Küpper, H. U. (2011). Unternehmensethik: Hintergründe, Konzepte und Anwendungsbereiche [Business ethics: Background, concepts and applications]. Stuttgart: Schaeffer-Poeschel.
Laux, H., Gillenkirch, R. M., & Schenk-Mathes, H. Y. (2012). Entscheidungstheorie [Decision making theory] (8th ed). Wiesbaden: Springer-Gabler.CrossRef
Lindblom, C. K. (1994). The implications of organisational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. Paper presented at the Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, New York, NY.
Lindgreen, A, & Swaen, V. (2010). Corporate social responsibility [Special issue]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 1–7.CrossRef
Lindgreen, A., Swaen, V., & Johnston, W. J. (2009). Corporate social responsibility: An empirical investigation of U.S. organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 303–323.CrossRef
May, S., Cheney, G, & Roper J. (2007). The debate over corporate responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. New York: North Point Press.
Minto, B. (2009). The pyramid principle: Logic in writing and thinking (3rd ed.). Harlow: Pearson.
O’Riordan, L., & Fairbrass, J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Models and theories in stakeholder dialogue. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 745–758.CrossRef
O’Riordan, L., & Fairbrass, J. (2013). Managing stakeholder engagement: A new conceptual framework. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1913-x.
Pies, I., Hielscher, S., & Beckmann, M. (2009). Moral committments and the societal role of business: An ordonomic approach to corporate citizenship. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(3), 375–401.CrossRef
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.
Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011). Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.
Rasiel, E. M., & Friga, P. N. (2001). The McKinsey mind: Understanding and implementing the problem-solving tools and management techniques oft he world’s top strategic consulting firm. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Robson, C. (2004). Real world research (2nd ed.). Madden: Blackwell.
Schreyögg, G., & Werder, A. (2004). Handwörterbuch Unternehmensführung und Organisation [Handbook dictionary of business management and organisation]. Stuttgart: Schaeffer-Poechel.
Schwalbach, J. (2000). Image, Reputation, und Unternehmenswert [Image, reputation, and company value]. In: B. Baerns (Ed.), Information und Kommunikation in Europa. Forschung und Praxis. [Transnational communication in Europe. research and practice] (pp. 287–297). Berlin: Vistas. http://​www.​econbiz.​de/​archiv/​b/​hub/​management/​imge.​pdf. Accessed 22 Jan 2014.
Schwartz, M. S., & Carroll, A. B (2008). Integrating and unifying competing and complementary frameworks: The search for a common core in the business and society field. Business & Society, 47(2), 148–186.CrossRef
Stark, A. (1993). What’s the matter with business ethics? Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 38–48.
Ulrich, P., & Fluri, E. (1995). Management: Eine Konzentrierte Einführung [Management: A concise introduction]. Berne: Campus.
Wagner, G. R. (2006). Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung als Unternehmensbild? [Social responsibility as a company image]. In S. Hilger (Ed.), Kapital und Moral: Ökonomie und Verantwortung in historisch-vergleichenden Perspektive [Capital and moral: Economics and responsibility from historical and comparative perspective] (pp. 35–66). Cologne: Böhlau.
Weber, M. (1992). Politik als Beruf [Politics as a vocation]. Stuttgart: Reclam.
Wickham, L., & Wilcock, J. (2012). Management consulting. Delivering an effective project (4th ed.). Harlow: Pearson.
Wieland, J. (1999). Die Ethik der Governance [The ethics of governance]. Marburg: Metropolis.
Williamson, O. E. (1979). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and anti-trust implications. New York: Free Press.
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.
Woodward, D., Edwards, P., & Birkin, F. (2001). Some evidence on executives: Views of corporate social responsibility. British Accounting Review, 33, 357–397.CrossRef
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Metadaten
Titel
Conceptual Framework for Corporate Responsibility Management: A Critical Review of Sustainable Business Practice Based on a Case Study of a Leading Transnational Corporation
verfasst von
Prof. Dr. Linda O’Riordan
Prof. Dr. Piotr Zmuda
Copyright-Jahr
2015
Buch
New Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility

Print ISBN: 978-3-658-06793-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-658-06794-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2015

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06794-6_24

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise