nach oben

Erschienen in:

2022 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

5. Conclusions

verfasst von : Maciej J. Nowak, Przemysław Śleszyński, Paulina Legutko-Kobus

Erschienen in: Spatial Planning in Poland

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The chapter contains the final conclusions related to the considerations in the monograph. It identifies key recommendations for further action—both in the research and theoretical spheres. The chapter also pays special attention to the interdisciplinary aspect of spatial planning problems.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel The Costs and Challenges of Spatial Planning in Poland

By the way, in the official documents of the Polish Ministry of Science this discipline is presented in the English version as “social and economic geography and spatial management” which is a mistake and introduces additional terminological confusion.

Alfasi N, Almagor J, Benenson I (2012) The actual impact of comprehensive land-use plans: insights from high resolution observations. Land Use Policy 29(4):862–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.01.003CrossRef

Alfasi N, Portugali J (2007) Planning rules for a self-planned city. Plan Theor 6(2):164–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095207077587CrossRef

Buitelaar E (2012) The fraught relationship between planning and regulation: land use plans and the conflicts in dealing with uncertainty. In: Hartmann T, Needham B (eds) Planning by law and property rights reconsidered. Ashgate, Surrey, UK, pp 207–218

Buitelaar E, Sorel N (2010) Between the rule of law and the quest for control: legal certainty in the Dutch planning system. Land Use Policy 27(3):983–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.01.002CrossRef

Dadashpoor H, Sheydai A (2021) Defining public interest in planning: a review. J Plan Lit. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122211018379CrossRef

de Vries J (2017) Planning and culture unfolded: the case of flanders and the Nederlands. In: Stead D, de Vries J, Tasan-Kok T (eds) Planning cultures and histories. The evolution of planning systems and spatial development patterns. Routledge, London, pp 2148–2164

Faludi A (2018) Historical institutionalist account of European spatial planning. Plan Perspect 33(4):507–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2018.1437554CrossRef

Herspergera A, Oliveiraa E, Pagliarina S, Palkaa G, Verburgb P, Bolligera J, Grădinarua S (2018) Urban land-use change: the role of strategic spatial planning. Glob Environ Chang 51:32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.05.001CrossRef

Moroni S (2007) Planning, liberty and the rule of law. Plan Theor 6(2):146–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095207077586CrossRef

Moroni S (2014) Complexity and the inherent limits of explanation and prediction: Urban codes for self-organising cities. Plan Theor 14(3):248–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095214521104CrossRef

Moroni S, Buitelaar E, Sorel N, Cozzolino S (2020) Simple planning rules for complex urban problems: toward legal certainty for spatial flexibility. J Plan Educ Res 40(3):320–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X18774122CrossRef

Muñoz Gielen D (2014) Urban governance, property rights, land readjustment and public value capturing. Eur Urban Reg Stud 21(1):60–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776412440543

Muñoz Gielen D, Tasan-Kok T (2010) Flexibility in planning and the consequences for public value capturing in UK, Spain and the Netherlands. Eur Plan Stud 18(7):1097–1131. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654311003744191CrossRef

Nadin V, Fernández-Maldonado A, Zonneveld W, Stead D, Dąbrowski M, Piskorek K, Sarkar A, Schmitt P, Smas L, Cotella G, Rivolin U, Solly A, Berisha E, Pede E, Seardo B, Komornicki T, Goch K, Bednarek-Szczepańska M, Degórska B, Szejgiec-Kolenda B, Śleszyński P, Lüer C, Böhme K, Nedovic-Budic Z, Williams B, Varghese J, Colic N, Knaap G, Csák L, Faragó L, Mezei C, Kovács I, Pamer Z, Reimer M, Münter A (2018) COMPASS – Comparative analysis of territorial governance and spatial planning systems in Europe Applied Research 2016–2018 Final Report. ESPON, European Commission, Luxembourg

Nadin V, Stead D, Dąbrowski M, Fernandez-Maldonado AM (2020) Integrated, adaptive and participatory spatial planning: trends across Europe. Reg Stud. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1817363CrossRef

Persson C (2013) Deliberation or doctrine? Land use and spatial planning for sustainable development in Sweden. Land Use Policy 34:301–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.04.007CrossRef

Purkarthofer E, Humer A, Mattila H (2021) Subnational and dynamic conceptualisations of planning culture: the culture of regional planning and regional planning cultures in Finland. Plan Theory Pract. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2021.1896772CrossRef

Savini F (2016) Don’t blame public law: the legal articulation of certainty in Amsterdam land-use planning. Town Plan Rev 87(4):459–479. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2016.29CrossRef

Śleszyński P (ed) (2013) Wskaźniki zagospodarowania i ładu przestrzennego w gminach. Biuletyn KPZK PAN 252:180–182

Stead D (2021) Conceptualizing the policy tools of spatial planning. J Plan Lit 36(3):297–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412221992283CrossRef

Stead D, de Vries J, Tasan-Kok T (2017) Planning cultures and histories: influences of the evolution of planning systems and spatial development patterns. In: Stead D, de Vries J, Tasan-Kok T (eds) Planning cultures and histories. The evolution of planning systems and spatial development patterns, Routledge, London, pp 1–6

Steele W, Ruming K (2012) Flexibility versus certainty: unsettling the land-use planning Shibboleth in Australia. Plan Pract Res 27(2):155–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.662670CrossRef

Tarakçı S, Türk ŞŞ (2020) Shaping of flexibility in urban renewal legal sources in Turkey and its effect on practices. Int J Archit Plann 8(2):652–671. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2020.131CrossRef

Titel: Conclusions
verfasst von: Maciej J. Nowak
Przemysław Śleszyński
Paulina Legutko-Kobus
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Spatial Planning in Poland
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-96938-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-96939-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96939-4_5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"