Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Neural Computing and Applications 15/2020

02.12.2019 | Original Article

Decision-making model with fuzzy preference relations based on consistency local adjustment strategy and DEA

verfasst von: Feifei Jin, Lidan Pei, Jinpei Liu, Ligang Zhou, Huayou Chen

Erschienen in: Neural Computing and Applications | Ausgabe 15/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

As one of the most useful tools, fuzzy preference relations (FPRs) can cope with the situations in which the experts are more comfortable providing their evaluation information with numerical values. Consistency-improving process and deriving the reliable priority weight vector for alternatives are two significant and challenging issues in decision making with FPRs. This paper investigates a novel decision-making model with FPRs on the basis of consistency local adjustment strategy and data envelopment analysis (DEA). Firstly, a new approach is proposed to generate the multiplicative consistent FPRs. Subsequently, a convergent consistency-improving algorithm for FPRs is developed to transform the unacceptable multiplicative consistent FPRs into the acceptable ones. In the consistency-improving process for FPRs, the local adjustment strategy is presented to employ decision-maker original evaluation information sufficiently. In order to determine the priority weight vector for alternatives, a novel fuzzy DEA model is constructed. Furthermore, a decision-making model with FPRs is designed to derive the reliable decision-making results. Finally, a numerical example of selecting the most important influence factor for fog–haze is provided, and the comparison with existing approaches is made to validate the rationality and effectiveness of the developed model.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Urena R, Chiclana F, Melancon G, Herrera-Viedma F (2019) A social network based approach for consensus achievement in multiperson decision making. Inf Fusion 47:72–87 Urena R, Chiclana F, Melancon G, Herrera-Viedma F (2019) A social network based approach for consensus achievement in multiperson decision making. Inf Fusion 47:72–87
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Çağman N, Deli I (2012) Products of FP-soft sets and their applications. Hacettepe J Math Stat 41(3):365–374MathSciNetMATH Çağman N, Deli I (2012) Products of FP-soft sets and their applications. Hacettepe J Math Stat 41(3):365–374MathSciNetMATH
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu ZS (2001) The least variance priority method (LVM) for fuzzy complementary judgment matrix. Syst Eng Theory Pract 21(10):93–96 Xu ZS (2001) The least variance priority method (LVM) for fuzzy complementary judgment matrix. Syst Eng Theory Pract 21(10):93–96
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Çağman N, Deli I (2012) Means of FP-soft sets and their applications. Hacettepe J Math Stat 41(5):615–625MathSciNetMATH Çağman N, Deli I (2012) Means of FP-soft sets and their applications. Hacettepe J Math Stat 41(5):615–625MathSciNetMATH
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith EB, Langari R (2003) Fuzzy multi-objective decision making for navigation of mobile robots in dynamic, unstructured environments. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 14(2):95–108MATH Smith EB, Langari R (2003) Fuzzy multi-objective decision making for navigation of mobile robots in dynamic, unstructured environments. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 14(2):95–108MATH
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanino T (1984) Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 12:117–131MathSciNetMATH Tanino T (1984) Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 12:117–131MathSciNetMATH
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu J, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2015) Trust based consensus model for social network in an incomplete linguistic information context. Appl Soft Comput 35:827–839 Wu J, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2015) Trust based consensus model for social network in an incomplete linguistic information context. Appl Soft Comput 35:827–839
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Orlovsky SA (1978) Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:155–167MathSciNetMATH Orlovsky SA (1978) Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:155–167MathSciNetMATH
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Nurmi H (1981) Approaches to collective decision making with fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 6:249–259MathSciNetMATH Nurmi H (1981) Approaches to collective decision making with fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 6:249–259MathSciNetMATH
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu YJ, Wu NN (2019) A two-stage consensus reaching model for group decision making with reciprocal fuzzy preference relations. Soft Comput 23(17):8057–8073MATH Xu YJ, Wu NN (2019) A two-stage consensus reaching model for group decision making with reciprocal fuzzy preference relations. Soft Comput 23(17):8057–8073MATH
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Saaty TL (2013) The modern science of multicriteria decision making and its practical applications: the AHP/ANP approach. Oper Res 61(5):1101–1118MathSciNetMATH Saaty TL (2013) The modern science of multicriteria decision making and its practical applications: the AHP/ANP approach. Oper Res 61(5):1101–1118MathSciNetMATH
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New YorkMATH Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New YorkMATH
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Meng FY, Tan CQ (2017) A new consistency concept for interval multiplicative preference relations. Appl Soft Comput 52:262–276 Meng FY, Tan CQ (2017) A new consistency concept for interval multiplicative preference relations. Appl Soft Comput 52:262–276
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Deli I, Çağman N (2015) Intuitionistic fuzzy parameterized soft set theory and its decision making. Appl Soft Comput 28:109–113 Deli I, Çağman N (2015) Intuitionistic fuzzy parameterized soft set theory and its decision making. Appl Soft Comput 28:109–113
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu ZS, Liao HC (2015) A survey of approaches to decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Knowl Based Syst 80:131–142 Xu ZS, Liao HC (2015) A survey of approaches to decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Knowl Based Syst 80:131–142
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Jin FF, Ni ZW, Pei LD, Chen HY, Li YP, Zhu XH, Ni LP (2019) A decision support model for group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic preferences relations. Neural Comput Appl 31(S2):S1103–S1124 Jin FF, Ni ZW, Pei LD, Chen HY, Li YP, Zhu XH, Ni LP (2019) A decision support model for group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic preferences relations. Neural Comput Appl 31(S2):S1103–S1124
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu YJ, Liu X, Wang HM (2017) The additive consistency measure of fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 9(7):1–12 Xu YJ, Liu X, Wang HM (2017) The additive consistency measure of fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 9(7):1–12
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Jin FF, Ni ZW, Chen HY, Li YP (2016) Approaches to decision making with linguistic preference relations based on additive consistency. Appl Soft Comput 49:71–80 Jin FF, Ni ZW, Chen HY, Li YP (2016) Approaches to decision making with linguistic preference relations based on additive consistency. Appl Soft Comput 49:71–80
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Deli I, Eraslan S, Çağman N (2018) ivnpiv-Neutrosophic soft sets and their decision making based on similarity measure. Neural Comput Appl 29:187–203 Deli I, Eraslan S, Çağman N (2018) ivnpiv-Neutrosophic soft sets and their decision making based on similarity measure. Neural Comput Appl 29:187–203
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F, Luque M (2004) Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 154(1):98–109MathSciNetMATH Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F, Luque M (2004) Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 154(1):98–109MathSciNetMATH
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Xia MM, Chen J (2015) Consistency and consensus improving methods for pairwise comparison matrices based on Abelian linearly ordered group. Fuzzy Sets Syst 266:1–32MathSciNetMATH Xia MM, Chen J (2015) Consistency and consensus improving methods for pairwise comparison matrices based on Abelian linearly ordered group. Fuzzy Sets Syst 266:1–32MathSciNetMATH
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu ZB, Xu JP (2012) A consistency and consensus based decision support model for group decision making with multiplicative preference relations. Decis Support Syst 52(3):757–767 Wu ZB, Xu JP (2012) A consistency and consensus based decision support model for group decision making with multiplicative preference relations. Decis Support Syst 52(3):757–767
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang TC, Chen YH (2007) Applying consistent fuzzy preference relations to partnership selection. Omega 35(4):384–388 Wang TC, Chen YH (2007) Applying consistent fuzzy preference relations to partnership selection. Omega 35(4):384–388
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Krejčí J (2017) Additively reciprocal fuzzy pairwise comparison matrices and multiplicative fuzzy priorities. Soft Comput 21(12):3177–3192MATH Krejčí J (2017) Additively reciprocal fuzzy pairwise comparison matrices and multiplicative fuzzy priorities. Soft Comput 21(12):3177–3192MATH
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu ZS, Wei CP (1999) A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 116(2):443–449MATH Xu ZS, Wei CP (1999) A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 116(2):443–449MATH
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee LW (2012) Group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on the additive consistency and the order consistency. Expert Syst Appl 39(14):11666–11676 Lee LW (2012) Group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on the additive consistency and the order consistency. Expert Syst Appl 39(14):11666–11676
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen SM, Lin TE, Lee LW (2014) Group decision making using incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on the additive consistency and the order consistency. Inf Sci 259:1–15MathSciNetMATH Chen SM, Lin TE, Lee LW (2014) Group decision making using incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on the additive consistency and the order consistency. Inf Sci 259:1–15MathSciNetMATH
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Alonso S (2007) Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B (Cybern) 37(1):176–189MATH Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Alonso S (2007) Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B (Cybern) 37(1):176–189MATH
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang HM (2016) A goal programming model of obtaining the priority weights from an interval preference relation. Inf Sci 354:197–210MATH Zhang HM (2016) A goal programming model of obtaining the priority weights from an interval preference relation. Inf Sci 354:197–210MATH
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang YM, Fan ZP, Hua Z (2007) A Chi square method for obtaining a priority vector from multiplicative and fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 182(1):356–366MATH Wang YM, Fan ZP, Hua Z (2007) A Chi square method for obtaining a priority vector from multiplicative and fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 182(1):356–366MATH
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu XW, Pan YW, Xu YJ, Yu S (2012) Least square completion and inconsistency repair methods for additively consistent fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 198:1–19MathSciNetMATH Liu XW, Pan YW, Xu YJ, Yu S (2012) Least square completion and inconsistency repair methods for additively consistent fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 198:1–19MathSciNetMATH
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444MathSciNetMATH Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444MathSciNetMATH
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Hatami-Marbini A, Saati S (2018) Efficiency evaluation in two-stage data envelopment analysis under a fuzzy environment: a common-weights approach. Appl Soft Comput 72:156–165 Hatami-Marbini A, Saati S (2018) Efficiency evaluation in two-stage data envelopment analysis under a fuzzy environment: a common-weights approach. Appl Soft Comput 72:156–165
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu DD (2009) Performance evaluation: an integrated method using data envelopment analysis and fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 194(1):227–235MathSciNetMATH Wu DD (2009) Performance evaluation: an integrated method using data envelopment analysis and fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 194(1):227–235MathSciNetMATH
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin Y, Wang YM (2019) Prioritization of hesitant multiplicative preference relations based on data envelopment analysis for group decision making. Neural Comput Appl 31(2):437–447MathSciNet Lin Y, Wang YM (2019) Prioritization of hesitant multiplicative preference relations based on data envelopment analysis for group decision making. Neural Comput Appl 31(2):437–447MathSciNet
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma J, Fan ZP, Jiang YP, Mao JY, Ma L (2006) A method for repairing the inconsistency of fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 157:20–33MathSciNetMATH Ma J, Fan ZP, Jiang YP, Mao JY, Ma L (2006) A method for repairing the inconsistency of fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 157:20–33MathSciNetMATH
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu JP, Xu Q, Chen HY, Zhou LG, Zhu JM, Tao ZF (2019) Group decision making with interval fuzzy preference relations based on DEA and stochastic simulation. Neural Comput Appl 31(7):3095–3106 Liu JP, Xu Q, Chen HY, Zhou LG, Zhu JM, Tao ZF (2019) Group decision making with interval fuzzy preference relations based on DEA and stochastic simulation. Neural Comput Appl 31(7):3095–3106
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu ZS (2002) Two methods for priorities of complementary judgment matrices-weighted least-square method and eigenvector method. Syst Eng Theory Pract 22(7):71–75 Xu ZS (2002) Two methods for priorities of complementary judgment matrices-weighted least-square method and eigenvector method. Syst Eng Theory Pract 22(7):71–75
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu DD, Luo C, Olson DL (2014) Efficiency evaluation for supply chains using maximin decision support. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 44(8):1088–1097 Wu DD, Luo C, Olson DL (2014) Efficiency evaluation for supply chains using maximin decision support. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 44(8):1088–1097
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Jin FF, Ni ZW, Pei LD, Chen HY, Tao ZF, Zhu XH, Ni LP (2017) Approaches to group decision making with linguistic preference relations based on multiplicative consistency. Comput Ind Eng 114:69–79 Jin FF, Ni ZW, Pei LD, Chen HY, Tao ZF, Zhu XH, Ni LP (2017) Approaches to group decision making with linguistic preference relations based on multiplicative consistency. Comput Ind Eng 114:69–79
Metadaten
Titel
Decision-making model with fuzzy preference relations based on consistency local adjustment strategy and DEA
verfasst von
Feifei Jin
Lidan Pei
Jinpei Liu
Ligang Zhou
Huayou Chen
Publikationsdatum
02.12.2019
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Neural Computing and Applications / Ausgabe 15/2020
Print ISSN: 0941-0643
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04648-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 15/2020

Neural Computing and Applications 15/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner