Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Technology Assessment: Criteria for Evaluating a Sustainable Energy Portfolio Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

15. Decision-Making Tools: Innovation Measurement Framework

verfasst von : Kenny Phan

Erschienen in: Hierarchical Decision Modeling

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Innovation is one of the most important sources of competitive advantage. It helps a company to fuel the growth of new products and services, sustain incumbents, create new markets, transform industries, and promote the global competitiveness of nations. Because of its importance, companies need to manage innovation. It is very important for a company to be able to measure its innovativeness because one cannot effectively manage without measurement. A good measurement model will help a company to understand its current capability and identify areas that need improvement.
This chapter develops a framework to determine the innovativeness of a company in the semiconductor industry by using output indicators. Output indicators are used because they cannot be manipulated. A hierarchical decision model (HDM) was constructed for the framework. Expert judgments were quantified and incorporated into the model. The hierarchy consisted of three levels: innovativeness index, output indicators, and sub-factors.
According to the experts, the top three sub-factors to measure the innovativeness of a company are revenue from new products, market share of new products, and products that are new to the world.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Decision-Making Tools: Deleting Criteria Using Sensitivity Analysis
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Rose S., Shipp S., Lal B., & Stone A. (2009). Frameworks for measuring innovation: Initial approaches. 24.
2.
Morris, L. (2008). Innovation metrics: The innovation process and how to measure it. 20.
3.
Kavadias S., & Chao R. O. (2007). Resource allocation and new product development portfolio management. In: Handbook of new product development research. Oxford: Elsevier/Butterworth.
4.
O’Regan, N., Ghobadian, A., & Sims, M. A. (2006). Fast tracking innovation in manufacturing SMEs. Technovation, 26(2), 251–261.CrossRef
5.
McGovern, G. J., Court, D., Quelch, J. A., & Crawford, B. (2004). Bringing customers into the boardroom. Harvard Business Review, 82(11), 70–80. 148.
6.
Han, J. K., Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. (1998). Market orientation and organizational performance: Is innovation a missing link? Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 30.CrossRef
7.
Escalfoni, R., Braganholo, V., & Borges, M. R. S. (2009). Applying group storytelling to capture innovation features. In: 2009 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (pp. 209–214).
8.
Sood, A., & Tellis, G. J. (2009). Innovation does pay off – if you measure correctly. Research-Technology Management, 52(4), 13–16.
9.
Hollanders H., & Esser F. C. (2007). Measuring innovation efficiency. INNO-Metrics Thematic Paper.
10.
(2008). The Advisory Committee on Measuring Innovation in the 21st Century Economy. Innovation Measurement – Tracking the State of Innovation in the American Economy.
11.
Dosi, G. (1988). The nature of the innovative process. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 221–238). London: Pinter Publishers.
12.
Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (2001). Managing innovation (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
13.
Steward, F., Wang, Y., & Tsoi, J. (2008). Direct measurement of innovation output using documentary and digital sources.
14.
Kleinknecht, A., & Bain, D. (1993). Why do we need new innovation output indicators? In A. Kleinknecht & D. Bain (Eds.), New concepts in innovation output measurement (pp. 1–9). New York, USA: St. Martin’s Press.
15.
Link, A. N. (1995). The use of literature-based innovation output indicators for research evaluation. Small Business Economics, 7(6), 451–455.CrossRef
16.
Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281.CrossRef
17.
Zahedi, F. (1986). The analytic hierarchy process – a survey of the method and its applications. Interfaces (Providence), 16(4), 96–108.CrossRef
18.
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83.CrossRef
19.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process (pp. 1–17). New York: McGraw-Hill.
20.
Saaty, T. L. (2000). Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process (Vol. 6). Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
21.
Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26.CrossRef
22.
Kodali, R., & Chandra, S. (2001). Analytical hierarchy process for justification of total productive maintenance. Production Planning Control Manager Opera, 12(7), 695–705.CrossRef
23.
Chan, Y., & Lynn, B. (1991). Performance evaluation and the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 3, 57–87.
24.
Hepler, C., & Mazur, G., (2007). The analytic hierarchy process – methodologies and application with customers and management at blue cross-blue shield of Florida. In: International Symposium on QFD (pp. 137–149).
25.
Yang, J., & Shi, P., (2002). Applying analytic hierarchy process in firm’s overall performance evaluation: A case study in China. International Journal 7(1).
26.
Ramanathan, R. (2001). A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 63(1), 27–35.CrossRef
27.
Jones, J., & Hunter, D. (1999). Using the Delphi and nominal group technique in health services research. In: Qualitative research in health care.
28.
Martino, J. P. (1993). Technological forecasting for decision making (Vol. 3, p. 462). Dallas, TX: McGraw-Hill.
29.
Rowe, G., & Wright, G., (1999) The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis, International Journal of Forecasting 15(4), 353–375, 99 AD.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
Metadaten
Titel
Decision-Making Tools: Innovation Measurement Framework
verfasst von
Kenny Phan
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Buch
Hierarchical Decision Modeling

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18557-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-18558-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18558-3_15

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise