Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 6/2019

07.01.2019 | Research Paper

Decoupling uncertainty quantification from robust design optimization

verfasst von: Tanmoy Chatterjee, Rajib Chowdhury, Palaniappan Ramu

Erschienen in: Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization | Ausgabe 6/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Robust design optimization (RDO) has been eminent in determining the optimal design of real-time complex systems under stochastic environment. Unlike conventional optimization, RDO involves uncertainty quantification which may render the procedure to be computationally intensive, if not prohibitive. In order to deal with such issues, an efficient approximation-based generalized RDO framework has been proposed. Since RDO formulation comprises of statistical terms of the performance functions, the proposed framework deals with approximation of those statistical quantities, rather than the performance functions. Consequently, the proposed framework allows transformation of the RDO problem to an equivalent deterministic one. As a result, unlike traditional surrogate-assisted RDO, the proposed framework yields desirable results in significantly less number of functional evaluations. For performing such response statistical approximation, two adaptive sparse refined Kriging-based computational models have been proposed. However, the generality of the proposed methodology allows any surrogate models to be employed within this framework, provided it is capable of capturing the functional non-linearity. Implementation of the proposed framework in three test examples and two finite element-based practical problems clearly illustrates its potential for further complicated applications.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bhattacharjya S (2010) Robust optimization of structures under uncertainty. PhD Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Bengal Engineering and Science University, Shibpur Bhattacharjya S (2010) Robust optimization of structures under uncertainty. PhD Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Bengal Engineering and Science University, Shibpur
Zurück zum Zitat Blatman G, Sudret B (2011) Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression. J Comput Phys 230:2345–2367MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Blatman G, Sudret B (2011) Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression. J Comput Phys 230:2345–2367MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Chakraborty S, Chowdhury R (2015) A semi-analytical framework for structural reliability analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 289:475–497MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Chakraborty S, Chowdhury R (2015) A semi-analytical framework for structural reliability analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 289:475–497MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Chakraborty S, Bhattacharjya S, Haldar A (2012) Sensitivity importance-based robust optimization of structures with incomplete probabilistic information. Int J Numer Methods Eng 90:1261–1277CrossRefMATH Chakraborty S, Bhattacharjya S, Haldar A (2012) Sensitivity importance-based robust optimization of structures with incomplete probabilistic information. Int J Numer Methods Eng 90:1261–1277CrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Chakraborty S, Chatterjee T, Chowdhury R, Adhikari S (2017) A surrogate based multi-fidelity approach for robust design optimization. Appl Math Model 47:726–744MathSciNetCrossRef Chakraborty S, Chatterjee T, Chowdhury R, Adhikari S (2017) A surrogate based multi-fidelity approach for robust design optimization. Appl Math Model 47:726–744MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chastaing G, Gamboa F, Prieur C (2012) Generalized hoeffding-sobol decomposition for dependent variables-application to sensitivity analysis. Electronic Journal of Statistics 6:2420–2448 Chastaing G, Gamboa F, Prieur C (2012) Generalized hoeffding-sobol decomposition for dependent variables-application to sensitivity analysis. Electronic Journal of Statistics 6:2420–2448
Zurück zum Zitat Chatterjee T, Chowdhury R (2017) An efficient sparse Bayesian learning framework for stochastic response analysis. Struct Saf 68:1–14CrossRef Chatterjee T, Chowdhury R (2017) An efficient sparse Bayesian learning framework for stochastic response analysis. Struct Saf 68:1–14CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chatterjee T, Chakraborty S, Chowdhury R (2016) A bi-level approximation tool for the computation of FRFs in stochastic dynamic systems. Mech Syst Signal Process 70-71:484–505CrossRef Chatterjee T, Chakraborty S, Chowdhury R (2016) A bi-level approximation tool for the computation of FRFs in stochastic dynamic systems. Mech Syst Signal Process 70-71:484–505CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chen W, Allen J, Tsui K, Mistree F (1996) Procedure for robust design: minimizing variations caused by noise factors and control factors. J Mech Des Trans ASME 118:478–485CrossRef Chen W, Allen J, Tsui K, Mistree F (1996) Procedure for robust design: minimizing variations caused by noise factors and control factors. J Mech Des Trans ASME 118:478–485CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chen W, Wiecek M, Zhang J (1999) Quality utility—a compromise programming approach to robust design. J Mech Des ASME 121:179–187CrossRef Chen W, Wiecek M, Zhang J (1999) Quality utility—a compromise programming approach to robust design. J Mech Des ASME 121:179–187CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chen W, Sahai A, Messac A, Sundararaj G (2000) Exploration of the effectiveness of physical programming in robust design. J Mech Des ASME 122:155–163CrossRef Chen W, Sahai A, Messac A, Sundararaj G (2000) Exploration of the effectiveness of physical programming in robust design. J Mech Des ASME 122:155–163CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng J, Liu Z, Wu Z et al (2014) Robust optimization of structural dynamic characteristics based on adaptive Kriging model and CNSGA. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51:423–437CrossRef Cheng J, Liu Z, Wu Z et al (2014) Robust optimization of structural dynamic characteristics based on adaptive Kriging model and CNSGA. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51:423–437CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dai W, Milenkovic O (2009) Subspace pursuit for compressive sensing signal reconstruction. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 55:2230–2249MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Dai W, Milenkovic O (2009) Subspace pursuit for compressive sensing signal reconstruction. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 55:2230–2249MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USAMATH Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USAMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Deb K, Agarwal A, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6:182–197CrossRef Deb K, Agarwal A, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6:182–197CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Deng J (2006) Structural reliability analysis for implicit performance function using radial basis function network. Int J Solids Struct 43:3255–3291CrossRefMATH Deng J (2006) Structural reliability analysis for implicit performance function using radial basis function network. Int J Solids Struct 43:3255–3291CrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Diez M, Peri D (2010) Robust optimization for ship conceptual design. Ocean Eng 37:966–977CrossRef Diez M, Peri D (2010) Robust optimization for ship conceptual design. Ocean Eng 37:966–977CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Doostan A, Iaccarino G (2009) A least-squares approximation of partial differential equations with high-dimensional random inputs. J Comput Phys 228:4332–4345MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Doostan A, Iaccarino G (2009) A least-squares approximation of partial differential equations with high-dimensional random inputs. J Comput Phys 228:4332–4345MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Du X, Chen W (2000) Towards a better understanding of modeling feasibility robustness in engineering design. J Mech Des Trans ASME 122:385–394CrossRef Du X, Chen W (2000) Towards a better understanding of modeling feasibility robustness in engineering design. J Mech Des Trans ASME 122:385–394CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Du X, Sudjianto A, Chen W (2004) An integrated framework for optimization under uncertainty using inverse reliability strategy. J Mech Des 126:562–570CrossRef Du X, Sudjianto A, Chen W (2004) An integrated framework for optimization under uncertainty using inverse reliability strategy. J Mech Des 126:562–570CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dubourg V (2011) Adaptive surrogate models for reliability analysis and reliability-based design optimization. PhD thesis, Universite Blaise Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France Dubourg V (2011) Adaptive surrogate models for reliability analysis and reliability-based design optimization. PhD thesis, Universite Blaise Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France
Zurück zum Zitat Dubourg V, Sudret B, Deheeger F (2013) Metamodel-based importance sampling for structural reliability analysis. Probabilistic Eng Mech 33:47–57CrossRef Dubourg V, Sudret B, Deheeger F (2013) Metamodel-based importance sampling for structural reliability analysis. Probabilistic Eng Mech 33:47–57CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Echard B, Gayton N, Lemaire M (2011) AK-MCS: an active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo simulation. Struct Saf 33:145–154CrossRef Echard B, Gayton N, Lemaire M (2011) AK-MCS: an active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo simulation. Struct Saf 33:145–154CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Efron B, Tibshirani R (1997) Improvements on cross-validation: the .632+ bootstrap method. J Am Stat Assoc 92:548–560MathSciNetMATH Efron B, Tibshirani R (1997) Improvements on cross-validation: the .632+ bootstrap method. J Am Stat Assoc 92:548–560MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Fang J, Gao Y, Sun G et al (2015) Multiobjective robust design optimization of fatigue life for a truck cab. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 135:1–8CrossRef Fang J, Gao Y, Sun G et al (2015) Multiobjective robust design optimization of fatigue life for a truck cab. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 135:1–8CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fonseca C, Fleming P (1995) Multiobjective genetic algorithms made easy: selection, sharing, and mating restriction. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Genetic Algorithms in Engineering Systems: Innovations and Applications. IET, pp 45–52 Fonseca C, Fleming P (1995) Multiobjective genetic algorithms made easy: selection, sharing, and mating restriction. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Genetic Algorithms in Engineering Systems: Innovations and Applications. IET, pp 45–52
Zurück zum Zitat Giunta A, Watson L, Koehler J (1998) A comparison of approximation modeling techniques: polynomial versus interpolating models. In: Proceedings of the seventh AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, AIAA-98-4758. pp 1–13 Giunta A, Watson L, Koehler J (1998) A comparison of approximation modeling techniques: polynomial versus interpolating models. In: Proceedings of the seventh AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, AIAA-98-4758. pp 1–13
Zurück zum Zitat Han JS, Kwak BM (2004) Robust optimization using a gradient index: MEMS applications. Struct Multidiscip Optim 27:469–478CrossRef Han JS, Kwak BM (2004) Robust optimization using a gradient index: MEMS applications. Struct Multidiscip Optim 27:469–478CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Huang B, Du X (2007) Analytical robustness assessment for robust design. Struct Multidiscip Optim 34:123–137CrossRef Huang B, Du X (2007) Analytical robustness assessment for robust design. Struct Multidiscip Optim 34:123–137CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jacquelin E, Adhikari S, Sinou J, Friswell MI (2014) Polynomial chaos expansion and steady-state response of a class of random dynamical systems. J Eng Mech 04014145(1–11) Jacquelin E, Adhikari S, Sinou J, Friswell MI (2014) Polynomial chaos expansion and steady-state response of a class of random dynamical systems. J Eng Mech 04014145(1–11)
Zurück zum Zitat Jin R, Chen W, Simpson T (2001) Comparative studies of metamodeling techniques under multiple modeling criteria. Struct Multidiscip Optim 23:1–13CrossRef Jin R, Chen W, Simpson T (2001) Comparative studies of metamodeling techniques under multiple modeling criteria. Struct Multidiscip Optim 23:1–13CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jin R, Du X, Chen W (2003) The use of metamodeling techniques for optimization under uncertainty. Struct Multidiscip Optim 25:99–116CrossRef Jin R, Du X, Chen W (2003) The use of metamodeling techniques for optimization under uncertainty. Struct Multidiscip Optim 25:99–116CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kersaudy P, Sudret B, Varsier N et al (2015) A new surrogate modeling technique combining Kriging and polynomial chaos expansions—application to uncertainty analysis in computational dosimetry. J Comput Phys 286:103–117MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Kersaudy P, Sudret B, Varsier N et al (2015) A new surrogate modeling technique combining Kriging and polynomial chaos expansions—application to uncertainty analysis in computational dosimetry. J Comput Phys 286:103–117MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Lagaros ND, Plevris V, Papadrakakis M (2007) Reliability based robust design optimization of steel structures. Int J Simul Multidiscip Des Optim 1:19–29CrossRef Lagaros ND, Plevris V, Papadrakakis M (2007) Reliability based robust design optimization of steel structures. Int J Simul Multidiscip Des Optim 1:19–29CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lee K-H, Park G-J (2001) Robust optimization considering tolerances of design variables. Comput Struct 79:77–86CrossRef Lee K-H, Park G-J (2001) Robust optimization considering tolerances of design variables. Comput Struct 79:77–86CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li G, Rosenthal C, Rabitz H (2001) High dimensional model representation. J Phys Chem A 105:7765–7777CrossRef Li G, Rosenthal C, Rabitz H (2001) High dimensional model representation. J Phys Chem A 105:7765–7777CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lophaven S, Nielson H, Sondergaard J (2002) DACE A MATLAB Kriging Toolbox. IMM-TR-2002-12. Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby Lophaven S, Nielson H, Sondergaard J (2002) DACE A MATLAB Kriging Toolbox. IMM-TR-2002-12. Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby
Zurück zum Zitat Marano GC, Greco R, Sgobba S (2010) A comparison between different robust optimum design approaches: application to tuned mass dampers. Probabilistic Eng Mech 25:108–118CrossRef Marano GC, Greco R, Sgobba S (2010) A comparison between different robust optimum design approaches: application to tuned mass dampers. Probabilistic Eng Mech 25:108–118CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mareš T, Janouchová E, Kučerová A (2016) Artificial neural networks in the calibration of nonlinear mechanical models. Adv Eng Softw 95:68–81CrossRef Mareš T, Janouchová E, Kučerová A (2016) Artificial neural networks in the calibration of nonlinear mechanical models. Adv Eng Softw 95:68–81CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McKay MD, Beckman RJ, Conover WJ (1979) A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 2:239–245MathSciNetMATH McKay MD, Beckman RJ, Conover WJ (1979) A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 2:239–245MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Messac A (1996) Physical programming: effective optimization for computational design. AIAA J 34:149–158CrossRefMATH Messac A (1996) Physical programming: effective optimization for computational design. AIAA J 34:149–158CrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Mortazavi A, Azarm S, Gabriel SA (2013) Adaptive gradient-assisted robust design optimization under interval uncertainty. Eng Optim 45:1287–1307MathSciNetCrossRef Mortazavi A, Azarm S, Gabriel SA (2013) Adaptive gradient-assisted robust design optimization under interval uncertainty. Eng Optim 45:1287–1307MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Needell D, Tropp JA (2009) CoSaMP: iterative signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate samples. Appl Comput Harmon Anal 26(3):301–321 Needell D, Tropp JA (2009) CoSaMP: iterative signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate samples. Appl Comput Harmon Anal 26(3):301–321
Zurück zum Zitat Osborne MR, Presnell B, B a T (2000) A new approach to variable selection in least squares problems. IMA J Numer Anal 20:389–403MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Osborne MR, Presnell B, B a T (2000) A new approach to variable selection in least squares problems. IMA J Numer Anal 20:389–403MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Patelli E, Broggi M, Angelis M de, Beer M (2014) OpenCossan: an efficient open tool for dealing with epistemic and aleatory uncertainties. In: Vulnerability, Uncertainty, and Risk, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA. pp 2564–2573 Patelli E, Broggi M, Angelis M de, Beer M (2014) OpenCossan: an efficient open tool for dealing with epistemic and aleatory uncertainties. In: Vulnerability, Uncertainty, and Risk, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA. pp 2564–2573
Zurück zum Zitat Pati YC, Rezaiifar R, Krishnaprasad PS (1993) Orthogonal matching pursuit: recursive function approximation with applications to wavelet decomposition. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers. pp 40–44 Pati YC, Rezaiifar R, Krishnaprasad PS (1993) Orthogonal matching pursuit: recursive function approximation with applications to wavelet decomposition. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers. pp 40–44
Zurück zum Zitat Ray T, Smith W (2006) A surrogate assisted parallel multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for robust engineering design. Eng Optim 38:997–1011CrossRef Ray T, Smith W (2006) A surrogate assisted parallel multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for robust engineering design. Eng Optim 38:997–1011CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Regis RG (2014) Evolutionary programming for high-dimensional constrained expensive black-box optimization using radial basis functions. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 18:326–347CrossRef Regis RG (2014) Evolutionary programming for high-dimensional constrained expensive black-box optimization using radial basis functions. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 18:326–347CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ren X, Rahman S (2013) Robust design optimization by polynomial dimensional decomposition. Struct Multidiscip Optim 48:127–148MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Ren X, Rahman S (2013) Robust design optimization by polynomial dimensional decomposition. Struct Multidiscip Optim 48:127–148MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Roy BK, Chakraborty S (2015) Robust optimum design of base isolation system in seismic vibration control of structures under random system parameters. Struct Saf 55:49–59CrossRef Roy BK, Chakraborty S (2015) Robust optimum design of base isolation system in seismic vibration control of structures under random system parameters. Struct Saf 55:49–59CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schuëller GI, Jensen H a (2008) Computational methods in optimization considering uncertainties—an overview. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:2–13CrossRefMATH Schuëller GI, Jensen H a (2008) Computational methods in optimization considering uncertainties—an overview. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:2–13CrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Shah H, Hosder S, Koziel S et al (2015) Multi-fidelity robust aerodynamic design optimization under mixed uncertainty. Aerosp Sci Technol 45:17–29CrossRef Shah H, Hosder S, Koziel S et al (2015) Multi-fidelity robust aerodynamic design optimization under mixed uncertainty. Aerosp Sci Technol 45:17–29CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sierra MR, Coello CAC (2005) Improving PSO-based multi-objective optimization using crowding, mutation and ∈-dominance. In: Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization Volume 3410 of the series Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 505–519 Sierra MR, Coello CAC (2005) Improving PSO-based multi-objective optimization using crowding, mutation and ∈-dominance. In: Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization Volume 3410 of the series Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 505–519
Zurück zum Zitat Srinivas N, Deb K (1994) Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Evol Comput 2:221–248CrossRef Srinivas N, Deb K (1994) Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Evol Comput 2:221–248CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sudret B (2012) Meta-models for structural reliability and uncertainty quantification. In: Proceedings of 5th Asian-Pacific Symposium on Structural Reliability and its Applications (APSSRA, 2012), Singapore. pp 53–76 Sudret B (2012) Meta-models for structural reliability and uncertainty quantification. In: Proceedings of 5th Asian-Pacific Symposium on Structural Reliability and its Applications (APSSRA, 2012), Singapore. pp 53–76
Zurück zum Zitat Taguchi G (1986) Quality engineering through design optimization. Krauss International Publications, White Plains, NY Taguchi G (1986) Quality engineering through design optimization. Krauss International Publications, White Plains, NY
Zurück zum Zitat Thanedar P, Arora J, Tseng C et al (1986) Performance of some SQP algorithms on structural design problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 23:2187–2203CrossRefMATH Thanedar P, Arora J, Tseng C et al (1986) Performance of some SQP algorithms on structural design problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 23:2187–2203CrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc B 58:267–288MathSciNetMATH Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc B 58:267–288MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Xiu D, Karniadakis GE (2002) The Wiener--Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations. SIAM J Sci Comput 24:619–644MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Xiu D, Karniadakis GE (2002) The Wiener--Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations. SIAM J Sci Comput 24:619–644MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Zang C, Friswell MI, Mottershead JE (2005) A review of robust optimal design and its application in dynamics. Comput Struct 83:315–326CrossRef Zang C, Friswell MI, Mottershead JE (2005) A review of robust optimal design and its application in dynamics. Comput Struct 83:315–326CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang Q, Li H (2007) MOEA/D: a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 11:712–731CrossRef Zhang Q, Li H (2007) MOEA/D: a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 11:712–731CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zitzler E, Thiele L (1998) Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study. In: Parallel Problem Solving from Nature – PPSN V, vol. 1498 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Belin/, Heidelberg, pp 292–301 Zitzler E, Thiele L (1998) Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study. In: Parallel Problem Solving from Nature – PPSN V, vol. 1498 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Belin/, Heidelberg, pp 292–301
Zurück zum Zitat Zitzler E, Laumanns M, Thiele L (2001) SPEA2: improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm. Tech. Rep. 103, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK), Department of Electrical Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich Zitzler E, Laumanns M, Thiele L (2001) SPEA2: improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm. Tech. Rep. 103, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK), Department of Electrical Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich
Metadaten
Titel
Decoupling uncertainty quantification from robust design optimization
verfasst von
Tanmoy Chatterjee
Rajib Chowdhury
Palaniappan Ramu
Publikationsdatum
07.01.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization / Ausgabe 6/2019
Print ISSN: 1615-147X
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-1488
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2167-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2019

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 6/2019 Zur Ausgabe

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.