Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Experiences of E-Government Development Implementation in Developing Countries: Challenges and Solutions Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

4. Democratizing Government: What We Know About E-Government and Civic Engagement

verfasst von : Nina David

Erschienen in: International E-Government Development

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Civic engagement is an ideal that is sought after as the fundamental basis of democratic societies. Civic engagement is, however, difficult to attain both from the perspective of citizens’ willingness and ability to participate and government’s ability to generate such engagement. E-government can play a role in enhancing civic engagement by allowing more and better opportunities for the same. In this chapter, I explore the theoretical and empirical literature on civic engagement, e-government, and their interaction. In the process, I identify key debates surrounding civic engagement through e-government, reveal some of the nuances associated with it, and through an operationalization of civic engagement through e-government, highlight the tools and techniques that are used to achieve it.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel E-Justice in Europe: From National Experiences to EU Cross-Border Service Provision
Nächstes Kapitel Online Privacy Protection in Chinese City Governments: An Analysis of Privacy Statements
Fußnoten
1
See (Bachen et al. 2008) for a conceptualization of youth civic engagement.
 
2
See (Kennedy 2007) for a list of public participation techniques and see (Coleman 1999) for a different version of this conceptualization.
 
3
One source for scholars interested in evaluating cases of participation in e-Governance is “Participedia,”which serves as a portal for decentralized collaborative decision making. It contains a roster of participatory governance cases from around the world. Please see: http://​participedia.​net/​en. For a peer reviewed assessment of the Participedia project, see Fung and Warren (2011).
 
Literatur
Abramson, J. B., Arterton, F. C., & Orren, G. R. (1988). The electronic commonwealth: The impact of new media technologies on democratic politics. New York: Basic Books.
Aladalah, M., Cheung, Y., & Lee, V. (2015). Enabling citizen participation in Gov. 2.0: An empowerment perspective. The Electronic Journal of e-Government, 13(2), 77–93.
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.CrossRef
Atkinson, R., & Leigh, A. (2003). Customer-oriented e-Government: Can we ever get there. Journal of Political Marketing, 2(3/4), 159–181.CrossRef
Bachen, C. R., Raphael, C., Lynn, K. M., McKee, C., & Philippi, J. (2008). Civic engagement, pedagogy, and information technology on web sites for youth. Political Communication, 25(3), 290–310.CrossRef
Berry, J. M., Kent, E. P., & Thomson, K. (1993). The rebirth of urban democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271.CrossRef
Caba Pérez, M. C., Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P., & López Hernández, A. M. (2010). Transparency and egovernment in developing countries: The case of Latin-American municipalities. In C. G. Reddick (Ed.), Citizens and e-government: Evaluating policy and management. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference (IGI Global).
Coleman, S. (1999). Cutting out the middleman: From virtual representation to direct deliberation. In B. N. Hague & B. Loader (Eds.), Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age. London; New York: Routledge.
Conroy, M., & Evans-Cowley, J. (2004). Informing and interacting: The use of e-Government for citizen participation in planning. Journal of E-Government, 1(3), 73–92.CrossRef
Dalton, R. (2008). Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies, 56(1), 76–98.CrossRef
David, N., Justice, J., & McNutt, J. (2015). Smart cities are transparent cities: The role of fiscal transparency in smart city governance. In M. P. Rodríguez Bolívar (Ed.), Transforming city governments for successful smart cities. Berlin: Springer.
Dryzek, J. (1999). Transnational democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 7(1), 30–51.CrossRef
Evans-Cowley, J., & Conroy, M. (2004). E-government and planning: Key citizen participation issues and applications. Columbus, OH: John Glenn Institute for Public Service and Public Policy.
Evans-Cowley, J., & Conroy, M. (2006). The growth of e-government in municipal planning. Journal of Urban Technology, 13(1), 81–107.CrossRef
Firmstone, J., & Coleman, S. (2015). Public engagement in local government: The voice and influence of citizens in online communicative spaces. Information, Communication & Society, 18(6), 680–695.CrossRef
Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513–522.CrossRef
Fung, A., & Warren, M. E. (2011). The participedia project: An introduction. International Public Management Journal, 14(3), 341–362.CrossRef
Gearhart, S., & Kang, S. (2010). E-government and civic engagement: How is citizens’ use of city web sites related with civic involvement and political behaviors? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54(3).
Heeks, R. (2005). e-Government as a carrier of context. Journal of Public Policy, 25(1), 51–74.CrossRef
Held, D. (1987). Models of democracy. Cambridge: Polity in Association with Blackwell.
Hiller, J. S., & Bélanger, F. (2001). Privacy strategies for electronic government. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999). Consensus building and complex adaptive systems. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(4), 412–423.CrossRef
Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55–65.CrossRef
Jaeger, P. T., & Bertot, J. C. (2010). Designing, implementing, and evaluating user-centered and citizen-centered e-government. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 6(2), 1–17.CrossRef
Johnson, C. (2015). Local civic participation and democratic legitimacy: Evidence from England and Wales. Political Studies, 63(4), 765–792.CrossRef
Jordan, G., & Maloney, W. A. (1996). How bumble-bees fly: Accounting for public interest participation. Political Studies, 44(4), 668.CrossRef
Jun, K. N., Wang, F., & Wang, D. (2014). E-Government use and perceived government transparency and service capacity. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(1), 125–151.CrossRef
Kang, S., & Gearhart, S. (2010). E-government and civic engagement: How is citizens’ use of city web sites related with civic involvement and political behaviors? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54(3), 443–462.CrossRef
Kennedy, S. (2007). Write the rules and win: Understanding citizen participation game dynamics. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1067–1076.CrossRef
King, C. S., Feltey, K. M., & O’Neil, B. S. (1998). The question of participation: Toward authentic public participation in public administration. Public Administration Review, 58(4), 317–326.CrossRef
Laris, M. (2009). O brave new world that has such avatars in it! Arlington among governments establishing a virtual presence. The Washington Post.
Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136.CrossRef
Levi, M., & Sacks, A. (2009). Legitimating beliefs: Sources and indicators. Regulation & Governance, 3(4), 311–333.CrossRef
Li, M., & Gregor, S. (2011). Outcomes of effective explanations: Empowering citizens through online advice. Decision Support Systems, 52(1), 119–132.CrossRef
Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446–454.CrossRef
Macintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. Paper read at 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, at Hawaii.
Macintosh, A., & Tambouris, E. (2009). Electronic participation: First international conference, ePart 2009, Linz, Austria, September 1–3, 2009: Proceedings. Springer.
Malina, A. (1999). Perspectives on citizen democratization and alienation in the public sphere. In B. N. Hague & B. Loader (Eds.), Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age. London; New York: Routledge.
Manin, B. (1987). On legitimacy and political deliberation: A sketch of a theory of political deliberation. Political Theory, 15(3), 338–368.CrossRef
Manza, J., & Cook, F. L. (2002). A democratic polity? Three views of policy responsiveness to public opinion in the United States. American Politics Research, 30(6), 630–667.CrossRef
McMillan, S. J. (2002). A four-part model of cyber-interactivity: Some cyber-places are more interactive than others. New Media and Society, 4(2), 271–292.CrossRef
Montgomery, K. C., Gottlieb-Robles, B., & Larson, G. P. (2004). Youth as E-citizens: Engaging the digital generation. American University, Center for Social Media, and American University, School of Communication. Washington, DC: Center for Social Media.
Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424–433.CrossRef
Musso, J., Weare, C., & Hale, M. (2000). Designing web technologies for local governance reform: Good management or good democracy? Political Communication, 17(1), 1–19. doi:10.​1080/​105846000198486.CrossRef
Nijkamp, P., & Cohen-Blankshtain, G. (2009). The importance of ICT for cities: E-governance and cyber perceptions. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRef
Reece, B. (2006). E-government literature review. Journal of E-Government, 3(1), 69–110.CrossRef
Richard, E. (1999). Tools of governance. In B. N. Hague & B. Loader (Eds.), Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age. London; New York: Routledge.
Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P., Alcaide Muñoz, L., & López Hernández, M. P. (2013). Determinants of financial transparency in government. International Public Management Journal, 16(4), 557–602.CrossRef
Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences: Integrating Knowledge and Practice to Advance Human Dignity, 21(2-3), 129–168.CrossRef
Scott, J. K. (2006). “E” the people: Do US municipal government web sites support public involvement? Public Administration Review, 66(3), 341–353.CrossRef
Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., & Yoon, S. H. (2001). Communication, context, and community: An exploration of print, broadcast, and Internet influences. Communication Research, 28(4), 464–506.CrossRef
Syed, P., & Whiteley, P. (1997). Political capital formation among British party members. In J. W. van Deth (Ed.), Private groups and public life: Social participation, voluntary associations and political involvement in representative democracies. New York: Routledge.
Thomas, J. C. (1995). Public participation in public decisions: New skills and strategies for public managers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 375–400.CrossRef
U.S. Census Bureau, & File, T. (2013). Computer and Internet use in the United States. Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau.
Wondolleck, J. M., & Yaffee, S. L. (2000). Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Metadaten
Titel
Democratizing Government: What We Know About E-Government and Civic Engagement
verfasst von
Nina David
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
International E-Government Development

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63283-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-63284-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63284-1_4

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise