Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
The Effect of the Carbon Tax to Minimize Emission Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2022 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Determining the Right Location for Turkey’s Nuclear Energy Investment Projects Based on Zero-carbon Emission Purposes

verfasst von : Çağatay Çağlayan, Dilan Kararoğlu, Duygu Yavuz

Erschienen in: Clean Energy Investments for Zero Emission Projects

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Turkey’s energy needs are increasing in parallel with the increasing industrialization and population. To meet its increasing energy needs, Turkey needs energy sources that are more sustainable and in line with zero-carbon emission targets. Although fossil fuels can meet the energy needs, they are not energy sources suitable for Turkey’s targets. Because there are not enough fossil fuel reserves in Turkey, fossil fuels are not sustainable and fossil fuels cause high carbon emissions. Therefore, renewable energies and nuclear energy come to the fore. Turkey continues to invest in renewable energy, but renewable energy investments in the country will not be sufficient to meet the anticipated energy demand in the future. Thus, the best alternative option for Turkey is nuclear power plants. The main purpose of Turkey’s nuclear power plant projects is to protect energy resources, ensure energy security, reduce environmental pollution, and reduce the total cost of all electricity generation, but deciding for a nuclear power plant site is a very strategic and complex process. In this study, criteria for determining the right location in Turkey’s nuclear energy investment projects were determined and the relevant literature was examined. The seismic activity and population density of the region where the power plant will be established should be low, and the availability and sufficiency of cooling water in the said region should be high. Appropriate topography of the region will increase the safety of the reactor to be established and environmental sensitivity will protect the biodiversity and natural resources of the region. In addition, the power plant area should be built away from airports and areas of high terrorist activity to prevent aircraft crashes and terrorist attacks. Finally, cost is an important criterion for nuclear power plant projects. A cost-oriented approach to site selection will increase the efficiency of these projects.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel The Role of Organic Products in Preventing the Climate Crisis
Nächstes Kapitel Potential Impacts of Economic Growth, Energy Use, and Urbanization on Zero-carbon Emissions
Literatur
Abdelkareem, M. A., Elsaid, K., Wilberforce, T., Kamil, M., Sayed, E. T., & Olabi, A. (2021). Environmental aspects of fuel cells: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 752, 141803.CrossRef
Adamantiades, A., & Kessides, I. (2009). Nuclear power for sustainable development: Current status and future prospects. Energy Policy, 37(12), 5149–5166.CrossRef
Ağbulut, Ü., & Sarıdemir, S. (2021). A general view to converting fossil fuels to cleaner energy source by adding nanoparticles. International Journal of Ambient Energy, 42(13), 1569–1574.CrossRef
Baskurt, Z. M., & Aydin, C. C. (2018). Nuclear power plant site selection by Weighted Linear Combination in GIS environment, Edirne, Turkey. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 104, 85–101.CrossRef
Basu, P. C. (2019). Site evaluation for nuclear power plants–The practices. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 352, 110140.CrossRef
Bhuiyan, M. A., Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., Mikhaylov, A., Danish, M. S. S., Pinter, G., Uyeh, D. D., & Stepanova, D. (2022). Economic indicators and bioenergy supply in developed economies: QROF-DEMATEL and random forest models. Energy Reports, 8, 561–570.CrossRef
Bull, S. R. (2001). Renewable energy today and tomorrow. Proceedings of the IEEE, 89(8), 1216–1226.CrossRef
Byers, E. A., Hall, J. W., & Amezaga, J. M. (2014). Electricity generation and cooling water use: UK pathways to 2050. Global Environmental Change, 25, 16–30.CrossRef
Cardin, M. A., Zhang, S., & Nuttall, W. J. (2017). Strategic real option and flexibility analysis for nuclear power plants considering uncertainty in electricity demand and public acceptance. Energy Economics, 64, 226–237.CrossRef
Chapin, D. M., Cohen, K. P., Davis, W. K., Kintner, E. E., Koch, L. J., Landis, J. W., Levenson, M., Mandil, I. H., Pate, Z. T., Rockwell, T., Schriesheim, A., Simpson, J. W., Squire, A., Starr, C., Stone, H. E., Taylor, J. J., Todreas, N., Wolfe, B., & Zebroski, E. L. (2002). Nuclear power plants and their fuel as terrorist targets. Science, 297(5589), 1997–1999.CrossRef
Chontanawat, J., Hunt, L. C., & Pierse, R. (2008). Does energy consumption cause economic growth?: Evidence from a systematic study of over 100 countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 30(2), 209–220.CrossRef
Devanand, A., Kraft, M., & Karimi, I. A. (2019). Optimal site selection for modular nuclear power plants. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 125, 339–350.CrossRef
Dinçer, H., Lisin, A., Ubay, G. G., & Çağlayan, Ç. (2021). Identifying the best financing sources for renewable energy companies in Latin American Countries. In Strategic approaches to energy management (pp. 1–12). Springer.
Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., Çağlayan, Ç., & Uluer, G. S. (2020). The contribution of nuclear energy investment on sustainable financial and economic development. Journal of Financial Economics and Banking, 1(1), 39–51.
Doğan, B., & Erol, D. (2019, October). The future of fossil and alternative fuels used in automotive industry. In 2019 3rd International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies (ISMSIT) (pp. 1–8). IEEE.
Dong, W., Zhao, G., Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., & Ubay, G. G. (2022). A novel hybrid decision making approach for the strategic selection of wind energy projects. Renewable Energy, 185, 321–337.CrossRef
Du, L., Dinçer, H., Ersin, İ., & Yüksel, S. (2020). IT2 fuzzy-based multidimensional evaluation of coal energy for sustainable economic development. Energies, 13(10), 2453.CrossRef
Ediger, V. Ş. (2019). An integrated review and analysis of multi-energy transition from fossil fuels to renewables. Energy Procedia, 156, 2–6.CrossRef
Ekmekçioglu, M., Can Kutlu, A., & Kahraman, C. (2011). A fuzzy multi-criteria SWOT analysis: An application to nuclear power plant site selection. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 4(4), 583–595.
Frano, R. L., Pugliese, G., & Forasassi, G. (2010). Preliminary seismic analysis of an innovative near term reactor: Methodology and application. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 240(6), 1671–1678.CrossRef
Gessinger, G. (1997). Lower CO2 emissions through better technology. Energy Conversion and Management, 38, S25–S30.CrossRef
Halicioglu, F. (2009). An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy, 37(3), 1156–1164.CrossRef
Hamit-Haggar, M. (2012). Greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: A panel cointegration analysis from Canadian industrial sector perspective. Energy Economics, 34(1), 358–364.CrossRef
Hossain, M. S. (2011). Panel estimation for CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and urbanization of newly industrialized countries. Energy Policy, 39(11), 6991–6999.CrossRef
James, N., Sitharam, T. G., Padmanabhan, G., & Pillai, C. S. (2014). Seismic microzonation of a nuclear power plant site with detailed geotechnical, geophysical and site effect studies. Natural Hazards, 71(1), 419–462.CrossRef
Jewell, J., & Ates, S. A. (2015). Introducing nuclear power in Turkey: A historic state strategy and future prospects. Energy Research & Social Science, 10, 273–282.CrossRef
Kampa, M., & Castanas, E. (2008). Human health effects of air pollution. Environmental Pollution, 151(2), 362–367.CrossRef
Komendantova, N., Patt, A., Barras, L., & Battaglini, A. (2012). Perception of risks in renewable energy projects: The case of concentrated solar power in North Africa. Energy Policy, 40, 103–109.CrossRef
Kou, G., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2022). Inventive problem-solving map of innovative carbon emission strategies for solar energy-based transportation investment projects. Applied Energy, 311, 118680.CrossRef
Kutbi, I. I. (1987). A pragmatic pairwise group-decision method for selection of sites for nuclear power plants. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 100(1), 49–63.CrossRef
Leventhal, P. L., & Hoenig, M. M. (1990). Nuclear terrorism: Reactor sabotage and weapons proliferation risks. Contemporary Economic Policy, 8(3), 106–121.CrossRef
Li, K., & Lin, B. (2015). Impacts of urbanization and industrialization on energy consumption/CO2 emissions: Does the level of development matter? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 1107–1122.CrossRef
Li, Y. X., Wu, Z. X., Dinçer, H., Kalkavan, H., & Yüksel, S. (2021). Analyzing TRIZ-based strategic priorities of customer expectations for renewable energy investments with interval type-2 fuzzy modeling. Energy Reports, 7, 95–108.CrossRef
Liu, Y., Gong, X., Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., & Aydın, R. (2021). A multidimensional outlook to energy investments for the countries with continental shelf in East Mediterranean Region with Hybrid Decision Making Model based on IVIF logic. Energy Reports, 7, 158–173.CrossRef
Liu, Y., Langer, V., Høgh-Jensen, H., & Egelyng, H. (2010). Life cycle assessment of fossil energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in Chinese pear production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(14), 1423–1430.CrossRef
Liu, J., Lv, J., Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., & Karakuş, H. (2021). Selection of renewable energy alternatives for green blockchain investments: A hybrid IT2-based fuzzy modelling. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 28, 1–15.CrossRef
Madlener, R., & Alcott, B. (2009). Energy rebound and economic growth: A review of the main issues and research needs. Energy, 34(3), 370–376.CrossRef
Martín, D. S., & del Mar Rubio-Varas, M. (2017). Freshwater for cooling needs: A long-run approach to the nuclear water footprint in Spain. Ecological Economics, 140, 146–156.CrossRef
Meng, Y., Dincer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2021). Understanding the innovative developments with two-stage technology S-curve of nuclear energy projects. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 140, 103924.CrossRef
Menyah, K., & Wolde-Rufael, Y. (2010). CO2 emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth in the US. Energy Policy, 38(6), 2911–2915.CrossRef
Mikayilov, J. I., Mukhtarov, S., Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., & Aydın, R. (2020). Elasticity analysis of fossil energy sources for sustainable economies: A case of gasoline consumption in Turkey. Energies, 13(3), 731.CrossRef
Mochizuki, M., Singh, R., Nguyen, T., & Nguyen, T. (2014). Heat pipe based passive emergency core cooling system for safe shutdown of nuclear power reactor. Applied Thermal Engineering, 73(1), 699–706.CrossRef
Mohammed Saeed, I. M., Saleh, M. A. M., Hashim, S., Hama, Y. M. S., Hamza, K., & Al-Shatri, S. H. (2020). The radiological assessment, hazard evaluation, and spatial distribution for a hypothetical nuclear power plant accident at Baiji potential site. Environmental Sciences Europe, 32(1), 1–12.CrossRef
Nisan, S., Caruso, G., Humphries, J. R., Mini, G., Naviglio, A., Bielak, B., & Volpi, L. (2003). Sea-water desalination with nuclear and other energy sources: The EURODESAL project. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 221(1–3), 251–275.CrossRef
Pao, H. T., & Tsai, C. M. (2011). Modeling and forecasting the CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth in Brazil. Energy, 36(5), 2450–2458.CrossRef
Santini, L., Accornero, C., & Cioncolini, A. (2016). On the adoption of carbon dioxide thermodynamic cycles for nuclear power conversion: A case study applied to Mochovce 3 Nuclear Power Plant. Applied Energy, 181, 446–463.CrossRef
Sari, R., & Soytas, U. (2007). The growth of income and energy consumption in six developing countries. Energy Policy, 35(2), 889–898.CrossRef
Sarkar, M. A. R., Ehsan, M., & Islam, M. A. (2003). Issues relating to energy conservation and renewable energy in Bangladesh. Energy for Sustainable Development, 7(2), 77–87.CrossRef
Sato, O., Tatematsu, K., & Hasegawa, T. (1998). Reducing future CO2 emissions—the role of nuclear energy. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 32(3–4), 323–330.CrossRef
Shang, H., Su, F., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2021). Identifying the strategic priorities of the technical factors for the sustainable low carbon industry based on macroeconomic conditions. SAGE Open, 11(2), 21582440211016345.CrossRef
Sovacool, B. K., Gilbert, A., & Nugent, D. (2014). An international comparative assessment of construction cost overruns for electricity infrastructure. Energy Research & Social Science, 3, 152–160.CrossRef
Soydan, O. (2021). Solar power plants site selection for sustainable ecological development in Nigde, Turkey. SN Applied Sciences, 3(1), 1–18.CrossRef
Strickland, E. (2011). 24 hours at Fukushima. IEEE Spectrum, 48(11), 35–42.CrossRef
Uluer, G. S., & Çağlayan, Ç. (2021). The economic and environmental importance of Akkuyu NUCLEAR Power Plant in Turkey. In Handbook of research on strategic management for current energy investments (pp. 300–319). IGI Global.CrossRef
Ünak, T. (2000). What is the potential use of thorium in the future energy production technology? Progress in Nuclear Energy, 37(1–4), 137–144.CrossRef
Waldrop, M. M. (2012). Nuclear energy: Radical reactors. Nature News, 492(7427), 26.CrossRef
Wolde-Rufael, Y. (2010). Bounds test approach to cointegration and causality between nuclear energy consumption and economic growth in India. Energy Policy, 38(1), 52–58.CrossRef
Xie, Y., Peng, Y., Yüksel, S., Dınçer, H., Uluer, G. S., Çağlayan, Ç., & Li, Y. (2020). Consensus-based public acceptance and mapping of nuclear energy investments using spherical and pythagorean fuzzy group decision making approaches. IEEE Access, 8, 206248–206263.CrossRef
Xie, Y., Zhou, Y., Peng, Y., Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., & an Xiang, P. (2021). An extended pythagorean fuzzy approach to group decision-making with incomplete preferences for analyzing balanced scorecard-based renewable energy investments. IEEE Access, 9, 43020–43035.CrossRef
Xu, B., Zhou, Y., & Pang, R. (2020). Seismic stability reliability assessment of nuclear power plant’s bank revetment considering unreinforced and reinforced situations. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 136, 107025.CrossRef
Yamamoto, M., Sakaguchi, A., Ochiai, S., & Imanaka, T. (2014). Isotopic compositions of transuranic nuclides released by the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident: With emphasis on Cm isotopes. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 300(3), 1045–1052.CrossRef
Yan, X., Sato, H., Inaba, Y., Noguchi, H., Tachibana, Y., & Kunitomi, K. (2014). Evaluation of GTHTR300A nuclear power plant design with dry cooling. International Journal of Energy Research, 38(11), 1467–1477.CrossRef
Yüksel, S., & Çağlayan, Ç. (2020). The factors affecting the investors’ decisions: A study on nuclear energy investments. Economics Literature, 2(2), 177–185.CrossRef
Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2022). Identifying the strategic priorities of nuclear energy investments using hesitant 2-tuple interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy DEMATEL. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 145, 104103.CrossRef
Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., Çağlayan, Ç., & Uluer, G. S. (2021). Determining the optimal financial strategies for nuclear energy companies. In Financial strategies in competitive markets (pp. 1–16). Springer.
Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., Çağlayan, Ç., Uluer, G. S., & Lisin, A. (2022). Bitcoin mining with nuclear energy. In Multidimensional strategic outlook on global competitive energy economics and finance. Emerald Publishing Limited.
Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Gong, C., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2022). An integrated hesitant 2-tuple Pythagorean fuzzy analysis of QFD-based innovation cost and duration for renewable energy projects. Energy, 248, 123561.CrossRef
Zhao, Y., Xu, Y., Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., & Ubay, G. G. (2021). Hybrid IT2 fuzzy modelling with alpha cuts for hydrogen energy investments. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(13), 8835–8851.CrossRef
Zhou, P., Luo, J., Cheng, F., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2021). Analysis of risk priorities for renewable energy investment projects using a hybrid IT2 hesitant fuzzy decision-making approach with alpha cuts. Energy, 224, 120184.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Determining the Right Location for Turkey’s Nuclear Energy Investment Projects Based on Zero-carbon Emission Purposes
verfasst von
Çağatay Çağlayan
Dilan Kararoğlu
Duygu Yavuz
Copyright-Jahr
2022
Buch
Clean Energy Investments for Zero Emission Projects

Print ISBN: 978-3-031-12957-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-12958-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2022

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12958-2_7