nach oben

Erschienen in:

2010 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Deterministic and Probabilistic Safety Analysis

verfasst von : Mohammad Modarres, Inn Seock Kim

Erschienen in: Handbook of Nuclear Engineering

Verlag: Springer US

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The main theme of this chapter is the process and evolution of deterministic and probabilistic safety analyses that have played a backbone role in assuring public health and safety in the peaceful uses of nuclear power. The chapter begins with a discussion of the origin of nuclear power safety analysis together with the overall perspectives of both deterministic and probabilistic approaches that are still prevalent, although there is an increasing trend in application of probabilistic safety analysis in safety-related decision making. Deterministic approaches, such as the defense-in-depth or safety margin, are regarded as a means to cope with uncertainties associated with adequacy of safety features. As probabilistic methods and applications gain maturity and acceptance, the uncertainties associated with safety features are measured and described probabilistically. The chapter concludes with a detailed discussion of the probabilistic safety assessment and its uses in nuclear power safety analysis.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Noise Techniques in Nuclear Systems

Nächstes Kapitel Multiphase Flows: Compressible Multi-Hydrodynamics

Ahearne J et al (2001) The regulatory process for the nuclear power reactors: a review. Report of the CSIS Nuclear Regulatory Process Review Steering Committee

Ahn SK, Kim IS, Oh KM (2010) Deterministic and risk-informed approaches for safety analysis of advanced reactors: part I, deterministic approaches. To appear, Reliab Eng Syst Safety

AICHE (1989) Guidelines for process equip- ment data. Center for Chemical Process Safety, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York

Aldemir T, Siu N (1996) Reliability and safety analysis of dynamic process systems. Reliab Eng Syst Safety (Special Issue) 52:181–337CrossRef

ANS (1973) Nuclear safety criteria for the design of stationary pressurized water reactor plants, ANSI N18.2-1973. American National Standards Institute, American Nuclear Society, Hinsdale

ANS (1983) Nuclear safety criteria for the design of stationary pressurized water reactor plants, ANSI/ANS-51.1-1983. American National Standards Institute, American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park

Ascher H, Feingold H (1984) Repairable systems reliability: modeling and inference, misconception and their causes. Marcel Dekker, New York

Azarkhail M (2007) Agent autonomy approach to physics based reliability modeling of structures and mechanical systems. Ph.d. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park

Azarkhail M, Modarres M (2004) A Study of implications of using importance measures in risk-informed decisions. In: PSAM-7, ESREL 04 Joint Conference, Berlin, Germany, 2004

Azarkhail M, Modarres M (2006) An intelligent-agent-oriented approach to risk analysis of complex dynamic systems with applications in planetary missions. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on probabilistic safety assessment and management, PSAM8, New Orleans, USA, 2006

Birnbaum ZW (1969) On the importance of different components in a multicomponent system. In: Krishnaiah PR (ed) Multivariate analysis II. Academic Press, New York

Carlisle R (1997) Probabilistic risk assessment in nuclear reactors: engineering success, public relations failure. Technol Culture 38:920–941CrossRef

Chang YH, Mosleh A, Dang V (2003) Dynamic probabilistic risk assessment: framework, tool, and application. In: Proceedings of the society for risk analysis annual meeting, Baltimore, 2003

Colglazier E, Weatherwas R (1986) Failure estimates for the space shuttle. In: Abstracts of the Society for Risk Analysis Annual Meeting, Boston, 1986

Crow LH (1990) Evaluating the reliability of repairable systems. In: IEEE Proceedings of the annual reliability and maintainability sym- posium, pp. 275–279CrossRef

Delaney MJ, Apostolakis GE, Driscoll MJ (2005) Risk-informed design guidance for future reactor systems. Nuc Eng Des 235:1537–1556CrossRef

Dezfuli H, Modarres M (1984) A truncation methodology for evaluation of large fault trees. IEEE Trans Reliab R-33:325–328

DOD (1995) Military handbook, reliability prediction of electronic equipment. MIL-HDBK-217F, Department of Defense

Dugan J, Bavuso S, Boyd M (1993) Dynamic fault tree models for fault tolerant computer systems. IEEE Trans Reliab 40(3):363

EPRI (1995) PSA applications guide. Electric Power Research Institute, TR-105396, Palo Alto

EPRI (2005) EPRI/NRC-RES fire PRA methodology for nuclear power facilities. EPRI 1011989, NUREG/CR-6850, Palo Alto, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC

Ericson C (1999) Fault tree analysis – A history. In: Proceedings of the 17th international system safety conference, Orlando, 1999

Farmer FR (1967) Reactor safety and siting: A proposed risk criterion. Nucl Safety 8:539–548

Fischer, D (1997) History of the international atomic energy agency: The first forty years. International Atomic Energy Agency

Fleming KN (2003) Issues and recommendations for advancement of pra technology in risk-informed decision making, NUREG/CR-6813. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

Fleming KN, Silady FA (2002) A risk informed defense-in-depth framework for existing and advanced reactors. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 78:205–225CrossRef

Ford D (1977) A history of Federal nuclear safety assessments: From WASH 740 through the reactor safety study. Union of Concerned Scientists, Washington

Frankel E (2002) Systems reliability and risk analysis, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

Fussell J (1975) How to hand calculate system reliability and safety characteristics. IEEE Trans Reliab 24(3):169–174CrossRef

Green A, Bourne A (1972) Reliability technology. Wiley, London

Hu YS, Modarres M (1999) Evaluating system behavior through dynamic master logic diagram (DMLD) modeling. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 64:241–269CrossRef

Hunt RN, Modarres M (1984) Integrated economic risk management in a nuclear power plant. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Society for Risk Analysis, Knoxville, TN, October, 1984; published in Risk Abstracts, Vol. 2, No. 2.

IAEA (1991) Safety culture. 75-INSAG-4, A report by the international nuclear safety advisory group, International Atomic Energy Agency

IAEA (1996) Defense in depth in nuclear safety. INSAG-10, A report by the international nuclear safety advisory group, International Atomic Energy Agency

IEEE (1984) IEEE guide to the collection and presentation of electrical, electronic, sensing component, and mechanical equipment reliability data for nuclear-power generating stations, IEEE Std 500–1984. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York

Kaplan S, Garrick J (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal 1:11–28CrossRef

Kapur KC, Lamberson LR (1977) Reliability in engineering design. Wiley, New York

Kemeny JG, Babbitt B, Haggerty PE, Lewis C et al (1979) Staff reports to the President’s commission on the accident at three mile island. Reports of the Technical Assessment Task Force, Washington, DC

Kim IS (1996) Improving technical specifications from a risk perspective. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 54:83–87CrossRef

Kim IS (2008) Feasibility study for development of human error pattern analysis methodology for operational experience feedback. Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, Republic of Korea

Kim IS, Modarres M (1987) Application of goal tree-success tree model as the knowledge base of operator advisory systems. Nucl Eng Des 104: 67–81CrossRef

Kim IS, Martorell S, Vesely WE, Samanta PK (1994) Risk analysis of surveillance requirements including their adverse effects. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 45:225–234CrossRef

Kim IS, Ahn SK, Hong SJ, Lee HJ (2008) New insights on risk-informed performance-based approaches to technology-neutral regulatory framework for generation IV reactors. In: Proceedings of the 9th international probabilistic safety assessment and management conference, PSAM9, Hong Kong, 2008

Kim IS, Ahn SK, Oh KM (2010) Deterministic and risk-informed approaches for safety analysis of advanced reactors: part II, risk-informed approaches. To appear, Reliab Eng Syst Safety

Kouts H (1998) History of safety research programs and some lessons to be drawn from it. In: 26th water reactor safety information meeting, Bethesda, 1998

Kumamoto H, Henley EJ (1996) Probabilistic risk assessment for engineers and scientists. IEEE Press, New York

Lewis H et al (1975) American physical society reactor study review group. Report on WASH-1400

Meserve R (2001) The evolution of safety goals and their connection to safety culture. Speech at the American Nuclear Society topical meeting on safety goals and safety culture, Milwaukee, 2001

Modarres M (1993) What every engineer should know about reliability and risk analysis. Marcel Dekker, New York

Modarres M (2006) Risk analysis in engineering, techniques, tools and trends. CRC Press, Boca Raton

Modarres M (2009) Advanced nuclear power plant regulation using risk-informed and performance-based methods. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 94:211–217CrossRef

Modarres M, Kaminskiy M, Krivtsov V (1999) Reliability engineering and risk analysis: A practical guide. Marcel Dekker, New York

Mosleh A, Fleming KN, Parry GW, Paula HM et al (1988) Procedure for treating common cause failures in safety and reliability studies, NUREG/CR-4780, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

Stamatelatos M, Apostolakis G, Dezfuli H, Everline C et al (2002) Probabilistic risk assessment procedures guide for NASA managers and practitioners, Vers. 1.1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC

NEI (2006) Risk-informed technical specifications initiative 4b, Risk-managed technical specifications (RMTS) guidelines, NEI-06–09, Rev. 0. Nuclear Energy Institute, Washington, DC

NEI (2007) Risk-informed technical specifications initiative 5b, risk-informed method for control of surveillance frequencies, NEI-04–10, Rev. 1. Nuclear Energy Institute, Washington, DC

Nelson W (1990) Accelerated testing: statistical models, test plans and data analyses. Wiley, New York

NSAC (1979) Analysis of three mile island – unit 2 accident. Nuclear Safety Analysis Center, NSAC-1

NUMARC (1993) Industry guideline for monitoring the effectiveness of maintenance at nuclear power plants, NUMARC 93–01. Nuclear Management and Resources Council

Poucet A (1988) Survey of methods used to assess human reliability in the human factors reliability benchmark exercise. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 22:257–268CrossRef

Reason J, Hobbs A (2003) Managing maintenance error. Ashgate, England

Rhodes R (1986) The making of the atomic bomb. Simon and Schuster, New York

Rogovin M, Frampton GT Jr. (1980) Three mile island – A report to the commissioners and to the public. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Special Inquiry Group, NUREG/CR-1250, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

Samanta PK, Kim IS, Mankamo T, Vesely WE (1994) Handbook of methods for risk-based analyses of technical specifications. NUREG/CR-6141, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DCCrossRef

Sattison MB et al (1990) Analysis of core damage frequency: zion, unit 1 internal events. NUREG/CR-4550, Vol. 7, Rev. 1, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

Smidts C (1996) Software reliability. In: Whitaker JC (ed) The electronics handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton

Sorensen J, Apostolakis G, Kress T, Powers D (1999) On the role of defense-in-depth in risk-informed regulation. In: Proceedings of the probabilistic safety assessment PSA’99, Washington, DC., American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, IL

Stamatis DH (2003) Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution, 2nd edn. ASQ Quality Press, Wisconsin, USA

Starr C (1969) Social Benefit versus technological risk. Science 19:1232–1238CrossRef

Swain AD, Guttmann HE (1983) Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications, NUREG/CR-1278, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC), Washington DC

USAEC (1957) WASH-740, Theoretical possibilities and consequences of major accidents in large nuclear power plants. US Atomic Energy Commission, AKA The Brookhaven Report

USAEC (1966) Minutes of the AEC general advisory committee. US Atomic Energy Commission

USNRC (1956) Domestic licensing of production and utilization facilities, Title 10. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50, 21FR355

USNRC (1975) Reactor safety study – an assessment of accident risks in US commercial nuclear power plants. WASH-1400 (NUREG-75/014, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC)

USNRC (1977) Single failure criterion. SECY-77–439

USNRC (1978) Standard format and content of safety analysis reports for nuclear power plants – LWR edition. Regulatory Guide 1.70, Revision 3

USNRC (1980a) NRC action plan developed as a result of the TMI-2 accident. NUREG-0660, Rev. 1, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

USNRC (1980b) Severe accident risks: An assessment for five US Nuclear Power Plants. NUREG-1150, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

USNRC (1983) PRA procedures guide: a guide to the performance of probabilistic risk assessments for nuclear power plants. NUREG/CR-2300, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

USNRC (1986) Safety goals for the operation of nuclear power plants; policy statement. 51 FR 30028

USNRC (1988) Individual plant examination for severe accident vulnerabilities – 10 CFR 50.54(f). Generic Lett 1:88–20

USNRC (1991) Individual plant examination of external events (ipeee) for severe accident vulnerabilities – 10 CFR 50.54(f). Generic Lett 4: 88–20

USNRC (1993) Final policy statement on technical specifications improvements for nuclear power plants. 58FR39132

USNRC (1995) Use of probabilistic risk assessment methods in nuclear regulatory activities; final policy statement. 60FR42622

USNRC (1997a) Maintenance rule status, results, and lessons learned. SECY-97–055

USNRC (1997b) Monitoring the effectiveness of maintenance at nuclear power plants. Regulatory Guide 1.160

USNRC (1998a) White paper on risk-informed and performance-based regulation. SECY-98–144

USNRC (1998b) An approach for plant-specific, risk-informed decisionmaking: inservice testing. Regulatory Guide 1.175

USNRC (1998c) An approach for plant-specific, risk-informed decisionmaking: technical specifications. Regulatory Guide 1.177

USNRC(1999a) General design criteria for nuclear power plants, Appendix A of 10 CFR 50

USNRC (1999b) General requirements for monitoring the effectiveness of maintenance at nuclear power plants, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 65. 64FR72001

USNRC (1999c) Staff Briefing on reactor inspection, enforcement and assessment

USNRC (2000) Consolidated line item improvement process for adopting standard technical specifications changes for power reactors. Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) 2000–06

USNRC (2001) Modified reactor safety goal policy statement. SECY-01–0009

USNRC (2002a) Perspectives gained from the individual plant examination of external events (IPEEE) program. NUREG-1742, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

USNRC (2002b) An approach for using probabilistic risk assessment in risk-informed decisions on plant-specific changes to the licensing basis. Regulatory Guide 1.174, Rev. 1

USNRC (2003a) Acceptance criteria for emergency core cooling systems for light-water nuclear power reactors, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations. Part 46, 68FR54142

USNRC (2003b) An approach for plant-specific risk-informed decisionmaking for inservice inspection of piping. Regulatory Guide 1.178, Rev. 1

USNRC (2003c) NUREG-CR-6813, Issues and recommendations for advancement of PRA technology in risk-informed decision making. Letter of ACRS Chairman M.V. Bonaca to EDO Director W.D. Travers, ACRSR-2034, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

USNRC (2004) An approach for estimating the frequencies of various containment failure modes and bypass events. NUREG/CR-6595, Rev.1, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

USNRC (2005a) Technical work to support evaluation of a broader change to the single-failure criterion. Technical report

USNRC (2005b) Independent verification of the mitigating systems performance index (MSPI) results for the pilot plants. NUREG-1816, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

USNRC (2006) Reactor oversight process. NUREG-1649, Rev. 4, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

USNRC (2007a) Combined license applications for nuclear power plants (LWR edition). Regulatory Guide 1.206

USNRC (2007b) Standard review plan for the review of safety analysis reports for nuclear powerplants. NUREG-0800, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

USNRC (2007c) Feasibility study for a risk-informed and performance-based regulatory structure for future plant licensing. NUREG-1860, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

USNRC (2007d) 19.0 Probabilistic risk assessment and severe accident evaluation for new reactors. In: Standard review plan for the review of safety analysis reports for nuclear power plants. NUREG-0800, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

USNRC (2007e) An approach for determining the technical adequacy of psrobabilistic risk assessment results for risk-informed activities. Regulatory guide 1.200, Rev. 1

USNRC (2007f) Operating reactor assessment program, inspection manual chapter 0305

Wood W (1983) Nuclear safety, risks and regulation. American Enterprise Institute – Public Policy Research

Titel: Deterministic and Probabilistic Safety Analysis
verfasst von: Mohammad Modarres
Inn Seock Kim
Verlag: Springer US
Buch: Handbook of Nuclear Engineering
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-98130-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-0-387-98149-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98149-9_15