nach oben

Journal of Science Education and Technology

Erschienen in:

01.06.2009

Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure University Students’ Biotechnology Attitude

verfasst von: Mehmet Erdogan, Murat Özel, Muhammet Uşak, Pavol Prokop

Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Ausgabe 3/2009

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The impact of biotechnologies on peoples’ everyday lives continuously increases. Measuring young peoples’ attitudes toward biotechnologies is therefore very important and its results are useful not only for science curriculum developers and policy makers, but also for producers and distributors of genetically modified products. Despite of substantial number of instruments which focused on measuring student attitudes toward biotechnology, a majority of them were not rigorously validated. This study deals with the development and validation of an attitude questionnaire toward biotechnology. Detailed information on development and validation process of the instrument is provided. Data gathered from 326 university students provided evidence for the validity and reliability of the new instrument which consists of 28 attitude items on a five point likert type scale. It is believed that the instrument will serve as a valuable tool for both instructors and researchers in science education to assess students’ biotechnology attitudes.

Vorheriger Artikel Students’ Learning with the Connected Chemistry (CC1) Curriculum: Navigating the Complexities of the Particulate World

Nächster Artikel Teaching Energy Conservation as a Unifying Principle in Physics

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Aerni P (2002) Stakeholder attitudes toward the risks and benefits of agricultural biotechnology in developing countries: a comparison between Mexico and the Philippines. Risk Anal 22(6):1123–1137. doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00277 CrossRef

Anastasi A (1996) Psychological testing. Macmillan, New York

Arvanitoyannis IS, Krystallis A (2005) Consumers’ beliefs, attitudes and intentions towards genetically modified foods, based on the “perceived safety vs. benefits” perspective. Int J Food Sci Technol 40(4):343–360. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.00916.x CrossRef

Bennett J, Lubben F, Hogarth S (2007) Bringing science to life: a synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Sci Educ 91(3):347–370. doi:10.1002/sce.20186 CrossRef

Chen SY, Raffan J (1999) Biotechnology: student’s knowledge and attitudes in the UK and Taiwan. J Biol Educ 34(1):17–23

Coll RK, Lay MC, Taylor N (2008) Scientists and scientific thinking: understanding scientific thinking through an investigation of scientists views about superstitions and religious beliefs. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ 4(3):197–214

Dawson V (2007) An exploration of high school (12–17 year old) students’ understandings of, and attitudes towards biotechnology processes. Res Sci Educ 37(1):59–73. doi:10.1007/s11165-006-9016-7 CrossRef

Dawson V, Schibeci R (2003a) Western Australian school students’ understanding of biotechnology. Int J Sci Educ 25(1):57–69. doi:10.1080/09500690210126720 CrossRef

Dawson V, Schibeci R (2003b) Western Australian high school students’ attitudes towards biotechnology processes. J Biol Educ 38(1):7–12

DeVellis RF (1991) Scale development: theory and applications. Sage, Newbury Park

Dhindsa HS, Chung G (2003) Attitudes and achievement of Bruneian science students. Int J Sci Educ 25(8):907–922. doi:10.1080/09500690305025 CrossRef

Durant J, Bauer M, Gaskell G (1998) Biotechnology in the public sphere. Science Museum, London

Francis LJ, Greer JE (1999) Attitude toward science among secondary school pupils in Northern Ireland: relationship with sex, age and religion. Res Sci Technol Educ 17(1):67–74. doi:10.1080/0263514990170105 CrossRef

Fraser BJ (1977) Selection and validation of attitude scales for curriculum evaluation. Sci Educ 61(3):317–329. doi:10.1002/sce.3730610307 CrossRef

Fraser BJ (1979) Evaluation of a science-based curriculum. In: Walberg HJ (ed) Educational environments and effects: evaluation, policy, and productivity. McCutchan, Berkeley, pp 218–234

Fraser BJ (1989) Assessing and improving classroom environment. Curtin University, Perth

George D, Mallery P (2001) SPSS for windows: step by step. Allyn & Bacon, USA

Gunter B, Kinderlerer J, Beyleveld D (1998) Teenagers and biotechnology: a survey of understanding and opinion in Britain. Stud Sci Educ 32:81–112. doi:10.1080/03057269808560128 CrossRef

Goodrum D, Hackling M, Rennie L (2001) The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools. Research report. Training and Youth Affairs. http://www.dest.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/5DF3591E-DA7C-4CBD-A96C-CE404B552EB4/1546/sciencereport.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct 2008

Hamstra AM, Smink C (1996) Consumer and biotechnology in the Netherlands. Br Food J 98:34–38. doi:10.1108/00070709610119865 CrossRef

Human Genetics Commission (2001) Public attitudes to human genetic information: people’s panel quantitative study conducted for the human genetics commission. Human Genetics Commission, London

Jegede OJ, Fraser B (1989) Influence of socio-cultural factors on secondary school students’ attitudes towards science. Res Sci Educ 19:155–164. doi:10.1007/BF02356855 CrossRef

Klop T, Severiens S (2007) An exploration of attitudes towards modern biotechnology: a study among Dutch secondary school students. Int J Sci Educ 29(5):663–679. doi:10.1080/09500690600951556 CrossRef

Lock R, Miles C (1993) Biotechnology and genetic engineering: students’ knowledge and Attitudes. J Biol Educ 27(4):267–272

Macer D, Asada Y, Tsuzuki M, Akiyama S, Macer N (1996) Bioethics in high schools in Australia, Japan & New Zealand. Eubios Ethics Institute, Christchurch

Mangusson MK, Hursti UK (2002) Consumer attitudes towards genetically modified foods. Appetite 39:9–24. doi:10.1006/appe.2002.0486 CrossRef

Massarani L, Moreira IC (2005) Attitudes towards genetics: a case study among Brazilian high school students. Public Underst Sci 14:201–212. doi:10.1177/0963662505050992 CrossRef

Moerbeek H, Casimir G (2005) Gender differences in consumers’ acceptance of genetically modified foods. Int J Consum Stud 29(4):308–318

Moon W, Balasubramanian SK (2004) Public attitudes toward biotechnology: the mediating role of risk perceptions on the impact of trust, awareness, and outrage. Rev Agric Econ 26(2):186–208. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9353.2004.00170.x CrossRef

Munby H (1997) Issues of validity in science attitude measurement. J Res Sci Teach 34(4):337–341. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199704)34:4<337::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-S CrossRef

Olsher G, Dreyful A (1999) The Fostension-teaching approach as a means to develop junior high student attitudes towards biotechnologies. J Biol Educ 34(1):24–30

Pardo R, Midden C, Miller JD (2002) Attitudes toward biotechnology in the European Union. J Biotechnol 98(1):9–24. doi:10.1016/S0168-1656(02)00082-2 CrossRef

Priest SH, Bonfadelli H, Rusanen M (2003) The “trust gap” hypothesis: predicting support for biotechnology across national cultures as a function of trust in actors. Risk Anal 23(4):751–766. doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00353 CrossRef

Prokop P, Lešková A, Kubiatko M, Diran C (2007) Slovakian students’ knowledge of and attitudes toward biotechnology. Int J Sci Educ 29(7):895–907. doi:10.1080/09500690600969830 CrossRef

Reckase MD (1979) Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: results and implications. J Educ Stat 4:207–230. doi:10.2307/1164671 CrossRef

Saba A, Vassalo M (2002) Consumer attitudes towards the use of gene technology in tomato production. Food Qual Prefer 13(1):13–21. doi:10.1016/S0950-3293(01)00052-0 CrossRef

Sáez MJ, Niño AG, Carretero A (2008) Matching society values: students’ views of biotechnology. Int J Sci Educ 30(2):167–183. doi:10.1080/09500690601152386 CrossRef

Salta K, Tzougraki C (2004) Attitudes toward chemistry among 11th grade students in high schools in Greece. Sci Educ 88:535–547. doi:10.1002/sce.10134 CrossRef

Shanahan J, Scheufele D, Lee E (2002) The polls-trends: attitudes about agricultural biotechnology and genetically modified organism. Public Opin Q 65:267–281. doi:10.1086/322201 CrossRef

Spinner H, Fraser BJ (2005) Evaluation of an innovative mathematics program in terms of classroom environment, student attitudes, and conceptual development. Int J Sci Math Educ 3:267–293. doi:10.1007/s10763-004-6531-8 CrossRef

StatSoft Inc. (2001) Electronic statistics textbook. StatSoft, Oklahoma. http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/stathome.html. Accessed 11 May 2001

Steele F, Aubusson P (2004) The challenge in teaching biotechnology. Res Sci Educ 34(4):365–387. doi:10.1007/s11165-004-0842-1 CrossRef

Sturgis P, Cooper H, Fife-Schaw C (2005) Attitudes to biotechnology: estimating the opinions of a better informed public. N Genet Soc 24(1):34–58. doi:10.1080/14636770500037693

Subrahmanyan S, Cheng PS (2000) Perceptions and attitudes of Singaporeans toward genetically modified foods. J Consum Aff 34(2):269–290CrossRef

Tapia M, Marsh GE (2004) An instrument to measure mathematics attitudes. Acad Exch Q 8(2):16–21

Wie SH, Strohbehn CH, Hsu CHC (1998) Iowa dietitians’ attitudes toward and knowledge of genetically engineered and irradiated foods. J Am Diet Assoc 98(11):1331–1333. doi:10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00298-3 CrossRef

Titel: Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure University Students’ Biotechnology Attitude
verfasst von: Mehmet Erdogan
Murat Özel
Muhammet Uşak
Pavol Prokop
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2009
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology / Ausgabe 3/2009
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9146-6

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2009

The Impact of an Engineering Design Curriculum on Science Reasoning in an Urban Setting

Students’ Learning with the Connected Chemistry (CC1) Curriculum: Navigating the Complexities of the Particulate World

Teaching Energy Conservation as a Unifying Principle in Physics

Crossing Levels and Representations: The Connected Chemistry (CC1) Curriculum

How Can Blogging Help Teachers Realize the Goals of Reform-based Science Instruction? A Study of Nine Classroom Blogs

Effective Integration of ICT in Jordanian Schools: An Analysis of Pedagogical and Contextual Impediments in the Science Classroom

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten