Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Universal Access in the Information Society
Erschienen in: Universal Access in the Information Society 4/2018

05.01.2017 | Long Paper

Digital assessment in higher education

Promoting universal usability through requirements specification and universal design quality (UD-Q) reviews

verfasst von: Miriam Eileen Nes Begnum, Rikke Julie Foss-Pedersen

Erschienen in: Universal Access in the Information Society | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Statistics show there is a clear relationship between higher education and employment in Norway, especially for people with disabilities. The use of digital assessment solutions is increasing in Norwegian higher education. The overall goal of this study is therefore to highlight the potential for improvement of current practices related to universal design, both for providers of digital assessment solutions and for higher education institutions. Based on a case study of practices in Norwegian higher education sector, this article reviews existing requirements for ensuring universal design in digital assessment solutions, prototypes an approach to evaluating universal design quality (UD-Q) of two major Norwegian digital assessment solutions and investigates the compliance between providers’ self-assessments from interviews and UD-Q evaluation scores. The article presents two contributions: (1) an improved set of requirements for universal usability when procuring digital assessments solutions and (2) UD-Q, a stepwise feature analysis-based expert inspection method for evaluating the UD-Q of digital assessment solutions.
Vorheriger Artikel Research challenges in accessible MOOCs: a systematic literature review 2008–2016
Nächster Artikel Applying online externally-facilitated regulated learning and computational thinking to improve students’ learning

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
2.
Lid, I.M.: Universell utforming - Verdigrunnlag, kunnskap og praksis. Cappelen Damm Akademisk, Oslo (2013)
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Zhuhadar, L., Carson, B., Daday, J., Nasraoui, O.: A universal design infrastructure for multimodal presentation of materials in STEM programs: universal design. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, Florence, Italy, pp. 569–574 (2015)
17.
Klironomos, I., Antona, M., Basdekis, I., Stephanidis, C.: White paper: promoting design for all and e-accessibility in Europe. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 5(1), 105–119 (2006)CrossRef
18.
Bocconi, S., Dini, S., Ferlino, L., Martinoli, C., Ott, M.: ICT educational tools and visually impaired students: different answers to different accessibility needs. In: Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, Applications and Services, Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 4556, pp. 491–500 (2007)
19.
Rose, D.H., Strangman, N.: Universal design for learning: meeting the challenge of individual learning differences through a neurocognitive perspective. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 5(4), 381–391 (2007)CrossRef
20.
Buzzi, M., Buzzi, M., Leporini, B.: Accessing e-learning systems via screen reader: an example, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5613 Human-Computer Interaction. Interacting in Various Application Domains, pp. 21–30 (2009)CrossRef
21.
Bocconi, S., Ott, M.: ICT and universal access to education: towards a culture of accessibility. Inf. Syst. E-learn. Knowl. Manag. Res. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 278, 330–337 (2013)CrossRef
22.
Squires, D., Preece, J.: Predicting quality in educational software: evaluating for learning, usability and the synergy between them. Interact. Comput. 11(5), 467–483 (1999)CrossRef
23.
Petrie, H., Bevan, N.: The Evaluation of Accessibility, Usability and User Experience, The Universal Access Handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2009)
24.
Benyon, D.: Designing Interactive Systems—A Comprehensive Guide to HCI, UX and Interaction Design, vol. 219, 3rd edn. Pearson, London (2014)
25.
Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering, pp. 155–156. Academic Press, London (1993)MATH
26.
27.
Lazar, J., Feng, J.H., Hochheiser, H.: Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 150. Wiley, Chichester (2010)
28.
Granić, A., Ćukušić, M.: Universal design within the context of e-learning, universal access in human-computer interaction. In: Applications and Services, Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 4556, pp. 617–626 (2007)
29.
Granić, A., Adams, R.: User sensitive research in e-learning: exploring the role of individual user characteristics. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 10(3), 307–318 (2010)CrossRef
30.
Pullin, G., Newell, A.: Focussing on extra-ordinary users. In: Universal Access in Human Computer Interaction, Coping with Diversity, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4554, pp. 253–262 (2007)
31.
Ardito, C., Costabile, M.F., De Marsico, M., Lanzilotti, R., Levialdi, S., Plantamura, P., Roselli, T., Rossano, V., Tersigni, M.: Towards guidelines for usability of e-learning applications. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3196 User-Centered Interaction Paradigms for Universal Access in the Information Society, pp. 185–202 (2004)CrossRef
32.
Ardito, C., Costabile, M.F., De Marsico, M., Lanzilotti, R., Levialdi, S., Roselli, T., Rossano, V.: An approach to usability evaluation of e-learning applications. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 4(3), 270–283 (2006)CrossRef
33.
Yesilada, Y., Brajnik, G., Harper, S.: How much does expertise matter? A barrier walkthrough study with experts and non-experts. In: Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA (2009)
34.
Tanaka, E.H., Da Rocha, H.V.: Evaluation of web accessibility tools. In: Proceedings of the 10th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems and the 5th Latin American Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Porto de Galinhas, Pernambuco, Brazil, pp. 272–279 (2011)
35.
Kitchenham, B.A.: DESMET: A method for evaluating Software Engineering methods and tools. Technical Report, University of Keele (1996)
36.
Kitchenham, B.A.: Evaluating software engineering methods and tool part 1: the evaluation context and evaluation methods. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 21(1), 11–14 (1996)CrossRef
37.
Tollefsen, M.: Web og Universell Utforming, 63. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo (2013)
38.
39.
40.
Leedy, P.D., Ormrod, J.E.: Practical Research Planning and Design, 10th edn. Pearson Education Limited, Essex (2014)
41.
Thagaard, T.: Systematikk og innlevelse: en innføring i kvalitativ metode, 4th edn. Fagbokforlaget, Bergen (2013)
42.
Creswell, J.W., Miller, D.L.: Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Pract. 39(3), 124–130 (2000)CrossRef
43.
Nes, M.E.S.: Appraising and Evaluating the Use of DAISY: For Print Disabled Students in Norwegian Primary- and Secondary Education. University of Oslo, Oslo (2007)
44.
Nes, M.E.S., Ribu, K., Tollefsen, M.: DAISY—Universally designed? Prototyping an approach to measuring universal design. In: Proceedings ICCHP, Linz, Austria, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Computers Helping People with Special Needs, vol. 5105, pp. 268–275 (2008)
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
Guenaga, M.L., Burger, D., Olivier, J.: Accessibility for e-Learning Environments. In: Proceedings ICCHP, Paris, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Computers Helping People with Special Needs, vol. 3118, pp. 157–163 (2004)
51.
Hansen, E.G., Mislevyb, R.J., Steinbergc, L.S., Leed, M.J., Forere, D.C.: Accessibility of tests for individuals with disabilities within a validity framework. System 33(1), 107–133 (2005)CrossRef
52.
53.
54.
55.
Metadaten
Titel
Digital assessment in higher education
Promoting universal usability through requirements specification and universal design quality (UD-Q) reviews
verfasst von
Miriam Eileen Nes Begnum
Rikke Julie Foss-Pedersen
Publikationsdatum
05.01.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Universal Access in the Information Society / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 1615-5289
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-5297
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0513-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Universal Access in the Information Society 4/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Long Paper

Bridging the accessibility gap in Open Educational Resources

Long Paper

User-centred app design for speech sound disorders interventions with tablet computers

Short Paper

User preferences for adaptive user interfaces in health information systems

Short Paper

On the accessibility of Moodle 2 by visually impaired users, with a focus on mathematical content

Long Paper

Audio description on smartphones: making cinema accessible for visually impaired audiences

Long Paper

Research challenges in accessible MOOCs: a systematic literature review 2008–2016

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise