Skip to main content
Erschienen in: TechTrends 4/2021

18.03.2021 | Original Paper

Don’t Be Evil: Should We Use Google in Schools?

verfasst von: Daniel G. Krutka, Ryan M. Smits, Troy A. Willhelm

Erschienen in: TechTrends | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Google is a multinational technology company whose massive advertising profits have allowed them to expand into many areas, including education. While the company has increasingly faced public scrutiny, the use of Google software and hardware in schools has often resulted in little debate. In this paper, we conduct a technoethical audit of Google to address ethical, legal, democratic, economic, technological, and pedagogical concerns educators, students, and community members might consider. We describe how Google extracts personal data from students, skirts laws intended to protect them, targets them for profits, obfuscates the company's intent in their Terms of Service, recommends harmful information, and distorts students’ knowledge. We propose that educators and scholars more closely interrogate the tools of Google and other technology companies to move toward more democratic and just uses of technology in schools.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Alvarez León, L. F. (2016). Property regimes and the commodification of geographic information: An examination of Google street view. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1–13.CrossRef Alvarez León, L. F. (2016). Property regimes and the commodification of geographic information: An examination of Google street view. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1–13.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Amrute, S. (2019). Of techno-ethics and techno-affects. Feminist Review, 123(1), 56–73.CrossRef Amrute, S. (2019). Of techno-ethics and techno-affects. Feminist Review, 123(1), 56–73.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Band, J. (2009). The long and winding road to the Google books settlement. The John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law, 9(2), 227–329. Band, J. (2009). The long and winding road to the Google books settlement. The John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law, 9(2), 227–329.
Zurück zum Zitat Bansal, K. (2016). Effectiveness of children online privacy strategies. Winona Computer Science Undergraduate Research Symposium, 16, 1–7. Bansal, K. (2016). Effectiveness of children online privacy strategies. Winona Computer Science Undergraduate Research Symposium, 16, 1–7.
Zurück zum Zitat Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the New Jim Code. Cambridge: Polity. Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the New Jim Code. Cambridge: Polity.
Zurück zum Zitat Brabazon, T. (2007). The University of Google: Education in the (post) information age. Aldershot: Ashgate. Brabazon, T. (2007). The University of Google: Education in the (post) information age. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Zurück zum Zitat Bunge, M. (1975). Towards a technoethics. Philosophic Exchange, 6(1), 69–79. Bunge, M. (1975). Towards a technoethics. Philosophic Exchange, 6(1), 69–79.
Zurück zum Zitat California Consumer Privacy Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1798.100–1798.199 (2018). California Consumer Privacy Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1798.100–1798.199 (2018).
Zurück zum Zitat Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6501–6505; 16 CFR Part 312 (1998). Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6501–6505; 16 CFR Part 312 (1998).
Zurück zum Zitat Daggett, L. M. (2008). FERPA in the twenty-first century: Failure to effectively regulate privacy for all students. Catholic University Law Review, 58(1), 59–114. Daggett, L. M. (2008). FERPA in the twenty-first century: Failure to effectively regulate privacy for all students. Catholic University Law Review, 58(1), 59–114.
Zurück zum Zitat Eubanks, V. (2017). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Eubanks, V. (2017). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1232g; 34 CFR Part 99 (1974). Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1232g; 34 CFR Part 99 (1974).
Zurück zum Zitat Haas, A., & Unkel, J. (2017). Ranking versus reputation: Perception and effects of search result credibility. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(12), 1285–1298.CrossRef Haas, A., & Unkel, J. (2017). Ranking versus reputation: Perception and effects of search result credibility. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(12), 1285–1298.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hargittai, E., Fullerton, L., Menchen-Trevino, E., & Thomas, K. Y. (2010). Trust online: Young adults’ evaluation of web content. International Journal of Communication, 4, 468–494. Hargittai, E., Fullerton, L., Menchen-Trevino, E., & Thomas, K. Y. (2010). Trust online: Young adults’ evaluation of web content. International Journal of Communication, 4, 468–494.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoback, C.. (2013). Terms and conditions may apply [film]. Hyrax Films. Hoback, C.. (2013). Terms and conditions may apply [film]. Hyrax Films.
Zurück zum Zitat Krutka, D. G., Heath, M. K., & Staudt Willet, K. B. (2019). Foregrounding technoethics: Toward critical perspectives in technology and teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 27(4), 555–574. Krutka, D. G., Heath, M. K., & Staudt Willet, K. B. (2019). Foregrounding technoethics: Toward critical perspectives in technology and teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 27(4), 555–574.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindh, M., & Nolin, J. (2016). Information we collect: Surveillance and privacy in the implementation of Google apps for education. European Educational Research Journal, 15(6), 644–663.CrossRef Lindh, M., & Nolin, J. (2016). Information we collect: Surveillance and privacy in the implementation of Google apps for education. European Educational Research Journal, 15(6), 644–663.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Livingstone, S., & Third, A. (2017). Children and young people’s rights in the digital age: An emerging agenda. New Media & Society, 19(5), 657–670.CrossRef Livingstone, S., & Third, A. (2017). Children and young people’s rights in the digital age: An emerging agenda. New Media & Society, 19(5), 657–670.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moore, C. (2016). The future of work: What Google shows us about the present and future of online collaboration. TechTrends, 60(3), 233–244.CrossRef Moore, C. (2016). The future of work: What Google shows us about the present and future of online collaboration. TechTrends, 60(3), 233–244.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: NYU Press. Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: NYU Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Joachims, T., Lorigo, L., Gay, G., & Granka, L. (2007). In Google we trust: Users’ decisions on rank, position, and relevance. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), 801–823.CrossRef Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Joachims, T., Lorigo, L., Gay, G., & Granka, L. (2007). In Google we trust: Users’ decisions on rank, position, and relevance. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), 801–823.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Papert, S. (1988). A critique of technocentrism in thinking about the school of the future. In B. Sendov & I. Stanchev (Eds.), Children in the Information Age (pp. 3–18). Oxford: Pergamon. Papert, S. (1988). A critique of technocentrism in thinking about the school of the future. In B. Sendov & I. Stanchev (Eds.), Children in the Information Age (pp. 3–18). Oxford: Pergamon.
Zurück zum Zitat Plunkett, L. A. (2019). Sharenthood: Why we should think before we talk about our kids online. Cambridge, MA: MIT. Plunkett, L. A. (2019). Sharenthood: Why we should think before we talk about our kids online. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Zurück zum Zitat Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Vintage Books. Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Vintage Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Rabu, S. N. A., & Badlishah, N. S. (2020). Levels of students’ reflective thinking skills in a collaborative learning environment using Google docs. TechTrends, 64(3), 533–541.CrossRef Rabu, S. N. A., & Badlishah, N. S. (2020). Levels of students’ reflective thinking skills in a collaborative learning environment using Google docs. TechTrends, 64(3), 533–541.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Reyes, I., Wijesekera, P., Reardon, J., On, A. E. B., Razaghpanah, A., Vallina-Rodriguez, N., & Egelman, S. (2018). “Won’t somebody think of the children?” examining COPPA compliance at scale. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2018(3), 63–83.CrossRef Reyes, I., Wijesekera, P., Reardon, J., On, A. E. B., Razaghpanah, A., Vallina-Rodriguez, N., & Egelman, S. (2018). “Won’t somebody think of the children?” examining COPPA compliance at scale. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2018(3), 63–83.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rheingold, H. (2012). Net smart: How to thrive online. MIT Press. Rheingold, H. (2012). Net smart: How to thrive online. MIT Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Sweeney, L. (2013). Discrimination in online ad delivery. Queue, 11(3), 10–29.CrossRef Sweeney, L. (2013). Discrimination in online ad delivery. Queue, 11(3), 10–29.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thornton, S. (2009). Lessons from America: Teaching politics with the Google generation. Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences, 1(3), 1–20.CrossRef Thornton, S. (2009). Lessons from America: Teaching politics with the Google generation. Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences, 1(3), 1–20.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press. Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaidhyanathan, S. (2011). The Googlization of everything: (and why we should worry). Berkeley: University of California Press. Vaidhyanathan, S. (2011). The Googlization of everything: (and why we should worry). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Wasson, J. C. (2003). FERPA in the age of computer logging: School discretion at the cost of student privacy. North Carolina Law Review, 81(3), 1348–1374. Wasson, J. C. (2003). FERPA in the age of computer logging: School discretion at the cost of student privacy. North Carolina Law Review, 81(3), 1348–1374.
Zurück zum Zitat Wineburg, S. A., & McGrew, S. (2018). Lateral Reading and the nature of expertise: Reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information. Teachers College Record, 121(11), 1–40. Wineburg, S. A., & McGrew, S. (2018). Lateral Reading and the nature of expertise: Reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information. Teachers College Record, 121(11), 1–40.
Zurück zum Zitat Zeide, E. (2016). Student privacy principles for the age of big data: Moving beyond FERPA and FIPPS. Drexel Law Review, 8(2), 339–394. Zeide, E. (2016). Student privacy principles for the age of big data: Moving beyond FERPA and FIPPS. Drexel Law Review, 8(2), 339–394.
Zurück zum Zitat Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for the future at the new frontier of power. Hachette Book Group. New York. Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for the future at the new frontier of power. Hachette Book Group. New York.
Metadaten
Titel
Don’t Be Evil: Should We Use Google in Schools?
verfasst von
Daniel G. Krutka
Ryan M. Smits
Troy A. Willhelm
Publikationsdatum
18.03.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
TechTrends / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 8756-3894
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-7075
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00599-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

TechTrends 4/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner