Dry Sliding Wear Properties of a 7075-T6 Aluminum Alloy Coated with Ni-P (h) in Different Pretreatment Conditions

A high-strength 7075-T6 aluminum alloy of the following composition (Table 1) was selected for the present study. The sample size was 40 × 6 × 6 mm. It is well known that the deposition of EN coating without any pretreatment on Al alloys is very difficult due to the presence of a thin oxide layer and so an appropriate surface preparation (polishing, degreasing, etching and pretreatment) is required. The substrate was mechanically polished with fine SiC paper (grit size 1000) before different pretreatment processes. After polishing, the substrate was degreased in sodium carbonate and sodium phosphate, and soils and oils were removed. And then the surface was etched and it was rinsed thoroughly in deionized water. Furthermore, the three aluminum alloy samples were immersed in three separate pretreatment baths, where any one of the Zn, Ni and HP were the main constituents. After being pretreated in a separate bath, the sample was immersed in the same electroless bath solution for plating Ni-P deposition layer. The electroless solution was put in a 500-mL glass beaker, which was kept at constant temperature by a thermostat. The bath composition and all operation parameters for the three separate pretreatment and electroless Ni-P deposition are listed in Table 2.

Three different pretreatments were done separately on three samples under the following conditions:

After the different pretreatments, the samples were put into the same EN bath for 120 min. The chemical composition and operating baths’ parameters are followed as in Table 2. The bath temperature was kept at 85 °C with a pH 6. After Ni-P deposition, the three different pretreated EN samples were heat-treated at 200 °C for 1 h and another three samples were treated at 400 °C for 1 h, followed by furnace cooling.

The dry sliding wear tests were performed using a pin-on-disk type machine (Model TR 20, Ducom, Bangalore, India) in conformity with the ASTM G 99 standard. The stationary pin is 7075 aluminum alloy with different pretreated EN coatings, and the rotating disk is hardened die steel with Rc65 hardness. Figure 1 shows the dimensions of the disc and specimen. Wear tests were carried out under dry sliding conditions under a normal weight of 0.25 kg, 0.5 kg at a sliding speed of 200 rpm. A fixed wear track diameter of 80 mm was used for all the tests, so the sliding distance per second is 200 rpm × 2π × 0.04 m/60 s = 0.84 m/s. The wear loss was measured directly as the height loss of the specimen using LVDT. Friction coefficient and frictional force were also continuously monitored and recorded separately using WINDCOM 2007 software during each test. The variation in temperature of the specimen surface during the sliding wear tests was measured by inserting a thermocouple through a hole of the stationary pin specimen (test sample) and positioned as close to the contact surfaces as possible.

Frictional properties of electroless nickel coatings ultimately are dependent on the pretreatment and also vary with phosphorus content or with heat treatment. Their phosphorus content provides a natural lubricity, which can be very useful for applications such as plastic moulding. The friction coefficient and frictional force were also continuously monitored and recorded separately during each sliding test. The friction coefficient, f, was calculated from the equation: f = T/Lr, where T is the induced friction torque, L is the normal load and r is the mean contact radius of the rotating pin specimen.

Vickers microhardness test was performed in order to determine the hardness of coating and uncoated samples under a load of 100 g with a time period for 30 s.

The 3D surface morphology of pretreatment (without EN) is studied under confocal laser scanning microscope (LEXT-OLS 3000, Olympus, Japan). The wear track performance and heat treatment of these coated samples is examined using SEM (JEOL, JSM 840A, Japan). The compositional analyses were analyzed by SEM attached kevex energy dispersive x-ray (EDAX).

The dry sliding wears response of Al and EN/Al on hardened die steel for different applied loads (0.25 and 0.5 kg) is shown in Fig. 2. A sliding distance of about 750 m (or 900 s) is selected in consideration of the coatings thickness. The 7075 Al specimen suffered a wear loss of ~50 and ~100 μm for 0.25 and 0.5 kg load, respectively. The 7075 Al alloy is (hardness 150 VHN) relatively soft in comparison to the counter disc and hence exhibited appreciable adhesion and resulted in substantial material removal. The prime cause for material removal under high applied load is attributed to high adhesion between the opposing surfaces, which is possibly due to high ratio of adhesion force to contact force. The strong adhesion force can be explained by the electron transfer between contacting surfaces. Numerous free electrons are present in metals and on contact these electrons may be exchanged between the two solids to establish bonding almost instantaneously (Ref 14). The wear loss was higher in the case of the as-cast Al specimen which slid against disc under different applied loads. The high wear loss in the initial stages was possibly due to high localized contact pressure at the real contact point between the opposing asperities; and with increasing sliding distance the area of the contact surfaces increased after having slid a certain distance. The abrupt increase in initial value was due to the sudden contact of surface of the sample and the counter surface in addition with load and adhesion are also in phase. Hence, the wear loss is initially high.

The wear loss curves of EN/HP/Al, EN/Zn/Al and EN/Ni/Al at 200 °C, 0.25 kg condition (Fig. 2a) showed that the sequence of better wear resistance is EN/Ni/Al, EN/Zn/Al, and EN/Ni/Al combinations. This negative wear is suggestive of the fact that the increase in specimen height resulted in the specimen being raised from the counter surface. During the dry sliding it was observed that the counter disc suffered wear due to relatively harder Ni-P (h) specimen being slid against it. After having slid a critical sliding distance (~160 m or 200 s), there is a steady increase in wear loss. The results are similar to the case of a hard diamond composite coating which exhibited such negative wear loss (Ref 15). Consequently, the coating showed a very low wear rate as the pulled out fine particles provided less damage to the EN coated and also the debris were finer and less. Specimens heat treated at 400 °C can further enhance their wear resistances (Fig. 2b). The heat treatment at 400 °C enhances the micro-crystalline structure phase in the EN deposit and thus increases of hardness, so a further enhanced negative wear and improvement in wear properties are observed. This concluded that 400 °C is good heat-treatment temperature for enhancing the wear resistance.

The specimens at 200 °C, 0.5 kg condition (Fig. 2c) observe that height increase is possible due to the debris formed during the sliding test adheres to the specimen and responsible for the specimen height. This is also obvious from the fact that though wear damage is higher at higher load (0.5 kg), negative wear is still high. Since adhesion is stronger under higher loads, the negative wear for 0.5 kg was greater than at 0.25 kg load. In addition, the ductile cleavage and deeper grooves were observed in the wear track path of as-cast Al alloy. This was further confirmed by the detachment of counter disc debris and this shows the higher load (0.5 kg) increases the anti-wear properties. The specimens at 400 °C, 0.5 kg condition (Fig. 2d) observe that the higher load, optimum temperature enhanced all EN deposits in negative wear properties. It recorded maximum ~60 μm in negative wear for EN/Ni/Al specimen with 400 °C and 0.5 kg load condition. It is shown in Fig. 5(a) that the roughening of the surface of the pretreated Ni enhances the strong interlocking between EN and Al alloy and the good adhesion between EN/Ni and Ni/Al is the reason for good wear performance. Finally, the emphasis in all the cases is that the EN/Ni/Al specimen with heat treatment (400 °C) exhibits better wear resistance than other pretreated samples in all conditions.

The friction coefficient recorded simultaneously during the wear test clearly reveals the characteristics of the wear process. The average friction coefficient, μ_av of electroless Ni-P (h) coatings in same load (0.5 kg) condition, is shown in Table 3. The average friction coefficient at 400 °C (μ_av) had minimum value as compared to 200 °C specimens. The friction coefficient for electroless nickel versus steel is ~0.12 to 0.13 for lubricated conditions and 0.43 to 0.44 for unlubricated conditions (Ref 16). Krishnaveni et al. (Ref 17) had studied coefficient of friction (Ni-B (h)). These investigations showed that friction coefficient of Ni-B (h) was ~0.7 against hardened steel. The pretreatment had significant influence on the frictional properties. The relationship between the coefficient of friction and the sliding distance of electroless Ni-P (h) deposits, heat treated at 200 and 400 °C for 1 h, is shown in Fig. 3(a) and (b). There is an initial sudden and abrupt increase of friction coefficiency, and then after some distance it stabilizes. This signifies the removal of the deposit and the onset of a friction process between the deposit pin and counter disc. The stability of 400 °C samples was started after 400 s; this was due to lack of sample flatness. Hardness test was done for the as-deposited and heat-treated specimens; at least six runs were performed and averaged. The hardness of the as-deposited Ni-P coating was about 550 VHN, which is much higher than that of the 7075 aluminum alloy substrate (about 150 VHN). Heat treatment (Ni-P (h)) causes these alloys to have a value as high as 1000 to 1100 VHN, which is equivalent to most commercial hard chromium coatings. This is due to the heat-treatment temperature of 400 °C enhancing the micro-crystalline phase in the EN deposit and thus increasing its hardness (Fig. 4). The Vicker’s hardness results are 1065, 1040 and 1015 VHN for Ni, Zn and HP pretreatments respectively at 400 °C/h condition compared to 550 VHN in as-deposit condition.

The SEM images of electroless Ni-P (h) deposits subjected to pin-on-disc wear test clearly revel the presence of groove patches and in some places even debris detachment is shown in Fig. 5(a) and (b). The transferred debris from coatings and the wear debris are also observed on the surface. The counter disc debris is also observed and indicated by arrows in Fig. 5. These results clearly demonstrate that the hardened steel has been removed during the slid wear test when the EN is abraded against the steel disc. The grooves distance in SEM images (Fig. 5a) measured that as-cast Al was higher and deeper, while EN were less and shorter and the same case is observed in Fig. 5(b). The confocal laser scanning microscope 3D images of three different pretreatment (without EN) clearly reveals the roughening surface of the pretreated Ni strike (Fig. 6a). This will enhance the strong interlocking between EN and Al alloy. On the other hand, zinc and HP show comparatively smooth surface (Fig. 6b, c). The SEM studies on the debris confirm the presence of Fe and Mn that suggest that debris comes out from the steel counter surface (Fig. 7). The as-cast 7075 Al substrate showed severe damages by wear, whereas Ni-P (h) were less affected; this was clearly revealed by the SEM photo. The SEM/EDAX microanalysis carried out across the specimen surface (Fig. 8) showed the fluctuation of the phosphorus content within 7-8%, so the microstructure should be a mixture of amorphous and microcrystalline phase. Figure 9 confirms that heating the sample up to 400 °C/1 h induced the transformation of amorphous to microcrystalline phase and thus enhances its mechanical properties. The thickness of the EN deposits could also be measured on the SEM images taken on the cross-section of some representative samples. It is concluded that Ni strike pretreatment specimens noticeably improve the wear, frictional and hardness behavior of the EN coatings on 7075 Al substrate and further enhanced it by heat treatment of 400 °C/h.