Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions
Erschienen in: Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 4/2021

01.12.2021 | Technical paper

Dynamic performance of multi-storey buildings under surface blast: A case study

verfasst von: Venkata Sudha Ambavaram, Anupama Muddarangappagari, Anoosha Mekala, Rajaram Chenna

Erschienen in: Innovative Infrastructure Solutions | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Blast loads create massive damage and reduce the structure's strength and stability, leading to internal and external damage. Due to this damage under extreme loads, efforts have been made to improve methods of structural analysis and design to resist blast loads. The research mainly focuses on the effect of surface blast on low-rise and high-rise buildings. In this study, five buildings with the same plan configuration are considered and designed according to Indian Standards. These buildings are modelled in SAP2000 software. The displacement responses are represented in terms of nonlinear time histories for different charge weights and standoff distances. Strengthening measures can be done to minimize the dynamic effect of the building due to blast loading. The responses significantly change at lower standoff distances for high-rise buildings and the same for standoff distances greater than 10 m. No significant effect is observed on the response of building between single and double bracings.
Vorheriger Artikel Impact of nano ZnO particles on the characteristics of the cement mortar
Nächster Artikel Structural behavior of ferro cellular insulated wall panel

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
DoD (Department of Defense) (2013) Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse. UFC 4–023–03, Washington, DC
2.
General Services Administration (GSA) (2003) Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects. GSA, Washington, D.C.
3.
ASCE (2005) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. SEI/ASCE 7-05 ASCE, Reston, VirginiaCrossRef
4.
ACI 318 (2005) Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary (ACI 318R-05). ACI Committee 318, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, USA
5.
6.
Ambrosinia D, Luccionia B, Jacintoa A, Danesia R (2005) Location and mass of explosive from structural damage. J Eng Struct 27:167–176CrossRef
7.
Agnew E, Marjanishvili S, Gallant S (2007) Concrete detailing for blast. Struct Mag 5:26–28
8.
Liew J (2008) Survivability of steel frame structures subject to blast and fire. J Constr Steel Res 64:854–866CrossRef
9.
Jun-Xiang X, Xi-La L (2009) A two-step approach to progressive collapse analysis of building structures under blast loading. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Sci) 14:393–397CrossRef
10.
Jayasooriya R, Thambiratnam DP, Perera NJ (2014) Blast response and safety evaluation of a composite column for use as key element in structural systems. Eng Struct 61:31–43CrossRef
11.
Kwasniewski L (2010) Nonlinear dynamic simulations of progressive collapse for a multi-storey building. J Eng Struct 32:1223–1235CrossRef
12.
Shi Y, Zhong X, Hong H (2010) A new method for progressive collapse analysis of RC frames under blast loading. J Eng Struct 32:1691–1703CrossRef
13.
Harinathbabu R (2011) Numerical simulation of progressive collapse of RC buildings subjected to earthquake and blast loads. Dissertation, Andhra University, India
14.
15.
Nourzadeh D, Humar J, Braimah A (2017) Comparison of response of building structures to blast loading and seismic excitations. Proced Eng 210:320–325CrossRef
16.
17.
Hadianfard MA, Malekpour S, Momeni M (2018) Reliability analysis of H-section steel columns under blast loading. Struct Saf 75:45–56CrossRef
18.
19.
Sunita T, Bharti SD, Shrimali MK, Datta TK (2020) Effect of Surface Blast on Multistory Buildings. J Perform Constr Facil 34:1–15
20.
21.
Ahmed K, Taha MS, Zahran ZG (2021) Mitigation of the blast load effects on a building structure using newly composite structural configurations. Def Technol 17:75–84CrossRef
22.
____Indian standard code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete. IS: 456–2000. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
23.
SAP2000 (2016) Integrated finite element analysis and design of structures computers and structures. CA, USA, Berkeley
24.
Aleem U, Furqan A, Heung-Woon J, Sung-Wook K, Jung-Wuk H (2016) Review of analytical and empirical estimations for incident blast pressure. KSCE J Civ Eng 21:2211–2225
25.
Newmark NM, Hansen RJ (1961) Design of blast resistant structures. In: Harris CM, Crede CE (eds) Shock and vibration handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York USA
26.
Kadid A, Nezzar B, Yahiaoui D (2012) Nonlinear dynamic analysis of reinforced concrete slabs subjected to blast loading. Asian J Civ Eng 13:617–634
27.
Vijayaraghavan C, Thirumalaivasan D, Venkatesan R (2012) A study on nuclear blast overpressure on buildings and other infrastructures using geospatial technology. J Comput Sci 8:1520–1530CrossRef
28.
Unified Facilities Criteria (2008) UFC 3–340–02 Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Air Force Civil Engineer Support Agency
29.
Nelson L, Priyan M, Tuan N (2004) Response Spectrum Solutions for Blast Loading. Electron J Struct Eng (eJSE) 4:28–44
30.
Ahmad S, Elahi A, Pervaiz H, Rahman AGA, Barbhuiya S (2014) Experimental study of masonry wall exposed to blast loading. Mater de Constr 64:1–11CrossRef
31.
Wu C, Hao H (2007) Numerical simulation of structural response and damage to simultaneous ground shock and air blast loads. Int J Impact Eng 34:556–572CrossRef
32.
Hatem TD, Kimiro M (1998) Applied element simulation for collapse analysis of Structures. Bull Earthq Resist Struct, IIS, Univ Tokyo 32:113–123
33.
U.S. Department of the Army (1990) Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosions. Technical Manual 5–1300 (TM5–1300), Washington DC, USA
34.
Okamura H, Maekawa K (1991) Nonlinear analysis constitutive models of reinforced concrete. Gihodo Co., Ltd., Tokyo
35.
Murty CVR (2007) IITK-GSDMA guidelines on measures to mitigate effects of terrorist attacks on buildings. NICEE. Kanpur, India
Metadaten
Titel
Dynamic performance of multi-storey buildings under surface blast: A case study
verfasst von
Venkata Sudha Ambavaram
Anupama Muddarangappagari
Anoosha Mekala
Rajaram Chenna
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2021
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 2364-4176
Elektronische ISSN: 2364-4184
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00585-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 4/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Technical paper

Development of design guideline for the baseplate thickness of lattice towers

Practice-oriented paper

Effect of shrinkage-controlled polymer-modified binders (SC-PMB) on the bond strength of repaired structural concrete

Practice-oriented paper

Developing and optimizing foam concrete using industrial waste materials

Technical paper

Effects of utilising granulated blast furnace slag as fine aggregate on concrete: a factorial design approach

Technical paper

Sustainability assessment of Bhutanese vernacular wattle and daub houses

Technical paper

Spent fluid cracking and spent alumina catalysts as sustainable construction materials in concrete