Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Wireless Personal Communications
Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications 3/2022

30.11.2021

Dynamic Private Modulus Based Password Conditional Privacy Preserving Authentication and Key-Agreement Protocol for VANET

verfasst von: Swapnil Paliwal, Aswani Kumar Cherukuri, Xiao-Zhi Gao

Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications | Ausgabe 3/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In recent years, the growth of vehicles in the urban areas has been massive; thus, we require a secure means via which we can monitor traffic, gain data about traffic conditions, weather, accidents, road defects, speed of the vehicle, condition of the roads, etc. VANET helps us deliver a secure and more efficient means of moni A VANET is an Ad-Hoc network, which helps in exchanging information with different entities from time to time. To ensure secure communication, we want to ensure that there is a presence of a secure session key such that an adversary is not able to gain access to privileged information. Thus, we focus on designing a probabilistic key exchange protocol that can be used in the Vehicular Ad hoc Network (VANET) setting. The proposed protocol is lightweight and is more efficient than bilinear pairing, modular exponentiation, and Elliptic Curve Cryptography. The security proof of the proposed system can be witnessed via Automated Validation of Internet Security Protocols and Applications and BAN logic.
Vorheriger Artikel A Comprehensive Survey of Detection of Tampered Video and Localization of Tampered Frame
Nächster Artikel QACRM: QoS Aware AHP Based Cognitive Route Selection in MANETs

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Ranjan, P. and Ahirwar, K.K. (2011). Comparative study of vanet and manet routing protocols. In Proc. of the International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Technologies (ACCT 2011) (pp. 517–523).
2.
Shao, J., Lin, X., Lu, R., & Zuo, C. (2015). A threshold anonymous authentication protocol for VANETs. IEEE Transactions on vehicular technology, 65(3), 1711–1720.CrossRef
3.
Yang, X., Yi, X., Khalil, I., Zeng, Y., Huang, X., Nepal, S., Yang, X., & Cui, H. (2019). A lightweight authentication scheme for vehicular ad hoc networks based on MSR. Vehicular communications, 15, 16–27.CrossRef
4.
Toh, C. K. (2001). Ad hoc mobile wireless networks: Protocols and systems. Pearson Education.
5.
Islam, S. H., Obaidat, M. S., Vijayakumar, P., Abdulhay, E., Li, F., & Reddy, M. K. C. (2018). A robust and efficient password-based conditional privacy preserving authentication and group-key agreement protocol for VANETs. Future Generation Computer Systems, 84, 216–227.CrossRef
6.
Lo, N. W., & Tsai, J. L. (2015). An efficient conditional privacy-preserving authentication scheme for vehicular sensor networks without pairings. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17(5), 1319–1328.CrossRef
7.
He, D., Zeadally, S., Xu, B., & Huang, X. (2015). An efficient identity-based conditional privacy-preserving authentication scheme for vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 10(12), 2681–2691.CrossRef
8.
Bayat, M., Barmshoory, M., Rahimi, M., & Aref, M. R. (2015). A secure authentication scheme for VANETs with batch verification. Wireless Networks, 21(5), 1733–1743.CrossRef
9.
Jianhong, Z., Min, X., & Liying, L. (2014). On the security of a secure batch verification with group testing for VANET. International Journal of Network Security, 16(5), 351–358.
10.
Shim, K. A. (2012). An efficient conditional privacy-preserving authentication scheme for vehicular sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 61(4), 1874–1883.CrossRef
11.
Liu, Y., Wang, L., & Chen, H. H. (2014). Message authentication using proxy vehicles in vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 64(8), 3697–3710.CrossRef
12.
Shen, J., Zhou, T., Wei, F., Sun, X., & Xiang, Y. (2017). Privacy-preserving and lightweight key agreement protocol for V2G in the social internet of things. IEEE Internet of things Journal, 5(4), 2526–2536.CrossRef
13.
Muthumeenakshi, R., Reshmi, T. R., & Murugan, K. (2017). Extended 3PAKE authentication scheme for value-added services in VANETs. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 59, 27–38.CrossRef
14.
Sucasas, V., Mantas, G., Saghezchi, F. B., Radwan, A., & Rodriguez, J. (2016). An autonomous privacy-preserving authentication scheme for intelligent transportation systems. Computers & Security, 60, 193–205.CrossRef
15.
Stallings, W. (2006). Cryptography and network security, 4/E. Pearson Education India.
16.
Ali, I., Hassan, A., & Li, F. (2019). Authentication and privacy schemes for vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs): A survey. Vehicular Communications, 16, 45–61.CrossRef
17.
Paliwal, S. (2019). Hash-based conditional privacy preserving authentication and key exchange protocol suitable for industrial Internet of Things. IEEE Access, 7, 136073–136093.CrossRef
18.
Xie, Q., Wong, D. S., Wang, G., Tan, X., Chen, K., & Fang, L. (2017). ‘Provably secure dynamic ID-based anonymous two-factor authenticated key exchange protocol with extended security model.’ IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 12(6), 1382–1392.CrossRef
19.
Das, A. K. (2015). ‘A secure and efficient user anonymity-preserving threefactor authentication protocol for large-scale distributed wireless sensor networks.’ Wireless Personal Communications, 82(3), 1377–1404.CrossRef
20.
Hong S-M.,Oh S-Y., and Yoon H. (1996) New modular multiplication algorithms for fast modular exponentiation. In: International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques, Springer, pp. 166–177.
21.
Wazid, M., Das, A. K., Kumar, N., Odelu, V., Reddy, A. G., Park, K., & Park, Y. (2017). ‘Design of lightweight authentication and key agreement protocol for vehicular ad hoc networks.’ IEEE Access, 5, 14966–14980.CrossRef
22.
Paliwal, S. and Kumar, C.A. (2017). A novel multi-party key exchange protocol. In International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (pp. 597–607). Springer.
23.
Chang, C. Y., Yen, H. C., & Deng, D. J. (2015). V2V QoS guaranteed channel access in IEEE 802.11 p VANETs. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 13(1), 5–17.CrossRef
24.
India Copyright SW-10887/2018: “Dynamic Stream and S-box Generation Protocol”. Diary Number: 6409/2018-CO/SW.
25.
Dass, H. K., & Verma, R. (2010). Introduction to engineering mathematics (Vol. 3, pp. 126–129). S. Chand Publication.
26.
Viganò, L. (2006). Automated security protocol analysis with the AVISPA tool. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 155, 61–86.CrossRef
27.
Ali, R., Pal, A. K., Kumari, S., Karuppiah, M., & Conti, M. (2018). A secure user authentication and key-agreement scheme using wireless sensor networks for agriculture monitoring. Future Generation Computer Systems, 84, 200–215.CrossRef
28.
Canetti, R. and Krawczyk, H. (2001). Analysis of key-exchange protocols and their use for building secure channels. In International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques (pp. 453–474). Springer.
29.
Gope, P., & Hwang, T. (2015). A realistic lightweight authentication protocol preserving strong anonymity for securing RFID system. Computers & Security, 55, 271–280.CrossRef
30.
Wessels, J., & BV, C. F. (2001). Application of BAN-logic. CMG FINANCE BV, 19, 1–23.
31.
Teepe, W. (2009). On BAN logic and hash functions or: How an unjustified inference rule causes problems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 19(1), 76–88.CrossRef
32.
Xie, Y., Wu, L., Shen, J., & Alelaiwi, A. (2017). EIAS-CP: New efficient identity-based authentication scheme with conditional privacy-preserving for VANETs. Telecommunication Systems, 65(2), 229–240.CrossRef
33.
Adrian, D., Bhargavan, K., Durumeric, Z., Gaudry, P., Green, M., Halderman, J.A., Heninger, N., Springall, D., Thomé, E., Valenta, L. and VanderSloot, B. (2015). Imperfect forward secrecy: How Diffie-Hellman fails in practice. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 5–17). ACM.
34.
Sharma, G., & Kalra, S. (2018). A lightweight multi-factor secure smart card based remote user authentication scheme for cloud-IoT applications. Journal of information security and applications, 42, 95–106.CrossRef
35.
India Application: “Symmetric Key Encryption using Private Modulo Operations”, Filed: (2016). Application Number 201641034920. Status: Awaiting Examination.
36.
Burrows, M., Abadi, M., & Needham, R. M. (1989). A logic of authentication. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 426(1871), 233–271.MathSciNetCrossRef
37.
38.
Sánchez-García, J., García-Campos, J. M., Reina, D. G., Toral, S. L., & Barrero, F. (2016). On-siteDriverID: A secure authentication scheme based on Spanish eID cards for vehicular ad hoc networks. Future generation computer systems, 64, 50–60.CrossRef
39.
40.
41.
Lu, R., Lin, X., Zhu, H., Ho, PH and Shen, X. (2008). ECPP: Efficient conditional privacy preservation protocol for secure vehicular communications. In IEEE INFOCOM 2008-The 27th Conference on Computer Communications (pp. 1229–1237). IEEE.
42.
US Patent: US8380177B. “Kevin Laracey .Mobile phone payment processing methods and systems”.
43.
Hasrouny, H., Samhat, A. E., Bassil, C., & Laouiti, A. (2017). VANet security challenges and solutions: A survey. Vehicular Communications, 7, 7–20.CrossRef
44.
Raw, R. S., Kumar, M., & Singh, N. (2013). Security challenges, issues and their solutions for VANET. International journal of network security & its applications, 5(5), 95.CrossRef
45.
Turkanović, M., Brumen, B., & Hölbl, M. (2014). A novel user authentication and key agreement scheme for heterogeneous ad hoc wireless sensor networks, based on the Internet of Things notion. Ad Hoc Networks, 20, 96–112.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Dynamic Private Modulus Based Password Conditional Privacy Preserving Authentication and Key-Agreement Protocol for VANET
verfasst von
Swapnil Paliwal
Aswani Kumar Cherukuri
Xiao-Zhi Gao
Publikationsdatum
30.11.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Wireless Personal Communications / Ausgabe 3/2022
Print ISSN: 0929-6212
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-834X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-09228-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2022

Wireless Personal Communications 3/2022 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Detecting Sybil Attack in Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (Vanets) by Using Fitness Function, Signal Strength Index and Throughput

OriginalPaper

Friendliness Based Trustworthy Relationship Management (F-TRM) in Social Internet of Things

OriginalPaper

LCR and AFD of the Products of Nakagami-m and Nakagami-m Squared Random Variables: Application to Wireless Communications Through Relays

Correction

Correction to: Mega-Constellation Satellite Networks—Addressing Rain Tele-Connections and Reducing Ground Segment Costs

OriginalPaper

SigSense: Mobile Crowdsensing Based Incentive Aware Geospatial Signal Monitoring for Base Station Installation Recommendation Using Mixed Reality Game

OriginalPaper

Mobile Phone Based Lecture Video Capturing & Streaming Technique for Efficient Bandwidth Utilization

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise