nach oben

Erschienen in:

09.02.2022 | Original Article

Effect of alkaline/hydrogen peroxide pretreatment on date palm fibers: induced chemical and structural changes and assessment of ethanol production capacity via Pichia anomala and Pichia stipitis

verfasst von: Imen Ben Atitallah, Ioanna Ntaikou, Georgia Antonopoulou, Chedly Bradai, Tahar Mechichi, Gerasimos Lyberatos

Erschienen in: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery | Ausgabe 10/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The thermochemical/oxidative pretreatment of date palm fibers (DPF) was investigated aiming to enhance bioethanol production from the pretreated biomass. The chemical reagents used were sodium hydroxide and/or hydrogen peroxide in dilute aquatic solutions, to which DPF was subjected at a two-step or one-step process. The effect of the pretreatment was evaluated by estimating the direct removal efficiency of lignin and the solubilization of holocellose, as well as by assessing the induced structural and morphological changes via IR spectroscopy and SEM imaging. Based on the results, a two-step combined pretreatment with NaOH applied first was selected as the most efficient and its effect on the enzymatic digestibility of DPF using commercial cellulolytic enzymes was further studied. Subsequently, batch experiments with the whole pretreated DPF slurries and after separating the solids from the hydrolysate were conducted through simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) and also separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF), using the non-conventional yeasts Pichia anomala (Wicherhamomyces anomalus, strain X19) and Pichia stipitis, either separately or in co-culture. The co-culture yielded to higher ethanol for both slurries and solids, whereas the results obtained from SSF and SHF experiments did not seem to differentiate significantly. The maximum ethanol yield obtained was approximately 150 g/kg dry DPF biomass, indicating that DPF can be a promising feedstock for lignocellulosic ethanol production.

Graphical abstract

Vorheriger Artikel Real measurement of carbon monoxide, total suspended particulate, and thermal efficiency in modern biomass household boilers

Nächster Artikel Valorizing food wastes: assessment of novel yeast strains for enhanced production of single-cell protein from wasted date molasses

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Ntaikou I, Menis N, Alexandropoulou M, Antonopoulou G, Lyberatos G (2018) Valorization of kitchen biowaste for ethanol production via simultaneous saccharification and fermentation using co-cultures of the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia stipitis. Bioresour Technol 263:75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.109CrossRef

Ben Atitallah I, Antonopoulou G, Ntaikou I, Alexandropoulou M, Nasri M, Mechichi T, Lyberatos G (2019) On the evaluation of different saccharification schemes for enhanced bioethanol production from potato peels waste via a newly isolated yeast strain of Wickerhamomyces anomalus. Bioresour Technol 289:121614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121614CrossRef

Nanda S, Mohammad J, Reddy SN, Kozinski JA, Dalai AK (2014) Pathways of lignocellulosic biomass conversion to renewable fuels. Biomass Conv Bioref 4:157–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-013-0097-zCrossRef

Chao CT, Krueger RR (2007) The date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.): overview of biology, uses, and cultivation. HortScience. 42(5):1077–1082. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.42.5.1077CrossRef

Antit Y, Olivares I, Hamdi M, Sánchez S (2021) Biochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass from date palm of Phoenix dactylifera L. into ethanol production. Energies. 14(7):1887. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071887CrossRef

Nasser RA, Salem MZM, Hiziroglu S, Al-Mefarrej HA, Mohareb AS, Alam M, Aref IM (2016) Chemical analysis of different parts of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) using ultimate, proximate and thermo-gravimetric techniques for energy production. Energies 9(5):374. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9050374CrossRef

Al-Oqla FM, Sapuan SM (2014) Natural fiber reinforced polymer composites in industrial applications: feasibility of date palm fibers for sustainable automotive industry. J Clean Prod 66:347–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.050CrossRef

Chandrasekaran M, Bahkali AH (2013) Valorization of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) fruit processing by-products and wastes using bioprocess technology - review. Saudi J Biol Sci 20(2):105–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2012.12.004CrossRef

Chaari R, Khlif M, Mallek H, Bradai C, Lacoste C, Belguith H, Tounsi H, Dony P (2020) Enzymatic treatments effect on the poly (butylene succinate)/date palm fibers properties for bio-composite applications. Ind Crop Prod 148:112270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112270CrossRef

10.

AL-Oqla FM, Alothman OY, Jawaid M, Sapuan S, Es-Saheb M (2014) Processing and properties of date palm fibers and its composites. Biomass bioenerg. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07641-6_1

11.

Carrere H, Antonopoulou G, Passos F, Affes R, Battimelli A, Lyberatos G, Ferrer I (2016) Review of pretreatment strategies for the most common anaerobic digestion feedstocks: from lab-scale research to full-scale application. Bioresour Technol 199:386–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.09.007CrossRef

12.

Dey P, Pal P, Kevin JD, Das DB (2020) Lignocellulosic bioethanol production: prospects of emerging membrane technologies to improve the process–a critical review. Rev Chem Eng 36(3):333–367. https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2018-0014CrossRef

13.

Antonopoulou G, Vayenas D, Lyberatos G (2016) Ethanol and hydrogen production from sunflower straw: the effect of pretreatment on the whole slurry fermentation. Biochem Eng J 116(15):65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2016.06.014CrossRef

14.

Zhang HD, Zhang JJ, Xie J, Qin YL (2020) Effects of NaOH-catalyzed organosolv pretreatment and surfactant on the sugar production from sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour Technol 312:123601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123601CrossRef

15.

Luo M, Tian D, Shen F, Hu J, Zhang Y, Yang G, Zeng Y, Deng S, Hu Y (2019) A comparative investigation of H₂O₂-involved pretreatments on lignocellulosic biomass for enzymatic hydrolysis. Biomass Conv Bioref 9(2):321–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-018-0364-0CrossRef

16.

Guan R, Yuan X, Wu Z, Jiang L, Li Y, Zeng G (2018) Principle and application of hydrogen peroxide based advanced oxidation processes in activated sludge treatment: a review. Chem Eng J 339:519–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.153CrossRef

17.

Dutra ED, Santos FA, Alencar BRA, Reis ALS, de Souza RFR, de Silva Aquino KA, Morais MA, Menezes RSC (2018) Alkaline hydrogen peroxide pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass: status and perspectives. Biomass Conv Bioref 8:225–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-017-0277-3CrossRef

18.

Gould JM (1984) Alkaline peroxide delignification of agricultural residues to enhance enzymatic saccharification. Biotechnol Bioeng 26(1):46–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260260110CrossRef

19.

Li M, Wang J, Yang Y, Xie G (2016) Alkali-based pretreatments distinctively extract lignin and pectin for enhancing biomass saccharification by altering cellulose features in sugar-rich Jerusalem artichoke stem. Bioresour Technol 208:31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.053CrossRef

20.

Tareen AK, Punsuvon V, Parakulsuksatid P (2020) Investigation of alkaline hydrogen peroxide pretreatment to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis and phenolic compounds of oil palm trunk. 3 Biotech 10(4):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-020-02169-6CrossRef

21.

Damaurai J, Preechakun T, Raita M, Champreda V, Laosiripojana N (2021) Investigation of alkaline hydrogen peroxide in aqueous organic solvent to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis of rice straw. Bioenergy Res 14:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-020-10152-5CrossRef

22.

Ho MC, Ong VZ, Wu TY (2019) Potential use of alkaline hydrogen peroxide in lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment and valorization: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 112:75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.082CrossRef

23.

Monte LS, Escócio VA, de Sousa AMF, Furtado CRG, Leite MCAM, Visconte LLY, Pacheco EBAV (2018) Study of time reaction on alkaline pretreatment applied to rice husk on biomass component extraction. Biomass Conv Bioref 8:189–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-017-0271-9CrossRef

24.

Hernández-Beltrán JU, Fontalvo J, Hernández-Escoto H (2020) Fed-batch enzymatic hydrolysis of plantain pseudostem to fermentable sugars production and the impact of particle size at high solids loadings. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00669-2

25.

Niju S, Nishanthini T, Balajii M (2020) Alkaline hydrogen peroxide-pretreated sugarcane tops for bioethanol production—a process optimization study. Biomass Conv Bioref 10:149–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00524-zCrossRef

26.

Ohgren K, Bura R, Lesnicki G, Saddler J, Zacchi G (2007) A comparison between simultaneous saccharification and fermentation and separate hydrolysis and fermentation using steam-pretreated corn stover. Process Biochem 42(5):834–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2007.02.003CrossRef

27.

Ntaikou I, Antonopoulou G, Lyberatos G (2021) Sustainable second generation bioethanol production from enzymatically hydrolyzed food waste using Pichia anomala as biocatalyst. Sustainability (Switzerland) 13(1):259. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010259CrossRef

28.

Gonzalez-Rios JA, Valle-Pérez AU, Amaya-Delgado L, Sanchez A (2021) A quick fed-batch saccharification strategy of wheat straw at high solid loadings improving lignocellulosic ethanol productivity. Biomass Conv. Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01580-0

29.

Senkevich S, Ntaikou I, Lyberatos G (2012) Bioethanol production from thermochemically pre-treated olive mill solid residues using the yeast Pachysolentannophilus. GNEST Journal 14(2):118–124. https://doi.org/10.30955/gnj.000861CrossRef

30.

Silva JPA, Carneiro LM, Roberto IC (2014) Assessment of advanced oxidative processes based on heterogeneous catalysis as a detoxification method of rice straw hemicellulose hydrolysate and their effect on ethanol production by Pichia stipitis. Biomass Conv Bioref 4(3):225–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-013-0104-4CrossRef

31.

Ntaikou I, Antonopoulou G, Vagenas D, Lyberatos G (2020) Assessment of electrocoagulation as a pretreatment method of olive mill wastewater for biofuels production in a biorefinery concept. Renew Energy 154:1252–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.108CrossRef

32.

Hashem M, Alamri SA, Asseri TAY, Moustafa YS, Lyberatos G, Ntaikou I (2021) On the optimization of fermentation conditions for enhanced bioethanol yields from starchy biowaste via yeast co-cultures. Sustainability (Switzerland) 13(4):1890. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041890CrossRef

33.

Antonopoulou G, Alexandropoulou M, Ntaikou I, Lyberatos G (2020) From waste to fuel: energy recovery from household food waste via its bioconversion to energy carriers based on microbiological processes. Sci Total Environ 732:139230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139230CrossRef

34.

Goli JK, Hameeda B (2021) Production of xylitol and ethanol from acid and enzymatic hydrolysates of Typha latifolia by Candida tropicalis JFH5 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae VS3. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01868-1

35.

Ntaikou I, Siankenich S, Lyberatos G (2021) Effect of thermo-chemical pretreatment on the saccharification and enzymatic digestibility of olive mill stones and their bioconversion towards alcohols. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(19):24570–24579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09625-zCrossRef

36.

Zha Y, Hossain AH, Tobola F, Sedee N, Havekes M, Punt PJ (2013) Pichia anomala 29X: a resistant strain for lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysate fermentation. FEMS Yeast Res 13(7):609–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/1567-1364.12062CrossRef

37.

Ben Atitallah I, Ntaikou I, Antonopoulou G, Alexandropoulou M, Brysch-Herzberg M, Nasri M, Lyberatos G, Mechichi T (2020) Evaluation of the non-conventional yeast strain Wickerhamomyces anomalus (Pichia anomala) X19 for enhanced bioethanol production using date palm sap as renewable feedstock. Renew Energy 154:71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.010CrossRef

38.

Bonatto C, Venturin B, Mayer DA, Bazoti SF, de Oliveira D, Alves SL Jr, Treichel H (2020) Experimental data and modelling of 2G ethanol production by Wickerhamomyces sp. UFFS-CE-3.1.2. Renew Energy 145:2445–2450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.010CrossRef

39.

Chen Y (2011) Development and application of co-culture for ethanol production by co-fermentation of glucose and xylose: a systematic review. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 38(5):581–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-010-0894-3CrossRef

40.

Nosrati-Ghods N, Harrison STL, Isafiade AJ, Tai SL (2018) Ethanol from biomass hydrolysates by efficient fermentation of glucose and xylose – a review. ChemBioEng Reviews 5(5):294–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.201800009CrossRef

41.

Haq I, Tahir A, Nawaz A, Mustafa Z, Mukhtar H, Rehman A (2020) Sustainable bioconversion of saccharified agro residues into bioethanol by Wickerhamomycesanomalus. Revista Mexicana De Ingeniería Química 19:1477–1491. https://doi.org/10.24275/rmiq/Bio966CrossRef

42.

APHA, Awwa, WPCF, (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC

43.

Monlau F, Barakat A, Steyer JP, Carrere H (2012) Comparison of seven types of thermo-chemical pretreatments on the structural features and anaerobic digestion of sunflower stalks. Bioresour Technol 120:241–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.040CrossRef

44.

DuBois M, Gilles K, Hamilton J, Rebers P, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28:350–356CrossRef

45.

Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugars. Anal Chem 31:426–428CrossRef

46.

Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Crocker D (2008) Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP), NREL/TP-510–42618. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Colorado

47.

Waterman PG, Mole S (1994) Analysis of phenolic plant metabolites. In: Lawton JH, Likens GE (eds) Methods in Ecology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

48.

Elseify LA, Midani M, Shihata LA, El-Mously H (2019) Review on cellulosic fibers extracted from date palms (Phoenix Dactylifera L.) and their applications. Cellulose. 26 (4): 2209–2232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02259-6

49.

Shaikh HM, Anis A, Poulose AM, Al-Zahrani SM, Madhar NA, Alhamidi A, Alam MA (2021) Isolation and characterization of alpha and nanocrystalline cellulose from date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) trunk mesh. Polymers. 13(11):1893. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13111893CrossRef

50.

Beroual M, Trache D, Mehelli O, Boumaza L, Tarchoun AF, Derradji M, Khimech K (2021) Effect of the delignification process on the physicochemical properties and thermal stability of microcrystalline cellulose extracted from date palm fronds. Waste Biomass Valor 12(15):2779–2793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-020-01198-9CrossRef

51.

Nasser RAS (2014) An evaluation of the used if midribs from common date palm cultivars grown in Saudi Arabia for energy production. BioResource 9(3):4343–4357CrossRef

52.

Hassan SS, Williams GA, Jaiswal AK (2018) Emerging technologies for the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 262:310–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.099CrossRef

53.

Jatoi AS, Abbasi SA, Hashmi Z, Shah AK, Alam MS, Bhatti ZA, Maitlo G, Hussain S, Khandro GA, Usto MA, Iqbal A (2021) Recent trends and future perspectives of lignocellulose biomass for biofuel production: a comprehensive review. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01853-8

54.

Antonopoulou G, Kampranis A, Ntaikou I, Lyberatos G (2019) Enhancement of liquid and gaseous biofuels production from agro-industrial residues after thermochemical and enzymatic pretreatment. Front Sustain Food Syst 3:92. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00092CrossRef

55.

Di Girolamo G, Bertin L, Capecchi L, Ciavatta C, Barbanti L (2014) Mild alkaline pre-treatments loosen fibre structure enhancing methane production from biomass crops and residues. Biomass Bioenerg 71:318–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.09.025CrossRef

56.

Senol H, Acikel U, Oda V (2021) Anaerobic digestion of sugar beet pulp after acid thermal and alkali thermal pretreatments. Biomass Conv Bioref 11(3):895–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00539-6CrossRef

57.

Pihlajaniemi V, Sipponen MH, Liimatainen H, Sirvio JA, Nyyssola A, Laakso S (2016) Weighing the factors behind enzymatic hydrolyzability of pretreated lignocellulose. Green Chem 18(5):1295–1305. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5gc01861gCrossRef

58.

Alexandropoulou M, Antonopoulou G, Ntaikou I, Lyberatos G (2017) Fungal pretreatment of willow sawdust with Abortiporus biennis for anaerobic digestion: impact of an external nitrogen source. Sustainability 9(1):130. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010130CrossRef

59.

Bar J, Phongpreecha T, Singh SK, Kral Yilmaz M, Foster CE, Crowe JD, Hodge DB (2018) Deconstruction of hybrid poplar to monomeric sugars and aromatics using ethanol organosolv fractionation. Biomass Conv Bioref 8(4):813–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-018-0330-xCrossRef

60.

Antonopoulou G, Dimitrellos G, Beobide AS, Vayenas D, Lyberatos G (2015) Chemical pretreatment of sunflower straw biomass: the effect on chemical composition and structural changes. Waste Biomass Valor 6:733–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-015-9388-xCrossRef

61.

Cebreiros F, Ferrari MD, Lareo C (2018) Combined autohydrolysis and alkali pretreatments for cellulose enzymatic hydrolysis of Eucalyptus grandis wood. Biomass Conv Bioref 8:33–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-016-0236-4CrossRef

62.

Sun S, Huang Y, Sun R, Tu M (2016) The strong association of condensed phenolic moieties in isolated lignins with their inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis. Green Chem 18(15):4276–4286. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6gc00685jCrossRef

63.

Abidi N, Cabrales L, Haigler CH (2014) Changes in the cell wall and cellulose content of developing cotton fibers investigated by FTIR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Polym 100:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.074CrossRef

64.

Lionetto F, Del Sole R, Cannoletta D, Vasapollo G, Maffezzoli A (2012) Monitoring wood degradation during weathering by cellulose crystallinity. Materials 5(10):1910–1922. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma5101910CrossRef

65.

Suo T, Peng P, Feng M, Liu H, Ai Z, Tong S, Yang X, Qin X (2012) Fixed-point and stratified analysis of the fine structure and composition of five gallstones with Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) specular reflection spectroscopy. Microsc Res Tech 75(3):294–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.21057.10.1016/j.msec.2017.04.004CrossRef

66.

Liu Y, Hu T, Wu Z, Zeng G, Huang D, Shen Y, He X, Lai M, He Y (2014) Study on biodegradation process of lignin by FTIR and DSC. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21(24):14004–14013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3342-5CrossRef

67.

Hosseinaei O, Wang S, Enayati AA, Rials TG (2012) Effects of hemicellulose extraction on properties of wood flour and wood-plastic composites. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 43:686–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.01.007CrossRef

68.

Zhang T, Guo M, Cheng L, Li X (2015) Investigations on the structure and properties of palm leaf sheath fiber. Cellulose 22(2):1039–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0570-xCrossRef

69.

Karimi K, Taherzadeh MJ (2016) A critical review of analytical methods in pretreatment of lignocelluloses: composition, imaging, and crystallinity. Bioresour Technol 200:1008–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.022CrossRef

70.

Khiari R, Belgacem MN (2020) Date Palm Nanofibres and Composites. In: Midani M, Saba N, Alothman OY (eds) Date Palm Fiber Composites Composites Science and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9339-0_6CrossRef

71.

Salehian P, Karimi K, Zilouei H, Jeihanipour A (2013) Improvement of biogas production from pine wood by alkali pretreatment. Fuel 106:484–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.12.092CrossRef

72.

Yabefa JA, Ocholi Y, Odubo GF (2014) Effect of temperature and changes in medium pH on enzymatic hydrolysis of β (1–4) glycosidic bond in orange mesocarp. Asian J Plant Sci Res 4(4):21–24

73.

Fenila F, Shastri Y (2016) Optimal control of enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Resource-Efficient Technologies 2:S96–S104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reffit.2016.11.006CrossRef

74.

Gupta R, Lee YY (2010) Pretreatment of corn stover and hybrid poplar by sodium hydroxide and hydrogen peroxide. Biotechnol Prog 26(4):1180–1186. https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.405CrossRef

75.

Cao W, Sun C, Liu R, Yin R, Wu X (2012) Comparison of the effects of five pretreatment methods on enhancing the enzymatic digestibility and ethanol production from sweet sorghum bagasse. Bioresour Technol 111:215–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.034CrossRef

76.

Cuevas M, Garcia JF, Sánchez S (2014) Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated almond-tree prunings for sugar production. Carbohydr Polym 99:791–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.089CrossRef

77.

Mohd Azhar SH, Abdulla R, Jambo SA, Marbawi H, Gansau JA, Mohd Faik AA, Rodrigues KF (2017) Yeasts in sustainable bioethanol production: a review. Biochem Biophys Rep 10:52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrep.2017.03.003CrossRef

78.

Zhang B, Sun H, Li J, Wan Y, Li Y, Zhang Y (2016) High-titer-ethanol production from cellulosic hydrolysate by an engineered strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during an in situ removal process reducing the inhibition of ethanol on xylose metabolism. Process Biochem 51(8):967–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2016.04.019CrossRef

79.

Abu Reesh IM (2021) Optimum design of N continuous stirred-tank bioreactors in series for fermentation processes based on simultaneous substrate and product inhibition. Processes 9(8):1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9081419CrossRef

80.

Bignell E (2012) The molecular basis of pH sensing, signaling, and homeostasis in fungi. Adv Appl Microbiol 79:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394318-7.00001-2CrossRef

81.

Lucena RM, Dolz-Edo L, Brul S, de Morais MA, Smits G (2020) Extreme low cytosolic pH is a signal for cell survival in acid stressed yeast. Genes 11(6):656. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11060656CrossRef

82.

Ben Atitallah I, Arous F, Louati I, Zouari-Mechichi H, Brysch-Herzberg M, Woodward S, Mechichi T (2021) Efficient bioethanol production from date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) sap by a newly isolated Saccharomyces cerevisiae X19G2. Process Biochem 105:102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2021.03.019CrossRef

83.

Prasertsan P, Nutongkaew T, Leamdum C, Suyota W, Boukaew S (2021) Direct biotransformation of oil palm frond juice to ethanol and acetic acid by simultaneous fermentation of co-cultures and the efficacy of its culture filtrate as an antifungal agent against black seed rot disease. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01482-1

Titel: Effect of alkaline/hydrogen peroxide pretreatment on date palm fibers: induced chemical and structural changes and assessment of ethanol production capacity via Pichia anomala and Pichia stipitis
verfasst von: Imen Ben Atitallah
Ioanna Ntaikou
Georgia Antonopoulou
Chedly Bradai
Tahar Mechichi
Gerasimos Lyberatos
Publikationsdatum: 09.02.2022
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery / Ausgabe 10/2022
Print ISSN: 2190-6815
Elektronische ISSN: 2190-6823
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02398-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Graphical abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2022

Valorizing food wastes: assessment of novel yeast strains for enhanced production of single-cell protein from wasted date molasses

Investigation on the effects of carbonization parameters on carbon material produced from durian shell

A review on direct carboxylation of glycerol waste to glycerol carbonate and its applications

Time-based evaluation of bioavailable phosphorus in a calcareous soil after the application of anaerobically digested sewage sludge

Usage potential of apple and carrot pomaces as raw materials for newly isolated yeast lipid-based biodiesel production

Insights into influences of bamboo biochar on nitrous oxide emission and diazotrophs during cow manure and bagasse composting