nach oben

Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery

Erschienen in:

14.03.2022 | Original Article

Effect of cow dung on anaerobic digestion characteristics of poplar fuel ethanol wastewater

verfasst von: Pingping Deng, Xiaofan Yan, Ruixia Liu, Tingting Ding, Jienan Chen, Zhiping Wu

Erschienen in: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery | Ausgabe 2/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Direct disposal of poplar fuel ethanol wastewater (PFEW) and incineration of cow dung caused serious harm to the environment. To investigate the effect of cow dung on the mesophilic digestion of PFEW, the anaerobic mono-digestion (PFEW) and co-digestion (PFEW + cow dung) were performed, respectively. The maximum cumulative methane production of mono-digestion was 254.7 mL/gVS when the substrate concentration of PFEW was 2.58 g/LVS, which was 22.16% higher than that of co-digestion. The volatile fatty acids (VFAs) testing results indicated that the degradation of propionic acid by acetogen was inhibited and the methane process was weakened in anaerobic co-digestion. The analysis of the microbial community showed that norank f Bacteroidetes vadinHA17, Clostridium sensu stricto and Leptolinea were acid-producing bacteria, Anaerolineaceae was acetogen, Methanosarcina and Methanobacterium were methanogens, of which appeared in both co-digestion and mono-digestion. Psychrobacillus which was only found in the co-digestion inhibited the growth of acetogen and affected the methane production, which revealed the exogenous inhibitory effect of cow dung on the anaerobic digestion of PFEW.

Vorheriger Artikel Comparison of corncob-derived solid acids and evaluation of catalytic cellulose hydrolysis performance in LiBr

Nächster Artikel Zirconium-lignin hybrid catalyst for the Meerwein-Ponndorf-Verley reduction of biomass-derived 5-hydroxymethylfurfural to 2,5-bis(hydroxymethyl)furan

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Antonio Tursi (2019) A review on biomass: importance, chemistry, classification, and conversion. Biofuel Res J 6(2):962–979. https://doi.org/10.18331/BRJ2019.6.2.3CrossRef

Nielsen F, Galbe M, Zacchi G, Wallberg O (2019) The effect of mixed agricultural feedstocks on steam pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, and cofermentation in the lignocellulose-to-ethanol process. Biomass Convers Biorefin 10(2):253–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00454-wCrossRef

Xu R, Zhang K, Liu P, Khan A, Xiong J, Tian F, Li X (2018) A critical review on the interaction of substrate nutrient balance and microbial community structure and function in anaerobic co-digestion. Bioresour Technol 247:1119–1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.095CrossRef

Singh SK, Juwarkar AA, Pandey RA, Chakrabarti T (2008) Applicability of high rate transpiration system for treatment of biologically treated distillery effluent. Environ Monit Assess 141(1–3):201–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9888-7CrossRef

Dou WX, Zhou Z, Jiang LM, Jiang AJ, Huang RW, Tian XC, Zhang W, Chen DQ (2017) Sulfate removal from wastewater using ettringite precipitation: magnesium ion inhibition and process optimization. J Environ Manage 196:518–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.054CrossRef

Zhang ZC, Han XL, Fang SQ, Chang C (2018) Study on the treatment of ethanol fermentation wastewater by membrane separation. Technol Water Treat 44(8):57–60. https://doi.org/10.16796/j.cnki.1000-3770.2018.08.013CrossRef

Hu YJ, Hu Q, Gao DW (2016) Advanced treatment of cellulose ethanol wastewater by Fenton oxidation. Chinese J Environ Eng 10(10):5653–5657. https://doi.org/10.12030/j.cjee.201505056CrossRef

NavamaniKartic D, Aditya Narayana BC, Arivazhagan M (2018) Removal of high concentration of sulfate from pigment industry effluent by chemical precipitation using barium chloride: RSM and ANN modeling approach. J Environ Manage 206:69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.10.017CrossRef

Zhang L, Loh KC, Sarvanantharajah S, Tong YW, Wang CH, Dai YJ (2019) Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of soybean curd residue for methane production: characterizing bacterial and methanogen communities and their correlations with organic loading rate and operating temperature. Bioresour Technol 288:121597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121597CrossRef

10.

Srisowmeya G, Chakravarthy M, Bakshi A, Nandhini Devi G (2021) Improving process stability, biogas production and energy recovery using two-stage mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of rice wastewater with cow dung slurry. Biomass Bioenergy 152:106184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106184CrossRef

11.

Zala M, Solanki R, Bhale PV, S V (2019) Experimental investigation on anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and water hyacinth in batch type reactor under mesophilic condition. Biomass Convers Biorefin 10(3):707–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00522-1CrossRef

12.

Zhou SQ, Wang J, Peng SC, Chen TH, Yue ZB (2021) Anaerobic co-digestion of landfill leachate and acid mine drainage using up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(7):8498–8506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11207-yCrossRef

13.

Xiomara Gómez-Quiroga, Aboudi K, Carlos José lvarez-Gallego, Luis Isidoro Romero-García (2022) Successful and stable operation of anaerobic thermophilic co-digestion of sun-dried sugar beet pulp and cow manure under short hydraulic retention time. Chemosphere 293: 133484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133484

14.

Ugwu SN, Enweremadu CC (2019) Effects of pre-treatments and co-digestion on biogas production from Okra waste. J Renew Sustain Energy 11:1. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5049530CrossRef

15.

Odejobi OJ, Ajala OO, Osuolale FN (2021) Anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste and animal manure: a review of operating parameters, inhibiting factors, and pretreatment with their impact on process performance. Biomass Convers Biorefin. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01626-3CrossRef

16.

Venkateshkumar R, Shanmugam S, Veerappan AR (2020) Anaerobic co-digestion of cow dung and cotton seed hull with different blend ratio: experimental and kinetic study. Biomass Convers Biorefin. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01006-3CrossRef

17.

Chen XY, Xiao XZ, Teng J, Dong SY, Lian JF, Zhu YC (2021) Research progress on methanogenic inhibition technology during anaerobic digestion of excess sludge. Environmental Engineering. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2097.X.20210107.0921.002.html

18.

APHA. (1998) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 21 st Edition[R], APHA.

19.

Ao TJ, Ran Y, Chen YC, Li RL, Luo YP, Liu XF, Li D (2020) Effect of viscosity on process stability and microbial community composition during anaerobic mesophilic digestion of Maotai-flavored distiller’s grains. Bioresour Technol 297:122460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122460CrossRef

20.

Cao Q, Liu XF, Ran Y, Li ZD, Li D (2019) Methane oxidation coupled to denitrification under microaerobic and hypoxic conditions in leach bed bioreactors. Sci Total Environ 649:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.289CrossRef

21.

Zhen GY, Lu XQ, Kobayashi T, Kumar G, Xu KQ (2016) Anaerobic co-digestion on improving methane production from mixed microalgae (Scenedesmus sp., Chlorella sp.) and food waste: kinetic modeling and synergistic impact evaluation. Chem Eng J 299:332–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.04.118CrossRef

22.

Zhang JX, Zhang YB, Quan XQ, Liu YW, An XL, Chen S, Zhao HM (2011) Bioaugmentation and functional partitioning in a zero valent iron-anaerobic reactor for sulfate-containing wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J 174(1):159–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.08.069CrossRef

23.

Siegert I, Banks C (2005) The effect of volatile fatty acid additions on the anaerobic digestion of cellulose and glucose in batch reactors. Process Biochemistry 40(11):3412–3418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2005.01.02CrossRef

24.

Jiang ZS, Ping JF, Guo YK, Chen XH, Guo JB, Lian J (2016) Effect of different ratios of cow manure and corn straw on the mixed anaerobic fermentation rate. J Hebei Univ Sci Technol 37(4):396–405. https://doi.org/10.7535/hbkd.2016yx04013CrossRef

25.

Zhou HQ, Brown RC, Wen ZY (2020) Biochar as an additive in anaerobic digestion of municipal sludge: biochar properties and their effects on the digestion performance. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 8(16):6391–6401. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c00571CrossRef

26.

Wang YY, Zhang YL, Wang JB, Meng L (2009) Effects of volatile fatty acid concentrations on methane yield and methanogenic bacteria. Biomass Bioenergy 33(5):848–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.01.007CrossRef

27.

Xu XJ, Chen C, Wang AJ, Fang N, Yuan Y, Ren NQ, Lee DJ (2012) Enhanced elementary sulfur recovery in integrated sulfate-reducing, sulfur-producing rector under micro-aerobic condition. Bioresour Technol 116:517–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.095CrossRef

28.

Beniche I, Hungría J, Bari HE, Siles JA, Chica AF, Martín MA (2020) Effects of C/N ratio on anaerobic co-digestion of cabbage, cauliflower, and restaurant food waste. Biomass Convers Biorefin 11(5):2133–2145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00733-xCrossRef

29.

Ren NQ, Zhao D, Chen XL, Li JZ (2002) Causes of propionic acid production and accumulation in anaerobic biological treatment and control countermeasures. Sci China 32(1):83–89

30.

Srisowmeya G, Chakravarthy M, Bakshi A, Devi GN (2021) Improving process stability, biogas production and energy recovery using two-stage mesophilic anaerobic codigestion of rice wastewater with cow dung slurry. Biomass and Bioenergy 152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106184

31.

Wang SQ, Zhang KQ, Kong DW, Gao WX, Liang JF, Li JJ, Du LZ (2021) Microbial community response to volatile fatty acid inhibition in dry anaerobic fermentation. Journal of Agro-Environment Science. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1347.S.20210722.0734.002.html

32.

Lu QH, Yu ZH, Yu SN, Liang ZW, Li HC, Sun LP, Wang SQ (2019) Organic matter rather than salinity as a predominant feature changes performance and microbiome in methanogenic sludge digesters. J Hazard Mater 377:349–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.05.075CrossRef

33.

Gao J, Li J, Zuo XY, Yuan HR, Liu YP, Li XJ (2020) Effect of biochar-addition on anaerobic digestion performance of wheat straw and its microbial community structer. China Biogas 38(6):14–20

34.

Tang TT, Li J, Yang AJ, Yang Z, Xiang FL, Yuan HY (2020) Effects of straw type and ratio change on microbial community in anaerobic digestion of sludge. Chem Industry Eng Prog 39(2):667–678. https://doi.org/10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2019-0777CrossRef

35.

Hahnke S, Langer T, Koeck DE, Klocke M (2016) Description of Proteiniphilum saccharofermentans sp. nov., Petrimonas mucosa sp. nov. and Fermentimonas caenicola gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from mesophilic laboratory-scale biogas reactors, and emended description of the genus Proteiniphilum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66(3):1466–1475. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.000902CrossRef

36.

Ziganshina EE, Belostotskiy DE, Bulynina SS, Ziganshin AM (2021) Effect of magnetite on anaerobic digestion of distillers grains and beet pulp: operation of reactors and microbial community dynamics. J Biosci Bioeng 131(3):290–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2020.10.003CrossRef

37.

Yang CT, Tsedan GU, Liu Y, Hou FJ (2020) Shrub coverage alters the rumen bacterial community of yaks (Bos grunniens) grazing in alpine meadows. J Anim Sci Technol 62(4):504–520. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.4.504CrossRef

38.

Liu F, Zhou XH, Chen X, Chen J, Du GC, Fang F (2018) Analysis of microbial community structer in Fermentation grains of Yanghe Luzhou-flavor liquor fermentation process and its relationship with organic substances correlation of acid synthesis. Acta Microbiol Sin 58(12):2087–2099. https://doi.org/10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20170616CrossRef

39.

Lee J, Koo T, Yulisa A, Hwang S (2019) Magnetite as an enhancer in methanogenic degradation of volatile fatty acids under ammonia-stressed condition. J Environ Manage 241:418–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.038CrossRef

40.

Jang SW, Yoou MH, Hong WJ, Kim YJ, Lee EJ, Jung KH (2020) Re-analysis of 16S amplicon sequencing data reveals soil microbial population shifts in rice fields under drought condition. Rice 13(1):44–51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-020-00403-6CrossRef

41.

Lee YJ, Romanek CS, Mills GL, Davis RC, Whitman WB, Wiegel J (2006) Gracilibacter thermotolerans gen. nov., sp. nov., an anaerobic, thermotolerant bacterium from a constructed wetland receiving acid sulfate water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56(9):2089–2093. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64040-0CrossRef

42.

Wang RM, Li CX, Lv N, Pan XF, Cai GJ, Ning J, Zhu GF (2021) Deeper insights into effect of activated carbon and nano-zero-valent iron addition on acidogenesis and whole anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 324:124671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124671CrossRef

43.

Lee J, Hwang S (2019) Single and combined inhibition of Methanosaeta concilii by ammonia, sodium ion and hydrogen sulfide. Bioresour Technol 281:401–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.02.106CrossRef

44.

Zhu XY, Kougias PG, Treu L, Campanaro S, Angelidaki I (2017) Microbial community changes in methanogenic granules during the transition from mesophilic to thermophilic conditions. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101(3):1313–1322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-8028-0CrossRef

45.

Yang FL, Li WZ, Liu CY, Wang MY, Li Q, Sun Y (2019) Impact of total carbon/sulfate on methane production and sulfate removal from co-digestion of sulfate-containing wastewater and corn stalk. J Environ Manage 243:411–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.129CrossRef

46.

Shan LL, Yu YL, Zhu ZB et al (2015) Microbial community analysis in a combined anaerobic and anaerobic digestion system for treatment of cellulosic ethanol production wastewater. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(22):17789–17798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4938-0CrossRef

47.

Han Z, Chen F, Zhong C, Zhou J, Wu XY, Yang XY, Zhou H, Jiang M, Jia HH, Wei P (2016) Effects of different carriers on biogas production and microbial community structure during anaerobic digestion of cassava ethanol wastewater. Environ Technol 38(18):2253–2262. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2016.1255666CrossRef

Titel: Effect of cow dung on anaerobic digestion characteristics of poplar fuel ethanol wastewater
verfasst von: Pingping Deng
Xiaofan Yan
Ruixia Liu
Tingting Ding
Jienan Chen
Zhiping Wu
Publikationsdatum: 14.03.2022
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery / Ausgabe 2/2024
Print ISSN: 2190-6815
Elektronische ISSN: 2190-6823
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02549-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2024

Development and evaluation of castor oil nanoemulsion on the cotton leaf worm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) and its adverse effects on the reproductive system of albino rats

Techno-economic feasibility of P(3-hydroxybutyrate) bioprocess with concentrated sugarcane vinasse as carbon and minerals source: an experimental and in silico approach

Process optimisation for improvement of crystallinity index of cellulose nanofibre from Imperata cylindrica by Taguchi methodology

Parametric optimization and kinetic modelling for organic matter removal from agro-waste derived paper packaging biorefinery wastewater

Comparative study of flash and acid hydrolysis of microalgae (Scenedesmus sp.) for the recovery of biochemicals and production of porous biocarbon nanosheets

Correction to: Activated eco-waste of Posidonia oceanica rhizome as a potential adsorbent of methylene blue from saline water