nach oben

Erschienen in:

28.03.2020 | Original Article

Effect of different heat treatments of inoculum on the production of hydrogen and volatile fatty acids by dark fermentation of sugarcane vinasse

verfasst von: Flaviane Eva Magrini, Gabriela Machado de Almeida, Denis da Maia Soares, Laura Fuentes, Claudia Ecthebehere, Lademir Luiz Beal, Maurício Moura da Silveira, Suelen Paesi

Erschienen in: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery | Ausgabe 6/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Vinasse the main residue of bioethanol production can be used as a substrate in microbiological processes to obtain value-added products. However, it is necessary to use a microbial consortium with high capacity to produce hydrogen (H₂) and volatile fatty acids (VFA). There is no consensus on the best inoculum pretreatment to eliminate hydrogen-consuming bacteria. Thus, the present study evaluated the influence of three methods of heat pretreatment of the inoculum: T1 = 90 °C/10 min; T2 = 105 °C/120 min; T3 = 121 °C/20 min for the production of H₂ and VFA using vinasse as substrate. The effect of the concentration of vinasse and the initial pH (5, 6 and 7) were also evaluated. The highest hydrogen production (821.34 mL) and yield (4.75 mmol H₂ g⁻¹ COD) was obtained using undiluted vinasse at pH 6 and T1 pretreatment. The highest number of copies of the Fe-hydrogenase genes confirms the higher H₂ production. The presence of Clostridium and facultative anaerobic microorganisms Bacillus and Enterobacter in the microbial consortia were confirmed by isolation and PCR-DGGE. The highest production of VFA was obtained at pH 7 and T3 pretreatment. This study showed that dark fermentation could be driven by the inoculum pretreatment and pH selecting different process either for the production of H₂ or VFA from vinasse in natura, without addition of supplements.

Vorheriger Artikel Syngas for biorefineries from thermochemical gasification of lignocellulosic fuels and residues—5 years’ experience with an advanced dual fluidized bed gasifier design

Nächster Artikel Chlorophytum rhizosphere, a suitable environment for electroactive biofilm development

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

CONAB, National Supply Company (Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento). https://www.conab.gov.br. Accessed 25 August 2019

Sydney EB, Larroche C, Novak AC, Nouaille R, Sarma SJ, Brar SK, Letti LAJ, Soccol VT, Soccol CR (2014) Economic process to produce biohydrogen and volatile fatty acids by a mixed culture using vinasse from sugarcane ethanol industry as nutrient source. Bioresour Technol 159:380–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.042CrossRef

Lazaro CZ, Perna V, Etchebehere C, Varesche MBA (2014) Sugarcane vinasse as substrate for fermentative hydrogen production: the effects of temperature and substrate concentration. Int J Hydrog Energy 39:6407–6418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.02.058CrossRef

Salomon KR, Lora EES (2009) Estimate of the electric energy generating potential for different sources of biogas in Brazil. Biomass Bioenergy 33:1101–1107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.03.001CrossRef

Cheong DY, Hansen CL (2006) Bacterial stress enrichment enchances anaerobic hydrogen production in cattle manure sludge. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 72:635–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-006-0313-xCrossRef

Atasoy M, Owusu-Agyeman I, Plaza E, Cetecioglu Z (2018) Bio-based volatile fatty acid production and recovery from waste streams: current status and future challenges. Bioresour Technol 268:773–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.042CrossRef

Strazzera G, Battista F, Garcia NH, Frison N, Bolzonella D (2018) Volatile fatty acids production from food wastes for biorefinery platforms: a review. J Environ Manag 226:278–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.039CrossRef

Lu Y, Slater FR, Mohd-Zaki Z, Pratt S, Batstone DJ (2011) Impact of operating history on mixed culture fermentation microbial ecology and product mixture. Water Sci Technol 64:760–765. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2011.699CrossRef

Maintinguer SI, Sakamoto IK, Adorno MAT, Varesche MBA (2015) Bacterial diversity from environmental sample applied to bio-hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 40:3180–3190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.12.118CrossRef

10.

Sivagurunathan P, Sen B, Lin CY (2014) Batch fermentative hydrogen production by enriched mixed culture: combination strategy and their microbial composition. J Biosci Bioeng 117:222–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2013.07.015CrossRef

11.

Maintinguer SI, Fernandes BS, Duart ICC, Saavedra NK, Adorno MAT, Varesche MBA (2008) Fermentative hydrogen production by microbial consortium. Int J Hydrog Energy 33:4309–4317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.06.053CrossRef

12.

Rossi DM, Costa JB, Souza EA, Peralba MCR, Samios D, Ayub MAZ (2011) Comparison of different pretreatment methods for hydrogen production using environmental microbial consortia on residual glycerol from biodiesel. Int J Hydrog Energy 36:4814–4819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.01.005CrossRef

13.

Wang A, Gao L, Ren N, Xu J, Liu C, Lee DJ (2010) Enrichment strategy to select functional consortium from mixed cultures: consortium from rumen liquor for simultaneous cellulose degradation and hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 35:13413–13418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.11.117CrossRef

14.

Motte JC, Trably E, Hamelin J, Escudié R, Bonnafous A, Steyer JP, Bernet N, Delgenès JP, Dumas C (2014) Total solid content drives hydrogen production through microbial selection during thermophilic fermentation. Bioresour Technol 166:610–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.05.078CrossRef

15.

Noori M, Saady C (2013) Homoacetogenesis during hydrogen production by mixed cultures dark fermentation: unresolved challenge. Int J Hydrog Energy 38:13172–13191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.07.122CrossRef

16.

Kraemer JT, Bagley DM (2007) Improving the yield from fermentative hydrogen production. Biotechnol Lett 29:685–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-006-9299-9CrossRef

17.

Ren NQ, Guo WQ, Wang XJ, Xiang WS, Liu BF, Wang XZ, Ding J, Chen ZB (2008) Effects of different pretreatment methods on fermentation types and dominant bacteria for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 33:4318–4324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.06.003CrossRef

18.

Wang J, Yin Y (2017) Principle and application of different pretreatment methods for enriching hydrogen-producing bacteria from mixed cultures. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:4804–4823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.135CrossRef

19.

Kim DH, Han SK, Kim SH, Shin HS (2006) Effect of gas sparging on continuous fermentative hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 31:2158–2169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.02.012CrossRef

20.

Bakonyi P, Borza B, Orlovits K, Simon V, Nemestothy N, Belafi-Bako K (2014) Fermentative hydrogen production by conventionally and unconventionally heat pretreated seed cultures: a comparative assessment. Int J Hydrog Energy 39:5589–5596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.01.110CrossRef

21.

Wang J, Wan W (2008) Comparison of different pretreatment methods for enriching hydrogen-producing bacteria from digested sludge. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33:2934–2941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.03.048CrossRef

22.

Phowan P, Danvirutai P (2014) Hydrogen production from cassava pulp hydrolysate by mixed seed cultures: effects of initial pH, substrate and biomass concentrations. Biomass Bioernergy 64:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.03.057CrossRef

23.

Khanal SK, Chen WH, Li L, Sung S (2004) Biological hydrogen production: efects of pH and intermediate products. Int J Hydrog Energy 29:1123–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2003.11.002CrossRef

24.

APHA (2005) Standart methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21 st ed., Washington, DC

25.

Dubois MKA, Gilles JK, Hamilton PA, Rebers SF (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28:350–356CrossRef

26.

Lay JJ, Lee YJ, Noike T (1999) Feasibility of biological hydrogen production from organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Water Res 33:2579–2586CrossRef

27.

Nielsen AT, Liu WT, Filipe C, Grady L, Molin S, Stahl DA (1999) Identification of a novel group of bacteria in sludge from a deteriorated biological phosphorus removal reactor. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:1251–1258CrossRef

28.

Poleto L, Souza P, Magrini FE, Beal LL, Torres APR, Souza MP, Laurino JP, Paesi S (2016) Selection and identification of microorganisms present in the treatment of wastewater and activated sludge to produce biohydrogen from glycerol. Int J Hydrog Energy 41:4374–4381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.051CrossRef

29.

Fang H, Zhang T, Li C (2006) Characterization of Fe-hydrogenase genes diversity and hydrogen-producing population in an acidophilic sludge. J Biotechnol 126:357–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.04.023CrossRef

30.

Perna V, Castelló E, Wenzel J, Zampol C, Fontes Lima DM, Borzacconi L, Varesche MBA, Zaiat M, Etchebehere C (2013) Hydrogen production in an upflow anaerobic packed bed reactor used to treat cheese whey. Int J Hydrog Energy 38:54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.10.022CrossRef

31.

Ramos LR, Silva EL (2018) Continuous hydrogen production from cofermentation of sugarcane vinasse and cheese whey in a thermophilic anaerobic fluidized bed reactor. Int J Hydrog Energy 43:13081–13089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.05.070CrossRef

32.

Liu G, Shen J (2004) Effects of culture and medium conditions on hydrogen production from starch using anaerobic bacteria. J Biosci Bioeng 98:251–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1723(04)00277-4CrossRef

33.

Fonseca BC, Guazzaroni ME, Reginatto V (2016) Fermentative production of H2 from different concentrations of galactose by the new isolate Clostridium beijerinckii Br21. Int J Hydrog Energy 41:21109–21120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.110CrossRef

34.

Ferraz Júnior ADN, Etchebehere C, Zaiat M (2015) Mesophilic hydrogen production in acidogenic packed-bed reactors (APBR) using raw sugarcane vinasse as substrate. Anaerobe 34:94–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.04.008CrossRef

35.

Zhang T, Liu H, Fang HHP (2003) Biohydrogen production from starch in wastewater under thermophilic condition. J Environ Manag 69:149–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4797(03)00141-5CrossRef

36.

Wang J, Wan W (2009) Factors influencing fermentative hydrogen production: a review. Int J Hydrog Energy 34:799–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.015CrossRef

37.

Fernandes BS, Peixoto G, Albrecht FR, Saavedra del Aguila NK, Zaiat M (2010) Potential to produce biohydrogen from various wastewaters. Energy Sustain Dev 14:143–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2010.03.004CrossRef

38.

Albanez R, Lovato G, Zaiat M, Ratusznei SM, Rodrigues JAD (2016) Optimization, metabolic pathways modeling and scale-up estimative of an AnSBBR applied to biohydrogen production by co-digestion of vinasse and molasses. Int J Hydrog Energy 41:20473–20484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.08.145CrossRef

39.

Kiyuna LSM, Fuess LT, Zaiat M (2017) Unraveling the influence of the COD/sulfate ratio on organic matter removal and methane production from the biodigestion of sugarcane vinasse. Bioresour Technol 232:103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.02.028CrossRef

40.

Torquato LDM, Pachiega R, Crespi MS, Nespeca MG, Oliveira JE, Maintinguer SI (2017) Potential of biohydrogen production from effluents of citrus processing industry using anaerobic bacteria from sewage sludge. Waste Manag 59:181–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.047CrossRef

41.

Peixoto G, Pantoja-Filho JLR, Agnelli JAB, Barboza M, Zaiat M (2012) Hydrogen and methane production, energy recovery, and organic matter removal from effluents in a two-stage fermentative process. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 168:651–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-012-9807-4CrossRef

42.

Marone A, Ayala-Campos OR, Trably E, Carmona-Martínez AA, Moscoviz R, Latrille E, Steyer JP, Alcaraz-Gonzalez V, Bernet N (2017) Coupling dark fermentation and microbial electrolysis to enhance bio-hydrogen production from agro-industrial wastewaters and by-products in a bio-refinery framework. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:1609–1621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.166CrossRef

43.

Guo L, Li XM, Bo X, Yang Q, Zeng GM, Liao DX, Liu JJ (2008) Impacts of sterilization, microwave and ultrasonication pretreatment on hydrogen producing using waste sludge. Bioresour Technol 99:3651–3658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.07.026CrossRef

44.

Mu Y, Yu HQ, Wang G (2007) Evaluation of three methods for enriching H2-producing cultures from anaerobic sludge. Enzym Microb Technol 40:947–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.07.033CrossRef

45.

Rafieenia R, Lavagnolo MC, Pivato A (2018) Pretreatment technologies for dark fermentative hydrogen production: current advances and future directions. Waste Manag 71:734–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.05.024CrossRef

46.

Baghchehsaraee B, Nakhla G, Karamanev D, Margaritis A, Reid G (2008) The effect of heat pretreatment temperature on fermentative hydrogen production using mixed cultures. Int J Hydrogen Hydrogen Energy 33:4064–4073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.05.069CrossRef

47.

Alibardi L, Favaro L, Lavagnolo MC, Basaglia M, Casella S (2012) Effects of heat treatment on microbial communities of granular sludge for biological hydrogen production. Water Sci Technol 66:1483–1490. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2012.336CrossRef

48.

Khan MA, Ngo HH, Guo W, Chang SW, Nguyen DD, Varjani S, Liu Y, Deng L, Cheng C (2019) Selective production of volatile fatty acids at different pH in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Bioresour Technol 283:120–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.03.073CrossRef

49.

Niz MYK, Etchelet I, Fuentes L, Etchebehere C, Zaiat M (2019) Extreme thermophilic condition: an alternative for long-term biohydrogen production from sugarcane vinasse. Int J Hydrog Energy 44:22876–22887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.07.015CrossRef

50.

Chen YG, Jiang S, Yuan HY, Zhou Q, Gu GW (2007) Hydrolysis and acidification of waste activated sludge at different pHs. Water Res 41:683–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4378-4CrossRef

51.

Chaganti SR, Pendyala B, Lalman JA, Veeravalli SS, Heath DD (2013) Influence of linoleic acid, pH and HRT on anaerobic microbial populations and metabolic shifts in ASBRs during dark hydrogen fermentation of lignocellulosic sugars. Int J Hydrog Energy 38:2212–2220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.11.137CrossRef

52.

Nandi R, Segunpta S (1998) Microbial production of hydrogen: an overview. Crit Rev Microbiol 24:61–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408419891294181CrossRef

53.

Antonopoulou G, Gavala HN, Skiadas IV, Angelopoulos K, Lyberatos G (2008) Biofuels generation from sweet sorghum: fermentative hydrogen production and anaerobic digestion of the remaining biomass. Bioresour Technol 99:110–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.11.048CrossRef

54.

Morgan-Sagastume F, Pratt S, Karlsson A, Cirne D, Lant P, Werker A (2011) Production of volatile fatty acids by fermentation of waste activated sludge pre-treated in full-scale thermal hydrolysis plants. Bioresour Technol 102:3089–3097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.054CrossRef

55.

Fu Z, Holtzapple MT (2010) Anaerobic mixed-culture fermentation of aqueous ammonia-treated sugarcane bagasse in consolidated bioprocessing. Biotechnol Bioeng 106:216–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22679CrossRef

56.

Jiang L, Wang J, Liang S, Wang X, Cen P, Xu Z (2009) Butyric acid fermentation in a fibrous bed bioreactor with immobilized Clostridium tyrobutyricum from cane molasses. Bioresour Technol 100:3403–3409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.032CrossRef

57.

Etchebehere C, Castelló E, Wenzel J, Anzola-Rojas MPL, Buitrón G, Cabrol L, Carminato VM, Carrillo-Reyes J, Cisneros-Pérez C, Fuentes L, Moreno-Andrade I, Razo-Flores E, Filippi GR, Tapia-Venegas E, Toledo-Alarcón J, Zaiat M (2016) Microbial communities from 20 different hydrogen-producing reactors studied by 454 pyrosequencing. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:3371–3384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7325-yCrossRef

58.

Hu C, Giannis A, Chen C, Wang J (2014) Evaluation of hydrogen producing cultures using pretreated food waste. Int J Hydrog Energy 39:19337–19342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.06.056CrossRef

59.

Yang Z, Guo R, Xu X, Wang L, Dai M (2016) Enhanced methane production via repeated batch bioaugmentation pattern of enriched microbial consortia. Bioresour Technol 216:471–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.062CrossRef

60.

Ren NQ, Chua H, Chan SH, Tsang YF, Wang YJ, Sin N (2007) Assessing optimal fermentation type for bio-hydrogen production in continuous-flow acidogenic reactors. Bioresour Technol 98:1774–1780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.07.026CrossRef

61.

Li WW, Yu HQ (2011) Physicochemical characteristics of anaerobic H2-producing granular sludge. Bioresour Technol 102:8653–8660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.02.110CrossRef

62.

Wu SY, Hung CH, Lin CN, Chen HW, Lee AS, Chang JS (2006) Fermentative hydrogen production and bacterial community structure in high-rate anaerobic bioreactors containing silicone-immobilized and self-flocculated sludge. Biotechnol Bioeng 93:934–946. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20800CrossRef

63.

Hung CH, Cheng CH, Guan DW, Wang ST, Hsu SC, Liang CM, Lin CY (2011) Interactions between Clostridium sp. and other facultative anaerobes in a self-formed granular sludge hydrogen-producing bioreactor. Int J Hydrog Energy 36:8704–8711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.06.010CrossRef

64.

Zhao X, Xing D, L. Zhang, Ren N (2010) Characterization and overexpression of a [FeFe]-hydrogenase gene of a novel hydrogen-producing bacterium Ethanoligenens harbinense. Int J Hydrog Energy 35:9598–9602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.06.098

65.

Castelló E, Braga L, Fuentes L, Etchebehere C (2018) Possible causes for the instability in the H₂ production from cheese whey in a CSTR. Int J Hydrog Energy 43:2654–2665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.12.104CrossRef

66.

Eder AS, Magrini FE, Spengler A, Silva JT, Beal LL, Paesi S (2020) Comparison of hydrogen and volatile fatty acid production by Bacillus cereus, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterobacter aerogenes singly, in co-cultures or in the bioaugmentation of microbial consortium from sugarcane vinasse. Environ Technol Inno 18:10063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.100638

67.

Shah AT, Favaro L, Alibardi L, Cagnin L, Sandon A, Cossu R, Casella S, Basaglia M (2016) Bacillus sp. strains to produce bio-hydrogen from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Appl Energy 176:116–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.054CrossRef

68.

Iyer P, Bruns MA, Zhang HS, Van Ginkel S, Logan BE (2004) H2-producing bacterial communities from a heat-treated soil inoculum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 66:166–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-004-1666-7CrossRef

69.

Fuentes L, Braga L, Castelló E, Etchebehere C (2018) Work scheme to isolate the different micro-organisms found in hydrogen-producing reactors: a study of effectiveness by pyrosequencing analysis. J Appl Microbiol 125:96–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13763CrossRef

70.

Harun I, Jahim JM, Anuar N, Hassan O (2012) Hydrogen production performance by Enterobacter cloacae KBH3 isolated from termite guts. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:15052–15061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.07.101CrossRef

71.

Sun L, Huang A, Gu W, Ma Y, Zhu D, Wang G (2015) Hydrogen production by Enterobacter cloacae isolated from sugar refinery sludge. Int J Hydrog Energy 40:1402–1407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.11.121CrossRef

72.

Buitrón G, Carvajal C (2010) Biohydrogen production from tequila vinasses in an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor: effect of initial substrate concentration, temperature and hydraulic retention time. Bioresour Technol 101:9071–9077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.127CrossRef

Titel: Effect of different heat treatments of inoculum on the production of hydrogen and volatile fatty acids by dark fermentation of sugarcane vinasse
verfasst von: Flaviane Eva Magrini
Gabriela Machado de Almeida
Denis da Maia Soares
Laura Fuentes
Claudia Ecthebehere
Lademir Luiz Beal
Maurício Moura da Silveira
Suelen Paesi
Publikationsdatum: 28.03.2020
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery / Ausgabe 6/2021
Print ISSN: 2190-6815
Elektronische ISSN: 2190-6823
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00687-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2021

Syngas for biorefineries from thermochemical gasification of lignocellulosic fuels and residues—5 years’ experience with an advanced dual fluidized bed gasifier design

Enhanced catalytic conversion of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural to 2,5-diformylfuran by HKUST-1/TEMPO under microwave irradiation

Optimization of oleaginous seeds liquefaction using response surface methodology

Production and characterization of co-composted biochar and digestate from biomass anaerobic digestion

A complete two-parameter kinetic model to describe the thermal pretreatment of biomasses

Chlorophytum rhizosphere, a suitable environment for electroactive biofilm development