nach oben

Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management

Erschienen in:

21.02.2022 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Effect of mixing ratio on sewage sludge and septage co-digestion

verfasst von: Changmin Lee, Xin Zhao, Jae Young Kim

Erschienen in: Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management | Ausgabe 3/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Septage, which is made up of liquid and solid materials pumped from septic tanks, can be a potential co-digestion resource for sewage sludge. This study was conducted to evaluate possibility of co-digestion of sewage sludge and septage. Biochemical methane potential tests were performed using primary sludge, secondary sludge and septage. The mixing ratio of the septage ranged from 30% to 62% (by volatile solid wt.) based on the typical ratio of the septage transported to municipal WWTP plants and the sewage sludge generated in the plants. The co-digestion of sewage sludge and septage showed synergistic effects on the methane potential due to the enhanced C/N ratio. The observed methane potential of co-digestion substrate was 8–16% higher than the predicted value based on weighted average of mono-digestion substrate's methane potentials. The maximum synergistic effect on methane potential was observed when 42% (by volatile solid wt.) of the septage was co-digested. In conclusion, the septage can be a suitable resource for co-digestion with sewage sludge.

Vorheriger Artikel Utilization of alum sludge waste for production of eco-friendly blended cement

Nächster Artikel Recovery of residual metals from − 0.5 mm non-metallic fractions in WPCBs using electrostatic separation enhanced by air classification

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Seiple TE, Coleman AM, Skaggs RL (2017) Municipal wastewater sludge as a sustainable bioresource in the United States. J Environ Manage 197:673–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2017.04.032CrossRef

Nam YW, Seok HK (2011) A study on the present state and improvement plan of domestic sewage sludge treatment. J Korea Soc Waste Manage 28:103–109

Donoso-Bravo A, Pérez-Elvira S, Aymerich E, Fdz-Polanco F (2011) Assessment of the influence of thermal pre-treatment time on the macromolecular composition and anaerobic biodegradability of sewage sludge. Bioresour Technol 102:660–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2010.08.035CrossRef

Okolie JA, Adekunle KF (2015) A review of biochemical process of anaerobic digestion. Adv Biosci Biotechnol 6:205–212. https://doi.org/10.4236/abb.2015.63020CrossRef

Choi JM, Han SK, Lee CY (2018) Enhancement of methane production in anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge by thermal hydrolysis pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 259:207–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.02.123CrossRef

Carlsson M, Lagerkvist A, Morgan-Sagastume F (2012) The effects of substrate pre-treatment on anaerobic digestion systems: a review. Waste Manage 32:1634–1650. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WASMAN.2012.04.016CrossRef

Carrere H, Antonopoulou G, Affes R et al (2016) Review of feedstock pretreatment strategies for improved anaerobic digestion: from lab-scale research to full-scale application. Bioresour Technol 199:386–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2015.09.007CrossRef

Lehtomäki A, Huttunen S, Rintala JA (2007) Laboratory investigations on co-digestion of energy crops and crop residues with cow manure for methane production: effect of crop to manure ratio. Resour Conserv Recycl 51:591–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.11.004CrossRef

Kaparaju P, Rintala J (2005) Anaerobic co-digestion of potato tuber and its industrial by-products with pig manure. Resour Conserv Recycl 43:175–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2004.06.001CrossRef

10.

Agustini CB, Spier F, da Costa M, Gutterres M (2018) Biogas production for anaerobic co-digestion of tannery solid wastes under presence and absence of the tanning agent. Resour Conserv Recycl 130:51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2017.11.018CrossRef

11.

Lansing S, Hülsemann B, Choudhury A et al (2019) Food waste co-digestion in Germany and the United States: from lab to full-scale systems. Resour Conserv Recycl 148:104–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2019.05.014CrossRef

12.

Astals S, Nolla-Ardèvol V, Mata-Alvarez J (2012) Anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and crude glycerol at mesophilic conditions: biogas and digestate. Bioresour Technol 110:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.080CrossRef

13.

Yoon Y, Lee S, Kim KH et al (2018) Study of anaerobic co-digestion on wastewater treatment sludge and food waste leachate using BMP test. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 20:283–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10163-017-0581-9/TABLES/7CrossRef

14.

de Oliveira LRG, dos Santos Filho DA, Fraga TJM et al (2021) Kinetics assessment and modeling of biogas production by anaerobic digestion of food wastes and acclimated sewage sludge. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 23:1646–1656. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10163-021-01248-X/FIGURES/4CrossRef

15.

Ju M, Bae SJ, Kim JY, Lee DH (2016) Solid recovery rate of food waste recycling in South Korea. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 18:419–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10163-015-0464-X/TABLES/5CrossRef

16.

Wang YS, Kuo NW (2019) Economic assessment of food waste co-digestion with sewage sludge in five Asian cities. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 21:872–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10163-019-00844-2/TABLES/8CrossRef

17.

Laurent A, Bakas I, Clavreul J et al (2014) Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems—part I: lessons learned and perspectives. Waste Manage 34:573–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WASMAN.2013.10.045CrossRef

18.

Cartes J, Neumann P, Hospido A, Vidal G (2018) Life cycle assessment of management alternatives for sludge from sewage treatment plants in Chile: does advanced anaerobic digestion improve environmental performance compared to current practices? J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 20:1530–1540. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10163-018-0714-9/TABLES/3CrossRef

19.

Mata-Alvarez J, Dosta J, Romero-Güiza MS et al (2014) A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 2013. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 36:412–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.039CrossRef

20.

Rose C, Parker A, Jefferson B, Cartmell E (2015) The characterization of feces and urine: a review of the literature to inform advanced treatment technology. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 45:1827–1879. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2014.1000761CrossRef

21.

Colón J, Forbis-Stokes AA, Deshusses MA (2015) Anaerobic digestion of undiluted simulant human excreta for sanitation and energy recovery in less-developed countries. Energy Sustain Dev 29:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESD.2015.09.005CrossRef

22.

Klingel F, Strauss M (2002) Fecal sludge management in developing countries—a planning manual. Birding View Project Water and Sanitation Project Moldova (ApaSan) View project

23.

Leckie JO, Halvadakis C, Pacey JG (1979) Landfill management with moisture control. J Environ Eng 105:337

24.

Jhung (1996) Nightsoil and septage treatment at municipal sewage treatment plants. WonKwang University

25.

Lee KH, Kwon SH, Lee JH et al (2006) Effects of mixing ratio of acid-fermented foodwaste and septic sludge on the efficiency of anaerobic co-digestion process. J Korea Soc Waste Manage 23:146–153

26.

Shelton DR, Tiedje JM (1984) General method for determining anaerobic biodegradation potential. Appl Environ Microbiol 47:850–857CrossRef

27.

Holliger C, Alves M, Andrade D et al (2016) Towards a standardization of biomethane potential tests. Water Sci Technol 74:2515–2522. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.336CrossRef

28.

Buswell AM, Mueller HF (1952) Mechanism of fermentation methane. Ind Eng Chem 44:550–552CrossRef

29.

Vavilin VA, Fernandez B, Palatsi J, Flotats X (2008) Hydrolysis kinetics in anaerobic degradation of particulate organic material: An overview. Waste Manage 28:939–951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.03.028CrossRef

30.

Bah H, Zhang W, Wu S et al (2014) Evaluation of batch anaerobic co-digestion of palm pressed fiber and cattle manure under mesophilic conditions. Waste Manage 34:1984–1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.07.015CrossRef

31.

Rinzema A, Alphenaar A, Lettinga G (1993) Anaerobic digestion of long-chain fatty acids in UASB and expanded granular sludge bed reactors. Process Biochem 28:527–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-9592(93)85014-7CrossRef

32.

Vidal G, Carvalho A, Méndez R, Lema J (2000) Influence of the content in fats and proteins on the anaerobic biodegradability of dairy wastewaters. Bioresour Technol 74:231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00015-8CrossRef

33.

Ahmadi-Pirlou M, Mesri Gundoshmian T (2021) The effect of substrate ratio and total solids on biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of municipal solid waste and sewage sludge. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 23:1938–1946. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10163-021-01264-X/TABLES/3CrossRef

34.

Dai X, Duan N, Dong B, Dai L (2013) High-solids anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste in comparison with mono digestions: stability and performance. Waste Manage 33:308–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WASMAN.2012.10.018CrossRef

35.

Davidsson Å, Lövstedt C, la Cour JJ et al (2008) Co-digestion of grease trap sludge and sewage sludge. Waste Manage 28:986–992. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WASMAN.2007.03.024CrossRef

36.

Luostarinen S, Luste S, Sillanpää M (2009) Increased biogas production at wastewater treatment plants through co-digestion of sewage sludge with grease trap sludge from a meat processing plant. Bioresour Technol 100:79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2008.06.029CrossRef

37.

Aichinger P, Wadhawan T, Kuprian M et al (2015) Synergistic co-digestion of solid-organic-waste and municipal-sewage-sludge: 1 plus 1 equals more than 2 in terms of biogas production and solids reduction. Water Res 87:416–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WATRES.2015.07.033CrossRef

38.

Gunaseelan VN (1997) Anaerobic digestion of biomass for methane production: a review. Biomass Bioenerg 13:83–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(97)00020-2CrossRef

39.

Khalid A, Arshad M, Anjum M et al (2011) The anaerobic digestion of solid organic waste. Waste Manage 31:1737–1744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.03.021CrossRef

40.

Murto M, Björnsson L, Mattiasson B (2004) Impact of food industrial waste on anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and pig manure. J Environ Manage 70:101–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2003.11.001CrossRef

41.

Romano RT, Zhang R (2008) Co-digestion of onion juice and wastewater sludge using an anaerobic mixed biofilm reactor. Bioresour Technol 99:631–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2006.12.043CrossRef

42.

Li Y, Park SY, Zhu J (2011) Solid-state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:821–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2010.07.042CrossRef

43.

Almomani FA, Khraisheh MAM (2016) Treatment of septic tank effluent using moving-bed biological reactor: kinetic and biofilm morphology. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13:1917–1932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-1039-7CrossRef

Titel: Effect of mixing ratio on sewage sludge and septage co-digestion
verfasst von: Changmin Lee
Xin Zhao
Jae Young Kim
Publikationsdatum: 21.02.2022
Verlag: Springer Japan
Erschienen in: Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management / Ausgabe 3/2022
Print ISSN: 1438-4957
Elektronische ISSN: 1611-8227
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-022-01372-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2022

Challenges to reducing post-consumer plastic rejects from the MSW selective collection at two MRFs in São Paulo city, Brazil

Comparison of the performance of different methods to stabilize mercury-containing waste

Scaled-up and economic assessment approach of the split-phase glycolysis process for the recycling of flexible polyurethane foam wastes

Application of titania from Ti-Salt flocculated sludge for UHPC

Examining the effect of the particle modification on zinc tailing waste as a cementitious material in concrete: performance and toxicity assessment

Correction to: Management of food waste in restaurants by way of circular practices