Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 1/2013

01.01.2013 | CARBON FOOTPRINTING

Energy from waste: carbon footprint of incineration and landfill biogas in the UK

verfasst von: Harish K. Jeswani, Rachelle W. Smith, Adisa Azapagic

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Ausgabe 1/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

The majority of waste in many countries is still landfilled. This represents waste of valuable resources and could lead to higher emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) compared to energy recovered by incineration, even when the landfill gas is recovered. This paper aims to find out which option is more sustainable with respect to the carbon footprint (global warming potential) by comparing energy recovered from MSW incineration with that from biogas recovered from landfilled waste.

Materials and methods

Life cycle assessment has been used as a tool, following the ISO 14040/44 and PAS 2050 methodologies. Data have been sourced from the operator of the incinerator, the Environment Agency for England and Wales, the CCaLC and Ecoinvent databases. CCaLC v2 and GaBi v4.3 have been used for the LCA modelling.

Results and discussion

The carbon footprint of MSW incineration is −0.179 t CO2 eq./t MSW while that from landfilling is 0.395 t CO2 eq./t MSW, with both systems credited for energy recovery. The results are sensitive to the composition of waste, energy options chosen to credit the systems and the recovery rate of biogas. Increasing the amount of fossil carbon in the waste by increasing paper recycling between 40 and 80 % increases the carbon footprint of incineration by 9–20 %. If instead of the electricity from the UK grid, electricity from heavy fuel oil or coal is assumed to be displaced by incineration, its carbon footprint reduces to −0.51 and −0.35 t CO2 eq./t MSW, respectively. Increasing the landfill gas recovery from 53 to 75 % and its utilisation for energy from 35 to 50 %, reduces the carbon footprint of landfilling by a half.

Conclusions

The results indicate that waste incineration offers significant savings of GHG compared to disposal by landfill. Based on the total amount of MSW of 225,000 t/year considered in this study, MSW incineration could save around 129 kt of CO2 eq. per year compared to landfilling with biogas recovery, with both systems co-generating heat and electricity. At the UK level, diverting all MSW that is currently landfilled to incineration with energy recovery could save around 8.38 million tonnes of CO2 eq. per year or 1.5 % of the total UK GHG emissions. These savings can be increased further by recycling of bottom ash and non-ferrous metals. Incineration remains a better option than landfilling under all the conditions considered in this study.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Arena U, Mastellone ML, Perugini F (2003) The environmental performance of alternative solid waste management options: a life cycle assessment study. Chem Eng J 96:207–222CrossRef Arena U, Mastellone ML, Perugini F (2003) The environmental performance of alternative solid waste management options: a life cycle assessment study. Chem Eng J 96:207–222CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Astrup T, Møller J, Fruergaard T (2009) Incineration and co-combustion of waste: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions. Waste Manag Res 27:789–799CrossRef Astrup T, Møller J, Fruergaard T (2009) Incineration and co-combustion of waste: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions. Waste Manag Res 27:789–799CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Azapagic A (2007) Energy from municipal solid waste: large-scale incineration or small-scale pyrolysis? Environ Eng Manag J 6(5):337–346 Azapagic A (2007) Energy from municipal solid waste: large-scale incineration or small-scale pyrolysis? Environ Eng Manag J 6(5):337–346
Zurück zum Zitat Azapagic A (2011) Municipal solid waste management: recovering energy from waste. Chapter 10. In: Azapagic A, Perdan S (eds) Sustainable development in practice: case studies for engineers and scientists, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester Azapagic A (2011) Municipal solid waste management: recovering energy from waste. Chapter 10. In: Azapagic A, Perdan S (eds) Sustainable development in practice: case studies for engineers and scientists, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester
Zurück zum Zitat BSI (2011) Publicly Available Specification PAS 2050:2011. Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. British Standards Institution, London BSI (2011) Publicly Available Specification PAS 2050:2011. Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. British Standards Institution, London
Zurück zum Zitat Cherubini F, Bargigli S, Ulgiati S (2009) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: landfilling, sorting plant and incineration. Energy 34:2116–2123CrossRef Cherubini F, Bargigli S, Ulgiati S (2009) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: landfilling, sorting plant and incineration. Energy 34:2116–2123CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Consonni S, Giugliano M, Grosso M (2005) Alternative strategies for energy recovery from municipal solid waste: part B: emission and cost estimates. Waste Manag 25:137–148CrossRef Consonni S, Giugliano M, Grosso M (2005) Alternative strategies for energy recovery from municipal solid waste: part B: emission and cost estimates. Waste Manag 25:137–148CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Defra (2007) Waste in the UK. Waste and recycling 2006, 27 September 2007. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London Defra (2007) Waste in the UK. Waste and recycling 2006, 27 September 2007. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London
Zurück zum Zitat Doka G (2009) Life cycle inventories of waste treatment services, vol 13, Ecoinvent report. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Duebendorf Doka G (2009) Life cycle inventories of waste treatment services, vol 13, Ecoinvent report. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Duebendorf
Zurück zum Zitat EA (2010) Permitting and monitoring data for MSW incinerators. Environment Agency for England and Wales, Leeds EA (2010) Permitting and monitoring data for MSW incinerators. Environment Agency for England and Wales, Leeds
Zurück zum Zitat EC (1999) Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste. OJ L 182:0001–0019 EC (1999) Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste. OJ L 182:0001–0019
Zurück zum Zitat Ecoinvent (2008) Calculation tool for waste disposal in municipal sanitary waste landfill (MSWLF) for Ecoinvent v2.1 (2008). Ecoinvent Centre, Switzerland. http://www.ecoinvent.org Ecoinvent (2008) Calculation tool for waste disposal in municipal sanitary waste landfill (MSWLF) for Ecoinvent v2.1 (2008). Ecoinvent Centre, Switzerland. http://​www.​ecoinvent.​org
Zurück zum Zitat Eriksson O, Carlsson Reich M, Frostell B, Björklund A, Assefa G, Sundqvist J-O, Granath J, Baky A, Thyselius L (2005) Municipal solid waste management from a systems perspective. J Clean Prod 13:241–252CrossRef Eriksson O, Carlsson Reich M, Frostell B, Björklund A, Assefa G, Sundqvist J-O, Granath J, Baky A, Thyselius L (2005) Municipal solid waste management from a systems perspective. J Clean Prod 13:241–252CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Finnveden G, Johansson J, Lind P, Moberg Å (2005) Life cycle assessment of energy from solid waste—part 1: general methodology and results. J Clean Prod 13:213–229CrossRef Finnveden G, Johansson J, Lind P, Moberg Å (2005) Life cycle assessment of energy from solid waste—part 1: general methodology and results. J Clean Prod 13:213–229CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fruergaard T, Astrup T (2011) Optimal utilization of waste-to-energy in an LCA perspective. Waste Manag 31:572–582CrossRef Fruergaard T, Astrup T (2011) Optimal utilization of waste-to-energy in an LCA perspective. Waste Manag 31:572–582CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat IPCC (2006) Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Volume 5. www.ipcc.ch IPCC (2006) Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Volume 5. www.​ipcc.​ch
Zurück zum Zitat ISO (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. ISO 14044:2006. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva ISO (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. ISO 14044:2006. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
Zurück zum Zitat Liamsanguan C, Gheewala SH (2007) Environmental assessment of energy production from municipal solid waste incineration. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:529–536 Liamsanguan C, Gheewala SH (2007) Environmental assessment of energy production from municipal solid waste incineration. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:529–536
Zurück zum Zitat Morselli L, De Robertis C, Luzi J, Passarini F, Vassura I (2008) Environmental impacts of waste incineration in a regional (Emilia Romagna, Italy) evaluated from a life cycle perspective. J Hazard Mater 159:505–511CrossRef Morselli L, De Robertis C, Luzi J, Passarini F, Vassura I (2008) Environmental impacts of waste incineration in a regional (Emilia Romagna, Italy) evaluated from a life cycle perspective. J Hazard Mater 159:505–511CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Papageorgiou A, Barton JR, Karagiannidis A (2009) Assessment of the greenhouse effect impact of technologies used for energy recovery from municipal waste: a case for England. J Environ Manag 90:2999–3012CrossRef Papageorgiou A, Barton JR, Karagiannidis A (2009) Assessment of the greenhouse effect impact of technologies used for energy recovery from municipal waste: a case for England. J Environ Manag 90:2999–3012CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Riber C, Bhander GS, Christensen TH (2008) Environmental assessment of waste incineration in a life-cycle-perspective (EASEWASTE). Waste Manag Res 26:96–103CrossRef Riber C, Bhander GS, Christensen TH (2008) Environmental assessment of waste incineration in a life-cycle-perspective (EASEWASTE). Waste Manag Res 26:96–103CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rigamonti L, Grosso M, Giugliano M (2009) Life cycle assessment for optimising the level of separated collection in integrated MSW management systems. Waste Manag 29:934–944CrossRef Rigamonti L, Grosso M, Giugliano M (2009) Life cycle assessment for optimising the level of separated collection in integrated MSW management systems. Waste Manag 29:934–944CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wanichpongpan W, Gheewala S (2007) Life cycle assessment as a decision support tool for landfill gas-to energy projects. J Clean Prod 15:1819–1826CrossRef Wanichpongpan W, Gheewala S (2007) Life cycle assessment as a decision support tool for landfill gas-to energy projects. J Clean Prod 15:1819–1826CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Energy from waste: carbon footprint of incineration and landfill biogas in the UK
verfasst von
Harish K. Jeswani
Rachelle W. Smith
Adisa Azapagic
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Ausgabe 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Elektronische ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0441-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe