nach oben

Journal of Science Education and Technology

Erschienen in:

28.12.2022

Engagement and Science Achievement in the Context of Integrated STEM Education: A Longitudinal Study

verfasst von: S. Selcen Guzey, Weiling Li

Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Ausgabe 2/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

A growing number of studies have shown the benefits of K-12 integrated science and engineering education. With this study, we add to the literature by documenting the relationship between STEM learning and engagement, and the demographic characteristics that impact achievement in STEM. This longitudinal study followed a diverse group of 245 middle school students from sixth grade to eighth grade. Students in two cohorts, cohort I and cohort II, participated in three different integrated STEM units during middle school, one in each grade level. Each curriculum unit focused on the same engineering concepts and practices but addressed different science content standards. The students completed science content tests and engagement surveys before and after the curriculum units. The results of the mixed-effects model analysis showed that behavioral engagement and career inspiration played a critical role in student achievement. While the achievement gap between students of color (SOC) and their White peers was narrowed in cohort II, the achievement gap between the SOC and their White peers in cohort I remained. Our analysis also revealed no gender differences in student achievement. These findings can inform the design of curriculum interventions that specifically target closing the achievement gaps between different groups of students.

Vorheriger Artikel Effects of an Augmented Reality-Based Chemistry Experiential Application on Student Knowledge Gains, Learning Motivation, and Technology Perception

Nächster Artikel The Backyard Weather Science Curriculum: Using a Weather-Observing Network to Support Data-Intensive Issue-Based Atmospheric Inquiry in Middle and High School

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Altman, D. G. (1990). Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.

Anderson, E., & Kim, D. (2006). Increasing the success of minority students in science and technology. American Council on Education.

Anwar, S., Menekse, M., Guzey, S. S., & Bryan, L. (2022). The effectiveness of an integrated STEM curriculum unit on middle school students’ life science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(7), 1204–1234. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21756CrossRef

Bhaumik, D. K., Roy, A., Aryal, S., Hur, K., Duan, N., et al. (2009). Sample size determination for studies with repeated continuous outcomes. Psychiatric Annals, 38, 765–771.

Blozis, S. A., & Harring, J. R. (2021). Fitting nonlinear mixed-effects models with alternative residual covariance structures. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(2), 531–566.CrossRef

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case of STEM education. NSTA Press.

Bystydzienski, J. M., Eisenhart, M., & Bruning, M. (2015). High school is not too late: Developing girls’ interest and engagement in engineering careers. The Career Development Quarterly, 63(1), 88–95.CrossRef

Calabrese-Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2018). A longitudinal study of equity-oriented STEM-rich making among youth from historically marginalized communities. American Educational Research Journal, 55(4), 761–800. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218758668CrossRef

Calabrese-Barton, A., Tan, E., & Greenberg, D. (2017). The makerspace movement: Sites of possibilities for equitable opportunities to engage underrepresented youth in STEM. Teachers College Record, 119, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811711900608

Capobianco, B. M., DeLisi, J., & Radloff, J. (2018). Characterizing elementary teachers’ enactment of high-leverage practices through engineering design-based science instruction. Science Education, 102(2), 342–376.

Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023007013CrossRef

Crismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S. (2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738–797. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01127.xCrossRef

Cunningham, C. M., & Kelly, G. (2017). Epistemic practices of engineering for education. Science Education, 101(3), 486–505. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21271CrossRef

Cunningham, C. M., Lachapelle, C. P., Brennan, R. T., Kelly, G. J., Tunis, C. S. A., & Gentry, C. A. (2020). The impact of engineering curriculum design principles on elementary students’ engineering and science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(3), 423–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21601CrossRef

Dalvi, T., Wendell, K. B., & Johnson, J. (2016). Community-based engineering: Experiences from a 2nd grade urban classroom. Young Children, 71(5), 8–15. Retrieved March 12, 2022, from https://www.naeyc.org/resources/pubs/yc/nov2016/engineering-second-grade

Dare, E. (2015). Understanding middle school students’ perceptions of physics using girl-friendly and integrated stem strategies: A gender study. Retrieved January 20, 2020, from the University of Minnesota digital conservancy. https://hdl.handle.net/11299/175413

Dare, E., Ring-Whalen, E. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2019). Creating a continuum of STEM models: Exploring how K-12 science teachers conceptualize STEM education. International Journal of Science Education, 41(12), 1701–1720. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1638531CrossRef

Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309371CrossRef

Dym, C., Agogino, A., Eris, O., Frey, D., & Leifer, L. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.xCrossRef

Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Lawrence Erlbaum.

English, L. D., & King, D. (2019). STEM integration in sixth grade: Designing and constructing paper bridges. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 863–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9912-0CrossRef

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.CrossRef

Ganesh, T., & Schnittka, C. G. (2014). Engineering education in the middle grades. In Ş. Purzer, J. Strobel, & M. E. Cardella (Eds.), Engineering in pre-college settings: Synthesizing research, policy, and practices (pp. 89–116). Purdue University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wq7bh.9

Gurka, M. J., Edwards, L. J., & Muller, K. E. (2011). Avoiding bias in mixed model inference for fixed effects. Statistics in Medicine, 30(22), 2696–2707.CrossRef

Guzey, S. S., & Aranda, M. (2017). Student participation in engineering practices and discourse: An exploratory case study. Journal of Engineering Education, 106, 585–606. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20176CrossRef

Hirsch, L. S., Carpinelli, J. D., Kimmel, J., Rockland, R., & Bloom, J. (2007). The differential effects of pre-engineering curricula on middle school students’ attitudes to and knowledge of engineering careers. 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Milwaukee. Retrieved February 10, 2022, from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=4417918

Lachapelle, C. P., Cunningham, C. M., Jocz, J., Kay, A. E., Phadnis, P., Wertheimer, J., & Arteaga, R. (2011). Engineering is elementary: An evaluation of years 4 through 6 field testing. Museum of Science.

Ladachart, L., Cholsin, J., Kwanpet, S., Teerapanpong, R., Dessi, A., Phuangsuwan, L., & Phothong, W. (2021). Using reverse engineering to enhance ninth-grade students’ understanding of thermal expansion. Journal of Science Education Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09940-1CrossRef

Lilly, S., McAlister, A. M., Fick, S. J., Chiu, J. L., & McElhaney, K. W. (2022). Elementary teachers’ verbal supports of science and engineering practices in an NGSS-aligned science, engineering, and computational thinking unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(6), 1035–1064. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21751CrossRef

Lottero-Perdue, P., & Lachapelle, C. (2020). Engineering mindsets and learning outcomes in elementary school. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(4), 640–664. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20350CrossRef

Maltese, A. V., & Cooper, C. S. (2017). STEM pathways: Do men and women differ in why they enter and exit? AERA Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417727276

Maltese, A., & Tai, R. (2010). Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 669–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902792385CrossRef

Mehalik, M. M., Doppelt, Y., & Schuun, C. D. (2008). Middle-school science through design-based learning versus scripted inquiry: Better overall science concept learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(January), 71–85.CrossRef

Moore, J. L. I. I. I. (2006). A qualitative investigation of African American males’ career trajectory in engineering: Implications for teachers, school counselors, and parents. Teachers College Record, 108(2), 246–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00653.xCrossRef

Moore, T. J., Brophy, S. P., Tank, K. M., Lopez, R., Johnston, A., Hynes, M., & Gajdzik, E. (2020). Multiple representations in computational thinking tasks: A clinical study of second-grade students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(19–34), 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09812-0CrossRef

Moore, T., Stohlmann, M., Wang, H., Tank, K., Glancy, A., & Roehrig, G. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In S. Purzer, J. Strobel, & M. Cardella (Eds.), Engineering in Pre-College Settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy, and Practices (pp. 35–60). Purdue University Press.CrossRef

Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (Eds.). (2015). PIRLS 2016 assessment framework (2nd ed.). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) (2018). Science and engineering for grades 6–12: Investigation and design at the center. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25216

National Research Council (NRC) (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.

National Science Board (2022). The state of U.S. science and engineering 2022. Retrieved March 1, 2020, from https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20221

Pleasant, J., & Olson, J. (2019). What is engineering? Elaborating the nature of engineering for K-12 education. Science Education, 103(1), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21483CrossRef

Purzer, S., & Quintana-Cifuentes, & Menekse, M. (2022). The honeycomb of engineering framework: Philosophy of engineering guiding precollege engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 111(1), 19–39.CrossRef

Reynolds, B., Mehalik, M. M., Lovell, M. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). Increasing student awareness of and interest in engineering as a career option through design-based learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 25(1), 788–798.

Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., Ring-Whalen, E. (2021a). Beyond the basics: A detailed conceptual framework of integrated STEM. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 3(11). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00041-y

Roehrig, G., Dare, E., Ring-Whalen, E., & Wieselmann, J. (2021b). Understanding coherence and integration in integrated STEM curriculum. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00259-8

Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in a social context. Oxford University Press.

Roy, A., Bhaumik, D. K., Aryal, S., & Gibbons, R. D. (2007). Sample size determination for hierarchical longitudinal designs with differential attrition rates. Biometrics, 63, 699–707.CrossRef

Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford University Press.

Siverling, E., Moore, T., Suazo-Flores, E., Mathis, C., & Guzey, S. S. (2021). What initiates evidence-based reasoning?: Situations that prompt students to justify their design ideas and decisions. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(2), 294–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20384CrossRef

Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233CrossRef

Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312(5777), 1143–1144.CrossRef

Tan, E., Calabrese Barton, A., Kang, H., & O’Neill, T. (2013). Desiring a career in STEM- related fields: How middle school girls articulate and negotiate identities-in-practice in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(10), 1143–1179.CrossRef

Valtorta, C. G., & Berland, L. K. (2015). Math, science, and engineering integration in a high school engineering course: A qualitative study. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 5(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1087

Wang, H. H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM integration: Teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314636

Wang, M. T., Fredricks, J. A., Ye, F., Hofkens, T. L., & Linn, J. S. (2016). The math and science engagement scales: Scale development, validation, and psychometric properties. Learning and Instruction, 43, 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.008

Wendell, K. B., & Rogers, C. (2013). Engineering design-based science, science content performance, and science attitudes in elementary school. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 513–540. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20173CrossRef

Wendell, K. B., Wright, C. G., & Paugh, P. (2017). Reflective decision-making in elementary students’ engineering design. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(3), 356–397.CrossRef

Wieselmann, J. R., Dare, E. A., Ring-Whalen, E. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2020a). “I just do what the boys tell me”: Exploring small group student interactions in an integrated STEM unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57, 112–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21587CrossRef

Wieselmann, J., Roehrig, G., & Kim, J. (2020b). Who succeeds in STEM? Elementary girls’ attitudes and beliefs about self and STEM. School Science and Mathematics, 120, 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12407CrossRef

Wilson‐Lopez, A., Strong, A., Hartman, C., Garlick, J., Washburn, K., Minichiello, A., Weingart, S., & Acosta‐Feliz, J. (2020). A systematic review of argumentation related to the engineering‐designed world. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(2), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20318

Wyss, V. L., Heulskamp, D., & Siebert, C. J. (2012.). Increasing middle school student interest in STEM careers with videos of scientists. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 7(4), 501–522.

Titel: Engagement and Science Achievement in the Context of Integrated STEM Education: A Longitudinal Study
verfasst von: S. Selcen Guzey
Weiling Li
Publikationsdatum: 28.12.2022
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology / Ausgabe 2/2023
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-10023-y

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2023

Teaching the Modeling of Human–Environment Systems: Acknowledging Complexity with an Agent-Based Model

Effects of an Augmented Reality-Based Chemistry Experiential Application on Student Knowledge Gains, Learning Motivation, and Technology Perception

How Tablet-Student Ratio and External Scripts Affect Knowledge Acquisition and Cognitive Load in Scientific Collaborative Inquiry Learning? A Three-Round Quasi-Experiment

Characteristics and Recommendations for the Virtual Role Model Visit — Based on a Literature Review

Augmented Reality Technology Used for Developing Topographic Map-Reading Skills in an Earth Science Course and its Potential Implications in Broader Learning Venues

Developing a Model for Interdisciplinary Collaboration for STEM Graduate Students

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten