Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology 2/2023

03.01.2023

How Tablet-Student Ratio and External Scripts Affect Knowledge Acquisition and Cognitive Load in Scientific Collaborative Inquiry Learning? A Three-Round Quasi-Experiment

verfasst von: Cixiao Wang, Qian Dong, Yuying Ma

Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Ausgabe 2/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

With the advancement of informational and portable technologies, virtual manipulatives based on tablets are applied to support students’ learning in science education. However, research on the impact of tablet-student ratios on individual knowledge acquisition and cognitive load in collaborative inquiry learning has not been addressed in detail yet. The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of tablet-student ratios (1:1 or 1:m) and external script availability (with or without) on students’ knowledge acquisition and cognitive load in collaborative inquiry learning when using virtual manipulatives. A three-round quasi-experiment was conducted across 3 months with 130 fifth graders from four classes learning three scientific inquiry themes. The four classes, class A (1:1 group with external script condition) with 31 students, class B (1:m group with external script condition) with 34 students, class C (1:1 group without external script condition) with 33 students, and class D (1:m group without external script condition) with 32 students, constitute four technology affordance conditions. The research conducted a pretest, posttest, and repeated-measures ANOVA to explore the effects of technology affordances on students’ knowledge acquisition and cognitive load of collaborative learning. Results show that technology affordances have impacts on students’ knowledge acquisition and cognitive load during collaborative inquiry activities. Moreover, the impacts changed over time. This study has practical implications for the instructional design of mobile device-supported collaborative inquiry activities.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Abrahamson, D., & Sánchez-García, R. (2016). Learning is moving in new ways: The ecological dynamics of mathematics education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(2), 203–239.CrossRef Abrahamson, D., & Sánchez-García, R. (2016). Learning is moving in new ways: The ecological dynamics of mathematics education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(2), 203–239.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Antle, A. N. (2014). Scratching the surface: Opportunities and challenges from designing interactive tabletops for learning. In V. R. Lee (Ed.), Learning technologies and the body: Integration and implementation in formal and informal learning environments (pp. 55–73). New York: Routledge. Antle, A. N. (2014). Scratching the surface: Opportunities and challenges from designing interactive tabletops for learning. In V. R. Lee (Ed.), Learning technologies and the body: Integration and implementation in formal and informal learning environments (pp. 55–73). New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Bell, T., Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., & Ploetzner, R. (2010). Collaborative inquiry learning: Models, tools, and challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 349–377.CrossRef Bell, T., Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., & Ploetzner, R. (2010). Collaborative inquiry learning: Models, tools, and challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 349–377.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chan, J. W., & Pow, J. W. (2020). The role of social annotation in facilitating collaborative inquiry-based learning. Computers & Education, 147, 103787.CrossRef Chan, J. W., & Pow, J. W. (2020). The role of social annotation in facilitating collaborative inquiry-based learning. Computers & Education, 147, 103787.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chu, H. C. (2014). Potential negative effects of mobile learning on students’ learning achievement and cognitive load—a format assessment perspective. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 332–344. Chu, H. C. (2014). Potential negative effects of mobile learning on students’ learning achievement and cognitive load—a format assessment perspective. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 332–344.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). L. Erlbaum Associates. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). L. Erlbaum Associates.
Zurück zum Zitat Crompton, H., Burke, D., & Gregory, K. H. (2017). The use of mobile learning in PK-12 education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 110, 51–63.CrossRef Crompton, H., Burke, D., & Gregory, K. H. (2017). The use of mobile learning in PK-12 education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 110, 51–63.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL, Can we support CSCL (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL, Can we support CSCL (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
Zurück zum Zitat Dillenbourg, P., & Betrancourt, M. (2006). Collaboration load. In J. Elen & R. E. Clark (Eds.), Theory, Handling Complexity in Learning (pp. 142–163). Pergamon. Dillenbourg, P., & Betrancourt, M. (2006). Collaboration load. In J. Elen & R. E. Clark (Eds.), Theory, Handling Complexity in Learning (pp. 142–163). Pergamon.
Zurück zum Zitat Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2007). Designing integrative scripts. Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 275–301). New York: Springer.CrossRef Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2007). Designing integrative scripts. Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 275–301). New York: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ellis, R. A., & Bliuc, A. (2015). An exploration into first-year university students’ approaches to inquiry and online learning technologies in blended environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 970–980.CrossRef Ellis, R. A., & Bliuc, A. (2015). An exploration into first-year university students’ approaches to inquiry and online learning technologies in blended environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 970–980.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Haake, J. M., & Mandl, H. (2007). Perspectives on collaboration scripts. Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 1–10). New York: Springer.CrossRef Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Haake, J. M., & Mandl, H. (2007). Perspectives on collaboration scripts. Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 1–10). New York: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fokides, E., & Mastrokoukou, A. (2018). Results from a study for teaching human body systems to primary school students using tablets. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(2), 154–170.CrossRef Fokides, E., & Mastrokoukou, A. (2018). Results from a study for teaching human body systems to primary school students using tablets. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(2), 154–170.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat García-Carmona, A. (2020). From inquiry-based science education to the approach based on scientific practices: A critical analysis and suggestions for science teaching. Science and Education, 29(2), 443–463.CrossRef García-Carmona, A. (2020). From inquiry-based science education to the approach based on scientific practices: A critical analysis and suggestions for science teaching. Science and Education, 29(2), 443–463.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Guzmán, J. L., & Joseph, B. (2021). Web-based virtual lab for learning design, operation, control, and optimization of an anaerobic digestion process. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30, 319–330.CrossRef Guzmán, J. L., & Joseph, B. (2021). Web-based virtual lab for learning design, operation, control, and optimization of an anaerobic digestion process. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30, 319–330.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ha, O., & Fang, N. (2018). Interactive virtual and physical manipulatives for improving students’ spatial skills. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(8), 1088–1110.CrossRef Ha, O., & Fang, N. (2018). Interactive virtual and physical manipulatives for improving students’ spatial skills. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(8), 1088–1110.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Harper, B., & Milman, N. B. (2016). One-to-one technology in K-12 classrooms: A review of the literature from 2004 through 2014. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(2), 129–142.CrossRef Harper, B., & Milman, N. B. (2016). One-to-one technology in K-12 classrooms: A review of the literature from 2004 through 2014. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(2), 129–142.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How Can Technologies Help? Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 247–265.CrossRef Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How Can Technologies Help? Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 247–265.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory: How many types of load does it really need? Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 1–19.CrossRef Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory: How many types of load does it really need? Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 1–19.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat King, A. (2007). Scripting collaborative learning processes: A cognitive perspective. Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 13–37). New York: Springer.CrossRef King, A. (2007). Scripting collaborative learning processes: A cognitive perspective. Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 13–37). New York: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., Kirschner, F., Zambrano, R., & J. (2018). From cognitive load theory to collaborative cognitive load theory. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(2), 213–233.CrossRef Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., Kirschner, F., Zambrano, R., & J. (2018). From cognitive load theory to collaborative cognitive load theory. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(2), 213–233.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Koning, B. B. D., & Tabbers, H. K. (2011). Facilitating understanding of movements in dynamic visualizations: An embodied perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 501–521.CrossRef Koning, B. B. D., & Tabbers, H. K. (2011). Facilitating understanding of movements in dynamic visualizations: An embodied perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 501–521.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Larrain, A., Howe, C., & Freire, P. (2018). ‘More is not necessarily better’: Curriculum materials support the impact of classroom argumentative dialogue in science teaching on content knowledge. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(3), 282–301.CrossRef Larrain, A., Howe, C., & Freire, P. (2018). ‘More is not necessarily better’: Curriculum materials support the impact of classroom argumentative dialogue in science teaching on content knowledge. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(3), 282–301.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Leon, A. C., & Heo, M. (2009). Sample sizes required to detect interactions between two binary fixed-effects in a mixed-effects linear regression model. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 53(3), 603–608.CrossRef Leon, A. C., & Heo, M. (2009). Sample sizes required to detect interactions between two binary fixed-effects in a mixed-effects linear regression model. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 53(3), 603–608.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lin, C. P., Wong, L. H., & Shao, Y. J. (2012). Comparison of 1:1 and 1:M CSCL environment for collaborative concept mapping. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(2), 99–113.CrossRef Lin, C. P., Wong, L. H., & Shao, Y. J. (2012). Comparison of 1:1 and 1:M CSCL environment for collaborative concept mapping. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(2), 99–113.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lin, Y. T., & Lin, Y. C. (2016). Effects of mental process integrated nursing training using mobile device on students’ cognitive load, learning attitudes, acceptance, and achievements. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(PB), 1213–1221. Lin, Y. T., & Lin, Y. C. (2016). Effects of mental process integrated nursing training using mobile device on students’ cognitive load, learning attitudes, acceptance, and achievements. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(PB), 1213–1221.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu, C. C., Hsieh, I. C., Wen, C. T., Chang, M. H., Fan Chiang, S. H., Tsai, M. J., Chang, C. J., & Hwang, F. K. (2021). The affordances and limitations of collaborative science simulations: The analysis from multiple evidences. Computers & Education, 160, 104029. Liu, C. C., Hsieh, I. C., Wen, C. T., Chang, M. H., Fan Chiang, S. H., Tsai, M. J., Chang, C. J., & Hwang, F. K. (2021). The affordances and limitations of collaborative science simulations: The analysis from multiple evidences. Computers & Education, 160, 104029.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu, K., Pang, F., & Shadiev, R. (2021). Understanding the mediating effect of learning approach between learning factors and higher order thinking skills in collaborative inquiry-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 2475–2492.CrossRef Lu, K., Pang, F., & Shadiev, R. (2021). Understanding the mediating effect of learning approach between learning factors and higher order thinking skills in collaborative inquiry-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 2475–2492.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mende, S., Proske, A., Körndle, H., et al. (2017). Who benefits from a low versus high guidance CSCL script and why? Instructional Science, 45, 439–468.CrossRef Mende, S., Proske, A., Körndle, H., et al. (2017). Who benefits from a low versus high guidance CSCL script and why? Instructional Science, 45, 439–468.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Min, J., Lin, Y. T., & Tsai, H. C. (2016). Mobile APP for motivation to learning: An engineering case. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 2048–2057.CrossRef Min, J., Lin, Y. T., & Tsai, H. C. (2016). Mobile APP for motivation to learning: An engineering case. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 2048–2057.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moyer, P. S., Bolyard, J. J., & Spikell, M. A. (2002). What are virtual manipulatives? Teaching Children Mathematics, 8(6), 372–377.CrossRef Moyer, P. S., Bolyard, J. J., & Spikell, M. A. (2002). What are virtual manipulatives? Teaching Children Mathematics, 8(6), 372–377.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Olympiou, G., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2012). Blending physical and virtual manipulatives: An effort to improve students’ conceptual understanding through science laboratory experimentation. Science Education, 96(1), 21–47.CrossRef Olympiou, G., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2012). Blending physical and virtual manipulatives: An effort to improve students’ conceptual understanding through science laboratory experimentation. Science Education, 96(1), 21–47.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Paas, F. G. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429–434.CrossRef Paas, F. G. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429–434.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Paas, F., & Van Merrienboer, J. (1994). Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 6(4), 351–371.CrossRef Paas, F., & Van Merrienboer, J. (1994). Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 6(4), 351–371.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., et al. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61.CrossRef Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., et al. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Reychav, I., & Wu, D. (2015). Mobile collaborative learning: The role of individual learning in groups through text and video content delivery in tablets. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 520–534.CrossRef Reychav, I., & Wu, D. (2015). Mobile collaborative learning: The role of individual learning in groups through text and video content delivery in tablets. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 520–534.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Reychav, I., & Wu, D. (2016). The interplay between cognitive task complexity and user interaction in mobile collaborative training. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 333–345.CrossRef Reychav, I., & Wu, D. (2016). The interplay between cognitive task complexity and user interaction in mobile collaborative training. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 333–345.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sung, Y., Chang, K., & Liu, T. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275.CrossRef Sung, Y., Chang, K., & Liu, T. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296.CrossRef Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147–177.CrossRef Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147–177.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vogel, F., Wecker, C., Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2017). Socio-cognitive scaffolding with computer-supported collaboration scripts: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 29(3), 477–511.CrossRef Vogel, F., Wecker, C., Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2017). Socio-cognitive scaffolding with computer-supported collaboration scripts: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 29(3), 477–511.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, C., & Le, H. (2022). The more, the merrier? Roles of device-student ratio in collaborative inquiries and its interactions with external scripts and task complexity. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(8), 1517–1542. Wang, C., & Le, H. (2022). The more, the merrier? Roles of device-student ratio in collaborative inquiries and its interactions with external scripts and task complexity. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(8), 1517–1542.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, C., Fang, T., & Gu, Y. (2020a). Learning performance and behavioral patterns of online collaborative learning: Impact of cognitive load and affordances of different multimedia. Computers & Education, 143, 103683. Wang, C., Fang, T., & Gu, Y. (2020a). Learning performance and behavioral patterns of online collaborative learning: Impact of cognitive load and affordances of different multimedia. Computers & Education, 143, 103683.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, C., Fang, T., & Miao, R. (2018). Learning performance and cognitive load in mobile learning: Impact of interaction complexity. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(6), 917–927. Wang, C., Fang, T., & Miao, R. (2018). Learning performance and cognitive load in mobile learning: Impact of interaction complexity. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(6), 917–927.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang C., Ma Y., & Wu F. (2020b). Comparative performance and involvement in collaborative inquiry learning: Three modalities of using virtual lever manipulative. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(5), 587–596. Wang C., Ma Y., & Wu F. (2020b). Comparative performance and involvement in collaborative inquiry learning: Three modalities of using virtual lever manipulative. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(5), 587–596.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong, L., & Looi, C. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2364–2381.CrossRef Wong, L., & Looi, C. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2364–2381.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zacharia, Z. C., & Olympiou, G. (2011). Physical versus virtual manipulative experimentation in physics learning. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 317–331.CrossRef Zacharia, Z. C., & Olympiou, G. (2011). Physical versus virtual manipulative experimentation in physics learning. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 317–331.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zheng, B., Warschauer, M., Lin, C. H., & Chang, C. (2016). Learning in one-to-one laptop environments: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1052–1084.CrossRef Zheng, B., Warschauer, M., Lin, C. H., & Chang, C. (2016). Learning in one-to-one laptop environments: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1052–1084.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang, L., KaLyuga, S., Lee, C., & Lei, C. (2016). Effectiveness of collaborative learning of computer programming under different learning group formations according to students’ prior knowledge: A cognitive load perspective. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 27(2), 171–192. Zhang, L., KaLyuga, S., Lee, C., & Lei, C. (2016). Effectiveness of collaborative learning of computer programming under different learning group formations according to students’ prior knowledge: A cognitive load perspective. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 27(2), 171–192.
Metadaten
Titel
How Tablet-Student Ratio and External Scripts Affect Knowledge Acquisition and Cognitive Load in Scientific Collaborative Inquiry Learning? A Three-Round Quasi-Experiment
verfasst von
Cixiao Wang
Qian Dong
Yuying Ma
Publikationsdatum
03.01.2023
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Science Education and Technology / Ausgabe 2/2023
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-10024-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2023

Journal of Science Education and Technology 2/2023 Zur Ausgabe

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.