nach oben

Journal of Science Education and Technology

Erschienen in:

02.02.2023

Epistemic Network Analysis of Students’ Drawings to Investigate Their Conceptions of Science Learning with Technology

verfasst von: Hsin-Yi Chang, Chin-Chung Tsai

Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Ausgabe 2/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The study employed epistemic network analysis (ENA) to investigate students’ conceptions of science learning with technology. One-hundred and eleven tenth-grade students were asked to express via drawings their conceptions of experienced and ideal learning of science with technology. Their drawings were coded into 20 elements in seven categories. ENA was then employed to generate and compare network models that show structures of the students’ conceptions. The results suggest that the students’ conceptions are diverse and connected. It was found that (1) the students’ conceptions of experienced and ideal learning of science with technology were significantly different, (2) the students who emphasized understanding as the main goal of science learning were better able to envision ideal learning of science with technology in light of how innovative technology can be used to enhance learning experiences, (3) the students who emphasized testing showed conceptions of science learning with technology limited to inside classrooms, and (4) the students who emphasized both understanding and testing demonstrated a pragmatic view of science learning and paid more attention to the affordances and effects of technology. Implications include that the potential of technology has yet to be fully taken advantage of to support science learning and that specific learning experiences may be tailored for students to address or broaden their conceptions of learning. The study may contribute to research by introducing new analysis methods of combining ENA with drawings and to theory and practice by revisiting theoretical frameworks of learning environments based on understanding of students’ conceptions.

Vorheriger Artikel Teaching the Modeling of Human–Environment Systems: Acknowledging Complexity with an Agent-Based Model

Nächster Artikel Augmented Reality Technology Used for Developing Topographic Map-Reading Skills in an Earth Science Course and its Potential Implications in Broader Learning Venues

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Antonenko, P. D., Toy, S., & Niederhauser, D. S. (2012). Using cluster analysis for data mining in educational technology research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(3), 383–398.CrossRef

Bressler, D. M., Bodzin, A. M., Eagan, B., & Tabatabai, S. (2019). Using epistemic network analysis to examine discourse and scientific practice during a collaborative game. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28, 553–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09786-8CrossRef

Buehl, M. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2001). Beliefs about academic knowledge. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 325–351.CrossRef

Cai, S., Jiao, X., Li, J., Jin, P., Zhou, H., & Wang, T. (2022). Conceptions of learning science among elementary school students in AR learning environment: A case study of “The magic sound.” Sustainability, 14(11), 6783. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116783CrossRef

Chang, H.-Y., Lin, T.-J., Lee, M.-H., Lee, S.W.-Y., Lin, T.-C., Tan, A.-L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2020). A systematic review of trends and findings in research employing drawing assessment in science education. Studies in Science Education, 56(1), 77–110.CrossRef

Chang, H.-Y., Wang, C.-Y., Lee, M.-H., Wu, H.-K., Liang, J.-C., Lee, S.W.-Y., Chiou, G.-L., Lo, H.-C., Lin, J.-W., Hsu, C.-Y., Wu, Y.-T., Chen, S., Hwang, F.-K., & Tsai, C.-C. (2015). A review of features of technology-supported learning environments based on participants’ perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.042CrossRef

Cheng, K.-H. (2018). Surveying students’ conceptions of learning science by augmented reality and their scientific epistemic beliefs. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1147–1159. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/81811CrossRef

Csanadi, A., Eagan, B., Kollar, I., Shaffer, D. W., & Fischer, F. (2018). When coding-and-counting is not enough: Using epistemic network analysis (ENA) to analyze verbal data in CSCL research. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13, 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9292-zCrossRef

Dart, B. C., Burnett, P. C., Purdie, N., Boulton-Lewis, G., Campbell, J., & Smith, D. (2000). Students’ conceptions of learning, the classroom environment, and approaches to learning. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(4), 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670009598715CrossRef

Elmoazen, R., Saqr, M., Tedre, M., & Hirsto, L. (2022). A systematic literature review of empirical research on epistemic network analysis in education. In IEEE Access, 10, 17330–17348. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3149812CrossRef

Entwistle, N. J., & Peterson, E. R. (2004). Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: Relationships with study behaviour and influences of learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 407–428.CrossRef

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.

Gerard, L., Marcia, C. L., & Berkeley, U. C. (2022). Computer-based guidance to support students’ revision of their science explanations. Computers & Education, 176, 104351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104351CrossRef

Green, S. K., & Gredler, M. E. (2002). A review and analysis of constructivism for school-based practice. School Psychology Review, 31(1), 53–70.CrossRef

Ho, H. N. J., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2022). The interrelationship among high school students’ conceptions of learning science, self-regulated learning science, and science learning self-efficacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20, 943–962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10205-xCrossRef

Hsieh, W.-M., & Tsai, C.-C. (2017). Exploring students’ conceptions of science learning via drawing: A cross-sectional analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 39, 274–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1280640CrossRef

Hsieh, W.-M., & Tsai, C.-C. (2018). Learning illustrated: An exploratory cross-sectional drawing analysis of students’ conceptions of learning. The Journal of Educational Research, 111, 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1220357CrossRef

Hsin, C.-T., Liang, J.-C., Hsu, C.-Y., Shih, M., Sheu, F.-R., & Tsai, C.-C. (2018). Young children’s conceptions of learning: A cross-sectional study of the early years of schooling. The Asia-Pacific Education Research, 28, 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0419-9CrossRef

Huang, W.-L., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2018). Exploring the relationship between university students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning mass communication in Taiwan. The Asia-Pacific Education Research, 27(3), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0364-zCrossRef

Koponen, I. T., & Pehkonen, M. (2008). Physics concepts and laws as network-structures: Comparisons of structural features in experts’ and novices’ concept maps. In Proceedings of the 3^rd International Conference on Concept Mapping. Tallinn, Estonia and Helsinki, Finland (pp. 540–547). Tallinn Estonia: Tallinn University.

Lai, C.-L. (2021). Exploring university students’ preferences for ai-assisted learning environment: A drawing analysis with activity theory framework. Educational Technology & Society, 24(4), 1–15.

Lee, M.-H., Johanson, R. E., & Tsai, C.-C. (2008). Exploring Taiwanese high school students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning science through a structural equation modeling analysis. Science Education, 92(2), 191–220.CrossRef

Lee, M.-H., Liang, J.-C., Wu, Y.-T., Chiou, G.-L., Hsu, C.-Y., Wang, C.-Y., Lin, J.-W., & Tsai, C.-C. (2020). High school students’ conceptions of science laboratory learning, perceptions of the science laboratory environment, and academic self-efficacy in science learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09951-wCrossRef

Lim, J., & Richardson, J. C. (2022). Considering how disciplinary differences matter for successful online learning through the community of inquiry lens. Computers & Education, 187, 104551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104551CrossRef

Lin, X.-F., Deng, C., Hu, Q., & Tsai, C.-C. (2019). Chinese undergraduate students’ perceptions of mobile learning: Conceptions, learning profiles, and approaches. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(3), 317–333.CrossRef

Linn, M. C., Eylon, B.-S., & Davis, E. A. (2004). The knowledge integration perspective on learning. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis, & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet Environments for Science Education (pp. 29–46). Routledge.

Lonka, K., Ketonen, E., & Vermunt, J. D. (2021). University students’ epistemic profiles, conceptions of learning, and academic performance. Higher Education, 81, 775–793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00575-6CrossRef

Marquart, C. L., Hinojosa, C., Swiecki, Z., Eagan, B., & Shaffer, D. W. (2018). Epistemic network analysis (version 1.5.2) [Software]. Available from http://app.epistemicnetwork.org

Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography - Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177–200.CrossRef

Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography - A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 3, 28–49.

Mohammadhassan, N., & Mitrovic, A. (2022). Discovering differences in learning behaviours during active video watching using epistemic network analysis. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1522, 362–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93859-8_24CrossRef

Nguyen, H. (2022). Exploring group discussion with conversational agents using epistemic network analysis. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1522, 378–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93859-8_25CrossRef

Peters-Burton, E. E., Dagher, Z. R., Erduran, S. (2022). Student, teacher, and scientist views of the scientific enterprise: An epistemic network re-analysis. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10254-w

Rachmatullah, A., Diana, S., & Ha, M. (2017). The effects of curriculum, gender and students’ favorite science subject on Indonesian high-school students’ conceptions of learning science. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(5), 797–812. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.797CrossRef

Rachmatullah, A., & Wiebe, E. N. (2022). Building a computational model of food webs: Impacts on middle school students’ computational and systems thinking skills. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(4), 585–618. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21738CrossRef

Richardson, J. T. (1999). The concepts and methods of phenomenongraphic research. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 53–82. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543069001053CrossRef

Shaffer, D. W. (2014). Formatting data for epistemic network analysis. Games and Professionals Imulations (Gaps) Technical Report Series, 1, 1–15.

Shaffer, D. W. (2017). Quantitative ethnography. Cathcart Press.

Shaffer, D. W., Collier, W., & Ruis, A. R. (2016). A tutorial on epistemic network analysis: Analyzing the structure of connections in cognitive, social, and interaction data. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(3), 9–45.CrossRef

Shaffer, D. W., & Ruis, A. R. (2017). Epistemic network analysis: A worked example of theory-based learning analytics. In C. Lang, G. Siemens, A. Wise, & D. Gašević (Ed.), Handbook of learning analytics (pp. 175–187). Solar. https://doi.org/10.18608/hla17.015

Siebert-Evenstone, A., & Shaffer, D. W. (2019). Cause and because: Using epistemic network analysis to model causality in the next generation science standards. In B. Eagan, M. Misfeldt, & A. Siebert-Evenstone (Eds.), International Conference on Quantitative Ethnography (pp. 223–233). Springer.CrossRef

Soltani, A., & Askarizadeh, G. (2021). How students’ conceptions of learning science are related to their motivational beliefs and self-regulation. Learning and Motivation, 73, 101707.CrossRef

Speece, D. L. (1994). Cluster analysis in perspective. Exceptionality, 5(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327035ex0501_3CrossRef

Tan, A.-L., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2021). Relationship among high school students’ science academic hardiness, conceptions of learning science and science learning self-efficacy in Singapore. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(2), 313–332.CrossRef

Tsai, C.-C. (2004). Conceptions of learning science among high school students in Taiwan: A phenomenographic analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1733–1750.CrossRef

Tsai, C.-C. (2009). Conceptions of learning versus conceptions of web-based learning: The differences revealed by college students. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1092–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.019CrossRef

Tsai, C.-C. (2017). Conceptions of learning in technology-enhanced learning environments: A review of case studies in Taiwan. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 12(2), 184–205. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-12-2017-0038CrossRef

Tsai, P.-S., Tsai, C.-C., & Hwang, G.-H. (2011). College students’ conceptions of context-aware ubiquitous learning: A phenomenographic analysis. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.01.004CrossRef

Voon, X. P., Wong, L. H., Looi, C. K., & Chen, W. (2020). Constructivism-informed variation theory lesson designs in enriching and elevating science learning: Case studies of seamless learning design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(10), 1531–1553. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21624CrossRef

Wang, Y.-L., Liang, J.-C., Lin, C.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2017). Identifying Taiwanese junior-high school students’ mathematics learning profiles and their roles in mathematics learning self-efficacy and academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 92–101.CrossRef

Weiler, D. T., Lingg, A. J., Eagan, B. R., Shaffer, D. W., & Werner, N. E. (2022). Quantifying the qualitative: Exploring epistemic network analysis as a method to study work system interactions. Ergonomics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2022.2051609

Wong, S.-Y., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2021). Uncovering Malaysian secondary school students’ academic hardiness in science, conceptions of learning science, and science learning self-efficacy: A structural equation modelling analysis. Research in Science Education, 51(4), 537–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09908-7CrossRef

Wooldridge, A. R., Carayon, P., Shaffer, D. W., & Eagan, B. (2018). Quantifying the qualitative with epistemic network analysis: A human factors case study of task-allocation communication in a primary care team. IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering, 8, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725579.2017.1418769CrossRef

Yeh, H.-Y., Tsai, Y.-H., Tsai, C.-C., & Chang, H.-Y. (2019). Investigating students’ conceptions of technology-assisted science learning: A drawing analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28, 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-9769-1CrossRef

Zhang, S., Gao, Q., Sun, M., Cai, Z., Li, H., Tang, Y., & Liu, Q. (2022). Understanding student teachers’_collaborative problem solving: Insights from an epistemic network analysis (ENA). Computers & Education, 183, Article 104485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104485

Zohar, B. R., & Trumper, R. (2020). The influence of inquiry-based remote observations via powerful optic robotic telescopes on high school students’ conceptions of physics and of learning physics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(5), 635–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09842-8CrossRef

Zörgő, S., Swiecki, Z., & Ruis A. R. (2021). Exploring the effects of segmentation on semi-structured interview data with epistemic network analysis. In A. R. Ruis, & Lee, S. B. (Ed.), Communications in computer and information science (Vol. 1312). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67788-6_6

Titel: Epistemic Network Analysis of Students’ Drawings to Investigate Their Conceptions of Science Learning with Technology
verfasst von: Hsin-Yi Chang
Chin-Chung Tsai
Publikationsdatum: 02.02.2023
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology / Ausgabe 2/2023
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-10026-9

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2023

How Tablet-Student Ratio and External Scripts Affect Knowledge Acquisition and Cognitive Load in Scientific Collaborative Inquiry Learning? A Three-Round Quasi-Experiment

The Backyard Weather Science Curriculum: Using a Weather-Observing Network to Support Data-Intensive Issue-Based Atmospheric Inquiry in Middle and High School

Engagement and Science Achievement in the Context of Integrated STEM Education: A Longitudinal Study

Beyond “Having Fun” As Evidence of Learning: A Longitudinal Case Study of a Teacher’s Evolving Conception of Hands-On Science Activities

Teaching the Modeling of Human–Environment Systems: Acknowledging Complexity with an Agent-Based Model

Effects of an Augmented Reality-Based Chemistry Experiential Application on Student Knowledge Gains, Learning Motivation, and Technology Perception

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten