nach oben

Journal of Science Education and Technology

Erschienen in:

09.01.2023

Beyond “Having Fun” As Evidence of Learning: A Longitudinal Case Study of a Teacher’s Evolving Conception of Hands-On Science Activities

verfasst von: Cassia Fernandez, Tatiana Hochgreb-Haegele, Adelmo Eloy, Paulo Blikstein

Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Ausgabe 2/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Science education reform initiatives have been implemented worldwide in recent years focusing on the integration of science and engineering practices into science learning. In this context, one promising area to explore is how the resources provided by makerspaces can promote more meaningful, contextualized, and practice-based ways of teaching and learning science. Nonetheless, there are few studies, and even fewer from the Global South, that analyze how teachers perceive the potential of these resources and integrate them into their lesson plans. Using an in-depth case-study methodology, this paper investigates results from a project that engages teachers in co-designing curricular units integrating new resources and practice-based approaches to science learning. In particular, we study how one science teacher developed new understandings about the role of “hands-on” science activities as he participated in a professional development program over 4 years. Based on our findings, we suggest strategies for the design of programs aimed at integrating science practices and makerspace resources into school curricula.

Vorheriger Artikel Developing a Model for Interdisciplinary Collaboration for STEM Graduate Students

Nächster Artikel Teaching the Modeling of Human–Environment Systems: Acknowledging Complexity with an Agent-Based Model

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

ACARA. (2016). The Australian curriculum: Learning areas: Science. Retrieved from http://acara.edu.au/curriculum_1/learning_areas/science.html

Avraamidou, L., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2005). Giving priority to evidence in science teaching: A first-year elementary teacher’s specialized practices and knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(9), 965–986. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20081CrossRef

Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1CrossRef

Bassoli, F. (2014). Atividades práticas e o ensino-aprendizagem de ciência(s): Mitos, tendências e distorções. Ciência & Educação (bauru), 20(3), 579–593.CrossRef

Bevan, B. (2017). The promise and the promises of making in science education. Studies in Science Education, 53(1), 75–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1275380CrossRef

Blikstein, P., Fuhrmann, T., Greene, D., & Salehi, S. (2012). Bifocal modeling: mixing real and virtual labs for advanced science learning. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 296–299). https://doi.org/10.1145/2307096.2307150.

Blikstein, P. (2013). Digital fabrication and ‘making’ in education: The democratization of invention. In J. Walter-Herrmann & C. Büching (Eds.), FabLabs: Of Machines, Makers and Inventors (pp. 1–21). Transcript Publishers.

Blikstein, P., & Worsley, M. (2016). Children are not hackers: Building a culture of powerful ideas, deep learning, and equity in the maker movement. In E. Halverson, K. Peppler, & Y. Kafai (Eds.), Makeology (pp. 64–79). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726519-7

Blikstein, P., Fuhrmann, T., & Salehi, S. (2016). Using the bifocal modeling framework to resolve “discrepant events” between physical experiments and virtual models in biology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 513–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9623-7CrossRef

Brasil. (2018). Ministério da Educação. Base Nacional Comum Curricular. Retrieved from http://basenacionalcomum.mec.gov.br/

Brasil. (2020). Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira (Inep). Censo da Educação Básica 2019: notas estatísticas. Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/3jea089

British Columbia Ministry of Education. (2017). BC’s new curriculum. Victoria, BC. Retrieved from https://curriculum.gov.bc.ca/curriculum/science

Buechley, L. (2013, October). Thinking about making. Keynote speech presented at FabLearn Conference, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

Bullock, S. M., & Sator, A. J. (2015). Maker pedagogy and science teacher education. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 13(1), 60–87.

Chu, S. L., Garcia, B., Deuermeyer, E., Deady, S., & Quek, F. (2019). An investigation of relevance from curriculum-aligned making in the elementary school science classroom. In Proceedings of FabLearn 2019 (pp. 1–9). https://doi.org/10.1145/3311890.3311891

Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7CrossRef

Clarke, D. J., & Peter, A. (1993). Modelling teacher change. In B. Atweh, C. Kanes, M. Carss, & G. Booker (Eds.), Contexts in mathematics education. Proceedings of the 16th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA). Queensland: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.

Coenders, F., & Terlouw, C. (2015). A model for in-service teacher learning in the context of an innovation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(5), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9432-5CrossRef

da Ramos, L. B., & C., & Rosa, P. R. da S. (2008). O Ensino de Ciências: Fatores intrínsecos e extrínsecos que limitam a realização de atividades experimentais pelo professor dos anos iniciais do ensino Fundamental. Investigações Em Ensino De Ciências, 13(3), 299–331.

DBRC, T. D.-B. R. C. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Research, 32(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001005CrossRef

de Andrade, M. L. F., & Massabni, V. G. (2011). O desenvolvimento de atividades práticas na escola: Um desafio para os professores de ciências. Ciência & Educação (bauru), 17(4), 835–854.CrossRef

Dolfing, R., Prins, G. T., Bulte, A. M. W., Pilot, A., & Vermunt, J. D. (2021). Strategies to support teachers’ professional development regarding sense-making in context-based science curricula. Science Education, 105(1), 127–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21603CrossRef

Duckworth, E., Easley, J., & Harkines, D. (1990). Science education: A minds-on approach for the elementary years. Routledge.

Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(March), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309371CrossRef

Falloon, G., Forbes, A., Stevenson, M., Bower, M., & Hatzigianni, M. (2020). STEM in the making? Investigating STEM learning in junior school makerspaces. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09949-3

Fernandez, C., Hochgreb-Haegele, T., & Blikstein, P. (2020). Toward a sustainable model for maker education in public education: Teachers as co-designers in an implementation of educational makerspaces. In Proceedings of the FabLearn 2020-9th Annual Conference on Maker Education (pp. 46–53).

Fishman, B., Penuel, W., Allen, A. R., Cheng, B., & Sabelli, N. O. R. A. (2013). Design-based implementation research: An emerging model for transforming the relationship of research and practice. Teachers College Record, 115(14), 136–156.CrossRef

Fullan, M. (1982). The meaning of educational change. Teachers College Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4451-8_12CrossRef

Furtak, E. M., & Penuel, W. R. (2019). Coming to terms: Addressing the persistence of “hands-on” and other reform terminology in the era of science as practice. Science Education, 103(1), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21488CrossRef

Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015005005

Halverson, E. R., & Sheridan, K. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495–504.CrossRef

Heineke, A. J., Smetana, L., & Carlson Sanei, J. (2019). A qualitative case study of field-based teacher education: One candidate’s evolving expertise of science teaching for emergent bilinguals. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(1), 80–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1537058CrossRef

Hochgreb-Haegele, T., Fernandez, C., & Blikstein, P. (2022). Addressing challenges in changing science teaching in the Global South: an integrative model for science education reform in Brazil. In Chinn, C., Tan, E., Chan, C., & Kali, Y. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 16th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - ICLS 2022. Hiroshima, Japan: International Society of the Learning Sciences (pp. 1433–1436).

Hollingsworth, H. (1999). Teacher professional growth: A study of primary teachers involved in mathematics professional development. Ph.D. thesis, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.

Justi, R., & Van Driel, J. (2006). The use of the interconnected model of teacher professional growth for understanding the development of science teachers’ knowledge on models and modelling. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(4), 437–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.11.011CrossRef

Ketelhut, D. J., Mills, K., Hestness, E., Cabrera, L., Plane, J., & McGinnis, J. R. (2020). Teacher change following a professional development experience in integrating computational thinking into elementary science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09798-4CrossRef

Lowell, B. R., Cherbow, K., & McNeill, K. L. (2021). Redesign or relabel? How a commercial curriculum and its implementation oversimplify key features of the NGSS. Science Education, 105(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21604CrossRef

Martin, L. (2015). The promise of the maker movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 5(1), 30–39.

Nascimento, R. M. L. L., & Mól, G. S. (2020). A formação de professores de ciências: Uma análise da sua atuação frente aos desafios e inovações do mundo moderno. Brazilian Journal of Development, 6(3), 15834–15845.CrossRef

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165

OECD. (2019). Education at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing, Paris,. https://doi.org/10.1787/f8d7880d-enCrossRef

Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of educational research, 81(3), 376–407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609

Peel, A., Dabholkar, S., Anton, G., Wu, S., Wilensky, U., & Horn, M. (2020). A case study of teacher professional growth through co-design and implementation of computationally enriched biology units. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, p.1950–1957. https://doi.org/10.22318/icls2020.1950.

Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Cheng, B., & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40(7), 331–337. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11421826CrossRef

Penuel, W. R., & Fishman, B. J. (2012). Large-scale science education intervention research we can use. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 281–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21001CrossRef

Quinn, H., & Bell, P. (2013). How designing, making, and playing relate to the learning goals of K-12 science education. In Design, Make, Play (pp. 35–51). Routledge.

Severance, S., Penuel, W. R., Sumner, T., & Leary, H. (2016). Organizing for teacher agency in curricular co-design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 531–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1207541CrossRef

Sipitakiat, A., Blikstein, P., & Cavallo, D. P. (2004). GoGo Board: Augmenting programmable bricks for economically challenged audiences. In Kafai, Y. B., Sandoval, W. A., Enyedy, N., Nixon, A. S., & Herrera, F. (Eds.), International Conference of the Learning Sciences 2004: Embracing Diversity in the Learning Sciences (pp. 481–488). Santa Monica, CA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.22318/icls2004.481

Tan, M. (2019). When makerspaces meet school: Negotiating tensions between instruction and construction. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(2), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9749-xCrossRef

Vossoughi, S., Hooper, P. K., & Escudé, M. (2016). Making through the lens of culture and power: Toward transformative visions for educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 86(2), 206–232. https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.86.2.206

Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., & Perkins, K. K. (2008). PhET: Simulations that enhance learning. Science, 322(5902), 682–683.CrossRef

Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Fifth edition. Sage Publications.

Titel: Beyond “Having Fun” As Evidence of Learning: A Longitudinal Case Study of a Teacher’s Evolving Conception of Hands-On Science Activities
verfasst von: Cassia Fernandez
Tatiana Hochgreb-Haegele
Adelmo Eloy
Paulo Blikstein
Publikationsdatum: 09.01.2023
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology / Ausgabe 2/2023
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-10012-1

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2023

Teaching the Modeling of Human–Environment Systems: Acknowledging Complexity with an Agent-Based Model

Effects of an Augmented Reality-Based Chemistry Experiential Application on Student Knowledge Gains, Learning Motivation, and Technology Perception

Characteristics and Recommendations for the Virtual Role Model Visit — Based on a Literature Review

Developing a Model for Interdisciplinary Collaboration for STEM Graduate Students

How Tablet-Student Ratio and External Scripts Affect Knowledge Acquisition and Cognitive Load in Scientific Collaborative Inquiry Learning? A Three-Round Quasi-Experiment

Engagement and Science Achievement in the Context of Integrated STEM Education: A Longitudinal Study

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten