nach oben

Journal of Science Education and Technology

Erschienen in:

01.02.2014

Enhancing Students’ Learning Process Through Self-Generated Tests

verfasst von: Marcos Sanchez-Elez, Inmaculada Pardines, Pablo Garcia, Guadalupe Miñana, Sara Roman, Margarita Sanchez, Jose Luis Risco

Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The use of new technologies in higher education has surprisingly emphasized students’ tendency to adopt a passive behavior in class. Participation and interaction of students are essential to improve academic results. This paper describes an educational experiment aimed at the promotion of students’ autonomous learning by requiring them to generate test type questions related to the contents of the course. The main idea is to make the student feel part of the evaluation process by including students’ questions in the evaluation exams. A set of applications running on our university online learning environment has been developed in order to provide both students and teachers with the necessary tools for a good interaction between them. Questions uploaded by students are visible to every enrolled student as well as to each involved teacher. In this way, we enhance critical analysis skills, by solving and finding possible mistakes in the questions sent by their fellows. The experiment was applied over 769 students from 12 different courses. Results show that the students who have actively participated in the experiment have obtained better academic performance.

Vorheriger Artikel Closing the Gap Between Attitudes and Perceptions About ICT-Enhanced Learning Among Pre-service STEM Teachers

Nächster Artikel Scientific Investigations of Elementary School Children

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Adeyinka T, Mutula S (2010) A proposed model for evaluating the success of WebCT course content management system. Comput Hum Behav 26:1795–1805CrossRef

Apple (2011) Apple distinguished educators. http://ade.apple.com/application/europe/es, 2011. Last Accessed July 2012

Arnold S, Fisler J (2010) OLAT: the swiss open source learning management system. In: Proceedings of the 2010 international conference on e-education, e-business, e-management and e-learning, IC4E ’10. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp 632–636. doi:10.1109/IC4E.2010.76

Barak M, Rafaeli S (2004) On-line question-posing and peer-assessment as means for web-based knowledge sharing in learning. Int J Hum Comput Stud 61(1):84–103CrossRef

Boekaerts M, Minnaert A (2003) Measuring behavioral change processes during an ongoing innovation program: scope and limits. In: De Corte E, Verschaffel L, Boekaerts M, Entwistel N, Merriënboer JV (eds) Powerful learning environments: unravelling basic components and dimensions. Pergamon, New York, pp 71–81

Brooks JG, Brooks MG (1993) In search of understanding: the case for constructivist classrooms. In: Caprio MW (ed) Association for supervision and curriculum development, Alexandria

Carrick-Simpson B, Armatas C (2003) Students’ interaction whit on-line learning activities: the role of study strategies and goals and computer attitudes. In: Proceedings of the 20th annual conference of the Australasian society for computers in learning in tertiary education, Australia, p. 104–114

Cavalli A, Maag S, Papagiannaki S, Verigakis G (2005) From UML models to automatic generated tests for the dotLRN e-learning platform. Electron Notes Theor Comput Sci 116:133–144CrossRef

Chin C, Brown DE, Bruce BC (2002) Student-generated questions: a meaningful aspect of learning in science. Int J Sci Educ 24(5):521–549

Cohen R (1983) Self-generated questions as an aid to reading comprehension. Read Teach 36:770–775

Coldwell J, Craig A, Goold A (2011) Using e-technologies for active learning. Interdiscip J Info Knowl Manag 6:95–106

Costa J, Caldeira H, Gallastegui JR, Otero J (2000) An analysis of question asking on scientific texts explaining natural phenomena. J Res Sci Teach 37:602–614CrossRef

Deci EL, Ryan RM (2010) Intrinsic motivation. John Wisley, Sons, Inc. All

Dreher MJ, Gambrell LB (1985) Teaching children to use a self-questioning strategy for studying expository prose. Read Improv 22:2–7

Eow Yee L, Wan Zahbte WA, Rosnaini M, Roselan B (2010) Computer games development experience and appreciative learning approach for creative process enhancement. Comput Educ 55(3):1131–1144CrossRef

Fong-Ling F, Ya-Ling W, His-Chuan H (2009) An investigation of coopetitive pedagogic design for knowledge creation in Web-based learning. Comput Educ 53:550–562CrossRef

Fried CB (2008) In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Comput Educ 50:906–914CrossRef

Fu-Yun Y (2011) Multiple peer-assessment modes to augment online student question-generation processes. Comput Educ 56(2):484–494CrossRef

Harasim LM (1990) Online education: perspectives on a new environment. Praeger, New York

HotPotatoes (2012) http://hotpot.uvic.ca/. Last Accessed July 2012

Joglar N, Martin D, Colmenar JM, Martínez I (2009) iTest: an online tool for assessment and self-assessment in mathematic. In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE international symposium on multimedia, ISM ’09. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, pp 663–668. doi:10.1109/ISM.2009.56

Keeling R (2006) Bologna process and the Lisbon research agenda: the European commission’s expanding role in higher education discourse. Eur J Educ 41(2):203–223CrossRef

King A (1994) Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. Am Educ Res J 30:338–368CrossRef

Kuo LH, Tseng TH, Yang HJ, Yang HH (2010) Design a Moodle synchronous learning activity. WTOS 9:409–421

Lee RA, DePue J (2010) Using baldrige method frameworks, excellence in higher education standards, and the Sakai CLE for the self assessment process. In: Proceedings of the 38th annual fall conference on Special Interest Group on University and College Computing Services (SIGUCCS). ACM, New York, pp 165–170

Leight H, Saunders C, Calkins R, Withers M (2012) Collaborative testing improves performance but not content retention in a large-enrollment introductory biology class. CBE Life Sci Educ 11(4):392–401CrossRef

Marbach-Ad G, Sokolove PG (2000) Can undergraduate biology students learn to ask higher-level questions? J Res Sci Teach 37:854–870CrossRef

Martens RL, Gulikers J, Bastiaens T (2004) The impact of intrinsic motivation on e-learning in authentic computer tasks. J Computer Assist Learn 20:368–376CrossRef

Marton F, Säljö R (1984) Approaches to learning. In: Marton F, Hounsell D, Entwistle N (eds) The experience of learning. Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh, pp 36–55

Mc Daniel MA, Fisher RP (1991) Tests and test feedback as learning sources. Contemp Educ Psychol 16:192–201CrossRef

Montfort DB, Brown S, (2012) What do we mean by cyberlearning: Characterizing a socially constructed definition with experts and practitioners. J Sci Educ Technol. doi:10.1007/s10956-012-9378-8

O’Donnell AM (1999) Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperation. In: O’Donnell AM, King A (eds) Cognitive perspectives on peer learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 179–196

Oncu S, Cakir H (2011) Research in online learning environments: priorities and methodologies. Comput Educ 57:1098–1108CrossRef

Pollard JK (2006) Student reflection using a Web-based Quiz. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE international conference on information technology based higher education and training, Australia, p 871–874

Raeff C (2009) Teaching and learning through asking basic disciplinary questions: examples from developmental psychology. Pedagogy Hum Sci 1:28–37

Rao SP, Collins HL, DiCarlo SE (2002) Collaborative testing enhances student learning. Adv Physiol Educ 26(1):37–41

Rosenshine B, Meister C, Chapman S (1996) Teaching students to generate questions: a review of the intervention studies. Rev Educ Res 66(2):181–221CrossRef

Slusser SR, Erickson RJ (2006) Group quizzes: an extension of the collaborative learning process. Teach Sociol 34(3):249–262CrossRef

Taboada A, Guthrie JT (2006) Contributions of student questioning and prior knowledge to construction of knowledge from reading information text. J Lit Res 38(1):1–35CrossRef

Taplin M (2000) Problem-based learning in distance education: practitioners’ beliefs about an action learning project. Distance Educ 21(2):284–307CrossRef

Tiernan P (2013) A study of the use of Twitter by students for lecture engagement and discussion. J Educ Inf Technol, Springer, p 1–18

Van den Broek P, Tzeng Y, Risden K, Trabasso T, Basche P (2001) Inferential questioning: effects on comprehension of narrative texts as a function of grade and timing. J Educ Psychol 93:521–529CrossRef

Yarnall L, Shechtman N, Penuel WR (2006) Using handheld computers to support improved classroom assessment in science: results from a field trial. J Sci Educ Technol 5(2):142–158CrossRef

Yu-Feng L, Pin-Chuan L, Chun-Ling H (2012) an approach to encouraging and evaluating learner’s knowledge contribution in web-based collaborative learning. J Educ Comput Res 47(2):107–135CrossRef

Titel: Enhancing Students’ Learning Process Through Self-Generated Tests
verfasst von: Marcos Sanchez-Elez
Inmaculada Pardines
Pablo Garcia
Guadalupe Miñana
Sara Roman
Margarita Sanchez
Jose Luis Risco
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2014
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9447-7

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

Assessing Scientific Practices Using Machine-Learning Methods: How Closely Do They Match Clinical Interview Performance?

Undergraduates’ Attitudes Toward Science and Their Epistemological Beliefs: Positive Effects of Certainty and Authority Beliefs

Measuring Student Attitude and Knowledge in Technology-Rich Biology Classrooms

A Classroom-Based Distributed Workflow Initiative for the Early Involvement of Undergraduate Students in Scientific Research

Urban High School Students’ IT/STEM Learning: Findings from a Collaborative Inquiry- and Design-Based Afterschool Program

A Meta-analysis Method to Advance Design of Technology-Based Learning Tool: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Research to Understand Learning in Relation to Different Technology Features

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten