nach oben

International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal

Erschienen in:

04.01.2020

Entrepreneurial ecosystems and the lifecycle of university business incubators: An integrative case study

verfasst von: Charlene L. Nicholls-Nixon, Dave Valliere, Steven A. Gedeon, Sean Wise

Erschienen in: International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

University business incubators (UBIs) are an important part of the ecosystem that supports entrepreneurial activities and economic development. Extant research has focused on examining UBI activities at a single point in time, but there is a paucity of theoretical and empirical work aimed at understanding the forces that explain why and how UBIs change over time. This is an important gap because establishing a university business incubator does not assure its development and growth. We address this issue by drawing upon the Fisher et al. Academy of Management Review, 41(3), 383-409 (2016) Identity-Legitimacy-Life Cycle model to explain how the pursuit of resources and organizational legitimacy shapes the development of UBIs along key strategic and operational dimensions, which has implications for performance evaluation over time. We illustrate with a case study about the creation and evolution of the DMZ, a leading UBI at Ryerson University in Canada. This case provides new insights about the dynamics of UBIs and their relationships with the entrepreneurial ecosystems in which they are embedded. Implications for future research, management practice, and public policy are discussed.

Vorheriger Artikel Science-based entrepreneurship education as a means for university-industry technology transfer

Nächster Artikel Entrepreneurial alertness and business model innovation: the role of entrepreneurial learning and risk perception

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Albort-Morant, G., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2016). A bibliometric analysis of international impact of business incubators. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1775–1779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.054.CrossRef

Aldrich, H., & Fiol, C. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19, 645–670.

Allen, D., & McCluskey, R. (1991). Structure, policy, services, and performance in the business incubator industry. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(2), 61–77.

Alvedalen, J., & Boschma, R. (2017). A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: Towards a future research agenda. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 887–903.

Audretsch, D. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39, 313–321.

Audretsch, D., & Keilbach, M. (2008). Resolving the knowledge paradox: Knowledge-spillover entrepreneurship and economic growth. Research Policy, 37, 1697–1705.

Audretsch, D., Cunningham, J., Kuratko, D., Lehmann, E., & Menter, M. (2019). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: Economic, technological, and societal impacts. Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 313–325.

Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43(7), 1097–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.015.CrossRef

Baraldi, E., & Ingemansson Havenvid, M. (2016). Identifying new dimensions of business incubation: A multi-level analysis of Karolinska Institute's incubation system. Technovation, 50-51, 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.08.003.CrossRef

Barbero, J. L., Casillas, J. C., Ramos, A., & Guitar, S. (2012). Revisiting incubation performance: How incubator typology affects results. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(5), 888–902.

Barbero, J. L., Casillas, J. C., Wright, M., & Garcia, A. R. (2014). Do different types of incubators produce different types of innovations? Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(2), 151–168.

Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing: Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441.

Benwell, B., & Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Bergek, A., & Norrman, C. (2008). Incubator best practice: A framework. Technovation, 28(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.008.CrossRef

Betakit (2019). How turning down $1 million changed the DMZ. Retrieved May 7, 2019, from http://betakit.com

Bhatli, D. (2016). Top University Business Incubators 2015–2016. Retrieved from Stockholm.

Bramwell, A., & Wolfe, D. (2008). Universities and regional economic development: The entrepreneurial University of Waterloo. Research Policy, 37, 1175–1187.

Brown, R., & Mason, C. (2017). Looking inside the spiky bits: A critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 49, 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9865-7.CrossRef

Brown, A., & Starkey, K. (2000). Organizational identity and learning: A psychodynamic perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25, 102–120.

Bruneel, J., Ratinho, T. F., Clarysse, B., & Groen, A. J. (2012). The evolution of business incubators: Comparing demand and supply of business incubation services across different incubator generations. Technovation, 32(2), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.11.003.CrossRef

Budyldina, N. (2018). Entrepreneurial universities and regional contribution. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14, 265–277.

Cavallo, A., Ghezzi, A., & Balocco, R. (2019). Entrepreneurial ecosystem research: Present debates and future directions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15, 1291–1321.

Clark, B. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation.

Clark, B. (2004). Delineating the character of the entrepreneurial university. Higher Education Policy, 17, 335–370.

Cohen, S. (2013). What do accelerators do? Insights from incubators and angels. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 8(3–4), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00184.CrossRef

Cohen, S., Bingham, C., & Hallen, B. (2018). The role of accelerator designs in mitigating bounded ratonality in new ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218782131

Cohen, S., Fehder, D., Hochberg, Y., & Murray, F. (2019). The design of startup accelerators. Research Policy, 48, 1781–1797.

Cooper, C. E., Hamel, S. A., & Connaughton, S. L. (2012). Motivations and obstacles to networking in a university business incubator. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(4), 433–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010-9189-0.CrossRef

Dahms, S., & Kingkaew, S. (2016). University business incubators: An institutional demand side perspective on value adding features. Entrepreneurial Business and Economic Review, 4(3), 41–56.

De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2011). Analyzing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Delmar, F., & Shane, S. (2004). Legitimating first: Organizing activities and the survival of new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 385–410.

Drori, I., & Honig, B. (2013). A process model of internal and external legitimacy. Organization Studies, 34(3), 345–376.

Dutton, J., & Dukerich, J. (1991). Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 517–554.

Essig, L. (2014). Ownership, failure, and experience: Goals and evaluation metrics of university-based arts venture incubators. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 2(1), 117–135.

Etzkowitz, H. (2002). Incubation of incubators: Innovation as a triple helix of university-industry-government networks. Science and Public Policy, 29(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154302781781056.CrossRef

Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4.CrossRef

Fisher, G. (2012). Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: A behavioral comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(5), 1019–1051. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00537.x.CrossRef

Fisher, G., Kotha, S., & Lahiri, A. (2016). Changing with the times: An integrated view of identity, legitimacy, and new venture life cycles. Academy of Management Review, 41(3), 383–409.

Fukugawa, N. (2018). Is the impact of incubator’s ability on incubation performance contingent on technologies and life cycle stages of startups?: Evidence from Japan. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14, 457–478.

Galbraith, B., McAdam, R., & Cross, S. (2019). The evolution of the incubator: Past, present and future. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2905297.

Garud, R., Schildt, H., & Lant, T. (2014). Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations, and the paradox of legitimacy. Organization Science, 25, 1479–1492.

Gedeon, S. (2019). Theory-based design of an entrepreneurship microcredentialing and modularisation system within a large university ecosystem. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127419856612.

Glynn, M. A. (2000). When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organization Science, 11(3), 285–298.

Good, M., Knockaert, M., Soppe, B., & Wright, M. (2019). The technology transfer ecosystem in academia: An organizational design perspective. Technovation, 82–83, 35–50.

Gray, B., & Ariss, S. (1985). Politics and strategic change across organizational life cycles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 707–723.

Grimaldi, R., & Grandi, A. (2005). Business incubators and new venture creation: An assessment of incubating models. Technovation, 25(2), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00076-2.CrossRef

Guerrero, M., & Urban, D. (2012). The development of an entrepreneurial university. Journal of Technology Transfer, 37, 43–74.

Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., Fayolle, A., Klofsten, M., & Mian, S. (2016). Entrepreneurial universities: Emerging models in the new social and economic landscape. Small Business Economics, 47, 551–563.

Hackett, S., & Dilts, D. (2004). A systematic review of business incubation research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 55–82. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTT.0000011181.11952.0f.CrossRef

Hausberg, J. P., & Korreck, S. (2018). Business incubators and accelerators: A co-citation analysis-based, systematic literature review. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9651-y.

Huang-Saad, A., Fay, J., & Sheridan, L. (2017). Closing the divide: Accelerating technology commercialization by catalyzing the university entrepreneurial ecosystem with I-corps. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 1466–1486.

Isenberg, D. (2010). The big idea: How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 40–50.

Jacob, M., Lundqvist, M., & Hellsmark, H. (2003). Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish University: The case of Chalmers University of Technology. Research Policy, 32, 1555–1568.

Jamil, F., Ismail, K., & Mahmood, N. (2015). A review of commercialization tools: University incubators and technology parks. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5, 223–228.

Johansen, S., Olsen, T., Solstad, E., & Torsteinsen, H. (2015). An insider view of the hybrid organization: How managers respond to challenges of efficiency, legitimacy and meaning. Journal of Management & Organization, 21(6), 725–740.

Just, R., & Huffman, W. (2009). The economics of universities in a new age of funding options. Research Policy, 38, 1102–1116.

Kazanjian, R. (1988). Relation of dominant problems to stages of growth in technology based ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 257–279.

Kher, R., & Lyons, T. (2018). Where do accelerators fit in the venture creation pipeline? Entrepreneurship Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2017-0140

Klofsten, M., Fayolle, A., Guerrero, M., Mian, S., Urbano, D., & Wright, M. (2019). The entrepreneurial university as driver for economic growth and social change – key challenges. Technolgical Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 149–158.

Lahikainen, K., Kolhinen, J., Ruskovaara, E., & Pihkala, T. (2019). Challenges to the development of an entrepreneurial university ecosystem: The case of a Finnish university campus. Industry and Higher Education, 33(2), 96–107.

Lewis, V., & Churchill, N. (1983). The five stages of small business growth. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 30–50.

McAdam, R., & Cross, S. (2019). The evolution of the incubator: Past, present, and future. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2905297

McAdam, M., McAdam, R., & Miller, K. (2016). Situated regional university incubation: A multi-level stakeholder perspective. Technovation, 50-51, 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.002.CrossRef

Mian, S., Lamine, W., & Fayolle, A. (2016). Technology business incubation: An overview of the state of knowledge. Technovation, 50–51, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.005.CrossRef

Miller, D., & Acs, Z. (2017). The campus as entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 49, 75–95.

Miller, D., & Friesen, P. (1980). Momentum and revolution in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Review, 23, 591–614.

Miller, K., McAdam, M., & McAdam, R. (2014). The changing university business model: A stakeholder perspective. R&D Management, 44(3), 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12064.CrossRef

Mrkajic, B. (2017). Business incubation models and institutionally void environments. Technovation, 68, 44–55.

Ng, W., Appel-Meulenbroek, R., Cloodt, M., & Arentze, T. (2019). Towards a segmentation of science parks: A typology study on science parks in Europe. Research Policy, 48, 719–732.

Nicholls-Nixon, C., & Valliere, D. (2019). A framework for exploring heterogeneity in university business incubators. Entrepreneurship Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2018-0190.

Nicholls-Nixon, C., Valliere, D., & Hassannezhad, Z. (Eds.). (2018). A typology of university business incubators: Implications for research and practice. University of Aveiro: Academic Conferences and Publishing International. XXII, 535–543.

Ozcan, P., Han, S., & Graebner, M. (2017). Single cases: The what, why, and how. In R. Mir & S. Jain (Eds.), The Routledge companion to qualitative research in organization studies. New York: Routledge.

Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van Hove, J. (2016). Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation, 50-51, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.003.CrossRef

Pinto, J. (2019). Key to effective organizational performance management lies at the intersection of paradox theory and stakeholder theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21, 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12199.CrossRef

Quinn, R., & Cameron, K. (1983). Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence. Management Science, 29, 33–51.

Redondo, M., & Camarero, C. (2017). Dominant logics and the manager’s role in university business incubators. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 32(2), 282–294.

Redondo, M., & Camarero, C. (2018). Social capital in university business incubators: Dimensions, antecedents and outcomes. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0494-7.

Redondo, M., & Camarero, C. (2019). Social capital in university business incubators: Dimensions, antecedents and outcomes. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15, 599–624.

Redondo-Carretero, M., & Camarero-Izquierdo, C. (2017). Relationships between entrepreneurs in business incubators. An exploratory case study. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 24(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051712X.2016.1275826.CrossRef

Roundy, P., Brockman, B., & Bradshaw, M. (2017). The resilience of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 8, 99–104.

Roundy, P., Bradshaw, M., & Brockman, B. (2018). The emergence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A complex adaptive systems approach. Journal of Business Research, 86, 1–10.

Rubens, A., Spigarelli, F., Cavacchi, A., & Rinaldi, C. (2017). Universities’ third missions and the entrepreneurial university and the challenges they bring to higher educational institutions. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Community, 11(3), 354–372.

Siegel, D. S., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2007). The rise of entrepreneurial activity at universities: Organizational and societal implications. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 489–504. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm015.CrossRef

Sirmon, D., Hitt, M., Ireland, R., & Gilbert, B. (2011). Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: Breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1390–1412.

Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167.

Spigel, B., & Harrison, R. (2018). Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12, 151–168.

Theodorakopoulos, N., Kakabadse, N. K., & McGowan, C. (2014). What matters in business incubation? A literature review and a suggestion for situated theorising. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 21(4), 602–622. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-09-2014-0152.CrossRef

Todorovic, Z. W., & Suntornpithug, N. (2008). The multi-dimensional nature of university incubators: Capability/resource emphasis phases. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 16(4), 385–410.

Van Looy, B., Landoni, P., Callaert, J., van Pottelsberghe, B., Sapsalis, E., & Debackere, K. (2011). Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: An empirical assessment of antecedents and trade-offs. Research Policy, 40(4), 553–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.001.CrossRef

van Weele, M., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Nauta, F. (2017). You can’t always get what you want: How entrepreneur’s perceived resource needs affect the incubator’s assertiveness. Technovation, 59, 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.08.004.CrossRef

Vanderstraeten, J., & Matthyssens, P. (2012). Service-based differentiation strategies for business incubators: Exploring external and internal alignment. Technovation, 32(12), 656–670.

Wasserman, N. (2003). Founder-CEO succession and the paradox of entrepreneurial success. Organization Science, 14(2), 149–172.

Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship: Conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 465–475.

Whetten, D. (2006). Albert and Whetten revisited: Strengthening the concept of organizational identity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15, 219–234.

Wright, M., Siegel, D., & Mustar, P. (2017). An emerging ecosystem for student start-ups. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 909–944.

Wry, T., Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. (2011). Legitimating nascent collective identities: Coordinating cultural entrepreneurship. Organization Science, 22, 414–463.

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Youtie, J., & Shapira, P. (2008). Building an innovation hub: A case study of the transformation of univeristy roles in regional technological and economic development. Research Policy, 37, 1188–1204.

Zahra, S. (2007). Contextualizing theory building in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(3), 443–452.

Zimmerman, M., & Zeitz, G. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27, 414–431.

Titel: Entrepreneurial ecosystems and the lifecycle of university business incubators: An integrative case study
verfasst von: Charlene L. Nicholls-Nixon
Dave Valliere
Steven A. Gedeon
Sean Wise
Publikationsdatum: 04.01.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 1554-7191
Elektronische ISSN: 1555-1938
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00622-4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Does entrepreneurs’ psychology affect their business venture success? Empirical findings from North Africa

Entrepreneurial alertness and business model innovation: the role of entrepreneurial learning and risk perception

Drivers and implications of entrepreneurial orientation for academic spin-offs

The role of diaspora in opportunity-driven entrepreneurial ecosystems: A mixed-methods study of Balkan economies

How knowledge heterogeneity influences business model design: mediating effects of strategic learning and bricolage

Entrepreneurial Opportunities of Refugees in Germany, France, and Ireland: Multiple Embeddedness Framework

Premium Partner