nach oben

Biodiversity and Conservation

Erschienen in:

01.01.2013 | Original Paper

Evidence-based assessment of butterfly habitat restoration to enhance management practices

verfasst von: Patrick Heer, Jérôme Pellet, Antoine Sierro, Raphaël Arlettaz

Erschienen in: Biodiversity and Conservation | Ausgabe 1/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The decline in distribution and abundance of biodiversity requires evidence-based guidelines for cost-effective conservation management and systematic quantitative assessments of its effects. We investigated the efficiency of a habitat restoration programme aimed at reducing the risk of extinction of the Iolas blue Iolana iolas (Ochsenheimer, 1816), one of the rarest butterflies of Central Europe. Using occupancy and capture-mark-recapture (CMR) models accounting for probability of detection, we assessed habitat patch occupancy, habitat selection, demography and dispersal with the aim of testing and refining restoration measures. Count surveys performed at 38 plantations dedicated to the species’ unique host plant resulted in an occupancy rate of 50 %, with mostly very low relative abundance indices. The site-occupancy habitat analysis demonstrated that species abundance was best explained by host plant vitality, habitat patch connectivity, and solar radiation. CMR surveys yielded very high catchability (82 %), individual detectability (86 %) rates and limited dispersal capacity. These results form the basis for future efficient count surveys to assess species distribution and abundance. They also provide evidence-based recommendations for improving ongoing habitat restoration: (i) the attractiveness of host plant plantations must be enhanced by promoting mass blossoming, which can be achieved through systematic autumn pruning of the extant plantations; (ii) new plantations should be created in order to fill in the gaps in the landscape matrix, to increase meta-population capacity through improved habitat connectivity. Finally, this study demonstrates the relevance of efficiency tests as an integral, adaptive phase of any conservation research activity.

Vorheriger Artikel Seed dispersal strategies and the threat of defaunation in a Congo forest

Nächster Artikel Trait-dependent declines of species following conversion of rain forest to oil palm plantations

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Arlettaz R, Schaub M, Fournier J, Reichlin TS, Sierro A, Watson JEM, Braunisch V (2010) From publications to public actions: when conservation biologists bridge the gap between research and implementation. Bioscience 60(10):835–842CrossRef

Beck J, Fiedler K (2009) Adult life spans of butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea plus Hesperioidea): broadscale contingencies with adult and larval traits in multi-species comparisons. Biol J Linn Soc 96(1):166–184CrossRef

Benz E, Bryner R, Buser H, Ettmüller W, Geiger W, Joos R, Jost B, Jutzeler D, Pleisch E, Reser L, Schiess-Bühler H, Schmid J, Sonderegger P, Stierli E, Wymann HP, Ziegler H (1987) Tagfalter und ihre Lebensräume. Arten Gefährdung Schutz. Schweizerischer Bund für Naturschutz, Basel

Bergman KO (1999) Habitat utilization by Lopinga achine (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) larvae and ovipositing females: implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 88:69–74CrossRef

Brommer JE, Fred MS (1999) Movement of the Apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo related to host plant and nectar plant patches. Ecol Entomol 24(2):125–131CrossRef

Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference. a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York

Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2004) Multimodel inference—understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Meth Res 33(2):261–304CrossRef

Carron G, Praz C (1999) Ecologie et conservation de la Mélitée des linaires Mellicta deione berisalii (Rühl, 1891) et de l’Azuré du baguenaudier Iolana iolas (Ochsenheimer, 1816) (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidae). Bull Murith 117:31–41

Carron G, Wermeille E, Schiesse H, Patocchi N (2001) Programme national de conservation des espèces prioritaires de papillons diurnes (Rhopalocera et Hesperiidae). Canton du Valais, pp. 52. http://home.page.ch/pub/insecta.carron@vtx.ch/

De Andres EF, Alegre J, Tenorio JL, Manzanares M, Sanchez FJ, Ayerbe L (1999) Vegetative propagation of Colutea arborescens L., a multipurpose leguminous shrub of semiarid climates. Agrofor Syst 46(2):113–121CrossRef

Dennis RLH, Eales HT (1997) Patch occupancy in Coenonympha tullia (Müller, 1764) (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae): habitat quality matters as much as patch size and isolation. J Insect Cons 1:167–176CrossRef

Dennis RLH, Eales HT (1999) Probability of site occupancy in the large heath butterfly Coenonympha tullia determined from geographical and ecological data. Biol Conserv 87(3):295–301CrossRef

Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Van Dyck H (2006) Habitats and resources: the need for a resource-based definition to conserve butterflies. Biodiversity Conserv 15(6):1943–1966CrossRef

Fleishman E, Ray C, Sjögren-Gulve P, Boggs CL, Murphy DD (2002) Assessing the roles of patch quality, area, and isolation in predicting metapopulation dynamics. Conserv Biol 16(3):706–716CrossRef

Fu P, Rich PM (2002) A geometric solar radiation model with applications in agriculture and forestry. Comput Electron Agr 37:25–35CrossRef

García-Villanueva V, Novoa Pérez JM, Blázquez Caselles A (1996) Posición sistemática, distribución geográfica y estatus de Iolana iolas (Ochsenheimer, 1816) en las provincias de Badajoz y Sevilla (España) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología 24(94):167–173

Gil-T F (2004) Nuevos datos sobre la biología de Iolana iolas Ochsenheimer (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) y su interacción con himenópteros mirmecófilos, fitófagos y parasitoides (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Eurytomidae, Ichneumonoidea). Boletín de la SEA 34:139–145

Gonseth Y (1994) Liste rouge des lépidoptères diurnes menacés de Suisse. In: Duelli P (ed) Listes rouges des espèces animales menacées de Suisse. Office fédéral de l’environnement, des forêts et du paysage (OFEFP), Berne, pp 48–51

Gutiérrez D, Thomas CD, León-Cortés JL (1999) Dispersal, distribution, patch network and metapopulation dynamics of the dingy skipper butterfly (Erynnis tages). Oecologia 121(4):506–517CrossRef

Haddad NM, Hudgens B, Damiani C, Gross K, Kuefler D, Pollock K (2008) Determining optimal population monitoring for rare butterflies. Conserv Biol 22(4):929–940PubMedCrossRef

Hanski I (1994) A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. J Anim Ecol 63(1):151–162CrossRef

Hanski I (1999) Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapopulations in dynamic landscapes. Oikos 87(2):209–219CrossRef

Hanski I, Ovaskainen O (2000) The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature 404(6779):755–758PubMedCrossRef

Hirzel AH, Posse B, Oggier PA, Crettenand Y, Glenz C, Arlettaz R (2004) Ecological requirements of reintroduced species and the implications for release policy: the case of the bearded vulture. J Appl Ecol 41(6):1103–1116CrossRef

Johnson JB, Omland KS (2004) Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 19(2):101–108PubMedCrossRef

Kéry M, Plattner M (2007) Species richness estimation and determinants of species detectability in butterfly monitoring programmes. Ecol Entomol 32(1):53–61CrossRef

Lambeck RJ (1997) Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conserv Biol 11(4):849–856CrossRef

Lande R (1988) Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241(4872):1455–1460PubMedCrossRef

Lauber K, Wagner G (2001) Flora Helvetica. 3., überarb. edn. Haupt, Bern

Lindzey S, Connor EF (2011) Monitoring the mission blue butterfly using immature stages. J Insect Cons 15(6):765–773

MacKenzie DI, Royle JA (2005) Designing occupancy studies: general advice and allocating survey effort. J Appl Ecol 42(6):1105–1114CrossRef

MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Hines JE, Knutson MG, Franklin AB (2003) Estimating site occupancy, colonization, and local extinction when a species is detected imperfectly. Ecology 84(8):2200–2207CrossRef

Mallet J, Barton NH (1989) Strong natural selection in a warning-color hybrid zone. Evolution 43(2):421–431CrossRef

Martilla O, Saarinen K, Jantunen J (1997) Habitat restoration and a successful reintroduction of the endangered Baton Blue butterfly (Pseudophilotes baton schiffermuelleri) in SE Finland. Ann Zool Fennici 34:177–185

Matter SF, Roland J, Keyghobadi N, Sabourin K (2003) The effects of isolation, habitat area and resources on the abundance, density and movement of the butterfly Parnassius smintheus. Am Midl Nat 150(1):26–36CrossRef

Memmott J, Cadotte M, Hulme PE, Kerby G, Milner-Gulland EJ, Whittingham MJ (2010) Putting applied ecology into practice. J Appl Ecol 47(1):1–4CrossRef

Meyer-Hozak C (2000) Population biology of Maculinea rebeli (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) on the chalk grasslands of Eastern Westphalia (Germany) and implications for conservation. J Insect Cons 4(2):63–72CrossRef

Moilanen A, Nieminen M (2002) Simple connectivity measures in spatial ecology. Ecology 83(4):1131–1145CrossRef

Munguira ML, Martín J (1993) The conservation of endangered lycaenid butterflies in Spain. Biol Conserv 66:17–22CrossRef

Murphy DD (1987) Are we studying our endangered butterflies to death? J Res Lepid 26:236–239

Naughton-Treves L, Holland MB, Brandon K (2005) The role of protected areas in conserving biodiversity and sustaining local livelihoods. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:219–252CrossRef

New TR (2007) Understanding the requirements of the insects we seek to conserve. J Insect Cons 11(2):95–97CrossRef

Nichols JD (1992) Capture-recapture models: using marked animals to study population dynamics. Bioscience 42(2):94–102CrossRef

Pellet J (2008) Seasonal variation in detectability of butterflies surveyed with Pollard walks. J Insect Cons 12(2):155–162CrossRef

Pellet J, Gander A (2009) Comparaison de méthodes pour l’estimation de l’abondance des populations de papillons de jour: établissement d’un protocole de suivi du Grand Nègre des bois (Minois dryas (Scopoli, 1763)) sur la rive sud du lac de Neuchâtel. Entomo Helv 2:101–116

Pellet J, Fleishman E, Dobkin DS, Gander A, Murphy DD (2007) An empirical evaluation of the area and isolation paradigm of metapopulation dynamics. Biol Conserv 136(3):483–495CrossRef

Pellet J, Bried JT, Parietti D, Gander A, Heer PO, Cherix D, Arlettaz R (2012) Monitoring butterfly abundance: beyond Pollard walks. PLoS One 7(7):e41396PubMedCrossRef

Pfitsch WA, Williams EH (2009) Habitat restoration for lupine and specialist butterflies. Restor Ecol 17(2):226–233CrossRef

Pollard E (1977) A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies. Biol Conserv 12:115–134CrossRef

Pollard E (1982) Monitoring butterfly abundance in relation to the management of a nature reserve. Biol Conserv 24(4):317–328CrossRef

Pollock KH, Nichols JD, Simons TR, Farnsworth GL, Bailey LL, Sauer JR (2002) Large scale wildlife monitoring studies: statistical methods for design and analysis. Environmetrics 13(2):105–119CrossRef

Pulliam HR (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Amer Nat 132(5):652–661CrossRef

Pullin AS, Knight TM (2009) Doing more good than harm—building an evidence-base for conservation and environmental management. Conserv Biol 142:931–934CrossRef

R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. doi:www.R-project.org

Rabasa SG, Gutiérrez D, Escudero A (2005) Egg laying by a butterfly on a fragmented host plant: a multi-level approach. Ecography 28(5):629–639CrossRef

Rabasa SG, Gutiérrez D, Escudero A (2007) Metapopulation structure and habitat quality in modelling dispersal in the butterfly Iolana iolas. Oikos 116(5):793–806CrossRef

Rabasa SG, Gutiérrez D, Escudero A (2008) Relative importance of host plant patch geometry and habitat quality on the patterns of occupancy, extinction and density of the monophagous butterfly Iolana iolas. Oecologia 156(3):491–503PubMedCrossRef

Robinson RA, Sutherland WJ (2002) Post-war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain. J Appl Ecol 39(1):157–176CrossRef

Schaub M, Zink R, Beissmann H, Sarrazin F, Arlettaz R (2009) When to end releases in reintroduction programmes: demographic rates and population viability analysis of bearded vultures in the Alps. J Appl Ecol 46(1):92–100CrossRef

Schtickzelle N, Le Boulengé E, Baguette M (2002) Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: demographic processes in a patchy population. Oikos 97(3):349–360CrossRef

Schultz CB, Crone EE (2005) Patch size and connectivity thresholds for butterfly habitat restoration. Conserv Biol 19(3):887–896CrossRef

Settele J, Kühn E (2009) Insect Conservation. Science 325(5936):41–42PubMedCrossRef

Sierro A (2007) Evaluation du succès des plantations de baguenaudiers sur l’azuré du baguenaudier Iolana iolas (Lépidoptère) dans le vignoble du Valais central. Bull Murith 125:63–71

Sinclair ARE, Hik DS, Schmitz OJ, Scudder GGE, Turpin DH, Larter NC (1995) Biodiversity and the need for habitat renewal. Ecol Appl 5(3):579–587CrossRef

Singer MC, Wedlake P (1981) Capture does affect probability of recapture in a butterfly species. Ecol Entomol 6(2):215–216CrossRef

Thomas JA (1991) Rare species conservation: case studies of European butterflies. In: Spellerberg IF, Goldsmith FB, Morris MG (eds) The scientific management of temperate communities for conservation. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 149–197

Thomas JA (2005) Monitoring change in the abundance and distribution of insects using butterflies and other indicator groups. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:339–357PubMedCrossRef

Thomas JA, Morris MG (1994) Patterns, mechanisms and rates of extinction among invertebrates in the United Kingdom. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 344(1307):47–54CrossRef

Thomas CD, Thomas JA, Warren MS (1992) Distributions of occupied and vacant butterfly habitats in fragmented landscapes. Oecologia 92(4):563–567CrossRef

Thomas JA, Bourn NAD, Clarke RT, Stewart KE, Simcox DJ, Pearman GS, Curtis R, Goodger B (2001) The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proc Biol Sci 268(1478):1791–1796PubMedCrossRef

Thomas JA, Telfer MG, Roy DB, Preston CD, Greenwood JJD, Asher J, Fox R, Clarke RT, Lawton JH (2004) Comparative losses of british butterflies, birds, and plants and the global extinction crisis. Science 303(5665):1879–1881PubMedCrossRef

Thomas JA, Simcox DJ, Hovestadt T (2010) Evidence based conservation of butterflies. J Insect Cons 15(1–2):241–258

Tolman T, Lewington R (2008) Collins butterfly guide. The most complete guide to the butterflies of Britain and Europe. Collins, London

Van Swaay C, Warren M, Loïs G (2006) Biotope use and trends of European butterflies. J Insect Cons 10(2):189–209CrossRef

Van Swaay C, Cuttelod A, Collins S, Maes D, López Munguira M, Šašić M, Settele J, Verovnik R, Verstrael T, Warren M, Wiemers M, Wynhoff I (2010) European red list of butterflies. Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

Vandewoestijne S, Schtickzelle N, Baguette M (2008) Positive correlation between genetic diversity and fitness in a large, well-connected metapopulation. BMC Biol 6(46):11

Veall MR, Zimmermann KF (1996) Pseudo-R² measures for some common limited dependent variable models. J Econ Surv 10(3):241–259CrossRef

Vittoz P, Engler R (2007) Seed dispersal distances: a typology based on dispersal modes and plant traits. Bot Helv 117(2):109–124CrossRef

Wahlberg N, Moilanen A, Hanski I (1996) Predicting the occurrence of endangered species in fragmented landscapes. Science 273(5281):1536–1538CrossRef

Wahlberg N, Klemetti T, Selonen V, Hanski I (2002) Metapopulation structure and movements in five species of checkerspot butterflies. Oecologia 130(1):33–43

White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46(suppl):S120–S139CrossRef

Titel: Evidence-based assessment of butterfly habitat restoration to enhance management practices
verfasst von: Patrick Heer
Jérôme Pellet
Antoine Sierro
Raphaël Arlettaz
Publikationsdatum: 01.01.2013
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Biodiversity and Conservation / Ausgabe 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0960-3115
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9710
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0417-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

Trait-dependent declines of species following conversion of rain forest to oil palm plantations

Rapid assessment of linear transport infrastructure in relation to the impact on landscape continuity for large ranging mammals

The size of savannah Africa: a lion’s (Panthera leo) view

Seed dispersal strategies and the threat of defaunation in a Congo forest

Tree community structure, dynamics, and diversity partitioning in a Bornean tropical forested landscape

Neotropical flowering epiphyte diversity: local composition and geographic affinities