Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Theory and Decision 1/2023

22.02.2022

Expected return—expected loss approach to optimal portfolio investment

verfasst von: Pavlo Blavatskyy

Erschienen in: Theory and Decision | Ausgabe 1/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Standard models of portfolio investment rely on various statistical measures of dispersion. Such measures favor returns smoothed over all states of the world and penalize abnormally low as well as abnormally high returns. A model of portfolio investment based on the tradeoff between expected return and expected loss considers only abnormally low returns as undesirable. Such a model has a comparative advantage over other existing models in that a first-order stochastically dominant portfolio always has a higher expected return and a lower expected loss. Expected return—expected loss model of portfolio investment can rationalize the equity premium puzzle. Two random variables are not comoving if there is at least one state of the world in which one random variable yields a positive return and the other—a negative return. Such random variables provide hedging benefits from diversification in portfolio investment according to the expected return—expected loss model. A special case of this model, when an investor linearly trade-offs expected returns and expected losses, is also a special case of the prospect theory when a decision-maker has a piece-wise linear value function without any probability weighting.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
These are monthly changes in close prices (adjusted for dividends and splits) on the first day of the month between June 2019 and May 2020 for Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Data downloaded from https://​finance.​yahoo.​com/​
 
2
In any state of the world si in which there is comovement (i.e. R1(si)R2(si) ≥ 0) the ratio (5) is not a well-defined share (being either negative or greater than one).
 
3
The case with comoving securities that we discussed first is just a special case of this algorithm when there are no “break even” shares.
 
4
These are monthly changes in close prices (adjusted for dividends and splits) on the first day of the month between June 2019 and May 2020 for Walmart Inc. (WMT) and Apple Inc. (AAPL). Data downloaded from https://​finance.​yahoo.​com/​
 
5
The dashed-dotted curve on Fig. 3 has only one kink corresponding to the “break even” share of AAPL α1 = 0.187 because AAPL and TSLA are comoving in all but one state (s4).
 
6
These are monthly changes in adjusted close prices between June 2019 and May 2020 for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). Data downloaded from https://​finance.​yahoo.​com/​.
 
7
In our example, system (6) has nine other solutions that are located inside the convex hull of feasible binary portfolios and hence they cannot be fully diversified boundary portfolios.
 
8
Mean-Gini approach is equivalent to Yaari (1987) dual model with a quadratic probability weighting function (Blavatskyy, 2016).
 
9
This is similar to Gul (1991) theory of disappointment aversion where outcomes are disappointing if they are below a lottery’s certainty equivalent.
 
10
Data (^IRX and ^IXIC) downloaded from https://​finance.​yahoo.​com/​.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Ang, A., Chen, J., & Xing, Y. (2006). Downside risk. The Review of Financial Studies, 19(1), 1191–1239. Ang, A., Chen, J., & Xing, Y. (2006). Downside risk. The Review of Financial Studies, 19(1), 1191–1239.
Zurück zum Zitat Barberis, N., Huang, M., & Santos, T. (2001). Prospect theory and asset prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 1–53.CrossRef Barberis, N., Huang, M., & Santos, T. (2001). Prospect theory and asset prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 1–53.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. (1995). Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 75–92.CrossRef Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. (1995). Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 75–92.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Birnbaum, M., & Navarrete, J. (1998). Testing descriptive utility theories: Violations of stochastic dominance and cumulative independence. Journal of Risk Uncertainty, 17, 49–78.CrossRef Birnbaum, M., & Navarrete, J. (1998). Testing descriptive utility theories: Violations of stochastic dominance and cumulative independence. Journal of Risk Uncertainty, 17, 49–78.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Blavatskyy, P. (2010). Modifying the mean-variance approach to avoid violations of stochastic dominance. Management Science, 56(11), 2050–2057.CrossRef Blavatskyy, P. (2010). Modifying the mean-variance approach to avoid violations of stochastic dominance. Management Science, 56(11), 2050–2057.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Blavatskyy, P. (2016). Probability weighting and L-moments. European Journal of Operational Research, 255(1), 103–109.CrossRef Blavatskyy, P. (2016). Probability weighting and L-moments. European Journal of Operational Research, 255(1), 103–109.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Blavatskyy, P., & Pogrebna, G. (2010). Models of stochastic choice and decision theories: why both are important for analyzing decisions. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 25(6), 963–986.CrossRef Blavatskyy, P., & Pogrebna, G. (2010). Models of stochastic choice and decision theories: why both are important for analyzing decisions. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 25(6), 963–986.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Borch, K. (1969). A note on uncertainty and indifference curves. The Review of Economic Studies., 36(1), 1–4.CrossRef Borch, K. (1969). A note on uncertainty and indifference curves. The Review of Economic Studies., 36(1), 1–4.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carbone, E., & Hey, J. (1995). A comparison of the estimates of EU and non-EU preference functionals using data from pairwise choice and complete ranking experiments. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, 20, 111–133.CrossRef Carbone, E., & Hey, J. (1995). A comparison of the estimates of EU and non-EU preference functionals using data from pairwise choice and complete ranking experiments. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, 20, 111–133.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Coval, J. D., & Shumway, T. (2005). Do behavioral biases affect prices? The Journal of Finance, 60(1), 1–34.CrossRef Coval, J. D., & Shumway, T. (2005). Do behavioral biases affect prices? The Journal of Finance, 60(1), 1–34.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat de Roos, N., & Sarafidis, Y. (2010). Decision making under risk in Deal or No Deal. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 25, 987–1027.CrossRef de Roos, N., & Sarafidis, Y. (2010). Decision making under risk in Deal or No Deal. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 25, 987–1027.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gini, C. (1912). Variabilità e Mutabilità. contributo allo studio delle distribuzioni e delle relazione statistiche. Studi Economici-Giuridici Dela Regia Università Di Cagliari, 3, 3–159. Gini, C. (1912). Variabilità e Mutabilità. contributo allo studio delle distribuzioni e delle relazione statistiche. Studi Economici-Giuridici Dela Regia Università Di Cagliari, 3, 3–159.
Zurück zum Zitat Gul, F. (1991). A theory of disappointment aversion. Econometrica, 59(3), 667–686.CrossRef Gul, F. (1991). A theory of disappointment aversion. Econometrica, 59(3), 667–686.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hey, J. (2001). Does repetition improve consistency? Experimental Economics, 4, 5–54.CrossRef Hey, J. (2001). Does repetition improve consistency? Experimental Economics, 4, 5–54.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J., & Richard, T. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the coarse theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1325–1348.CrossRef Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J., & Richard, T. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the coarse theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1325–1348.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.CrossRef Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Knetsch, J. L. (1989). The endowment effect and evidence of nonreversible indifference curves. American Economic Review, 79, 1277–1284. Knetsch, J. L. (1989). The endowment effect and evidence of nonreversible indifference curves. American Economic Review, 79, 1277–1284.
Zurück zum Zitat Konno, H., & Yamazaki, H. (1991). Mean absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and its application to Tokyo stock market. Management Science, 37, 519–531.CrossRef Konno, H., & Yamazaki, H. (1991). Mean absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and its application to Tokyo stock market. Management Science, 37, 519–531.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1998). Testing different stochastic specifications of risky choice. Economica, 65, 581–598.CrossRef Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1998). Testing different stochastic specifications of risky choice. Economica, 65, 581–598.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7, 77–91. Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7, 77–91.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehra, R., & Prescott, E. (1985). The equity premium: A puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics, 15, 145–161.CrossRef Mehra, R., & Prescott, E. (1985). The equity premium: A puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics, 15, 145–161.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Odean, T. (1998). Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? The Journal of Finance, 53(5), 1775–1798.CrossRef Odean, T. (1998). Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? The Journal of Finance, 53(5), 1775–1798.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Quiggin, J. (1981). Risk perception and risk aversion among Australian farmers. Australian Journal of Agricultural Resource Economics, 25(2), 160–169.CrossRef Quiggin, J. (1981). Risk perception and risk aversion among Australian farmers. Australian Journal of Agricultural Resource Economics, 25(2), 160–169.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Quiggin, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(4), 323–343.CrossRef Quiggin, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(4), 323–343.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roy, A. D. (1952). Safety first and the holding of assets. Econometrica, 20, 431–450.CrossRef Roy, A. D. (1952). Safety first and the holding of assets. Econometrica, 20, 431–450.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7–59.CrossRef Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7–59.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shalit, H., & Yitzhaki, S. (1984). Mean-Gini. Portfolio theory. And the pricing of risky assets. The Journal of Finance, 39(5), 1449–1468.CrossRef Shalit, H., & Yitzhaki, S. (1984). Mean-Gini. Portfolio theory. And the pricing of risky assets. The Journal of Finance, 39(5), 1449–1468.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shefrin, H., & Statman, M. (1985). The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: Theory and evidence. Journal of Finance, 40, 777–790.CrossRef Shefrin, H., & Statman, M. (1985). The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: Theory and evidence. Journal of Finance, 40, 777–790.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39–60.CrossRef Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39–60.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323.CrossRef Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59(4), 251–278.CrossRef Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59(4), 251–278.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press. von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Wakker, P., Erev, I., & Weber, E. (1994). Comonotonic independence: The critical test between classical and rank-dependent utility theories. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 9, 195–230.CrossRef Wakker, P., Erev, I., & Weber, E. (1994). Comonotonic independence: The critical test between classical and rank-dependent utility theories. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 9, 195–230.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yaari, M. (1987). The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica, 55, 95–115.CrossRef Yaari, M. (1987). The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica, 55, 95–115.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yitzhaki, S. (1982). Stochastic dominance. Mean variance. And Gini’s mean difference. The American Economic Review, 72(1), 178–185. Yitzhaki, S. (1982). Stochastic dominance. Mean variance. And Gini’s mean difference. The American Economic Review, 72(1), 178–185.
Metadaten
Titel
Expected return—expected loss approach to optimal portfolio investment
verfasst von
Pavlo Blavatskyy
Publikationsdatum
22.02.2022
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Theory and Decision / Ausgabe 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0040-5833
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7187
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-022-09870-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

Theory and Decision 1/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner