Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
An Introduction to Requirements Knowledge Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2013 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

15. Experience-Based Requirements Engineering Tools

verfasst von : E. Knauss, S. Meyer

Erschienen in: Managing Requirements Knowledge

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Writing a good software requirement specification is a complex task. Many different aspects must be taken into account; most of them can only be learned through experience. Being aware of experiences and distilled best practices at the right time when writing a specification is another challenge. Experience-based requirements engineering tools make sharing and reuse of experience feasible. In this chapter, we present design principles for such tools, define a learning model to describe how organisations and individuals can learn new experiences by using them, and sketch a strategy for evaluating experience-based requirements engineering tools. We highlight these concepts with an example.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel An Overview of Recommender Systems in Requirements Engineering
Nächstes Kapitel The Eclipse Requirements Modeling Framework
Fußnoten
Literatur
1.
Schneider K (2009) Experience and knowledge management in software engineering. Springer, BerlinCrossRef
2.
Senge PM (1993) The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. Century Business Random House, London
3.
Kiyavitskaya N, Zeni N, Mich L, Berry DM (2008) Requirements for tools for ambiguity identification and measurement in natural language requirements specifications. Requir Eng 13:207–239CrossRef
4.
Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York
5.
Fischer G (1994) Domain-oriented design environments. Autom Sof Eng 1:177–203CrossRef
6.
Knauss E, Lübke D, Meyer S (2009) Feedback-driven requirements engineering: the heuristic requirements assistant. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 31st international conference on software engineering, IEEE, Vancouver, Canada, pp 587–590
7.
Cockburn A (2001) Writing effective use cases. Addison-Wesley, Boston
8.
Kusumoto S, Matukawa F, Inoue K, Hanabusa S, Maegawa Y (2004) Estimating effort by use case points: method, tool and case study. In: Proceedings of the 10th international symposium on software metrics, IEEE, Chicago, USA, pp 292–299
9.
Maciaszek LA (2007) Requirements analysis and system design. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow
10.
Berry DM, Kamsties E, Krieger MM (2003) From contract drafting to software specification: linguistic sources of ambiguity, Technical report, University of Waterloo
11.
12.
Willett P (2006) The Porter stemming algorithm: then and now. Program Electron Lib Inform Syst 40:219–223CrossRef
13.
Knauss E, Houmb S, Schneider K, Islam S, Jürjens J (2011) Supporting requirements engineers in recognising security issues. In: 17th international working conference on requirements engineering: foundation for software quality, Essen, Germany, pp 4–18
14.
Berry DM, Kamsties E (2003) Ambiguity in requirements specification. In: do Leite Prado JCS, Doorn JH (eds) Perspectives of requirements engineering. Kluwer, Norwell, pp 7–44
15.
Wilson WM, Rosenberg LH, Hyatt LE (1997) Automated analysis of requirement specifications. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on software engineering (ICSE’97. ACM, New York, pp 161–171
16.
Kof L (2005) Text analysis for requirements engineering. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität München, Germany
17.
Lee SW, Muthurajan D, Gandhi RA, Yavagal DS, Ahn G-J (2006) Building decision support problem domain ontology from natural language requirements for software assurance. Int J Softw Eng Knowl Eng 16:851–884CrossRef
18.
Chantree F, Nuseibeh B, de Roeck A, Willis A (2006) Identifying nocuous ambiguities in natural language requirements. In: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE international requirements engineering conference. IEEE Computer Society, Minneapolis, pp 56–65
19.
Gleich B, Creighton O, Kof L (2010) Ambiguity detection: towards a tool explaining ambiguity sources. In: Wieringa R, Persson A (eds) Proceedings of requirements engineering: foundation for software quality (REFSQ). Springer, Essen, pp 218–232CrossRef
20.
Fabbrini F, Fusani M, Gnesi S, Lami G (2001) An automatic quality evaluation for natural language requirements. In: Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on RE: foundation for software quality (REFSQ 2001), Interlaken, pp 150–164
21.
Fantechi A, Gnesi S, Lami G, Maccari A (2002) Application of linguistic techniques for use case analysis. In: Proceedings of IEEE joint international conference on requirements engineering, Essen, pp 157–164
22.
Melchisedech R (2000) Verwaltung und Prüfung natürlichsprachlicher Spezifikationen. Ph.D. thesis, Fakultät Informatik, Universität and Stuttgart, Germany
23.
Somé SS (2006) Supporting use case based requirements engineering. Inform Softw Technol 48:43–58CrossRef
24.
Jang H-C (1994) A knowledge-based analyzer for requirements specification analysis. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on tools with artificial intelligence, New Orleans, USA, pp 276–282
25.
Hunter A, Nuseibeh B (1998) Managing inconsistent specifications: reasoning, analysis, and action. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol 7:335–367CrossRef
26.
Gervasi V, Zowghi D (2005) Reasoning about inconsistencies in natural language requirements. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol 14:277–330CrossRef
27.
Berenbach B, Borotto G (2006) Metrics for model driven requirements development. In: ICSE’06: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on software engineering. ACM, Shanghai, pp 445–451
28.
de Souza CRB, Oliveira HLR, da Rocha CRP, Gonçalves KM, Redmiles DF (2003) Using critiquing systems for inconsistency detection in software engineering models. SEKE, San Francisco, USA, pp 196–203
29.
Gervasi V, Zowghi D (2010) On the role of ambiguity in RE. In: Wieringa R, Persson A (eds) Proceedings of requirements engineering: foundation for software quality (REFSQ). Springer, Essen, pp 248–254CrossRef
30.
Adam S, Doerr J, Eisenbarth M, Gross A (2009) Using task-oriented requirements engineering in different domains – experience of application in research and industry. In: Proceedings of the 17th IEEE international requirements engineering conference (RE’09), Atlanta, pp 267–272
31.
Knauss E, Flohr T (2007) Managing requirement engineering processes by adapted quality gateways and critique-based RE-tools. In: Proceedings of workshop on measuring requirements for project and product success, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
32.
Knauss E, Schneider K (2012) Supporting learning organisations in writing better requirements documents based on heuristic critiques. In: Regnell B, Damian D (eds) Proceedings of requirements engineering: foundation for software quality (REFSQ’12). Springer, Heidelberg/Essen, pp 165–171CrossRef
33.
Knauss E, Schneider K, Stapel K (2009) Learning to write better requirements through heuristic critiques, IEEE, Atlanta, USA
Metadaten
Titel
Experience-Based Requirements Engineering Tools
verfasst von
E. Knauss
S. Meyer
Copyright-Jahr
2013
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch
Managing Requirements Knowledge

Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34418-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-34419-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2013

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34419-0_15

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise