nach oben

Review of Managerial Science

Erschienen in:

12.09.2023 | Review Paper

Exploring digital transformation capability via a blended perspective of dynamic capabilities and digital maturity: a pattern matching approach

verfasst von: Bernardo Henrique Leso, Marcelo Nogueira Cortimiglia, Antonio Ghezzi, Vinicius Minatogawa

Erschienen in: Review of Managerial Science | Ausgabe 4/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The need for digital transformation is constant and understanding the mechanisms that aid organizations in achieving successful transformations is crucial. This study combines the dynamic capabilities theory with the perspective of digital maturity by answering the question, "What are the capabilities underlying the ability to become a digitally mature organization?" A systematic review of studies that investigated digital transformation from a maturity perspective was conducted and the findings were consolidated into a conceptual framework structured according to the dynamic capabilities lens. The framework was then compared to insights from case studies of four digitally mature organizations using the flexible pattern-matching approach. As a result, a framework of digital transformation dynamic capability was proposed, consisting of five thematic areas of action: designing and managing transformation, fostering digital value propositions, acting in digital business ecosystems, systematizing structural changes, and supporters and enablers. The main implication of this study is the original approach for consolidating and organizing previous literature on digital transformation that can guide organizations to articulate and develop specific processes and resources to mature digitally, leading to a capacity for continuous change in the perpetually evolving digital landscape. There are also implications for theory building, as the proposed framework can serve as an agenda for future research on dynamic capabilities for digital transformation.

Vorheriger Artikel Relationship conflict and counterproductive work behavior: the roles of affective well-being and emotional intelligence

Nächster Artikel The GenAI is out of the bottle: generative artificial intelligence from a business model innovation perspective

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Aguinis H, Solarino AM (2019) Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: the case of interviews with elite informants. Strateg Manag J. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3015CrossRef

Amit R, Schoemaker P (1993) Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strateg Manag J 14:33–46CrossRef

Annarelli A, Battistella C, Nonino F, Parida V, Pessot E (2021) Literature review on digitalization capabilities: co-citation analysis of antecedents, conceptualization and consequences. Technol Forecast Soc Ch 166:120635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120635CrossRef

Auerbach CF, Silverstein LB (2003) Qualitative data: an introduction to coding and analysis. New York University Press, NY

Axmann B, Harmoko H (2020) Industry 40 readiness assessment. Tehnički glasnik 14(2):212–217CrossRef

Barwinski RW, Bouncken RB, Henkelmann L (2021) Die geschäftsführung als enabler der digitalen transformation in kleinen unternehmen. ZfKE–Zeitschrift KMU Entrepreneurship 69(2):97–120. https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.69.2.97CrossRef

Bharadwaj AS (2000) A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Q 24(1):169CrossRef

Bharadwaj A, El Sawy OA, Pavlou PA, Venkatraman N (2013) Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights. MIS Q 37(2):471–482CrossRef

Blayone TJB, VanOostveen R (2020) Prepared for work in Industry 4.0? Modelling the target activity system and five dimensions of worker readiness. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 34(1):1–19CrossRef

Bouncken R, Barwinski R (2020) Shared digital identity and rich knowledge ties in global 3D printing—a drizzle in the clouds? Glob Strateg J. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1370CrossRef

Bouncken R, Schmitt F (2022) SME family firms and strategic digital transformation: inverting dualisms related to overconfidence and centralization. J Small Bus Strateg 32(3):1–17

Bouncken RB, Tiberius V (2021) Legitimacy processes and trajectories of co-prosumption services: insights from coworking spaces. J Serv Res. https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705211050208CrossRef

Bouncken RB, Qiu Y, Sinkovics N, Kürsten W (2021) Qualitative research: extending the range with flexible pattern matching. RMS 15(2):251–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00451-2CrossRef

Bouwman H, Nikou S, de Reuver M (2019) Digitalization, business models, and SMEs: How do business model innovation practices improve performance of digitalizing SMEs? Telecommun Policy 43(9):101828CrossRef

Brewis C, Dibb S, Meadows M (2023) Leveraging big data for strategic marketing: a dynamic capabilities model for incumbent firms. Technol Forecast Soc Ch 190:122402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122402CrossRef

Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1997) The art of continuous change: linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Adm Sci Q 42(1):1–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393807CrossRef

Brunetti F, Matt DT, Bonfanti A et al (2020) Digital transformation challenges: strategies emerging from a multi-stakeholder approach. TQM J 32:697–724. https://doi.org/10.1108/tqm-12-2019-0309CrossRef

Büyüközkan G, Güler M (2020) Analysis of companies digital maturity by hesitant fuzzy linguistic MCDM methods. J Intel Fuzzy Syst 38(1):1119–1132CrossRef

Calicchio N, Chui M, Grosman N (2018) Preparing Brazil for the future of work: jobs, technology, and skills| McKinsey and Company. www.mckinsey.com. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-organizations-and- Accessed 3 April 2020

Cao G, Duan Y, El Banna A (2019) A dynamic capability view of marketing analytics: evidence from UK firms. Ind Mark Manag 76:72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.08.002CrossRef

Caputo A, Pizzi S, Pellegrini MM, Dabić M (2021) Digitalization and business models: Where are we going? A science map of the field. J Bus Res 123:489–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.053CrossRef

Castelo-Branco I, Cruz-Jesus F, Oliveira T (2019) Assessing industry 4.0 readiness in manufacturing: evidence for the European union. Computers in industry, [online] 107, pp.22–32. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166361518304081 Accessed 23 May 2019

Chanias S, Myers MD, Hess T (2019) Digital transformation strategy making in pre-digital organizations: the case of a financial services provider. J Strateg Inf Syst 28(1):17–33CrossRef

Chesbrough HW (2003) Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, mass: Harvard business school press, print

Chirumalla K (2021) Building digitally-enabled process innovation in the process industries: a dynamic capabilities approach. Technovation 105:102256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102256CrossRef

Chonsawat N, Sopadang A (2020) Defining SMEs’ 4.0 readiness indicators. Appl Sci 10(24):8998CrossRef

Colli M, Berger U, Bockholt M, Madsen O, Møller C, Wæhrens BV (2019) A maturity assessment approach for conceiving context-specific roadmaps in the Industry 4.0 era. Annu Rev Control 48:165–177CrossRef

Crittenden AB, Crittenden VL, Crittenden WF (2019) The digitalization triumvirate: How incumbents survive. Bus Horiz 62(2):259–266CrossRef

De Carolis A, Macchi M, Negri E, Terzi S (2017) A maturity model for assessing the digital readiness of manufacturing companies. In: Advances in production management systems. The path to intelligent, collaborative and sustainable manufacturing, pp.13–20

Di Stefano G, Peteraf M, Verona G (2014) The Organizational drivetrain: a road to integration of dynamic capabilities research. Acad Manag Perspect 28:307–327. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0100CrossRef

Dijkman RM, Sprenkels B, Peeters T, Janssen, A (2015) Business models for the internet of things. International journal of information management, [online] 35(6), pp.672–678. Available at: https://is.ieis.tue.nl/staff/rdijkman/papers/Dijkman2015.pdf

Eisenhardt K, Martin J (2000) Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strateg Manag J 21(10/11):1105–1121CrossRef

Eling M, Lehmann M (2017) The impact of digitalization on the insurance value chain and the insurability of risks. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 43:359–396. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41288-017-0073-0CrossRef

Enkel E, Sagmeister V (2020) External corporate venturing modes as new way to develop dynamic capabilities. Technovation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102128CrossRef

Felin T, Foss NJ (2005) Strategic organization: a field in search of micro-foundations. Strateg Organ 3(4):441–455CrossRef

Felin T, Foss NJ, Ployhart RE (2015) The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory. Acad Manag Ann 9(1):575–632. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2015.1007651CrossRef

Fernández-Rovira C, Valdés JÁ, Molleví G, Nicolas-Sans R (2021) The digital transformation of business. Towards the datafication of the relationship with customers. Technol Forecast Soc Ch 162:120339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120339CrossRef

Feroz AK, Zo H, Eom J, Chiravuri A (2023) Identifying organizations’ dynamic capabilities for sustainable digital transformation: a mixed methods study. Technol Soc 73:102257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102257CrossRef

Ferreira J, Coelho A, Moutinho L (2020) Dynamic capabilities, creativity and innovation capability and their impact on competitive advantage and firm performance: the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Technovation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.11.004CrossRef

Ferreira JJM, Fernandes CI, Ferreira FAF (2019) To be or not to be digital, that is the question: firm innovation and performance. Journal of business research. [online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296318305642 Accessed 2 Mar 2019

Fitzgerald M, Kruschwitz N, Bonnet D, Welch M (2014) Embracing digital technology: a new strategic imperative. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 55(2):1

Fletcher G, Griffiths M (2020) Digital transformation during a lockdown. Int J Info Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102185CrossRef

Foss NJ, Saebi T (2016) Fifteen years of research on business model innovation. Journal of Management, [online] 43(1), pp.200–227. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316675927 Accessed 15 Oct 2019

Foss NJ, Linder S (2019). Microfoundations. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108685498CrossRef

Foss NJ, Pedersen T (2016) Microfoundations in strategy research. Strateg Manag J 37:22–34CrossRef

Foss NJ, Saebi T (2018) Business models and business model innovation: between wicked and paradigmatic problems. Long Range Plan 51(1):9–21CrossRef

Galaske N, Arndt A, Friedrich H, Bettenhausen KD, Anderl R (2017) Workforce management 4.0-assessment of human factors readiness towards digital manufacturing. In: Advances in ergonomics of manufacturing: managing the enterprise of the future, pp.106–115

Gatignon A, Capron L (2020) The firm as an architect of polycentric governance: building open institutional infrastructure in emerging markets. Strateg Manag J. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3124CrossRef

Gattringer R, Damm F, Kranewitter P, Wiener M (2021) Prospective collaborative sensemaking for identifying the potential impact of emerging technologies. Creat Innov Manag 30(3):651–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12432CrossRef

Gerring J (2009) Case selection for case-study analysis: qualitative and quantitative techniques. Oxford University Press, New York

Gibbert M, Ruigrok W (2010) The “‘What’” and “‘How’” of case study rigor: three strategies based on published work. Organ Res Methods 13:710–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109351319CrossRef

Gibbert M, Nair LB, Ruigrok W (2016) What passes as rigorous replication logic in management case study research? Acad Manag Proc 2016(1):14245. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2016.14245abstractCrossRef

Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2012) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research. Organ Res Methods 16(1):15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151CrossRef

Gökalp E, Şener U, Eren PE (2017) Development of an assessment model for industry 4.0: industry 4.0-MM. Communications in computer and information science, pp.128–142

Gong C, Ribiere V (2021) Developing a unified definition of digital transformation. Technovation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102217CrossRef

Grant R (1991) The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. Knowl Strategy 33(3):3–23

Grasser M, Schlaipfer V, Priedl R, Sorantin E (2018) Human based digital intelligence analyses for health care ecosystems. Studies Health Technol Info 251:211–214

Gürdür D, El-khoury J, Törngren M (2019) Digitalizing Swedish industry: What is next? Comput Ind 105:153–163CrossRef

Haarhaus T, Liening A (2020) Building dynamic capabilities to cope with environmental uncertainty: the role of strategic foresight. Technol Forecast Soc Ch 155:120033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120033CrossRef

Hallinger P (2013) A conceptual framework for systematic reviews of research in educational leadership and management. J Educ Adm 51(2):126–149CrossRef

Hanelt A, Bohnsack R, Marz D, Antunes C (2020) A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. J Manage Stud. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639CrossRef

Heinze Aleksej, Griffiths Marie, Fenton Alex, Fletcher Gordon (2018) Knowledge exchange partnership leads to digital transformation at hydro-X water treatment, Ltd. Glob Bus Organ Excell 37(4):6–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.21859SSSCrossRef

Heubeck T (2023) Managerial capabilities as facilitators of digital transformation? Dynamic managerial capabilities as antecedents to digital business model transformation and firm performance. Digit Bus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2023.100053CrossRef

Holbeche LS (2018) The agile organisation, 2nd edn. Kogan Page, London

Holmström J (2018) Recombination in digital innovation: challenges, opportunities, and the importance of a theoretical framework. Inf Organ 28(2):107–110CrossRef

Imgrund F, Fischer M, Janiesch C, Winkelmann A (2018) Approaching digitalization with business process management. Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2018

Isaev E, Korovkina N, Tabakova M (2018) Evaluation of the readiness of a company’s IT department for digital business transformation. Bus Info 2018(2):55–64CrossRef

Kane G (2019) The technology fallacy: people are the real key to digital transformation. Res Technol Manag 62(6):44–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2019.1661079CrossRef

Kane GC, Palmer D, Nguyen Phillips A, Kiron D, Buckle N (2018) Coming of age digitally. [online] MIT sloan management review. Available at: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/coming-of-age-digitally/

Khin S, Ho TC (2019) Digital technology, digital capability and organizational performance. Int J Innov Sci. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-08-2018-0083CrossRef

Kiel D, Arnold C, Voigt K-I (2017) The influence of the Industrial Internet of Things on business models of established manufacturing companies – A business level perspective. Technovation, [online] 68, pp.4–19. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497216303169 Accessed 14 May 2019

Kim SK, Min S (2015) Business model innovation performance: When does adding a new business model benefit an incumbent? Strateg Entrep J 9(1):34–57CrossRef

Kontić L, Vidicki Đ (2018) Strategy for digital organization: testing a measurement tool for digital transformation. Strategic Management 23(2):29–35CrossRef

Kozlowski S, Klein KJ (2000) A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: contextual, temporal, and emergence processes. In: Klein KJ, Kozlowski SW (eds) Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: foundations, extensions, and new directions. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 3–90

Lam C, Law R (2019) Readiness of upscale and luxury-branded hotels for digital transformation. Int J Hosp Manag 79:60–69CrossRef

Laubengaier DA, Cagliano R, Canterino F (2022) It takes two to tango: analyzing the relationship between technological and administrative process innovations in industry 4.0. Technol Forecast Soc Ch 180:121675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121675CrossRef

Leon De, Valdez O (2016) A digital maturity model for telecommunications service providers. Technol Innov Manag Rev 6(8):19–32CrossRef

Leso BH, Cortimiglia MN (2021) The influence of user involvement in information system adoption: an extension of TAM. Cogn Technol Work. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-021-00685-wCrossRef

Leso BH, Cortimiglia MN, ten Caten CS (2021) The influence of situational involvement on employees’ intrinsic involvement during is development. Bus Inf Syst Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-021-00719-7CrossRef

Leso BH, Cortimiglia MN, Ghezzi A (2022) The contribution of organizational culture, structure, and leadership factors in the digital transformation of SMEs: a mixed-methods approach. Cogn Technol Work. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-022-00714-2CrossRef

Leyh C, Martin S, Schäffer T (2018) Analyzing industry 4.0 models with focus on lean production aspects. information technology for management. Ongoing research and development, [online] pp.114–130. Available at: https://link.springer.com/chapter/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77721-4_7 Accessed 10 Nov 2019

Li F (2020) The digital transformation of business models in the creative industries: a holistic framework and emerging trends. Technovation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.12.004CrossRef

Li Y, Fei GZ (2023) Network embeddedness, digital transformation, and enterprise performance—the moderating effect of top managerial cognition. Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1098974CrossRef

Li L, Su F, Zhang W, Mao J-Y (2017) Digital transformation by SME entrepreneurs: a capability perspective. Inf Syst J 28(6):1129–1157. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12153CrossRef

Lin T-C, Sheng ML, Wang KJ (2020) Dynamic capabilities for smart manufacturing transformation by manufacturing enterprises. Asian J Technol Innov. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2020.1769486CrossRef

Linde L, Sjödin D, Parida V, Wincent J (2021) Dynamic capabilities for ecosystem orchestration a capability-based framework for smart city innovation initiatives. Technol Forecast Soc Ch 166:120614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120614CrossRef

Lindgreen A, Di Benedetto CA, Beverland MB (2020) How to write up case-study methodology sections. Ind Mark Manage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.04.012CrossRef

Llopis-Albert C, Rubio F, Valero F (2021) Impact of digital transformation on the automotive industry. Technol Forecast Soc Ch 162:120343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120343CrossRef

Manesh MF, Pellegrini MM, Marzi G, Dabic M (2020) Knowledge management in the fourth industrial revolution: mapping the literature and scoping future avenues. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 68(1):289–300CrossRef

Marcos JÁ, Hernández MC, Ortiz JIÁ (2019) The digital maturity of the Spanish press. A case study. Revista Latina Comun Soc 74:499–520

Matarazzo M, Penco L, Profumo G, Quaglia R (2021) Digital transformation and customer value creation in made in Italy SMES: a dynamic capabilities perspective. J Bus Res 123:642–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.033CrossRef

Matt C, Hess T, Benlian A (2015) Digital transformation strategies. Bus Inf Syst Eng 57(5):339–343CrossRef

Mazumder S, Garg S (2021) Decoding digital transformational outsourcing: the role of service providers’ capabilities. Int J Info Manag 58:102295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102295CrossRef

Mergel Ines, Edelmann Noella, Haug Nathalie (2019) Defining digital transformation: results from expert interviews. Govern Info Q 36(4):101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002CrossRef

Mettler T, Pinto R (2018) Evolutionary paths and influencing factors towards digital maturity: an analysis of the status quo in Swiss hospitals. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 133:104–117CrossRef

Nylén D, Holmström J (2015) Digital innovation strategy: a framework for diagnosing and improving digital product and service innovation. Bus Horiz 58(1):57–67CrossRef

Oliveira DT, Cortimiglia MN (2017) Value co-creation in web-based multisided platforms: a conceptual framework and implications for business model design. Bus Horiz 60(6):747–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.07.002CrossRef

Pacchini APT, Lucato WC, Facchini F, Mummolo G (2019) The degree of readiness for the implementation of Industry 4.0. Comput Ind 113:103125CrossRef

Pesch R, Endres H, Bouncken RB (2021) Digital product innovation management: balancing stability and fluidity through formalization. J Prod Innov Manag. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12609CrossRef

Peteraf M, Di Stefano G, Verona G (2013) The elephant in the room of dynamic capabilities: bringing two diverging conversations together. Strateg Manag J 34:1389–1410. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2078CrossRef

Pirola F, Cimini C, Pinto R (2020) Digital readiness assessment of Italian SMEs: a case-study research. J Manuf Technol Manag 31(5):1045–1083CrossRef

Poeppelbuss J, Roeglinger, M (2011) What makes a useful maturity model? A framework of general design principles for maturity models and its demonstration in business process management. In: 19th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2011

Porfírio JA, Carrilho T, Felício JA, Jardim J (2020) Leadership characteristics and digital transformation. J Bus Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.058CrossRef

Potrich L, Cortimiglia MN, de Medeiros JF (2019) A systematic literature review on firm-level proactive environmental management. J Environ Manage 243:273–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.110CrossRef

Pramanik HS, Kirtania M, Pani AK (2019) Essence of digital transformation—manifestations at large financial institutions from North America. Futur Gener Comput Syst 95(1):323–343CrossRef

Qiu Y, Bouncken RB, Arndt F, Ng W (2023) Microfoundations and dynamics of do-it-yourself ecosystems. Technol Forecast Soc Ch 193:122611CrossRef

Rafael LD, Jaione GE, Cristina L, Ibon SL (2020) An industry 4.0 maturity model for machine tool companies. Technol Forecast Soc Ch 159:120203CrossRef

Ramantoko G, Fatimah L, Pratiwi S, Kinasih K (2018) Measuring digital capability maturity: case of smallmedium Kampongdigital companies in Bandung. Pertanika J Soc Sci Human 26:215–230

Remane, G., Hanelt, A., Wiesböck, F. and Kolbe, L. (2017). DIGITAL MATURITY IN TRADITIONAL INDUSTRIES AN EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS. In: Proceedings of 25th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2017).

Saarikko T, Westergren UH, Blomquist T (2020) Digital transformation: five recommendations for the digitally conscious firm. Bus Horiz. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.07.005CrossRef

Santos RC, Martinho JL (2020) An Industry 4.0 maturity model proposal. J Manuf Technol Manag 31(5):1023–1043CrossRef

Schilke O, Hu S, Helfat CE (2018) Quo vadis, dynamic capabilities? A content-analytic review of the current state of knowledge and recommendations for future research. Academy of Management Annals, [online] 12(1), pp.390–439. Available at: https://www.oliverschilke.com/fileadmin/pdf/ Schilke_Hu_Helfat._Quo_Vadis_Dynamic_Capabilities.pdf Accessed 7 Dec 2019

Schuh G, Reiner A, Gausemeier J, ten Hompel M, Wahlster W, Eds (2017) Industrie 4.0 maturity index. Managing the digital transformation of companies (acatech STUDY). Herbert Utz Verlag, Munich

Schumacher A, Nemeth T, Sihn W (2019) Roadmapping towards industrial digitalization based on an Industry 4.0 maturity model for manufacturing enterprises. Procedia CIRP 79:409–414CrossRef

Scott IA, Sullivan C, Staib A (2019) Going digital: a checklist in preparing for hospital-wide electronic medical record implementation and digital transformation. Aust Health Rev 43(3):302CrossRef

Shahiduzzaman MD (2017) Digital business: towards a value centric maturity model. Part A. PWC chair in digital economy/Queensland University of Technology

Shakina E, Parshakov P, Alsufiev A (2021) Rethinking the corporate digital divide: the complementarity of technologies and the demand for digital skills. Technol Forecast Soc Ch 162:120405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120405CrossRef

Sinkovics N (2018) Pattern matching in qualitative analysis. In: Cassel C, Cunliffe A, Grandy G (eds) The sage handbook of qualitative business and management research methods. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 468–485

Sjödin DR, Parida V, Leksell M, Petrovic A (2018) Smart factory implementation and process innovation. Res Technol Manag 61(5):22–31CrossRef

Solarino AM, Aguinis H (2020) Challenges and best-practice recommendations for designing and conducting interviews with elite informants. J Manag Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12620CrossRef

Soluk Jonas, Kammerlander Nadine (2021) Digital transformation in family-owned mittelstand firms: a dynamic capabilities perspective. Eur J Info Syst. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085x.2020.1857666CrossRef

Soluk J, Decker-Lange C, Hack A (2023) Small steps for the big hit: a dynamic capabilities perspective on business networks and non-disruptive digital technologies in SMEs. Technol Forecast Soc Ch 191:122490CrossRef

Sousa MJ, Rocha Á (2019) Skills for disruptive digital business. J Bus Res 94:257–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.051CrossRef

Stoianova O, Lezina T, Ivanova V (2020) The framework for assessing company’s digital transformation readiness. St Petersburg Univ J Econ Studies 36(2):243–265CrossRef

Suddaby R, Coraiola D, Harvey C, Foster W (2020) History and the micro-foundations of dynamic capabilities. Strateg Manag J 41(3):530–556CrossRef

Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg Manag J 28(13):1319–1350CrossRef

Teece DJ (2014) The foundations of enterprise performance: dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms. Acad Manag Perspect 28(4):328–352CrossRef

Teece DJ, Pisano G. Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strat. Mgmt. J., [online] 18(7), pp.509–533. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)10970266(199708)18:7<509::AIDSMJ882 >3.0.CO;2Z Accessed 28 Mar 2020

Tekic Z, Koroteev D (2019) From disruptively digital to proudly analog: a holistic typology of digital transformation strategies. Bus Horizons 62(6):683–693CrossRef

Tilson D, Lyytinen K, Sørensen C (2010) Research commentary—digital infrastructures: the missing is research agenda. Inf Syst Res 21(4):748–759CrossRef

Torres R, Sidorova A, Jones MC (2018) Enabling firm performance through business intelligence and analytics: a dynamic capabilities perspective. Info Manag 55(7):822–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.03.010CrossRef

Tortora D, Chierici R, Farina Briamonte M, Tiscini R (2021) “I digitize so I exist”. Searching for critical capabilities affecting firms’ digital innovation. J Bus Res 129:193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.048CrossRef

Tranfield D, Denyer D, Smart P (2003) Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br J Manag 14(3):207–222CrossRef

Tronvoll B, Sklyar A, Sörhammar D, Kowalkowski C (2020) Transformational shifts through digital servitization. Ind Market Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.005CrossRef

Vaska S, Massaro M, Bagarotto EM, Dal Mas F (2021) The digital transformation of business model innovation: a structured literature review. Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.539363CrossRef

Verhoef PC, Broekhuizen T, Bart Y, Bhattacharya A, Dong JQ, Fabian N, Haenlein M (2021) Digital transformation: a multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. J Bus Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022CrossRef

Vial G (2019) Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda. J Strateg Inf Syst 28(2):118–144CrossRef

Wagire AA, Joshi R, Rathore APS, Jain R (2021) Development of maturity model for assessing the implementation of Industry 4.0: learning from theory and practice. Prod Plan Control 32(8):603–622CrossRef

Warner KS, Wäger M (2019) Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: an ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Plan 52(3):326–349CrossRef

Weill P, Stephanie W (2015) Thriving in an increasingly digital ecosystem. MIT sloan management review 56 (4). https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/thriving-in-an-increasingly-digital-ecosystem/

Westerman G, Tannou M, Bonnet D, Ferraris P, McAfee A (2012) The digital advantage: how digital leaders outperform their peers in every industry. MIT Sloan Capgemini Consult 2:2–23

Williams PA, Lovelock B, Cabarrus T, Harvey M (2019) Improving digital hospital transformation: development of an outcomes-based infrastructure maturity assessment framework. JMIR Med Inform 7(1):e12465CrossRef

Yeow A, Soh C, Hansen R (2018) Aligning with new digital strategy: a dynamic capabilities approach. J Strateg Inf Syst 27(1):43–58CrossRef

Zaheer H, Breyer Y, Dumay J, Enjeti M (2022) The entrepreneurial journeys of digital start-up founders. Technol Forecast Soc Ch 179:121638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121638CrossRef

Zangiacomi A, Pessot E, Fornasiero R et al (2019) Moving towards digitalization: a multiple case study in manufacturing. Prod Plan Control 31:143–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1631468CrossRef

Titel: Exploring digital transformation capability via a blended perspective of dynamic capabilities and digital maturity: a pattern matching approach
verfasst von: Bernardo Henrique Leso
Marcelo Nogueira Cortimiglia
Antonio Ghezzi
Vinicius Minatogawa
Publikationsdatum: 12.09.2023
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Review of Managerial Science / Ausgabe 4/2024
Print ISSN: 1863-6683
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-6691
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00692-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2024

Betting on the future: how to build antifragility in innovative start-up companies

Family ownership and control as drivers for environmental, social, and governance in family firms

The GenAI is out of the bottle: generative artificial intelligence from a business model innovation perspective

The social mission works: internalizing the mission to achieve organizational performance in social enterprises

Unlocking the connection between education, entrepreneurial mindset, and social values in entrepreneurial activity development

Zombie firms and corporate financialization: evidence from China

Premium Partner