nach oben

Erschienen in:

23.02.2024 | Original Research

Fabrication and characterizations of electrospun cellulose/CeO₂ nanocomposite membranes

verfasst von: Aeakartit Boonprasertpoh, Prin Chantarangkul, Satita Thiangtham, Boonyarach Kitiyanan, Pirom Noisumdaeng, Jatuphorn Wootthikanokkhan, Vissanu Meeyoo

Erschienen in: Cellulose | Ausgabe 5/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Nanocomposite membranes based on electrospun-cellulose (EC) composites combined with cerium oxide (CeO₂) nanoparticles (NPs) were fabricated by electrospinning using cellulose acetate (CA) as a precursor. CeO₂ NPs were initially synthesized via cellulose nitrate template. After removing the template and any residual by calcination at 500 °C, the nanocubic CeO₂ NPs were obtained with average sizes of 20.40 ± 3.8 nm and then incorporated into cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) by mixing with CA solution. Subsequently, the obtained CA/CeO₂ nanocomposite membrane was formed via the electrospinning and then converted to the EC/CeO₂ nanocomposite membrane by being treated with a NaOH ethanolic solution. FTIR analysis confirmed the stepwise conversion of the acetyl group in CA structure to the hydroxyl groups of cellulose. The fabricated nanocomposite membranes characterized via FE-SEM and AFM, evaluating that the addition of CeO₂ NPs incorporated into the fabricated CNFs resulted in changing their average fiber diameter without the exfoliation of CeO₂ NPs. The average fiber diameter of the EC and EC/CeO₂ nanocomposite membranes with 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 wt% CeO₂ contents was estimated to be 206 ± 66, 189 ± 47, 178 ± 52, and 147 ± 108 nm, respectively. However, it was observed that, at 1.5 wt% of CeO₂ NP contents, the bead-like formation appeared, leading to enhancement of water uptake capacities up to 260.11 ± 15.93%, meanwhile the EC membrane exhibited the water uptake capacities of 203.77 ± 11.11%. In addition, the antibacterial activity of EC nanocomposite membranes was conducted against Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and Escherichia coli (E. coli). The results indicated that incorporating CeO₂ NPs into the CNF matrix via electrospinning does not exhibit the distinct antibacterial activities of EC. The effect of the CeO₂ NPs incorporated in EC nanocomposite membranes was further discussed.

Graphical abstract

Vorheriger Artikel Preparation of fibroblast growth factor 2-incorporated carboxymethyl cellulose nanoparticles for tissue repair and regeneration

Nächster Artikel 3D printed anti-swelling hydrogel scaffold with dialdehyde cellulose nanocrystals

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Abebe B, Zereffa EA, Tadesse A, Murthy HCA (2020) A review on enhancing the antibacterial activity of ZnO: mechanisms and microscopic investigation. Nanoscale Res Lett 15(1):190. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-020-03418-6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Abramova AV, Abramov VO, Fedulov IS, Baranchikov AE, Kozlov DA, Veselova VO, Kameneva SV, Ivanov VK, Cravotto G (2021) Strong antibacterial properties of cotton fabrics coated with ceria nanoparticles under high-power ultrasound. Nanomaterials 11(10):2704. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11102704CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ahmad R, Mohsin M, Ahmad T, Sardar M (2015) Alpha amylase assisted synthesis of TiO₂ nanoparticles: structural characterization and application as antibacterial agents. J Hazard Mater 283:171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.08.073CrossRefPubMed

Ahmad A, Javed MS, Khan S, Almutairi TM, Mohammed AAA, Luque R (2023) Green synthesized Ag decorated CeO₂ nanoparticles: efficient photocatalysts and potential antibacterial agents. Chemosphere 310:136841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136841CrossRefPubMed

Ansari MA, Khan HM, Khan AA, Pal R, Cameotra SS (2013) Antibacterial potential of Al₂O₃ nanoparticles against multidrug resistance strains of Staphylococcus aureus isolated fromskin exudates. J Nanopart Res 15:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-1970-1CrossRef

Araldi da Silva B, de Sousa CR, Valério A, De Noni JA, Hotza D, Gómez González SY (2021) Electrospinning of cellulose using ionic liquids: an overview on processing and applications. Eur Polym J 147:110283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110283CrossRef

Baig N, Kammakakam I, Falath W (2021) Nanomaterials: a review of synthesis methods, properties, recent progress, and challenges. Mater Adv 2(6):1821–1871. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0MA00807ACrossRef

Bandyopadhyay S, Peralta-Videa JR, Plascencia-Villa G, José-Yacamán M, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2012) Comparative toxicity assessment of CeO₂ and ZnO nanoparticles towards Sinorhizobium meliloti, a symbiotic alfalfa associated bacterium: use of advanced microscopic and spectroscopic techniques. J Hazard Mater 241:379–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.09.056CrossRefPubMed

Bose S, Roy M, Bandyopadhyay A (2012) Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends Biotechnol 30(10):546–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.005CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cacicedo ML, Castro MC, Servetas I, Bosnea L, Boura K, Tsafrakidou P, Dima A, Terpou A, Koutinas A, Castro GR (2016) Progress in bacterial cellulose matrices for biotechnological applications. Bioresource Technol 213:172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.071CrossRef

Dincă V, Mocanu A, Isopencu G, Busuioc C, Brajnicov S, Vlad A, Icriverzi M, Roseanu A, Dinescu M, Stroescu M (2020) Biocompatible pure ZnO nanoparticles-3D bacterial cellulose biointerfaces with antibacterial properties. Arab J Chem 13(1):3521–3533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2018.12.003CrossRef

El-Din TAS, Elzatahry AA, Aldeyab SS, Kamoun EA (2012) Preparation and characterization of water-absorbing composite membrane for medical applications. Afr J Biotechnol 11(66):13058–13064. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB12.707CrossRef

French AD (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 21(2):885–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0030-4CrossRef

French AD (2017) Glucose, not cellobiose, is the repeating unit of cellulose and why that is important. Cellulose 24(11):4605–4609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1450-3CrossRef

Garnier B, Boudenne A (2016) Use of hollow metallic particles for the thermal conductivity enhancement and lightening of filled polymer. Polym Degrad Stabil 127:113–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.11.026CrossRef

Gudkov SV, Burmistrov DE, Serov DA, Rebezov MB, Semenova AA, Lisitsyn AB (2021) A mini review of antibacterial properties of ZnO nanoparticles. Aip Conf Proc 9:641481. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2021.641481CrossRef

Hu W, Chen S, Zhou B, Wang H (2010) Facile synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles based on bacterial cellulose. Mater Sci Eng B 170(1):88–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2010.02.034CrossRef

Huang Z-M, Zhang YZ, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S (2003) A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 63(15):2223–2253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00178-7CrossRef

Ibrahim NA, Nada AA, Hassabo AG, Eid BM, Noor El-Deen AM, Abou-Zeid NY (2017) Effect of different capping agents on physicochemical and antimicrobial properties of ZnO nanoparticles. Chem Pep 71(7):1365–1375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-017-0132-9CrossRef

Janpetch N, Saito N, Rujiravanit R (2016) Fabrication of bacterial cellulose-ZnO composite via solution plasma process for antibacterial applications. Carbohyd Polym 148:335–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.066CrossRef

Jatoi AW, Kim IS, Ni QQ (2019) A comparative study on synthesis of AgNPs on cellulose nanofibers by thermal treatment and DMF for antibacterial activities. Mater Sci Eng C 98:1179–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.017CrossRef

Jones DE, Turcott R, Acheson B, Kwok QS, Vachon M (2003) The thermal decomposition of nitrocellulose. Canada N. p. Web

Kalaycıoğlu Z, Kahya N, Adımcılar V, Kaygusuz H, Torlak E, Akın-Evingür G, Erim FB (2020) Antibacterial nano cerium oxide/chitosan/cellulose acetate composite films as potential wound dressing. Eur Polym J 133:109777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109777CrossRef

Kalwar K, Hu L, Li D-L, Shan D (2018) AgNPs incorporated on deacetylated electrospun cellulose nanofibers and their effect on the antimicrobial activity. Polym Adv Technol 29(1):394–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.4127CrossRef

Katepetch C, Rujiravanit R, Tamura H (2013) Formation of nanocrystalline ZnO particles into bacterial cellulose pellicle by ultrasonic-assisted in situ synthesis. Cellulose 20(3):1275–1292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-9892-8CrossRef

Kim I-S, Baek M, Choi S-J (2010) Comparative cytotoxicity of Al₂O₃, CeO₂, TiO₂ and ZnO nanoparticles to human lung cells. J Nanosci Nanotechno 10(5):3453–3458. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2010.2340CrossRef

Li S, Wang X, Guo Y, Hu J, Lin S, Tu Y, Chen L, Ni Y, Huang L (2022) Recent advances on cellulose-based nanofiltration membranes and their applications in drinking water purification: a review. J Clean Prod 333:130171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130171CrossRef

Liyanage S, Acharya S, Parajuli P, Shamshina JL, Abidi N (2021) Production and surface modification of cellulose bioproducts. Polymer 13(19):343. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13193433CrossRef

Lu Z, Mao C, Meng M, Liu S, Tian Y, Yu L, Sun B, Li CM (2014) Fabrication of CeO₂ nanoparticle-modified silk for UV protection and antibacterial applications. J Colloid Interf Sci 435:8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2014.08.015CrossRef

Masadeh MM, Karasneh GA, Al-Akhras MA, Albiss BA, Aljarah KM, Al-Azzam SI, Alzoubi KH (2015) Cerium oxide and iron oxide nanoparticles abolish the antibacterial activity of ciprofloxacin against gram positive and gram negative biofilm bacteria. Cytotechnology 67:427–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-014-9701-8CrossRefPubMed

Mousa HM, Abdal-Hay A, Bartnikowski M, Mohamed IM, Yasin AS, Ivanovski S, Park CH, Kim CS (2018) A multifunctional zinc oxide/poly (lactic acid) nanocomposite layer coated on magnesium alloys for controlled degradation and antibacterial function. ACS Biomater-Sci Eng 4(6):2169–2180. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00277CrossRefPubMed

Nath B, Chaliha C, Kalita E, Kalita M (2016) Synthesis and characterization of ZnO: CeO₂: nanocellulose: PANI bionanocomposite. A bimodal agent for arsenic adsorption and antibacterial action. Carbohyd Polym 148:397–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.03.091CrossRef

Petersen N, Gatenholm P (2011) Bacterial cellulose-based materials and medical devices: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biot 91(5):1277–1286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3432-yCrossRef

Prasanna SRVS, Balaji K, Pandey S, Rana S (2019) Metal oxide based nanomaterials and their polymer nanocomposites. In: Karak N (ed) Nanomaterials and polymer nanocomposites. Elsevier, pp 123–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814615-6.00004-7CrossRef

Quan Z, Wang Y, Wu J, Qin X, Yu J (2021) Preparation and characterization of electrospun cellulose acetate sub-micro fibrous membranes. Text Res J 91(21–22):2540–2550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00405175211011772CrossRef

Rauf MA, Owais M, Rajpoot R, Ahmad F, Khan N, Zubair S (2017) Biomimetically synthesized ZnO nanoparticles attain potent antibacterial activity against less susceptible S. aureus skin infection in experimental animals. RSC Adv 7(58):36361–36373. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA05040BCrossRef

Saito T, Kuramae R, Wohlert J, Berglund LA, Isogai A (2013) An ultrastrong nanofibrillar biomaterial: the strength of single cellulose nanofibrils revealed via sonication-induced fragmentation. Biomacromol 14(1):248–253. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm301674eCrossRef

Savina IN, English CJ, Whitby RLD, Zheng Y, Leistner A, Mikhalovsky SV, Cundy AB (2011) High efficiency removal of dissolved As(III) using iron nanoparticle-embedded macroporous polymer composites. J Hazard Mater 192(3):1002–1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.06.003CrossRefPubMed

Scherrer P (1918) Bestimmung der Grosse und inneren Struktur von Kolloidteilchen mittels Rontgenstrahlen. Nach Ges Wiss Gottingen 2:8–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-33915-2_7CrossRef

Shah V, Shah S, Shah H, Rispoli FJ, McDonnell KT, Workeneh S, Karakoti A, Kumar A, Seal S (2012) Antibacterial activity of polymer coated cerium oxide nanoparticles. PLoS ONE 7(10):47827. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047827CrossRef

Shaheen TI, Capron I (2021) Formulation of re-dispersible dry o/w emulsions using cellulose nanocrystals decorated with metal/metal oxide nanoparticles. RSC Adv 11(51):32143–32151. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RA06054FCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Singh G, Joyce EM, Beddow J, Mason TJ (2012) Evaluation of antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticles coated sonochemically onto textile fabrics. J Microbiol Biotechnol Food Sci 2(1):106–120

Sofi HS, Akram T, Shabir N, Vasita R, Jadhav AH, Sheikh FA (2021) Regenerated cellulose nanofibers from cellulose acetate: incorporating hydroxyapatite (HAp) and silver (Ag) nanoparticles (NPs), as a scaffold for tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C 118:111547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111547CrossRef

Soleimani S, Heydari A, Fattahi M (2022) Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from waste cotton fibers using sulfuric acid hydrolysis. Starch – Stärke 74(11–12):2200159. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.202200159CrossRef

Sonia S, Jayasudha R, Jayram ND, Kumar PS, Mangalaraj D, Prabagaran SR (2016) Synthesis of hierarchical CuO nanostructures: Biocompatible antibacterial agents for Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Curr Appl Phys 16(8):914–921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2016.05.006CrossRef

Suo B, Li H, Wang Y, Li Z, Pan Z, Ai Z (2017) Effects of ZnO nanoparticle-coated packaging film on pork meat quality during cold storage. J Sci Food Agr 97(7):2023–2029. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8003CrossRef

Syed A, Yadav LSR, Bahkali AH, Elgorban AM, Abdul Hakeem D, Ganganagappa N (2020) Effect of CeO₂–ZnO nanocomposite for photocatalytic and antibacterial activities. Crystals 10(9):817. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10090817CrossRef

Tarus BK, Mwasiagi JI, Fadel N, Al-Oufy A, Elmessiry M (2019) Electrospun cellulose acetate and poly (vinyl chloride) nanofiber mats containing silver nanoparticles for antifungi packaging. SN Appl Sci 1:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0271-4CrossRef

Thiangtham S, Runt J, Manuspiya H (2019) Sulfonation of dialdehyde cellulose extracted from sugarcane bagasse for synergistically enhanced water solubility. Carbohyd Polym 208:314–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.080CrossRef

Wang S, Hou W, Wei L, Jia H, Liu X, Xu B (2007) Antibacterial activity of nano-SiO₂ antibacterial agent grafted on wool surface. Sur Coat Tech 202(3):460–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.06.012CrossRef

Wasim M, Khan MR, Mushtaq M, Naeem A, Han M, Wei Q (2020) Surface modification of bacterial cellulose by copper and zinc oxide sputter coating for UV-resistance/antistatic/antibacterial characteristics. Coatings. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10040364CrossRef

Xavier JR (2023) Influence of surface modified mixed metal oxide nanoparticles on the electrochemical and mechanical properties of polyurethane matrix. Front Chem Sci Eng 17(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-022-2176-9CrossRef

Xue J, Wu T, Dai Y, Xia Y (2019) Electrospinning and electrospun nanofibers: methods, materials, and applications. Chem Rev 119(8):5298–5415. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00593CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Yang X, Liu Y, Li J, Zhang Y (2019) Effects of calcination temperature on morphology and structure of CeO₂ nanofibers and their photocatalytic activity. Mater Lett 241:76–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.01.006CrossRef

Yarin AL, Koombhongse S, Reneker DH (2001) Taylor cone and jetting from liquid droplets in electrospinning of nanofibers. J Appl Phys 90(9):4836–4846. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1408260CrossRef

Zare Y, Rhee KY, Hui D (2017) Influences of nanoparticles aggregation/agglomeration on the interfacial/interphase and tensile properties of nanocomposites. Compos B Eng 122:41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.04.008CrossRef

Titel: Fabrication and characterizations of electrospun cellulose/CeO2 nanocomposite membranes
verfasst von: Aeakartit Boonprasertpoh
Prin Chantarangkul
Satita Thiangtham
Boonyarach Kitiyanan
Pirom Noisumdaeng
Jatuphorn Wootthikanokkhan
Vissanu Meeyoo
Publikationsdatum: 23.02.2024
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Cellulose / Ausgabe 5/2024
Print ISSN: 0969-0239
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-882X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-024-05788-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Graphical abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2024

Facile preparation of CuS microspheres-based superhydrophobic paper with self-cleaning, high chemical stability, and photothermal effect enhanced separation of oil/water mixtures and emulsions

The multifunctional flexible conductive viscose fabric prepared by thiol modification followed by copper plating

Reversible wettability control of self-assembled TiO2 scaffolds on bacterial cellulose from superhydrophobicity to superhydrophilicity

Influence on the structure and the molecular mobility of cellulose–diamine complexes studied by a multiscale experimental approach

Structural changes during heterogeneous sulfation and following homogenization of cotton cellulose

Fractionation of wood due to industrial chipping: effects and potential for Kraft pulping of European spruce