Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Strength of Materials
Erschienen in: Strength of Materials 1/2014

01.01.2014

Fracture Resistance of Sheet Metals and Thin-Wall Structures. Part 1. Critical Review

verfasst von: V. P. Naumenko, I. V. Limanskii

Erschienen in: Strength of Materials | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper considers the basic principles of the most widespread methods for determining typical states of a mode I through crack in specimens and structures of sheet metals that are fractured under conditions close to the plane stress state. The results of experimental investigations are presented which make it possible to judge of the relative advantages and disadvantages of these methods from the standpoint of their possible use in engineering assessments of the integrity and remaining strength of thin-wall structures.
Vorheriger Artikel The Influence of Inelastic Resistance on Vibrations of an Elastic Body with a Closing Crack under the Main and Subharmonic Resonances
Nächster Artikel Thermal Fatigue Fracture Criteria of Single Crystal Heat-Resistant Alloys and Methods for Identification of Their Parameters

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
A. A. Griffith, “The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, 221A, 163–198 (1921).CrossRef
2.
SINTAP. EU-Project BE 95-1462: Final Report, Brite Euram Programme, Brussels (1999).
3.
W. Kocak, S. Webster, J. J. Janosc, et al. (Eds). FITNET Fitness-for-Service (FFS) Procedure, GKSS Research Centre, ISBN 978-3-940923-00-4 (2008), Vol. 1, Revision MK8.
4.
R6. Assessment of the Integrity of Structures Containing Defects, Report R6, Revision 4, with Amendment 7, British Energy Generation, Gloucecter, UK (2009).
5.
API 579. Recommended Practice for Fitness-for-Service, API, Washington, D.C. (2000).
6.
M. Schödel, U. Zerbst, and C. Dalle Donne, “Application of the European flaw assessment procedure SINTAP to thin wall structures subjected to biaxial and mixed mode loadings,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 73, 626–642 (2006).CrossRef
7.
U. Zerbst, A. Pempe, I. Scheider, et al. “Proposed extension of the SINTAP/FITNET thin wall option based on a simple method for reference load determination,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 76, 74–87 (2009).CrossRef
8.
ISO-27306. Metallic Materials – Method of Constraint Loss Correction of CTOD Fracture Toughness for Fracture Assessment of Steel Components, International Organization for Standardization (2009).
9.
E561-92a. Standard Practice for R-Curve Determination, ASTM Standard (1992).
10.
E1820-01. Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness, ASTM Standard (2001).
11.
E8M-93. Standard Test Method for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, ASTM Standard (1993).
12.
ISO 6892-1998(E). Metallic Materials – Tensile Testing at Ambient Temperature, ISO Standard (1998).
13.
G. S. Pisarenko, V. P. Naumenko, and G. S. Volkov, “Effect of plastic constraint on the fracture toughness of ductile steels,” Strength Mater., 9, No. 11, 1325–1332 (1977).CrossRef
14.
G. S. Pisarenko, V. P. Naumenko, and G. S. Volkov, Determination of Material Fracture Toughness Based on the Energy Contour Integral [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1978).
15.
G. S. Pisarenko and V. P. Naumenko, “Experimental methods of material fracture mechanics,” Fiz.-Khim. Mekh. Mater., No. 2, 28–41 (1982).
16.
G. S. Pisarenko, V. P. Naumenko, and Å. Å. Onishchenko, Elasto-Plastic Mode I Fracture Mode I Fracture of Thin-Sheet Steel under Biaxial Loading [in Russian], Preprint, Institute of Problems of Strength, Academy of Sciences of UkrSSR, Kiev (1983).
17.
V. P. Naumenko and A. I. Semenets, Fracture Toughness and Strength of Large-Scale Plates of Aluminum Alloys [in Russian], Preprint, Institute of Problems of Strength, Academy of Sciences of UkrSSR, Kiev (1990).
18.
V. P. Naumenko and V. A. Rakovsky, “Crack growth onset in biaxially loaded elasto-plastic plates,” in: J. C. Blouel and K.-H. Schwalbe (Eds.), Defect Assessment in Components – Fundamentals and Applications (ESIS/ECF9), London (1991), pp. 363–377.
19.
V. P. Naumenko, “The Griffith problem and Mode I fracture in tension and compression,” Fiz.-Khim. Mekh. Mater., No. 4, 75–86 (1993).
20.
V. P. Naumenko and O. Kolednik, “Load biaxiality effects on the fracture resistance of thin steel plates,” in: Structural Integrity: Experiments, Models and Applications, Berlin (1994), pp. 911–917.
21.
V. P. Naumenko, O. Kolednik, N. P. O’Dowd, et al. “Transferability of plane-stress R-curves: effect of specimen size and crack length,” in: M. W. Brown, E. R. de los Rois, and K. J. Miller (Eds.), Fracture from Defects (Proc. of the ECF12), Vol. 2 (1998), pp. 631–636.
22.
V. P. Naumenko, O. Kolednik, N. P. O’Dowd, and G. S. Volkov, “Effect of constraint on resistance to stable crack growth in thin aluminium plates,” in: V. T. Troshchenko (Ed.), Life Assessment and Management for Structural Components, Vol. 1, Kiev (2000), pp. 299–304.
23.
V. P. Naumenko, “Single-parameter prediction of stable crack growth in large-scale panels,” in: A. Neimitz, I. V. Rokach, D. Kocanda, and K. Golos (Eds.), Proc. of the Fourteenth Europ. Conf. on Fracture, EMAS, Vol. 2, Sheffield (2002), pp. 543–550.
24.
V. P. Naumenko and G. S. Volkov, “Engineering assessment of tear cracks in large-scale panels from thin-sheet aluminium,” in: Proc. of the 6th Int. Conf. on Engineering Structural Integrity Assessment, Manchester (2002).
25.
V. P. Naumenko and G. S. Volkov, “Assessment of plane stress tearing in terms of various crack driving parameters,” in: S. R. Daniewicz, J. C. Newman and K.-H. Schwalbe (Eds.), Proc. of the ASTM-ESIS Conf. on Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics, ASTM STP 1461, West Conshohocken, PA (2003).
26.
G. S. Pisarenko, V. P. Naumenko, and V. M. Stepkov, “Results of an experimental investigation of fracture kinetics and crack resistance of brittle materials,” Strength Mater., 16, No. 12, 1694–1701 (1984).CrossRef
27.
V. P. Naumenko and O. V. Mitchenko, “Brittle fracture of a sheet with a hole in compression,” Strength Mater., 17, No. 7, 890–900 (1985).CrossRef
28.
G. S. Pisarenko, V. P. Naumenko, and N. I. Nedelchev, “Crack resistance of brittle materials. What is it?” Strength Mater., 17, No. 11, 1497–1506 (1985).CrossRef
29.
V. P. Naumenko and A. L. Maistrenko, “Determination of fracture toughness of brittle nonmetallic materials,” Zavod. Lab., No. 4, 63–70 (1985).
30.
G. S. Pisarenko, V. P. Naumenko, and V. M. Stepkov, “Brittle fracture under uniaxial and biaxial loading,” in: Strength of Materials and Structural Elements under a Complex Stress State [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1986), pp. 196–201.
31.
V. P. Naumenko, “Determination of fracture toughness for brittle nonmetallic materials at the subcritical crack growth stage,” J. Test. Eval., 14, No. 2, 76–80 (1986).CrossRef
32.
V. P. Naumenko, “Modelling of brittle fracture in tension and compression,” in: Fracture Processes in Concrete, Rock, and Ceramics, Proc. Int. RILEM/ESIS Conference (1991), pp. 183–192.
33.
V. P. Naumenko, “Macrocrack initiation and growth in compression and tension,” Fiz.-Khim. Mekh. Mater., No. 5, 62–66 (1991).
34.
V. P. Naumenko, Yu. D. Skrypnyk, and N. I. Nedelchev, “Constraint-dependent fracture toughness of glass and PMMA,” in: Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Fracture, Turin (2005), pp. 71–76.
35.
A. L. Hizer, “Specimen size effect on J-R curves for RPV steels,” in: ASTM STP 1171 (1993), pp. 195–238.
36.
J. D Landes, “Extrapolation of the J-R curve for predicting reactor pressure vessel integrity,” in: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report NUREG/CR-5650 (1992).
37.
A. L Hizer, G. B. Terrel, and W. A. van der Sluys, “Size effect on j-r curves for A302-B plate,” in: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report NUREG/CR-5265 (1989).
38.
Lin Xia, C. F. Shih, and J. W. Hutchinson, “A computational approach to ductile crack growth under large scale yielding conditions,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 43, 389–413 (1995).CrossRef
39.
T. Pardoen and J. W. Hutchinson, “An extended model for void growth and coalescence,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 48, 2467–2512 (2000).CrossRef
40.
“RILEM Draft Recommendation. Determination of fracture energy of mortar and concrete by means of three-point bend tests on notched beams,” Mater. Struct., 18, 286–290 (1985).
41.
V. Tvergaard and J. W. Hutchinson, “The relation between crack growth resistance and fracture process parameters in elastic-plastic solids,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 40, 1377–1397 (1992).CrossRef
42.
Y. Wey, X. Qiu, and K. C. Hwang, “Steady-state crack growth and fracture work based on the theory of mechanism-based strain gradient plasticity,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 71, 107–125 (2004).CrossRef
43.
S. Xu and X. Zhang, “Determination of fracture parameters for crack propagation in concrete using energy approach,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 75, 4292–4308 (2008).CrossRef
44.
Hu X. and F. Wittman, “Size effect on toughness induced by crack close to free surface,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 65, 209–221 (2000).
45.
J. D. G. Sumpter, “An alternative view of R curve testing,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 64, 161–176 (1999).CrossRef
46.
J. D. G. Sumpter, “The energy dissipation rate approach to tearing instability,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 71, 17–37 (2004).CrossRef
47.
J. D. G. Sumpter, “Size effects in tearing instability: An analysis based on energy dissipation rate,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 74, 2352–2374 (2007).CrossRef
48.
B. Cotterell and A. G. Atkins, “A review of the J and I integrals and their implications for crack growth resistance and toughness in ductile fracture,” Int. J. Fract., 81, No. 4, 357–372 (1996).CrossRef
49.
S. G. Larsson and A. J. Carlsson, “Influence of non-singular stress terms and specimen geometry on small-scale yielding at crack tips in elastic-plastic materials,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 22, No. 4, 263–277 (1973).CrossRef
50.
J. R. Rice, “Limitations to the small scale yielding approximation for crack tip plasticity,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 22, No. 1, 17–26 (1974).CrossRef
51.
P. C. Leevers and J. C. Radon, “Inherent stress biaxiality in various fracture specimen geometries,” Int. J. Fract., 19, No. 4, 311–323 (1982).CrossRef
52.
T. L. Anderson, “Crack tip parameters for large scale yielding and low constraint configurations,” Int. J. Fract., 41, 79–104 (1989).CrossRef
53.
A. M. Al-Ani and S. W. Hancock, “J-dominance of short crack in tension and bending,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 39, 23–43 (1991).CrossRef
54.
N. P. O’Dowd and C. F. Shih, “Family of crack-tip fields characterized by a triaxiality parameter. I. Structure of fields,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 39, 989–1015 (1991).CrossRef
55.
N. P. O’Dowd and C. F. Shih, “Family of crack-tip fields characterized by triaxiality parameter. II. Fracture applications,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 40, 939–963 (1992).CrossRef
56.
Y. J. Chao, S. Yang, and M. A. Sutton, “On the fracture of solids characterized by one or two parameters: Theory and practice,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 42, 629–647 (1994).CrossRef
57.
N. P. O’Dowd, O. Kolednik, and V. P. Naumenko, “Elastic-plastic analysis of biaxially loaded centercracked plates,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 36, 5639–5661 (1999).CrossRef
58.
M. Schödel and U. Zerbst, “Application of the European flaw assessment procedure SINTAP to thin wall structures,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 71, 1035–1058 (2004).CrossRef
59.
K.-H. Schwalbe, J. C. Newman, Jr., and J. Shannon, Jr., “Fracture mechanics testing on specimens with low constraint-standardization activities within ISO and ASTM,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 72, 557–576 (2005).CrossRef
60.
E2472-06. Standard Test Method for Determination of Resistance to Stable Crack Extension under Low-Constraint Conditions, ASTM Standard (2007).
61.
ISO 22889. Metallic Materials – Method of Test for the Determination of Resistance to Stable Crack Extension Using Specimens of Low Constraint, International Standard (2007).
62.
B. R Seshadri., J. C. Newman, Jr., and D. C. Dawicke, “Residual strength analyses of stiffened and unstiffened panels,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 70, 509–524 (2003).
63.
R. W. Hampton and D. Nelson, “Stable crack growth and instability prediction in thin plates and cylinders,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 70, 469–491 (2003).CrossRef
64.
D. L. Rudland, G. M. Wilkowski, Z. Feng, et al., “Experimental investigation of CTOA in line-pipe steels,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 70, 567–577 (2003).CrossRef
65.
Ph. P. Darcis, C. N. McCowan, H. Windhoff, et al., “Crack tip opening angle optical measurement methods in five pipe-line steels,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 75, 2453–2468 (2008).CrossRef
66.
S. Xu, W. R. Tyson, and R. Bouchard, “Experimental validation of simplified single-specimen CTOA method for DWTT specimens,” in: Proc. 12th Int. Conf. on Fracture, Paper T35.018, Ottawa (2009).
67.
V. P. Naumenko, S. V. Lenzion, and I. V. Limansky, “Displacement-based assessment of ductile tearing under low-constraint conditions,” The Open Mech. Eng. J., 2, 40–59 (2008).CrossRef
68.
J. Eftis and H. Liebowitz, “On the modified Westergaard equations for certain plane crack problems,” Int. J. Fract. Mech., 8, No. 4, 383–392 (1972).
69.
J. Schijve, “Some considerations on the Eftis–Liebowitz equation for the COD compliance of a center cracked sheet specimen,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 55, No. 3, 341–346 (1996).CrossRef
70.
K.-H. Schwalbe, “Introduction of δ5 as an operational definition of the CTOD and its practical use,” in: ASTM STP 1256, Fract. Mech., 26, 763–778 (1995).
71.
C. E. Turner, “A re-assessment of ductile tearing resistance (Pts. I and II),” in: Fracture Behaviour and Design of Materials and Structures (Proc. ECF 8), Vol. 2 (1990), pp. 933–968.
72.
C. E. Turner and L. Braga, “Energy dissipation rate and COA analyses of fully plastic ductile tearing,” in: ASTM STP 1171 (1993), pp. 158–175.
73.
C. E. Turner and O. Kolednik, “A micro and macro approach to the energy dissipation rate model of stable ductile crack growth,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 17, 1089–1107 (1994).CrossRef
74.
W. Brocks and T. Siegmund, “Effect of geometry and material on the energy dissipation rate,” in: Fracture Mechanics: Application and Challenges (Proc. ECF 13, Sept. 6–9, 2000), San Sebastian (2000).
75.
T. Siegmund and W. Brocks, “Modelling crack growth in thin-sheet aluminium alloys,” in: ASTM STP 1389, Fatigue Fract. Mech., 31, 475–485 (2000).CrossRef
76.
V. P. Naumenko and I. V. Limansky, “Energy-based assessment of ductile tearing in a thin sheet aluminium alloy,” Proc. Eng., 1, Issue 1, 63–66 (2009).CrossRef
77.
V. P. Naumenko, “Through-life assessment of ductile tearing under low-constraint conditions,” in: Proc. 12th Int. Conf. on Fracture, Ottawa (2009).
78.
B. Cotterell and J. K. Reddel, “The essential work of plane stress ductile fracture,” Int. J. Fract., 13, 267–277 (1977).
79.
J. G. Williams and M. Rink, “The standardization of the EWF test,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 74, 1009–1017 (2007).CrossRef
80.
A. Ya. Krasovskii, V. M. Torop, and I. V. Orynyak, Two-Criterion Diagram for the Evaluation of the Limiting State of a Cracked Body [in Russian], Preprint, Institute of Problems of Strength, Academy of Sciences of UkrSSR, Kiev (1989).
81.
I. Milne, R. A. Ainsworth, A. R. Dowling, and A. T. Stewart, Assessment of the Integrity of Structures Containing Defects, CEGB Report R/H/R6 Revision 3, CEGB, Berkeley, UK (1986).
82.
DSTU-N B V.2.3-21:2008. Main Pipelines. Guidance. Determination of the Remaining Strength of Main Pipelines Containing Defects [in Ukrainian], Valid since January 1, 2009.
83.
A. Ya. Krasovskii, “Constitutive equations and fracture models,” in: Handbook on Material Resistance to Deformation and Fracture [in Russian], Part 2, Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1994), pp. 328–384.
84.
A. A. Lebedev and N. G. Chausov, New Methods for Assessing the Degradation in the Mechanical Properties of Metal in Structures during the Operating Life [in Russian], Preprint, Institute of Problems of Strength, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev (2004).
85.
A. Ya. Krasovskii and V. A. Vainshtock, “A failure criterion of materials taking into consideration the form of the stressed state at the crack apex,” Strength Mater., 10, No. 5, 559–564 (1978).CrossRef
86.
I. V. Orynyak, A. Ya. Krasovskii, and M. V. Borodii, “Main features of the national standard DSTU-N B V.2.3-21:2008 ‘Determination of the remaining strength of trunk pipelines containing defects’,” Strength Mater., 41, No. 5, 464–470 (2009).CrossRef
87.
V. Kumar, M. D. German, and C. F. Shih, An Engineering Approach for Elastic-Plastic Fracture Analysis, EPRI Report NP-1931, EPRI, Palo Alta, CA (1981).
88.
R. A. Ainsworth, “The assessment of defects in structures of strain hardening material,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 19, 633–642 (1984).CrossRef
89.
Y.-J. Kim and D.-J. Shim, “Relevance of plastic limit loads to reference stress approach for surface cracked cylinder problems,” Int. J. Press.Vess. Piping, 82, 687–699 (2005).CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Fracture Resistance of Sheet Metals and Thin-Wall Structures. Part 1. Critical Review
verfasst von
V. P. Naumenko
I. V. Limanskii
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Strength of Materials / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0039-2316
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-9325
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-014-9512-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

Strength of Materials 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

On the Strength and Crack Propagation Process of the Pre-Cracked Rock-Like Specimens under Uniaxial Compression

OriginalPaper

Selection of Analytical Methods for Determination of Mechanical Characteristics of Unidirectional Composites Based on Glass Fibers

OriginalPaper

Thermal Fatigue Fracture Criteria of Single Crystal Heat-Resistant Alloys and Methods for Identification of Their Parameters

OriginalPaper

Numerical Simulation of Dynamic Processes of Elastoplastic Interaction Between Three-Dimensional Heterogeneous Bodies on the Basis of Semi-Analytical Finite Element Method. Part 2. A Study of the Dynamic Deformation of Complex-Shaped Three-Dimensional Structures

OriginalPaper

An Experimental Study of Ratcheting Effect Under Multiaxial Proportional Loading

OriginalPaper

A Study of the Creep Damageability of Tubular Solid Oxide Fuel Cell

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise