Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 7/2018

01.04.2015 | ADVANCING SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC KNOWLEDGE IN LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT

From behind the curtain: talking about values in LCA

verfasst von: Susanne Freidberg

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Ausgabe 7/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

Practitioners of life cycle assessment (LCA) acknowledge that more input from social scientists can help advance the cause of life cycle management (LCM). This commentary offers a social science perspective on a long-running question within LCA, namely, how the field should manage not only stakeholders’ values but also those of practitioners themselves.

Methods

More than 60 interviews were conducted with LCA practitioners and their industry clients. Qualitative data were also collected through participant observation at several LCA and LCM conferences, a study of the field’s history, and extensive content and discourse analysis of LCA publications and online forums.

Results and discussion

Results show that LCA practitioners’ values are informed partly by the knowledge acquired through their LCA work. At the same time, LCA standards and professional norms implicitly advise practitioners to keep those values out of their work as much as possible, so as not to compromise its apparent objectivity. By contrast, many social scientists contend openly that value-based judgments, based on “situated knowledge,” can actually enhance the rigor, accountability, and credibility of scientific assessments.

Conclusions

LCA practitioners’ own situated knowledge justifies not only the value choices required by LCA but also their evaluative judgments of contemporary life cycle-based sustainability initiatives. This more critical voice could advance the goals of LCM while also boosting the credibility of LCA more generally.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Arvesen A, Bright RM, Hertwich EG (2011) Considering only first-order effects? How simplifications lead to unrealistic technology optimism in climate change mitigation. Energ Policy 39:7448–7454CrossRef Arvesen A, Bright RM, Hertwich EG (2011) Considering only first-order effects? How simplifications lead to unrealistic technology optimism in climate change mitigation. Energ Policy 39:7448–7454CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baumann H, Rydberg T (1994) Life cycle assessment: a comparison of three methods for impact analysis and evaluation. J Clean Prod 2:13–20CrossRef Baumann H, Rydberg T (1994) Life cycle assessment: a comparison of three methods for impact analysis and evaluation. J Clean Prod 2:13–20CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dauvergne P, Lister J (2012) Big brand sustainability: governance prospects and environmental limits. Glob Environ Chang 22:36–45CrossRef Dauvergne P, Lister J (2012) Big brand sustainability: governance prospects and environmental limits. Glob Environ Chang 22:36–45CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat De Schryver AM, Humbert S, Huijbregts MAJ (2013) The influence of value choices in life cycle impact assessment of stressors causing human health damage. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:698–706CrossRef De Schryver AM, Humbert S, Huijbregts MAJ (2013) The influence of value choices in life cycle impact assessment of stressors causing human health damage. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:698–706CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat European Commission (2013) Annex II-Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) Guide to the commission recommendation on the use of common methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations European Commission (2013) Annex II-Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) Guide to the commission recommendation on the use of common methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations
Zurück zum Zitat Finkbeiner M (2009) Carbon footprinting—opportunities and threats. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:91–94CrossRef Finkbeiner M (2009) Carbon footprinting—opportunities and threats. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:91–94CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Finkbeiner M (2014a) The international standards as the constitution of life cycle assessment: the ISO 14040 series and its offspring. In Klöpffer W (ed) Background and future prospects in life cycle assessment. Springer, pp 85-106 Finkbeiner M (2014a) The international standards as the constitution of life cycle assessment: the ISO 14040 series and its offspring. In Klöpffer W (ed) Background and future prospects in life cycle assessment. Springer, pp 85-106
Zurück zum Zitat Finkbeiner M (2014b) Product environmental footprint—breakthrough or breakdown for policy implementation of life cycle assessment? Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:266–271CrossRef Finkbeiner M (2014b) Product environmental footprint—breakthrough or breakdown for policy implementation of life cycle assessment? Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:266–271CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Finkbeiner M, Ackermann R, Bach V, Berger M, Brankatschk G, Chang Y-J, Wolf K (2014) Challenges in life cycle assessment: an overview of current gaps and research needs. In: Klöpffer W (ed) Background and future prospects in life cycle assessment, Springer, pp 207-58 Finkbeiner M, Ackermann R, Bach V, Berger M, Brankatschk G, Chang Y-J, Wolf K (2014) Challenges in life cycle assessment: an overview of current gaps and research needs. In: Klöpffer W (ed) Background and future prospects in life cycle assessment, Springer, pp 207-58
Zurück zum Zitat Finnveden G (1997) Valuation methods within LCA—where are the values? Int J Life Cycle Assess 2:163–169CrossRef Finnveden G (1997) Valuation methods within LCA—where are the values? Int J Life Cycle Assess 2:163–169CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fullana i Palmer P, Puig R, Bala A, Baquero G, Riba J, Raugei M (2011) From life cycle assessment to life cycle management. J Ind Ecol 15:458–475CrossRef Fullana i Palmer P, Puig R, Bala A, Baquero G, Riba J, Raugei M (2011) From life cycle assessment to life cycle management. J Ind Ecol 15:458–475CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Haas P (1992) Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. Int Organ 46(1):1–35CrossRef Haas P (1992) Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. Int Organ 46(1):1–35CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Haraway D (1988) Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Stud 14:575–599CrossRef Haraway D (1988) Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Stud 14:575–599CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Heiskanen E (1997) The social shaping of a technique for environmental assessment. Sci Stud 11:27–51 Heiskanen E (1997) The social shaping of a technique for environmental assessment. Sci Stud 11:27–51
Zurück zum Zitat Hertwich EG, Pease WS (1998) ISO 14042 restricts use and development of impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3:180–181CrossRef Hertwich EG, Pease WS (1998) ISO 14042 restricts use and development of impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3:180–181CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hertwich EG, Hammitt J, Pease W (2000) A theoretical foundation for life cycle assessment: recognizing the role of values in environmental decision making. J Ind Ecol 4:13–28CrossRef Hertwich EG, Hammitt J, Pease W (2000) A theoretical foundation for life cycle assessment: recognizing the role of values in environmental decision making. J Ind Ecol 4:13–28CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hofstetter P, Baumgartner T, Scholz R (2000) Modelling the valuesphere and the ecosphere: integrating the decision makers’ perspectives into LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5:161–175CrossRef Hofstetter P, Baumgartner T, Scholz R (2000) Modelling the valuesphere and the ecosphere: integrating the decision makers’ perspectives into LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5:161–175CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Huppes G, Oers L, Pretato U, Pennington DW (2012) Weighting environmental effects: analytic survey with operational evaluation methods and a meta-method. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:876–891CrossRef Huppes G, Oers L, Pretato U, Pennington DW (2012) Weighting environmental effects: analytic survey with operational evaluation methods and a meta-method. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:876–891CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ISO (2006a) ISO 14040: Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Standards Organization, Geneva ISO (2006a) ISO 14040: Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Standards Organization, Geneva
Zurück zum Zitat ISO (2006b) ISO 14044: Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. International Standards Organization, Geneva ISO (2006b) ISO 14044: Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. International Standards Organization, Geneva
Zurück zum Zitat Klöpffer W (1998) Subjective is not arbitrary. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3:61–62CrossRef Klöpffer W (1998) Subjective is not arbitrary. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3:61–62CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lloyd SM, Ries R (2007) Characterizing, propagating, and analyzing uncertainty in life cycle assessment: a survey of quantitative approaches. J Ind Ecol 11:161–179CrossRef Lloyd SM, Ries R (2007) Characterizing, propagating, and analyzing uncertainty in life cycle assessment: a survey of quantitative approaches. J Ind Ecol 11:161–179CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Longino HE (1990) Science as social knowledge: values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton Longino HE (1990) Science as social knowledge: values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton
Zurück zum Zitat Nemecek T, Bengoa X, Lansche J, Mouron P, Rossi V, Humbert S (2014) World Food LCA Database: methodological guidelines for the life cycle inventory of agricultural products. Quantis and Agriscope, Lausanne Nemecek T, Bengoa X, Lansche J, Mouron P, Rossi V, Humbert S (2014) World Food LCA Database: methodological guidelines for the life cycle inventory of agricultural products. Quantis and Agriscope, Lausanne
Zurück zum Zitat Pizzirani S, McLaren SJ, Seadon JK (2014) Is there a place for culture in life cycle sustainability assessment? Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1316–1330CrossRef Pizzirani S, McLaren SJ, Seadon JK (2014) Is there a place for culture in life cycle sustainability assessment? Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1316–1330CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Porter T (1994) Objectivity as standardization: the rhetoric of impersonality in measurement, statistics, and cost-benefit analysis. In: Megill A (ed) Rethinking Objectivity. Duke, Durham, pp 197–237 Porter T (1994) Objectivity as standardization: the rhetoric of impersonality in measurement, statistics, and cost-benefit analysis. In: Megill A (ed) Rethinking Objectivity. Duke, Durham, pp 197–237
Zurück zum Zitat Potting J, Curran MA, von Blottnitz H (2010) From life cycle talking to taking action. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:326–329CrossRef Potting J, Curran MA, von Blottnitz H (2010) From life cycle talking to taking action. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:326–329CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S, Bras B (2008a) A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment part 1. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:290–300CrossRef Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S, Bras B (2008a) A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment part 1. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:290–300CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S, Bras B (2008b) A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment part 2. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:374–388CrossRef Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S, Bras B (2008b) A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment part 2. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:374–388CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rose G (1997) Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Prog Hum Geog 21:305–320CrossRef Rose G (1997) Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Prog Hum Geog 21:305–320CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Satterfield T, Gregory R, Klain S, Roberts M, Chan KM (2013) Culture, intangibles and metrics in environmental management. J Environ Manag 117:103–114CrossRef Satterfield T, Gregory R, Klain S, Roberts M, Chan KM (2013) Culture, intangibles and metrics in environmental management. J Environ Manag 117:103–114CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sayer A (2011) Why things matter to people: social science, values and ethical life. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef Sayer A (2011) Why things matter to people: social science, values and ethical life. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Steen B (2006) Describing values in relation to choices in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:277–283CrossRef Steen B (2006) Describing values in relation to choices in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:277–283CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Turnpenny J, Jones M, Lorenzoni I (2011) Where now for post-normal science? A critical review of its development, definitions, and uses. Sci Technol Hum Val 36:287–306CrossRef Turnpenny J, Jones M, Lorenzoni I (2011) Where now for post-normal science? A critical review of its development, definitions, and uses. Sci Technol Hum Val 36:287–306CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Volkwein S, Klöpffer W (1996) The valuation step within LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 1:36–39CrossRef Volkwein S, Klöpffer W (1996) The valuation step within LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 1:36–39CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zamagni A, Pesonen H-L, Swarr T (2013) From LCA to life cycle sustainability assessment: concept, practice and future directions. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1637–1641CrossRef Zamagni A, Pesonen H-L, Swarr T (2013) From LCA to life cycle sustainability assessment: concept, practice and future directions. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1637–1641CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
From behind the curtain: talking about values in LCA
verfasst von
Susanne Freidberg
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Ausgabe 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Elektronische ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0879-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2018

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 7/2018 Zur Ausgabe