nach oben

Journal of Happiness Studies

Erschienen in:

19.12.2022 | Research Paper

Good Personality and Subjective Well-Being During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study in Chinese Contexts

verfasst von: Liying Jiao, Wen Jiang, Zhen Guo, Yue Xiao, Mengke Yu, Yan Xu

Erschienen in: Journal of Happiness Studies | Ausgabe 2/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Numerous studies have emphasized the importance of examining psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is important to identify the factors that affect the influence of COVID-19 on people’s mental health. The present research was a three-wave longitudinal study (N = 1495) examining the concurrent and prospective relations of good personality with subjective well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results showed that good personality positively predicted the subsequent well-being after controlling for the respective autoregressive effects and Big Five personality traits. Specifically, individuals who scored higher on measures of good personality tended to maintain higher well-being in the face of COVID-19. However, subjective well-being could positively predict subsequent personality only at the first time point. In addition, the prospective effect of good personality on subjective well-being was greater than the reverse effect. These findings support the opinion that as a positive value orientation in personality, good personality has a significant positive impact on the response to the pandemic situation.

Vorheriger Artikel Well-being Effects of Natural Disasters: Evidence from China’s Wenchuan Earthquake

Nächster Artikel Introduction to a Culturally Sensitive Measure of Well-Being: Combining Life Satisfaction and Interdependent Happiness Across 49 Different Cultures

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Adachi, P., & Willoughby, T. (2015). Interpreting effect sizes when controlling for stability effects in longitudinal autoregressive models: Implications for psychological science. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12(1), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2014.963549CrossRef

Aknin, L. B., Dunn, E. W., Helliwell, J. F., Biswas-Diener, R., Nyende, P., Barrington-Leigh, C. P., Burns, J., Kemeza, I., Ashton-James, C. E., & Norton, M. I. (2013). Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031578CrossRef

Aknin, L. B., Broesch, T., Hamlin, J. K., & Van de Vondervoort, J. W. (2015). Prosocial behavior leads to happiness in a small-scale rural society. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(4), 788–795. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000082CrossRef

Allison, P. D. (2003). Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 545–557. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843x.112.4.545CrossRef

Anglim, J., & Horwood, S. (2021). Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic and big five personality on subjective and psychological well-being. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(8), 1527–1537. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620983047CrossRef

Aschwanden, D., Strickhouser, J. E., Sesker, A. A., Lee, J. H., Luchetti, M., Stephan, Y., & SutinTerracciano, A. R. A. (2021). Psychological and behavioural responses to Coronavirus disease 2019: The role of personality. European Journal of Personality, 35(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2281CrossRef

Bauger, L., Bongaardt, R., & Bauer, J. J. (2021). Maturity and well-being: The development of self-authorship, eudaimonic motives, age, and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(3), 1313–1340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00274-0CrossRef

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497CrossRef

Beaty, J. C., Cleveland, J. N., & Murphy, K. R. (2001). The relation between personality and contextual performance in “strong” versus “weak” situations. Human Performance, 14(2), 125–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327043HUP1402_01CrossRef

Bono, G., Reil, K., & Hescox, J. (2020). Stress and well-being in college students during the COVID-19 pandemic: Can grit and gratitude help? International Journal of Wellbeing, 10(3), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v10i3.1331CrossRef

Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (1993). When do individual differences matter? A paradoxical theory of personality coherence. Psychological Inquiry, 4(4), 247–271. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0404_1CrossRef

Cooper, W. H., & Withey, M. J. (2009). The strong situation hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(1), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308329378CrossRef

Counted, V., Pargament, K. I., Bechara, A. O., Joynt, S., & Cowden, R. G. (2020). Hope and well-being in vulnerable contexts during the COVID-19 pandemic: Does religious coping matter? Journal of Positive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1832247CrossRef

Cui, H., & Wang, D. (2005). Correlation research between personality and psychosomatic symptom in healthy population (In Chinese). Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 13(3), 198–300. https://doi.org/10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2005.03.015CrossRef

De Freitas, J., Cikara, M., Grossmann, I., & Schlegel, R. (2018). Moral goodness is the essence of personal identity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(9), 739–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.05.006CrossRef

de la Iglesia, G., & Solano, A. C. (2018). The positive personality model (PPM): Exploring a new conceptual framework for personality assessment. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02027CrossRef

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01CrossRef

DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 197–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.197CrossRef

Diener, E., Sandvik, E., & Pavot, W. (1991). Happiness is the frequency, not the intensity, of positive versus negative affect. In F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjective well-being: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 119–139). Pergamon.

Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056CrossRef

Dong, M., van Prooijen, J. W., Wu, S., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2021). Culture, status, and hypocrisy: High-status people who don’t practice what they preach are viewed as worse in the United States than China. Social Psychological and Personality Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550621990451CrossRef

Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The Mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192CrossRef

Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319(5870), 1687–1688. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150952CrossRef

Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2014). Prosocial spending and happiness: Using money to benefit others pays off. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413512503CrossRef

Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 430–457. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5CrossRef

Feinstein, R. E., Kotara, S., Jones, B., Shanor, D., & Nemeroff, C. B. (2020). A health care workers mental health crisis line in the age of covid-19. Depression and Anxiety, 37(8), 822–826. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.23073CrossRef

Ferguson, E., Zhao, K., O’Carroll, R. E., & Smillie, L. D. (2019). Costless and costly prosociality: Correspondence among personality traits, economic preferences, and real-world prosociality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(4), 461–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618765071CrossRef

Ferro, M. A. (2014). Missing data in longitudinal studies: Cross-sectional multiple imputation provides similar estimates to full-information maximum likelihood. Annals of Epidemiology, 24(1), 75–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.10.007CrossRef

Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2013). Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 439–392). Information Age Publishing.

Gable, S. L., & Haidt, J. (2005). What (and why) is positive psychology? Review of General Psychology, 9, 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.103CrossRef

Galea, S., Merchant, R. M., & Lurie, N. (2020). The mental health consequences of COVID-19 and physical distancing. JAMA Internal Medicine, 180(6), 817–818. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1562CrossRef

Garcia, D., & Erlandsson, A. (2011). The relationship between personality and subjective well-being: Different association patterns when measuring the affective component in frequency and intensity. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(6), 1023–1034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9242-6CrossRef

Ge, X. (2020). Oriental wisdom for interpersonal life: Confucian ideal personality traits (Junzi personality) predict positive interpersonal relationships. Journal of Research in Personality, 89, 104034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104034CrossRef

Ge, X., & Hou, Y. (2021). Confucian ideal personality traits (Junzi personality) and mental health: The serial mediating roles of self-control and authenticity (In Chinese). Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(4), 374–386. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00374CrossRef

Gong, S., Lu, J. G., Schaubroeck, J. M., Li, Q., Zhou, Q., & Qian, X. (2020). Polluted psyche: Is the effect of air pollution on unethical behavior more physiological or psychological? Psychological Science, 31(8), 1040–1047. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620943835CrossRef

Gubler, D. A., Makowski, L. M., Troche, S. J., & Schlegel, K. (2021). Loneliness and well-being during the Covid-19 pandemic: Associations with personality and emotion regulation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(5), 2323–2342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00326-5CrossRef

Gutiérrez-Cobo, M. J., Megías-Robles, A., Gómez-Leal, R., Cabello, R., & Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2021). Is it possible to be happy during the COVID-19 lockdown? A longitudinal study of the role of emotional regulation strategies and pleasant activities in happiness. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063211CrossRef

Helzer, E. G., Furr, R. M., Hawkins, A., Barranti, M., Blackie, L. E. R., & Fleeson, W. (2014). Agreement on the perception of moral character. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(12), 1698–1710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214554957CrossRef

Hilbig, B. E., Glöckner, A., & Zettler, I. (2014). Personality and prosocial behavior: Linking basic traits and social value orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036074CrossRef

Hofmann, W., Luhmann, M., Fisher, R. R., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2014). Yes, but are they happy? Effects of trait self-control on affective well-being and life satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 82(4), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12050CrossRef

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118CrossRef

Huang, Y., & Sengupta, J. (2020). The influence of disease cues on preference for typical versus atypical products. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(3), 393–411. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucaa029CrossRef

Hui, B. P. H., & Kogan, A. (2018). Who helping helps: An event-sampling study of how basic psychological needs moderate the impact of acting prosocially. Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(6), 563–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1365165CrossRef

Hui, B. P. H., Ng, J. C. K., Berzaghi, E., Cunningham-Amos, L. A., & Kogan, A. (2020). Rewards of kindness? A meta-analysis of the link between prosociality and well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 146(12), 1084–1116. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000298CrossRef

Jasielska, D. (2020). The moderating role of kindness on the relation between trust and happiness. Current Psychology, 39(6), 2065–2073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9886-7CrossRef

Javaras, K. N., Schaefer, S. M., van Reekum, C. M., Lapate, R. C., Greischar, L. L., & BachhuberLoveRyffDavidson, D. R. G. D. C. D. R. J. (2012). Conscientiousness predicts greater recovery from negative emotion. Emotion, 12(5), 875–881. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028105CrossRef

Jayawickreme, E., Prentice, M., & Fleeson, W. (2020). Morality as a basic psychological need Preliminary evidence. In C. A. Darnell & K. Kristjánsson (Eds.), Virtues and virtue education in theory and practice: Are virtues local or universal? (pp. 101–116). Taylor and Francis.CrossRef

Jiao, L., Yang, Y., Xu, Y., Gao, S., & Zhang, H. (2019). Good and evil in Chinese culture: Personality structure and connotation. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 51(10), 1128–1142. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.01128CrossRef

Jiao, L., Yang, Y., Guo, Z., Xu, Y., Zhang, H., & Jiang, J. (2021). Development and validation of the good and evil character traits (GECT) scale. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 62, 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12696CrossRef

Jiao, L. (2021). Good and evil personalities: Structures, the differential patterns of trait inference, and applications (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Beijing Normal University.

Kaufman, S. B., Yaden, D. B., Hyde, E., & Tsukayama, E. (2019). The light vs. dark triad of personality: Contrasting two very different profiles of human nature. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 467. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00467CrossRef

King, R. B., & Gaerlan, M. J. M. (2014). High self-control predicts more positive emotions, better engagement, and higher achievement in school. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-013-0188-zCrossRef

Kislyakov, P. A., & Shmeleva, E. A. (2021). Prosocial orientation of Russians during the COVID-19 pandemic: Caring for others and yourself. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 629467. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.629467CrossRef

Kroencke, L., Geukes, K., Utesch, T., Kuper, N., & Back, M. D. (2020). Neuroticism and emotional risk during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research in Personality, 89, 104038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104038CrossRef

Lee, T., & Shi, D. (2021). A comparison of full information maximum likelihood and multiple imputation in structural equation modeling with missing data. Psychological Methods, 26(4), 466–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000381CrossRef

Liekefett, L., Christ, O., & Becker, J. C. (2021). Can conspiracy beliefs be beneficial? Longitudinal linkages between conspiracy beliefs, anxiety, uncertainty aversion, and existential threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211060965CrossRef

Liu, S., Lithopoulos, A., Zhang, C. Q., Garcia-Barrera, M. A., & Rhodes, R. E. (2021). Personality and perceived stress during COVID-19 pandemic: Testing the mediating role of perceived threat and efficacy. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110351CrossRef

Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 616–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.616CrossRef

Luhmann, M., Hofmann, W., Eid, M., & Lucas, R. E. (2012). Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 592–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025948CrossRef

Luijten, C. C., van de Bongardt, D., & Nieboer, A. P. (2022). The roles of social media use and friendship quality in adolescents’ internalizing problems and well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00539-wCrossRef

Lyubomirsky, A., Sheldon, S., & Schkade, K. M. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.111CrossRef

Martela, F., & Ryan, R. M. (2016). The benefits of benevolence: Basic psychological needs, beneficence, and the enhancement of well-being. Journal of Personality, 84(6), 750–764. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12215CrossRef

Maslow, A. (1962). Toward a psychology of being. Wiley.CrossRef

Mischel, W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 333–352). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Modersitzki, N., Phan, L. V., Kuper, N., & Rauthmann, J. F. (2021). Who is impacted? Personality predicts individual differences in psychological consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(6), 1110–1130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620952576CrossRef

Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2018). The dark core of personality. Psychological Review, 125(5), 656–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000111CrossRef

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.

Nikčević, A. V., Marino, C., Kolubinski, D. C., Leach, D., & Spada, M. M. (2021). Modelling the contribution of the Big Five personality traits, health anxiety, and COVID-19 psychological distress to generalised anxiety and depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Affective Disorders, 279, 578–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.10.053CrossRef

O’Brien, C. A., Tourigny, L., & Manser Payne, E. H. (2021). Personality and responses to Covid-19 health and safety prevention. Personality and Individual Differences, 181, 111013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111013CrossRef

Ock, J. (2020). How satisfied are you with your job? Estimating the reliability of scores on a single-item job satisfaction measure. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 28(3), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12285CrossRef

Orth, U., Meier, L. L., Bühler, J. L., Dapp, L. C., Krauss, S., Messerli, D., & Robins, R. W. (2022). Effect size guidelines for cross-lagged effects. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000499. in press.CrossRef

Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. American Psychological Association.

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879CrossRef

Prentice, M., Jayawickreme, E., Hawkins, A., Hartley, A., Furr, R. M., & Fleeson, W. (2019). Morality as a basic psychological need. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(4), 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618772011CrossRef

Prentice, M., Jayawickreme, E., & Fleeson, W. (2020). An experience sampling study of the momentary dynamics of moral, autonomous, competent, and related need satisfactions, moral enactments, and psychological thriving. Motivation and Emotion, 44(2), 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-020-09829-3CrossRef

Quirin, M., Bode, R. C., & Kuhl, J. (2011). Recovering from negative events by boosting implicit positive affect. Cognition and Emotion, 25(3), 559–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.536418CrossRef

Rossi, C., Bonanomi, A., & Oasi, O. (2021). Psychological wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic: The influence of personality traits in the Italian population. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 5862. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115862CrossRef

Santos, H. C., & Grossmann, I. (2021). Cross-temporal exploration of the relationship between wisdom-related cognitive broadening and subjective well-being: Evidence from a cross-validated national longitudinal study. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(4), 506–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620921619CrossRef

Schimmack, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2008). The influence of environment and personality on the affective and cognitive component of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 89(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9230-3CrossRef

Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2019). The impact of signature character strengths interventions: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(4), 1179–1196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-9990-2CrossRef

Sharpe, J. P., Martin, N. R., & Roth, K. A. (2011). Optimism and the big five factors of personality: Beyond neuroticism and extraversion. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(8), 946–951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.033CrossRef

Sheldon, K. M., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2004). Achieving sustainable new happiness: Prospects, practices, and prescriptions. In A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 127–145). John Wiley and Sons.CrossRef

Shi, H., Jiao, L., Gao, S., Yu, M., Xu, Y., Jiang, J., & Wang, F. (2020). Characteristics and trends of college students’ values during the COVID-19 Epidemic (In Chinese). Psychological Exploration, 40(2), 105–110.

Shillington, K. J., Johnson, A. M., Mantler, T., Burke, S. M., & Irwin, J. D. (2021). Kindness as an intervention for student social interaction anxiety, resilience, affect, and mood: The KISS of kindness study II. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(8), 3631–3661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-021-00379-0CrossRef

Soto, C. J. (2015). Is happiness good for your personality? Concurrent and prospective relations of the big five with subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 83(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12081CrossRef

Stanley, M. L., Henne, P., & De Brigard, F. (2019). Remembering moral and immoral actions in constructing the self. Memory and Cognition, 47(3), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0880-yCrossRef

Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.138CrossRef

Steptoe, A., Deaton, A., & Stone, A. A. (2015). Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing. The Lancet, 385(9968), 640–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61489-0CrossRef

Strickhouser, J. E., Zell, E., & Krizan, Z. (2017). Does personality predict health and well-being? A Metasynthesis. Health Psychology, 36(8), 797–810. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000475CrossRef

Sun, J., Xun, F., Liu, P., & Zhang, W. (2019). The implicit advantage of a high kindness trait in the action control of emotion regulation (In Chinese). Acta Psychologica Sinica, 51(7), 781–794. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00781CrossRef

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Boston Pearson.

Tan, Y., Huang, C., Geng, Y., Cheung, S. P., & Zhang, S. (2021). Psychological well-being in Chinese college students during the COVID-19 pandemic: Roles of resilience and environmental stress. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 671553. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.671553CrossRef

Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.xCrossRef

Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000217CrossRef

Thoits, P. A., & Hewitt, L. N. (2001). Volunteer work and well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090173CrossRef

Van Doesum, N. J., de Vries, R. E., Blokland, A. A. J., Hill, J. M., Kuhlman, D. M., Stivers, A. W., Tybur, J. M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2020). Social mindfulness: Prosocial the active way. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 15(2), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2019.1579352CrossRef

Volk, A. A., Brazil, K. J., Franklin-Luther, P., Dane, A. V., & Vaillancourt, T. (2021). The influence of demographics and personality on COVID-19 coping in young adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110398CrossRef

Wang, D., & Cui, H. (2007). A predictive research on psychosomatic symptom with personality dimensions, self-experience inconsistency, and behavior inhibition (In Chinese). Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39(5), 861–873.

Wang, Z., Luo, S., Xu, J., Wang, Y., Yun, H., Zhao, Z., Zhan, H., & Wang, Y. (2021). Well-being reduces COVID-19 anxiety: A three-wave longitudinal study in China. Journal of Happiness Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-021-00385-2CrossRef

Waters, L., Algoe, S. B., Dutton, J., Emmons, R., Fredrickson, B. L., Heaphy, E., Moskowitz, J. T., Neff, K., Niemiec, R., Pury, C., & Steger, M. (2021). Positive psychology in a pandemic: Buffering, bolstering, and building mental health. The Journal of Positive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2021.1871945CrossRef

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063CrossRef

Yıldırım, M., & Güler, A. (2021). Positivity explains how COVID-19 perceived risk increases death distress and reduces happiness. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110347CrossRef

Zacher, H., & Rudolph, C. W. (2021). Individual differences and changes in subjective wellbeing during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. American Psychologist, 76(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000702CrossRef

Zettler, I., Schild, C., Lilleholt, L., Kroencke, L., Utesch, T., Moshagen, M., Böhm, R., Back, M. D., & Geukes, K. (2022). The role of personality in COVID-19-related perceptions, evaluations, and behaviors: Findings across five samples, nine traits, and 17 criteria. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(1), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211001680CrossRef

Zhang, S. X., Wang, Y., Rauch, A., & Wei, F. (2020). Unprecedented disruption of lives and work: Health, distress and life satisfaction of working adults in China one month into the COVID-19 outbreak. Psychiatry Research, 288, 112958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112958CrossRef

Zhang, B., Li, Y. M., Li, J., Luo, J., Ye, Y., Yin, L., Chen, Z., Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2022). The big five inventory–2 in China: A comprehensive psychometric evaluation in four diverse samples. Assessment, 29(6), 1262–1284. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211008245CrossRef

Titel: Good Personality and Subjective Well-Being During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study in Chinese Contexts
verfasst von: Liying Jiao
Wen Jiang
Zhen Guo
Yue Xiao
Mengke Yu
Yan Xu
Publikationsdatum: 19.12.2022
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Happiness Studies / Ausgabe 2/2023
Print ISSN: 1389-4978
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7780
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00610-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2023

Self-Compassion as a Means to Improve Job-Related Well-Being in Academia

Can Environmental Protection Behavior Enhance Farmers' Subjective Well-Being?

Should We Cheer Together? Gender Differences in Instantaneous Well-being: An Application to COVID-19 Lockdowns

Efficacy of a School-Based Mental Health Intervention Based on Mindfulness and Character Strengths Use Among Adolescents: a Pilot Study of Think Happy-Be Happy Intervention

Home Alone: Widows’ Well-Being and Time

Can Good Memories of the Past Instill Happiness? Nostalgia Improves Subjective Well-Being by Increasing Gratitude