Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Group Decision and Negotiation 3/2019

02.01.2019

Group Decision Making with Heterogeneous Preference Structures: An Automatic Mechanism to Support Consensus Reaching

verfasst von: Bowen Zhang, Yucheng Dong, Enrique Herrera-Viedma

Erschienen in: Group Decision and Negotiation | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In real-world decision problems, decision makers usually express their opinions with different preference structures. In order to deal with the heterogeneous preference information in group decision making, this paper presents an optimization-based consensus model for group decision making with heterogeneous preference structures (utility values, preference orderings, multiplicative preference relations and additive preference relations). This proposal seeks to minimize the information loss between decision makers’ heterogeneous preference information and individual preference vectors and also seeks the collective solution with a consensus. Meanwhile, in order to justify the consensus model, we discuss its internal aggregation operator between the obtained individual and group preference vectors, demonstrate that the proposed model satisfies the Pareto principle of social choice theory, and prove the uniqueness of the solution to the optimization model. Furthermore, based on the proposed optimization-based consensus model, we present an automatic mechanism to support consensus reaching in the group decision making with heterogeneous preference structures. In the consensus reaching process, the obtained individual and group preference vectors are considered as a decision aid which decision makers can use as a reference to adjust their preference opinions. Finally, detailed simulation experiments and comparison analysis are conducted to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of our proposed model.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Altuzarra A, Moreno-Jiménez JM, Salvador M (2010) Consensus building in AHP-group decision making: a Bayesian approach. Oper Res 58(6):1755–1773CrossRef Altuzarra A, Moreno-Jiménez JM, Salvador M (2010) Consensus building in AHP-group decision making: a Bayesian approach. Oper Res 58(6):1755–1773CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat An LTH (2000) An efficient algorithm for globally minimizing a quadratic function under convex quadratic constraints. Math Program 87(3):401–426CrossRef An LTH (2000) An efficient algorithm for globally minimizing a quadratic function under convex quadratic constraints. Math Program 87(3):401–426CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Arrow KJ (1963) Social choice and individual values. Wiley, New York Arrow KJ (1963) Social choice and individual values. Wiley, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Ben-Arieh D, Easton T (2007) Multi-criteria group consensus under linear cost opinion elasticity. Decis Support Syst 43:713–721CrossRef Ben-Arieh D, Easton T (2007) Multi-criteria group consensus under linear cost opinion elasticity. Decis Support Syst 43:713–721CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ben-Arieh D, Easton T, Evans B (2008) Minimum cost consensus with quadratic cost functions. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 39(1):210–217CrossRef Ben-Arieh D, Easton T, Evans B (2008) Minimum cost consensus with quadratic cost functions. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 39(1):210–217CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chen X, Zhang HJ, Dong YC (2015) The fusion process with heterogeneous preference structures in group decision making: a survey. Inf Fusion 24:72–83CrossRef Chen X, Zhang HJ, Dong YC (2015) The fusion process with heterogeneous preference structures in group decision making: a survey. Inf Fusion 24:72–83CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (1998) Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on additive preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 97:33–48CrossRef Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (1998) Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on additive preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 97:33–48CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2001) Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making model based on additive preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 122:277–291CrossRef Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2001) Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making model based on additive preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 122:277–291CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Contreras I (2010) A distance-based consensus model with flexible choice of rank-position weights. Group Decis Negot 19(5):441–456CrossRef Contreras I (2010) A distance-based consensus model with flexible choice of rank-position weights. Group Decis Negot 19(5):441–456CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cook WD (2006) Distance-based and ad hoc consensus models in ordinal preference ranking. Eur J Oper Res 172(2):369–385CrossRef Cook WD (2006) Distance-based and ad hoc consensus models in ordinal preference ranking. Eur J Oper Res 172(2):369–385CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cook WD, Seiford LM (1978) Priority ranking and consensus formation. Manag Sci 24(24):1721–1732CrossRef Cook WD, Seiford LM (1978) Priority ranking and consensus formation. Manag Sci 24(24):1721–1732CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dong YC, Zhang HJ (2014) Multiperson decision making with different preference representation structures: a direct consensus framework and its properties. Knowl Based Syst 58:45–57CrossRef Dong YC, Zhang HJ (2014) Multiperson decision making with different preference representation structures: a direct consensus framework and its properties. Knowl Based Syst 58:45–57CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dong YC, Xu YF, Li HY, Feng B (2010) The OWA-based consensus operator under linguistic representation models using position indexes. Eur J Oper Res 203:455–463CrossRef Dong YC, Xu YF, Li HY, Feng B (2010) The OWA-based consensus operator under linguistic representation models using position indexes. Eur J Oper Res 203:455–463CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dong YC, Li CC, Xu YF, Gu X (2015) Consensus-based group decision making under multi-granular unbalanced 2-tuple linguistic preference relations. Group Decis Negot 24:217–242CrossRef Dong YC, Li CC, Xu YF, Gu X (2015) Consensus-based group decision making under multi-granular unbalanced 2-tuple linguistic preference relations. Group Decis Negot 24:217–242CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dong YC, Zhang HJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2016) Integrating experts’ weights generated dynamically into the consensus reaching process and its applications in managing non-cooperative behaviors. Decis Support Syst 84:1–15CrossRef Dong YC, Zhang HJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2016) Integrating experts’ weights generated dynamically into the consensus reaching process and its applications in managing non-cooperative behaviors. Decis Support Syst 84:1–15CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dong YC, Zha QB, Zhang HJ, Kou G, Fujita H, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) Consensus reaching in social network group decision making: research paradigms and challenges. Knowl Based Syst 162:3–13CrossRef Dong YC, Zha QB, Zhang HJ, Kou G, Fujita H, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) Consensus reaching in social network group decision making: research paradigms and challenges. Knowl Based Syst 162:3–13CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fan ZP, Zhang Y (2010) A goal programming approach to group decision-making with three formats of incomplete preference relations. Soft Comput 14(10):1083–1090CrossRef Fan ZP, Zhang Y (2010) A goal programming approach to group decision-making with three formats of incomplete preference relations. Soft Comput 14(10):1083–1090CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fan ZP, Xiao SH, Hu GF (2004) An optimization method for integrating two kinds of preference information in group decision-making. Comput Ind Eng 46:329–335CrossRef Fan ZP, Xiao SH, Hu GF (2004) An optimization method for integrating two kinds of preference information in group decision-making. Comput Ind Eng 46:329–335CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fan ZP, Ma J, Jiang YP, Sun YH, Ma L (2006) A goal programming approach to group decision making based on multiplicative preference relations and additive preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 174:311–321CrossRef Fan ZP, Ma J, Jiang YP, Sun YH, Ma L (2006) A goal programming approach to group decision making based on multiplicative preference relations and additive preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 174:311–321CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gong ZW, Zhang HH, Forrest J, Li LS, Xu XX (2015) Two consensus models based on the minimum cost and maximum return regarding either all individuals or one individual. Eur J Oper Res 240:183–192CrossRef Gong ZW, Zhang HH, Forrest J, Li LS, Xu XX (2015) Two consensus models based on the minimum cost and maximum return regarding either all individuals or one individual. Eur J Oper Res 240:183–192CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gong ZW, Xu C, Chiclana F, Xu XX (2016) Consensus measure with multi-stage fluctuation utility based on china’s urban demolition negotiation. Group Decis Negot 26(2):1–29 Gong ZW, Xu C, Chiclana F, Xu XX (2016) Consensus measure with multi-stage fluctuation utility based on china’s urban demolition negotiation. Group Decis Negot 26(2):1–29
Zurück zum Zitat Herrera F, Martínez L, Sánchez PJ (2005) Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making. Eur J Oper Res 166(1):115–132CrossRef Herrera F, Martínez L, Sánchez PJ (2005) Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making. Eur J Oper Res 166(1):115–132CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F (2002) A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 32:394–402CrossRef Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F (2002) A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 32:394–402CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Herrera-Viedma E, Martínez L, Mata F, Chiclana F (2005) A consensus support system model for group decision-making problems with multigranular linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 13:644–658CrossRef Herrera-Viedma E, Martínez L, Mata F, Chiclana F (2005) A consensus support system model for group decision-making problems with multigranular linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 13:644–658CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Herrera-Viedma E, Cabrerizo FJ, Kacprzyk J, Pedrycz W (2014) A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment. Inf Fusion 17:4–13CrossRef Herrera-Viedma E, Cabrerizo FJ, Kacprzyk J, Pedrycz W (2014) A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment. Inf Fusion 17:4–13CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jiang YP, Fan ZP, Ma J (2008) A method for group decision making with multi-granularity linguistic assessment information. Inf Sci 178(4):1098–1109CrossRef Jiang YP, Fan ZP, Ma J (2008) A method for group decision making with multi-granularity linguistic assessment information. Inf Sci 178(4):1098–1109CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M (1988) A ‘soft’ measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences. Eur J Oper Res 343:16–325 Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M (1988) A ‘soft’ measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences. Eur J Oper Res 343:16–325
Zurück zum Zitat Kacprzyk J, Zadrozny S (2010) Soft computing and Web intelligence for supporting consensus reaching. Soft Comput 14:833–846CrossRef Kacprzyk J, Zadrozny S (2010) Soft computing and Web intelligence for supporting consensus reaching. Soft Comput 14:833–846CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M, Nurmi H (1992) Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority. Fuzzy Sets Syst 49:21–31CrossRef Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M, Nurmi H (1992) Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority. Fuzzy Sets Syst 49:21–31CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M, Nurmi H (1997) Consensus under fuzziness. Kluwer, NorwellCrossRef Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M, Nurmi H (1997) Consensus under fuzziness. Kluwer, NorwellCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kim J (2008) A model and case for supporting participatory public decision making in edemocracy. Group Decis Negot 17:179–193CrossRef Kim J (2008) A model and case for supporting participatory public decision making in edemocracy. Group Decis Negot 17:179–193CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kozierkiewicz-Hetmanska A (2017) The analysis of expert opinions’ consensus quality. Inf Fusion 34:80–86CrossRef Kozierkiewicz-Hetmanska A (2017) The analysis of expert opinions’ consensus quality. Inf Fusion 34:80–86CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ma J, Fan ZP, Jiang YP, Mao JY (2006) An optimization approach to multiperson decision making based on different formats of preference information. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 36(5):876–889CrossRef Ma J, Fan ZP, Jiang YP, Mao JY (2006) An optimization approach to multiperson decision making based on different formats of preference information. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 36(5):876–889CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat María J, Jiménez M, Joven JA, Pirla AR, Lanuza AT (2005) A spreadsheet module for consistent consensus building in AHP-group decision making. Group Decis Negot 14(2):89–108CrossRef María J, Jiménez M, Joven JA, Pirla AR, Lanuza AT (2005) A spreadsheet module for consistent consensus building in AHP-group decision making. Group Decis Negot 14(2):89–108CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moreno-Jiménez JM, Joven JA, Pirla AR, Lanuza AT (2005) A spreadsheet module for consistent consensus building in AHP group decision making. Group Decis Negot 14:89–108CrossRef Moreno-Jiménez JM, Joven JA, Pirla AR, Lanuza AT (2005) A spreadsheet module for consistent consensus building in AHP group decision making. Group Decis Negot 14:89–108CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Orlovsky SA (1978) Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1(3):155–167CrossRef Orlovsky SA (1978) Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1(3):155–167CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Palomares I, Estrella FJ, Martínez L, Herrera F (2014) Consensus under a fuzzy context: taxonomy, analysis framework AFRYCA and experimental case of study. Inf Fusion 20:252–271CrossRef Palomares I, Estrella FJ, Martínez L, Herrera F (2014) Consensus under a fuzzy context: taxonomy, analysis framework AFRYCA and experimental case of study. Inf Fusion 20:252–271CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Parreiras RO, Ekel PY, Morais DC (2012) Fuzzy set based consensus schemes for multicriteria group decision making applied to strategic planning. Group Decis Negot 21:153–183CrossRef Parreiras RO, Ekel PY, Morais DC (2012) Fuzzy set based consensus schemes for multicriteria group decision making applied to strategic planning. Group Decis Negot 21:153–183CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pérez IJ, Cabrerizo FJ, Alonso S, Herrera-Viedma E (2014) A new consensus model for group decision making problems with non-homogeneous experts. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 44(4):494–498CrossRef Pérez IJ, Cabrerizo FJ, Alonso S, Herrera-Viedma E (2014) A new consensus model for group decision making problems with non-homogeneous experts. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 44(4):494–498CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pérez IJ, Cabrerizo FJ, Alonso S, Dong YC, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) On dynamic consensus processes in group decision making problems. Inf Sci 459:20–35CrossRef Pérez IJ, Cabrerizo FJ, Alonso S, Dong YC, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) On dynamic consensus processes in group decision making problems. Inf Sci 459:20–35CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Perny P, Roy B (1992) The use of fuzzy outranking relations in preference modelling. Fuzzy Sets Syst 49(1):33–53CrossRef Perny P, Roy B (1992) The use of fuzzy outranking relations in preference modelling. Fuzzy Sets Syst 49(1):33–53CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15:234–281CrossRef Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15:234–281CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Sen A (1970) Collective choice and social welfare. Holdenday, San Francisco Sen A (1970) Collective choice and social welfare. Holdenday, San Francisco
Zurück zum Zitat Seo F, Sakawa M (1985) Fuzzy multiattribute utility analysis for collective choice. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 15:45–53CrossRef Seo F, Sakawa M (1985) Fuzzy multiattribute utility analysis for collective choice. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 15:45–53CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Srdjevic B (2007) Linking analytic hierarchy process and social choice methods to support group decision-making in water management. Decis Support Syst 42:2261–2273CrossRef Srdjevic B (2007) Linking analytic hierarchy process and social choice methods to support group decision-making in water management. Decis Support Syst 42:2261–2273CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sun BZ, Ma WM (2015) An approach to consensus measurement of linguistic preference relations in multi-attribute group decision making and application. Omega 51:83–92CrossRef Sun BZ, Ma WM (2015) An approach to consensus measurement of linguistic preference relations in multi-attribute group decision making and application. Omega 51:83–92CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tanino T (1990) On group decision making under fuzzy preferences. In: Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M (eds) Multiperson decision making using fuzzy sets and possibility theory. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 172–185CrossRef Tanino T (1990) On group decision making under fuzzy preferences. In: Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M (eds) Multiperson decision making using fuzzy sets and possibility theory. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 172–185CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wu J, Chiclana F (2014a) Visual information feedback mechanism and attitudinal prioritisation method for group decision making with triangular fuzzy complementary preference relations. Inf Sci 279:716–734CrossRef Wu J, Chiclana F (2014a) Visual information feedback mechanism and attitudinal prioritisation method for group decision making with triangular fuzzy complementary preference relations. Inf Sci 279:716–734CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wu J, Chiclana F (2014b) A risk attitudinal ranking method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers based on novel attitudinal expected score and accuracy functions. Appl Soft Comput 22(5):272–286CrossRef Wu J, Chiclana F (2014b) A risk attitudinal ranking method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers based on novel attitudinal expected score and accuracy functions. Appl Soft Comput 22(5):272–286CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wu ZB, Xu JP (2012) A consistency and consensus based decision support model for group decision making with multiplicative preference relations. Decis Support Syst 52:757–767CrossRef Wu ZB, Xu JP (2012) A consistency and consensus based decision support model for group decision making with multiplicative preference relations. Decis Support Syst 52:757–767CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Xu JP, Wu ZB, Zhang Y (2014) A consensus based method for multi-criteria group decision making under uncertain linguistic setting. Group Decis Negot 23(1):127–148CrossRef Xu JP, Wu ZB, Zhang Y (2014) A consensus based method for multi-criteria group decision making under uncertain linguistic setting. Group Decis Negot 23(1):127–148CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Xu XH, Du ZJ, Chen XH (2015) Consensus model for multi-criteria large-group emergency decision making considering non-cooperative behaviors and minority opinions. Decis Support Syst 79:150–160CrossRef Xu XH, Du ZJ, Chen XH (2015) Consensus model for multi-criteria large-group emergency decision making considering non-cooperative behaviors and minority opinions. Decis Support Syst 79:150–160CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang Z, Gao CH (2014) An approach to group decision making with heterogeneous incomplete uncertain preference relations. Comput Ind Eng 71:27–36CrossRef Zhang Z, Gao CH (2014) An approach to group decision making with heterogeneous incomplete uncertain preference relations. Comput Ind Eng 71:27–36CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang GQ, Dong YC, Xu YF, Li HY (2011) Minimum-cost consensus models under aggregation operators. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 41(6):1253–1261CrossRef Zhang GQ, Dong YC, Xu YF, Li HY (2011) Minimum-cost consensus models under aggregation operators. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 41(6):1253–1261CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang BW, Dong YC, Xu YF (2014) Multiple attribute consensus rules with minimum adjustments to support consensus reaching. Knowl Based Syst 67:35–48CrossRef Zhang BW, Dong YC, Xu YF (2014) Multiple attribute consensus rules with minimum adjustments to support consensus reaching. Knowl Based Syst 67:35–48CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Group Decision Making with Heterogeneous Preference Structures: An Automatic Mechanism to Support Consensus Reaching
verfasst von
Bowen Zhang
Yucheng Dong
Enrique Herrera-Viedma
Publikationsdatum
02.01.2019
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Group Decision and Negotiation / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0926-2644
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9907
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-018-09609-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Group Decision and Negotiation 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner