Skip to main content

2022 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

How Does Turkish Family Law Cope with Different Ways of Living?

verfasst von : Ceyda Süral Efeçınar, Ekin Ömeroǧlu

Erschienen in: Normativity and Diversity in Family Law

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

There are citizens with a variety of ethnic and religious cultures living in Turkey; however, the Turkish Constitution makes no distinctions between these groups. Therefore, the Turkish Civil Code, which regulates family relations, does not take into consideration any cultural differences. Some members of Turkish society have adopted a completely secular way of life. However, Muslim traditions and ideas are not completely absent or neglected in Turkish society today. Although marriage before an imam is not recognized by Turkish law, there are couples who opt to marry only before an imam. What are the consequences of imam-marriage; what happens to the inheritance, matrimonial or maintenance rights that spouses in such marriages can claim? One example is the dower or mahr, which is considered a cultural tradition in Turkish society. Although the mahr is not regulated in the Turkish Civil Code, claims to it have been the subject matter of cases brought before Turkish courts. How do the courts deal with these cases? Another issue is the religious education of Alevi children. Despite ECHR decisions on this issue, the Turkish state still makes religious culture and ethics courses compulsory for Alevi pupils, and the syllabi of these courses mostly convey a Sunni interpretation of Islam, with the principal Alevi rites presented as cultural activities or folk rituals. How do Alevi parents react to this situation? These three different issues will be examined in this article to investigate how the state is tackling such claims.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
O.G. 20.10.1982/17844.
 
2
Ergin (2010), pp. 1–34.
 
3
O.G. 08.12.2001/24607.
 
4
Alevism is a unique branch of Islam. Like Shiites, Alevis revere Ali, Muhammad’s cousin and son-in-law. Although they read from the Koran, their rituals and customs vastly differ from those of Sunnis. Alevis do not pray in mosques, men and women pray alongside one another, they are not expected to pray five times a day and they do not fast during Ramadan. Nawa (2017), Kingsley (2017).
 
5
See U.S. Department of State, 2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Turkey, https://​www.​state.​gov/​reports/​2019-report-on-international-religious-freedom/​turkey/​ (accessed 20 April 2021).
 
6
Art. 124/II TCC. Before 2001, there was a difference between the age requirement for a man and for a woman. Women had to be at least 15, whereas men had to be at least 17 to get married. A woman who was over 14 could get authorization to get married from the court in exceptional cases, whereas men had to be at least 15 to get such authorization. The increase in the marriage age might encourage girls not to stop their education. Demir (2004), p. 5.
 
7
Court of Cassation, 2nd Civil Chamber, 03.05.2011, E. 2011/4235, K. 2011/7649, Kazancı Case-Law Database.
 
8
Art. 13 TCC determines who has mental capacity. Everyone who is not deprived of the capacity to act reasonably due to his/her young age, mental illness, mental weakness, drunkenness or any other similar reasons has mental capacity.
 
9
Art. 126-127 TCC.
 
10
Art. 128 TCC.
 
11
According to the 2014 Report of the Turkish Family Structure Research, 21.3% of Turkish people get married to their relatives. Turğut and Feyzioğlu (2014), p. 132.
 
12
The rate of polygamy is around 2% in Turkey. However, in the eastern and south-eastern region, the rate of polygamy is found to be around 4.7–5% and is higher than the average of Turkey. Yılmaz et al. (2015), p. 222.
 
13
Okan İbiloğlu et al. (2018), p. 986; Yılmaz et al. (2015), pp. 222–223.
 
14
This provision is related to affiliation. According to Art. 285 TCC, the husband is deemed to be the father of a child who was born within the marriage or within 300 days after the termination of the marriage. Art. 132 is used to prevent a conflict over the identity of the father if a child is born within 300 days following the termination of the previous marriage of the mother.
 
15
O.G. 06.05.1930/1489.
 
16
Art. 134 TCC.
 
17
O.G. 29.04.2006/26153.
 
18
In one case, the judge allowed a girl who was 11 years old to marry; however, the Court of Cassation cancelled this decision, Court of Cassation, 2nd Civil Chamber, 28.12.1987, E. 1987/11288, K. 1987/10889. In a further case, a boy who was under the age of 15 received permission from the court to marry; however, again the Court of Cassation held that the court’s decision was void, Court of Cassation, 2nd Civil Chamber, 24.09.1985, E. 1985/8499, K. 1985/7437.
 
19
O.G. 07.11.1985/18921.
 
20
According to the 2014 Report of the Turkish Family Structure Research, 84.6% of Turkish people also conduct a religious ceremony to get married. Turğut and Feyzioğlu (2014), p. 141.
 
21
Kılıçoğlu (2019), p. 56.
 
22
Serozan (1975), pp. 296–297.
 
23
According to the 2014 Report of the Turkish Family Structure Research, 2.6% of Turkish people get married before an imam and do not get officially married. Turğut and Feyzioğlu (2014), p. 141.
 
24
Islamic law requires that the spouses have reached puberty, but this has been interpreted differently by different traditions and opinions, with some of them requiring that both spouses are at an age to understand the consequences of sexual intercourse and marriage, whereas some believe that it is sufficient for the girl to have started having a period, which might happen at the age of 10 to 12. For further information, see Acar (2003), pp. 125–140. For further information on the requirements for a valid marriage under Islamic law, see Koçak (2015), pp. 335–368.
 
25
Court of Cassation, 14th Civil Chamber, 23.06.2015, E. 2015/2019, K. 2015/6983.
 
26
Court of Cassation, 13th Civil Chamber, 24.04.2006, E. 2006/355, K. 2006/6349.
 
27
Court of Cassation, 3rd Civil Chamber, 02.03.2017, E. 2016/12465, K. 2017/2439; 24.12.2014, E. 2014/20049, K. 2014/17124.
 
28
ECHR, 02.11.2010, Application No. 3976/05.
 
29
Şerife Yiǧit v. Turkey, 02.11.2010, Application No. 3976/05.
 
30
Court of Cassation, 17th Civil Chamber, 24.04.2017, E. 2014/21087, K. 2017/4416; 4th Civil Chamber, 08.03.2012, E. 2011/159, K. 2012/3755.
 
31
Court of Cassation, 21th Civil Chamber, 04.04.2017, E. 2016/12503, K. 2017/2769; 29.03.2016, E. 2016/264, K. 2016/5478; 01.04.2015, E. 2014/17542, K. 2015/6892; 30.09.2014, E. 2014/3233, K. 2014/19088.
 
32
O.G. 04.02.2011/27836.
 
33
Court of Cassation, 21th Civil Chamber, 25.09.2014, E. 2014/8509, K. 2014/18671; 29.04.2014, E. 2014/1985, K. 2014/9444.
 
34
Court of Cassation, General Assembly of Civil Chambers, 26.02.2003, E. 2003/4-55, K. 2003/100. Yılmaz (2014), p. 154.
 
35
Court of Cassation, 4th Civil Chamber, 01.10.2001, E. 2001/4849, K. 2001/8843; 22.12.2014, E. 2014/2965, K. 2014/17570; 14.04.2016, E. 2015/6000, K. 2016/5100; General Assembly of the Civil Chambers, 03.03.2010, E. 2010/4-88, K. 2010/126.
 
36
Judges usually were lenient with the convicted imams and with the unofficially married couple, and the courts generally reduced the punishment from imprisonment to only a light financial penalty. Yılmaz (2014), p. 151.
 
37
Constitutional Court, 27.05.2015, E. 2014/36, K. 2015/51. O.G. 10.06.2015/29382.
 
39
The Presidency of Religious Affairs was founded, as part of the Prime Ministry, to carry out work on Islamic belief, worship and ethics; educate society on religion; and administer places of worship in line with the principle of secularism by staying out of all political views and thinking and aspiring to national solidarity and integration. Art. 136 of the Constitution; Art. 1 of the Act on Organization and Missions of the Directorate of Religious Affairs, O.G. 02.07.1965/12038.
 
41
O.G. 29.04.2006/26153.
 
42
O.G. 03.11.2017/30229.
 
43
NTV, 12.10.2017, http://​www.​ntv.​com.​tr/​turkiye/​mahir-unaldan-muftulere-nikah-yetkisi-aciklamasi,HQ-tBeZEIUKYhWytEWSf0A (accessed 20 April 2021).
 
45
BBC Türkçe, 31.07.2017, http://​www.​bbc.​com/​turkce/​haberler-turkiye-40768127 (accessed 20 April 2021).
 
47
According to Metin Feyzioğlu, the President of the Turkish Bar Association, those who choose to conduct their marriage before municipal authorities will now fear appearing not to be faithful enough. BBC Türkçe, 31.07.2017, http://​www.​bbc.​com/​turkce/​haberler-turkiye-40768127 (accessed 20 April 2021).
 
48
Pürselim Arning (2013), p. 140; Şirin (2015), pp. 298–302; Sağlam (2016), p. 3.
 
49
Pürselim Arning (2013), p. 138; Şirin (2015), p. 299; Sağlam (2016), p. 2.
 
50
Pürselim Arning (2013), p. 138.
 
51
Pürselim Arning (2013), p. 139; Şirin (2015), p. 300.
 
52
General Assembly for Unification of Conflicting Decisions, 02.12.1959, E. 1959/14, K. 1959/30.
 
53
3rd Civil Chamber, 12.04.2016, E. 2015/8664, K. 2016/5668; 27.05.2015, E. 2014/16026, K. 2015/9622; 10.02.2015, E. 2014/15771, K. 2015/1997.
 
54
3rd Civil Chamber, 18.06.2018, E. 2016/19950, K. 2018/6669. It must also be noted that the 3rd Civil Chamber, in this decision, also concluded that family courts should have jurisdiction in this case according to the Law on the Establishment, Jurisdiction and Procedure of Family Courts. The same Civil Chamber, in a more recent decision, annulled the decision of a family court that found itself incompetent for a claim relating to mahr stating that family courts shall have jurisdiction in cases related with mahr. 3rd Civil Chamber, 05.07.2018, E. 2016/20303, K. 2018/7653.
 
55
This Article 226 is part of the provisions regulating termination of default matrimonial property regime, participation on acquired property. For other decisions where Article 226 is applied to claims relating to jewellery promised or given as mahr, see 3rd Civil Chamber, 02.11.2015, E. 2014/20951, K. 2015/16950; 27.04.2015, E. 2014/14206, K. 2015/6882.
 
56
2nd Civil Chamber, 05.12.2018, E. 2018/1864, K. 2018/14111; 20.11.2018, E. 2018/7034, K. 2018/13187; 3rd Civil Chamber, 25.10.2018, E. 2016/22593, K. 2018/10593; 18.10.2018, E. 2018/5505, K. 2018/10278; 8th Civil Chamber, 07.11.2018, E. 2016/6087, K. 2018/18275.
 
57
8th Civil Chamber, 14.03.2016, E. 2014/22932, K. 2016/4548. It must be noted that in this decision, the 8th Civil Chamber also decided that as mahr is characterized as a contractual relationship between the spouses, the civil courts of first instance shall have jurisdiction but not the family courts.
 
58
3rd Civil Chamber, 19.11.2018, E. 2017/1270, K. 2018/11727.
 
59
8th Civil Chamber, 27.10.2015, E. 2015/8894, K. 2015/19291; 1st Civil Chamber, 13.10.2010, E. 2010/9242, K. 2010/10342.
 
60
4th Civil Chamber, 18.02.1985, E. 1984/09153, K. 1985/01223. See Pürselim Arning (2013), p. 145.
 
61
1st Civil Chamber, 12.10.2015, E. 2014/2903, K. 2015/11649; 15.12.2014, E. 2014/1693, K. 2014/19629; 19.06.2013, E. 2013/7586, K. 2013/10272; 08.03.2013, E. 2012/16657, K. 2013/3539; 13.10.2011, E. 2011/8023, K. 2011/10250, 05.10.2011, E. 2011/8161, K. 2011/9851; 27.05.2009, E. 2009/4577, K. 2009/6090.
 
62
Şirin (2015), p. 317.
 
63
3rd Civil Chamber, 09.05.2018, E. 2016/17924, K. 2018/4924.
 
64
4th Civil Chamber, 22.12.2005, E. 2005/291, K. 2005/13922.
 
65
Kılıçoğlu (2019), p. 504.
 
66
Akıntürk and Ateş (2019), pp. 413–414.
 
67
Dural et al. (2020), pp. 363–364.
 
68
In Turkey, children belonging to the Jewish and Christian faiths are exempted from religious culture and ethics classes in accordance with decision no. 1 of 9 July 1990 of the Supreme Council for Education. T.C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Tebliğler Dergisi (1990), p. 553.
 
69
Hasan and Eylem Zengin v. Turkey, 09.10.2007, Application No. 1448/04.
 
70
Hasan and Eylem Zengin v. Turkey, 09.10.2007, Application No. 1448/04.
 
71
Gürcan (2015), p. 6.
 
72
Altıparmak (2013).
 
73
Council of State 8th Chamber, 15.05.2009, E. 2007/8365, K. 2009/3238; 29.02.2008, E. 2007/679, K. 2008/1461; 28.12.2007, E. 2006/4107, K. 2007/7481.
 
74
Istanbul 9th Administrative Court, 17.01.2017, E. 2016/95, K. 2016/1521.
 
75
Mansur Yalçın and Others v. Turkey, 16.09.2014, Application No. 21163/11.
 
76
Mansur Yalçın and Others v. Turkey, 16.09.2014, Application No. 21163/11.
 
77
O.G. 24.06.1973/14574.
 
78
O.G. 11.04.2012/28261.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Acar Hİ (2003) İslam Hukukunda Evlenme Ehliyeti Bakımından Küçüklerin Evlendirilmesi Problemi. Dini Araştırmalar 6(16):125–140 Acar Hİ (2003) İslam Hukukunda Evlenme Ehliyeti Bakımından Küçüklerin Evlendirilmesi Problemi. Dini Araştırmalar 6(16):125–140
Zurück zum Zitat Akıntürk T, Ateş D (2019) Türk Medeni Hukuku Aile Hukuku, vol 21. Beta, Istanbul Akıntürk T, Ateş D (2019) Türk Medeni Hukuku Aile Hukuku, vol 21. Beta, Istanbul
Zurück zum Zitat Demir PÖ (2004) Yeni Medeni Kanunda Evli Kadınların Hukuki Durumu ile İlgili Yenilik ve Değişiklikler. Vedat Kitapçılık, Istanbul Demir PÖ (2004) Yeni Medeni Kanunda Evli Kadınların Hukuki Durumu ile İlgili Yenilik ve Değişiklikler. Vedat Kitapçılık, Istanbul
Zurück zum Zitat Dural M, Öğüz T, Gümüş A (2020) Türk Özel Hukuku, Aile Hukuku, vol 15. Filiz Kitabevi, Istanbul Dural M, Öğüz T, Gümüş A (2020) Türk Özel Hukuku, Aile Hukuku, vol 15. Filiz Kitabevi, Istanbul
Zurück zum Zitat Ergin AD (2010) Azınlık Dillerinin Kullanımı Konusunda Türkiye Nerede Duruyor? Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 59(1):1–34 Ergin AD (2010) Azınlık Dillerinin Kullanımı Konusunda Türkiye Nerede Duruyor? Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 59(1):1–34
Zurück zum Zitat Kılıçoğlu AM (2019) Aile Hukuku, vol 4. Turhan Kitabevi, Ankara Kılıçoğlu AM (2019) Aile Hukuku, vol 4. Turhan Kitabevi, Ankara
Zurück zum Zitat Koçak Z (2015) Şart Nazariyesi Açısından İslam Aile Hukukunda Evlenme ve Boşanma. EKEV Akademi Dergisi 19(64):335–368CrossRef Koçak Z (2015) Şart Nazariyesi Açısından İslam Aile Hukukunda Evlenme ve Boşanma. EKEV Akademi Dergisi 19(64):335–368CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Okan İbiloğlu A, Atlı A, Özkan M (2018) Negative effects of polgamy on family matters in the province of Diyarbakir. Cukurova Med J 43(4):982–988CrossRef Okan İbiloğlu A, Atlı A, Özkan M (2018) Negative effects of polgamy on family matters in the province of Diyarbakir. Cukurova Med J 43(4):982–988CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Özbudak Ç (2015) Anayasa Mahkemesi: “Resmi Nikah Olmaksızın Dini Nikah Caizdir”. Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi 121:89–110 Özbudak Ç (2015) Anayasa Mahkemesi: “Resmi Nikah Olmaksızın Dini Nikah Caizdir”. Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi 121:89–110
Zurück zum Zitat Pürselim Arning HS (2013) Türk ve Alman Milletlerarası Özel Hukuklarında Mehir Kavramının Vasıflandırılması. Milletlerarası Hukuk ve Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk Bülteni 33(2):137–151 Pürselim Arning HS (2013) Türk ve Alman Milletlerarası Özel Hukuklarında Mehir Kavramının Vasıflandırılması. Milletlerarası Hukuk ve Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk Bülteni 33(2):137–151
Zurück zum Zitat Sağlam H (2016) İslam Hukukunda Mehir Evlilik Sigortası Mıdır? Univ J Theol 1(1):1–19CrossRef Sağlam H (2016) İslam Hukukunda Mehir Evlilik Sigortası Mıdır? Univ J Theol 1(1):1–19CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Serozan R (1975) Türk Medeni Kanunu Çerçevesinde Çokevlilik. İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası 41(3–4):293–306 Serozan R (1975) Türk Medeni Kanunu Çerçevesinde Çokevlilik. İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası 41(3–4):293–306
Zurück zum Zitat Şirin Ş (2015) İslam Hukukunda Mehir Davaları. Marife Dini Araştırmalar Dergisi 15(2):297–319 Şirin Ş (2015) İslam Hukukunda Mehir Davaları. Marife Dini Araştırmalar Dergisi 15(2):297–319
Zurück zum Zitat Turğut M, Feyzioğlu S (eds) (2014) Türkiye Aile Yapısı Araştırması Tespitler, Öneriler. T.C. Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı Aile ve Toplum Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara Turğut M, Feyzioğlu S (eds) (2014) Türkiye Aile Yapısı Araştırması Tespitler, Öneriler. T.C. Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı Aile ve Toplum Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara
Zurück zum Zitat Yılmaz E, Tamam L, Bal U (2015) Poligami ve Ruh Sağlığına Etkileri. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar 7(2):221–228CrossRef Yılmaz E, Tamam L, Bal U (2015) Poligami ve Ruh Sağlığına Etkileri. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar 7(2):221–228CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yılmaz İ (2014) Islamic family law in secular Turkish Courts. In: Giunchi E (ed) Adjudicating family law in muslim courts. Routledge, London, pp 148–159 Yılmaz İ (2014) Islamic family law in secular Turkish Courts. In: Giunchi E (ed) Adjudicating family law in muslim courts. Routledge, London, pp 148–159
Metadaten
Titel
How Does Turkish Family Law Cope with Different Ways of Living?
verfasst von
Ceyda Süral Efeçınar
Ekin Ömeroǧlu
Copyright-Jahr
2022
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83106-6_15

Premium Partner