Skip to main content

2014 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. How Is Uncertainty Addressed in the Knowledge Base for National Adaptation Planning?

verfasst von : Hans-Martin Füssel, Mikael Hildén

Erschienen in: Adapting to an Uncertain Climate

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Adaptation actors are generally encouraged to develop adaptation strategies that are robust in the presence of unavoidable uncertainties. However, where can they obtain information on key uncertainties relevant to their decisions? In response to this question, we review the consideration of key uncertainties in the knowledge base for adaptation planning in 14 European countries. In this context, the adaptation knowledge base is understood as information that is directly relevant for adaptation planning and which is provided by or on behalf of public authorities (e.g. through reports and web portals). It includes in particular national climate projections, relevant non-climatic scenarios and climate change impact, vulnerability and risk assessments.
We find substantial differences across countries and jurisdictions. Some key findings are as follows. Almost all national-level climate change projections consider uncertainties related to emission scenarios, global climate models and downscaling methods. Many countries have established web portals that provide access to climate projections; their functionality and the presentation of uncertainty vary widely across them. Only a few countries have developed non-climatic (e.g. socio-economic, demographic and environmental) scenarios for use in climate change impact, vulnerability and risk assessments. All countries have conducted climate impact, vulnerability or risk assessments. The consideration of uncertainty within these varies widely, from a generic qualitative discussion to a probabilistic assessment based on a comprehensive modelling exercise. Most countries have developed guidance material for decision-makers concerned with adaptation. Such guidelines generally explain key sources of uncertainty in climate and climate impact projections but only few guidelines provide practical guidance on adaptation decision-making under uncertainty.
We conclude that substantial efforts are needed to improve the appreciation of uncertainties in climate and climate impact projections by decision-makers and the public at large. Dynamic interactive tools in web portals can be an important part of the tool box for those who are confronted with adapting to climate change. In addition, targeted guidance is needed that explains the relevance of key uncertainties and how they can be addressed by appropriate adaptation strategies in a specific adaptation context.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
3
The table includes information from those 27 EEA member countries that have provided information on the country pages in Climate-ADAPT at the end of 2012. The EEA member countries include all EU Member States and additionally Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, Switzerland and Turkey.
 
4
No information was available for the EEA member countries Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Iceland and Turkey. Information for Denmark was updated compared to (EEA 2013) following the adoption of the Action plan for a climate-proof Denmark (http://​en.​klimatilpasning.​dk/​media/​590075/​action_​plan.​pdf).
 
5
The terms climate impact, vulnerability and risk assessment, as used in different countries, show substantial overlaps. In the context of this study, no further distinction is made within this group of assessments. For a discussion of the evolution of these kinds of assessments, see Füssel and Klein (2006). For a discussion of the use of the terms vulnerability and risk in the climate change context, see the Glossary and EEA (2012, Section 1.7).
 
7
The most noticeable difference between the two sources is related to Poland. The assessment for Poland in Hanger et al. (2013) is based on Pfenninger et al. (2010) and did not consider more recent information available in Climate-ADAPT.
 
8
The very low score for the Netherlands in Lorenz et al. (2013) is due to the fact that this study assessed the National Programme on Climate Adaptation and Spatial Planning from 2007 rather than the more recent Delta Programme.
 
9
Further responses were received from Croatia, Lithuania and Slovenia. Croatia and Slovenia were not included in this analysis because their responses contained very limited information on climate projections and the consideration of uncertainties. Lithuania was not included because publicly available information on climate and climate impact projections was largely restricted to National Communications under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Note that information for “Belgium” was reported separately for the Flemish and the Walloon region, and some information is only available for one of these regions. One member of the EPA IG on Adaptation provided a response for the Basque Autonomous Region in Spain. This response was excluded considering that comprehensive information for Spain was available separately.
 
10
The table contains two different sets of climate scenarios for Germany, denoted as Deutscher Klimaatlas (German climate atlas, by the German Weather Service) and Regionaler Klimaatlas Deutschland (Regional climate atlas Germany, by the Regional Climate Offices of the Helmholtz Association). Another set of climate projections for Germany is being provided on the Kompass website of the Umweltbundesamt (Federal Environment Agency). The Kompass projections are not considered here as they are older than the two projections included in Table 2. Spain has published regional climate change scenarios in 2009 and is currently compiling new scenarios from different sources. The Netherlands have also published two sets of climate projections.
 
15
The latest initiative to generate regional climate change projections based on a multi-model ensemble is the CORDEX (http://​cordex.​dmi.​dk/​joomla/​index.​php) project coordinated by the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP). EURO-CORDEX (http://​www.​euro-cordex.​net/​) is the European branch of the CORDEX initiative and will produce ensemble climate simulations based on multiple dynamical and empirical-statistical downscaling models forced by multiple GCMs from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5).
 
16
When interpreting the information in Table 5, it should be considered that guidance documents can possibly be provided by many institutions. It is thus much more difficult to assemble a complete overview of guidance documents than of national-level climate projections and CCIV assessments.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Budescu, D.V., S. Broomell, and H.H. Por. 2009. Improving communication of uncertainty in the reports of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Psychological Science 20(3): 299–308.CrossRef Budescu, D.V., S. Broomell, and H.H. Por. 2009. Improving communication of uncertainty in the reports of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Psychological Science 20(3): 299–308.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Curry, J.A., and P.J. Webster. 2011. Climate science and the uncertainty monster. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 92(12): 1667–1682.CrossRef Curry, J.A., and P.J. Webster. 2011. Climate science and the uncertainty monster. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 92(12): 1667–1682.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fischhoff, B. 2011. Applying the science of communication to the communication of science. Climatic Change 108(4): 701–705.CrossRef Fischhoff, B. 2011. Applying the science of communication to the communication of science. Climatic Change 108(4): 701–705.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Funtowicz, S.O., and J.R. Ravetz. 1992. Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science. In Social theories of risk, 251–273. Westport: Greenwood. Funtowicz, S.O., and J.R. Ravetz. 1992. Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science. In Social theories of risk, 251–273. Westport: Greenwood.
Zurück zum Zitat Füssel, H.-M., and R.J.T. Klein. 2006. Climate change vulnerability assessments: An evolution of conceptual thinking. Climatic Change 75: 301–329.CrossRef Füssel, H.-M., and R.J.T. Klein. 2006. Climate change vulnerability assessments: An evolution of conceptual thinking. Climatic Change 75: 301–329.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hanger, S., et al. 2013. Knowledge and information needs of adaptation policy-makers: a European study. Regional Environmental Change 13(1): 91–101.CrossRef Hanger, S., et al. 2013. Knowledge and information needs of adaptation policy-makers: a European study. Regional Environmental Change 13(1): 91–101.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lemos, M.C., C.J. Kirchhoff, and V. Ramprasad. 2012. Narrowing the climate information usability gap. Nature Climate Change 2(11): 789–794.CrossRef Lemos, M.C., C.J. Kirchhoff, and V. Ramprasad. 2012. Narrowing the climate information usability gap. Nature Climate Change 2(11): 789–794.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Massey, E., and D. Huitema. 2012. The emergence of climate change adaptation as a policy field: the case of England. Regional Environmental Change 13(2): 341–352.CrossRef Massey, E., and D. Huitema. 2012. The emergence of climate change adaptation as a policy field: the case of England. Regional Environmental Change 13(2): 341–352.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Meehl, G.A., et al. 2007. Global climate projections. In Climate change 2007: The physical science basis, ed. IPCC, 747–845. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Meehl, G.A., et al. 2007. Global climate projections. In Climate change 2007: The physical science basis, ed. IPCC, 747–845. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Moser, S.C. 2010. Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 1(1): 31–53. Moser, S.C. 2010. Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 1(1): 31–53.
Zurück zum Zitat Moss, R.H., and S.H. Schneider. 2000. Uncertainties in the IPCC TAR: Recommendations to lead authors for more consistent assessment and reporting. In Guidance papers on the cross-cutting issues of the third assessment report of the IPCC, ed. R. Pachauri, T. Taniguchi, and K. Tanaka, 33–51. Geneva: WMO. Moss, R.H., and S.H. Schneider. 2000. Uncertainties in the IPCC TAR: Recommendations to lead authors for more consistent assessment and reporting. In Guidance papers on the cross-cutting issues of the third assessment report of the IPCC, ed. R. Pachauri, T. Taniguchi, and K. Tanaka, 33–51. Geneva: WMO.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakicenovic, N., and R. Swart (eds.). 2000. Special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Nakicenovic, N., and R. Swart (eds.). 2000. Special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Pidgeon, N., and B. Fischhoff. 2011. The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nature Climate Change 1(1): 35–41.CrossRef Pidgeon, N., and B. Fischhoff. 2011. The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nature Climate Change 1(1): 35–41.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rabinovich, A., and T.A. Morton. 2012. Unquestioned answers or unanswered questions: beliefs about science guide responses to uncertainty in climate change risk communication. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis 32(6): 992–1002.CrossRef Rabinovich, A., and T.A. Morton. 2012. Unquestioned answers or unanswered questions: beliefs about science guide responses to uncertainty in climate change risk communication. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis 32(6): 992–1002.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, J.B., J.M. Vogel, and J.E. Cromwell. 2009. An architecture for government action on adaptation to climate change. An editorial comment. Climatic Change 95(1/2): 53–61.CrossRef Smith, J.B., J.M. Vogel, and J.E. Cromwell. 2009. An architecture for government action on adaptation to climate change. An editorial comment. Climatic Change 95(1/2): 53–61.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Swart, R., et al. 2009. Agreeing to disagree: uncertainty management in assessing climate change, impacts and responses by the IPCC. Climatic Change 92(1–2): 1–29.CrossRef Swart, R., et al. 2009. Agreeing to disagree: uncertainty management in assessing climate change, impacts and responses by the IPCC. Climatic Change 92(1–2): 1–29.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tang, S., and S. Dessai. 2012. Usable science? The U.K. climate projections 2009 and decision support for adaptation planning. Weather, Climate, and Society 4(4): 300–313.CrossRef Tang, S., and S. Dessai. 2012. Usable science? The U.K. climate projections 2009 and decision support for adaptation planning. Weather, Climate, and Society 4(4): 300–313.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van der Sluijs, J. 2005. Uncertainty as a monster in the science-policy interface: four coping strategies. Water Science and Technology: A Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research 52(6): 87–92. Van der Sluijs, J. 2005. Uncertainty as a monster in the science-policy interface: four coping strategies. Water Science and Technology: A Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research 52(6): 87–92.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilby, R.L., and S. Dessai. 2010. Robust adaptation to climate change. Weather 65(7): 180–185.CrossRef Wilby, R.L., and S. Dessai. 2010. Robust adaptation to climate change. Weather 65(7): 180–185.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
How Is Uncertainty Addressed in the Knowledge Base for National Adaptation Planning?
verfasst von
Hans-Martin Füssel
Mikael Hildén
Copyright-Jahr
2014
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04876-5_3