nach oben

Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations

Erschienen in:

01.12.2022

Hybrid Microscale Phantom of Kidney for Monte Carlo Simulation

verfasst von: Masoud Jabbary

Erschienen in: Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations | Ausgabe 6/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Computational modeling of interaction of radiation with human tissue cells plays an important role in medical physics for evaluation of radiation toxicity. Monte Carlo simulation used to implement such a model. 3D phantom of cells must be created and fed to a Monte Carlo software. In this study a 3D voxelized phantom of a kidney cells in a nephron structure created and used in Monte Carlo simulations to assessment of nephrotoxicity. The phantom is fed to GATE Monte Carlo toolkits and simulations were performed to calculate the absorbed dose/energy from source in a range of energy. The dose estimated in subunits of the voxelized and stylized phantoms showed a considerable bias (average of relative differences). The digital phantom showed very significant differences in dose distribution among the cells in different subunits of the nephron. The results demonstrated that a small dissimilarity in size and shape of geometry can lead to a considerable difference in microdosimetry results. The model presented in this study offers a phantom not only concerning realistic geometry of nephron neglected in previous stylized models, but also has the capability to plot the spatial distribution of absorbed dose for any distribution of radiopharmaceuticals in nephron cells.

Vorheriger Artikel Hybrid Model of a Stationary Plasma Thruster Taking into Account the Finite Electron Mass

Nächster Artikel An Alternative Formalism for the Single-Heated Channel Numerical Analysis

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

J. Svensson, J. Mölne, E. Forssell-Aronsson, M. Konijnenberg, and P. Bernhardt, “Nephrotoxicity profiles and threshold dose values for [¹⁷⁷Lu] – DOTATATE in nude mice,” Nucl. Med. Biol. 39 (6), 756–762 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2012.02.003CrossRef

B. Lambert, M. Cybulla, S. M. Weiner, C. Van De Wiele, H. Ham, R. A. Dierckx, et al., “Renal toxicity after radionuclide therapy,” Radiat. Res. 161 (5), 607–611 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1667/rr3105CrossRef

E. Vegt, M. De Jong, J. F. M. Wetzels, R. Masereeuw, M. Melis, W. J. Oyen et al., “Renal toxicity of radiolabeled peptides and antibody fragments: mechanisms, impact on radionuclide therapy, and strategies for prevention,” J. Nucl. Med. 51 (7), 1049–1058 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.110.075101CrossRef

A. A. Flynn, R. B. Pedley, A. J. Green, J. L. Dearling, E. El-Emir, GM. Boxer et al., “The nonuniformity of antibody distribution in the kidney and its influence on dosimetry,” Rad. Res. 159 (2), 182–189 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1667/0033-7587(2003)159[0182:tnoadi]2.0.co;2CrossRef

M. Konijnenberg, M. Melis, R. Valkema, E. Krenning, and M. De Jong, “Radiation dose distribution in human kidneys by octreotides in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy,” J. Nucl. Med. 48 (1), 134–142 (2007).

L. G. Bouchet, W. E. Bolch, H. P. Blanco, B. W. Wessels, J. A. Siegel, D. A. Rajon et al., “MIRD Pamphlet No 19: Absorbed fractions and radionuclide S values for six age-dependent multiregion models of the kidney,” J. Nucl. Med. 44 (7), 1113–1147 (2003).

M. Borg, T. Hughes, N. Horvath, M. Rice, and A. C. Thomas, “Renal toxicity after total body irradiation,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 54 (4), 1165–1173 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-3016(02)03039-0CrossRef

J. Bergstein, S. P. Andreoli, A. J. Provisor, and M. Yum, “Radiation nephritis following total-body irradiation and cyclophosphamide in preparation for bone marrow transplantation,” Transplantation 41 (1), 63–66 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-198601000-00013CrossRef

L. C. Stephens, M. E. Robbins, D. A. Johnston, H. D. Thames, R. E. Price, L. J. Peters, et al., “Radiation nephropathy in the rhesus monkey: morphometric analysis of glomerular and tubular alterations,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 31 (4), 865–873 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(94)00437-4CrossRef

10.

B. Brans, L. Bodei, F. Giammarile, O. Lindén, M. Luster, W. Oyen, et al., “Clinical radionuclide therapy dosimetry: the quest for the “Holy Gray,” Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 34 (5), 772–786 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-006-0338-5CrossRef

11.

L. Bodei, M. Cremonesi, M. Ferrari, M. Pacifici, C. M. Grana, M. Bartolomei et al., “Long-term evaluation of renal toxicity after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with ⁹⁰Y-DOTATOC and ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE: the role of associated risk factors,” Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 35 (10), 1847–1856 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-008-0778-1CrossRef

12.

R. Valkema, S. A. Pauwels, L. K. Kvols, D. J. Kwekkeboom, et al., “Long-term follow-up of renal function after peptide receptor radiation therapy with ⁹⁰Y-DOTA⁰, Tyr³-octreotide and ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA⁰, Tyr³-octreotate,” J. Nucl. Med. 46 (Supl. 1), 83S–91S (2005).

13.

H. Bergsma, M. W. Konijnenberg, W. A. van der Zwan, B. L. R. Kam, J. J. M. Teunissen, P. P. Kooij, et al., “Nephrotoxicity after PRRT with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-octreotate,” Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 43 (10), 1802–1811 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3382-9CrossRef

14.

J. R. Cassady, “Clinical radiation nephropathy,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 31 (5), 1249–1256 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(94)00428-NCrossRef

15.

A. Bertolet, M. Cortés-Giraldo, and A. Carabe-Fernandeza, “An analytical microdosimetric model for radioimmunotherapeutic alpha emitters,” J. Radiat. Res. 194 (4), 403–410 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1667/rade-20-00045.1CrossRef

16.

O. P. Joneja, C. Negreanu, J. Stepanek, and R. Chawla, “Comparison of Monte Carlo simulations of photon/electron dosimetry in microscale applications,” Aust. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 26 (2), 63–69 (2003).CrossRef

17.

B. Seniwal, M. A. Bernal, and T. C. F. Fonseca, “Microdosimetric calculations for radionuclides emitting β and α particles and Auger electrons,” Appl. Radiat. Isot. 166, 109302 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2020.109302CrossRef

18.

R. F. Hobbs, H. Song, D. L. Huso, M. H. Sundel, and G. Sgouros, “A nephron-based model of the kidneys for macro-to-micro α-particle dosimetry,” Phys. Med. Biol. 57 (13), 4403–4424 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/57/13/4403CrossRef

19.

D. Sarrut, M. Bardiès, N. Boussion, N. Freud, S. Jan S, J.-M. Létang, et al., “A review of the use and potential of the GATE Monte Carlo simulation code for radiation therapy and dosimetry applications,” Med. Phys. 41 (6, Part 1), 064301 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4871617CrossRef

20.

A. A. Parach, H. Rajabi, and M. A. Askari, “Assessment of MIRD data for internal dosimetry using the GATE Monte Carlo code,” Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 50 (3), 441–450 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-011-0370-0CrossRef

21.

C. O. Thiam, V. Breton, D. Donnarieix, B. Habib, and L. Maigne, “Validation of a dose deposited by low-energy photons using GATE/GEANT4,” Phys. Med. Biol. 53 (11), 3039–3055 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/11/019CrossRef

22.

D. Villoing, S. Marcatili, M.-P. Garcia, and M. Bardiès, “Internal dosimetry with the Monte Carlo code GATE: validation using the ICRP/ICRU female reference computational model,” Phys. Med. Biol. 62 (5), 1885–1904 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/62/5/1885CrossRef

23.

D. E. Cullen, J. H. Hubbell, and L. Kissel, “EPDL97: the evaluated photo data library, ’97 version,” UCRL-50400, Vol. 6, Rev. 5 (Lawrence Livermore National Lab., University of California, Livermore, CA, 1997). https://doi.org/10.2172/295438

24.

S. T. Perkins and D. E. Cullen, “ENDL type formats for the LLNL evaluated atomic data library, EADL, for the evaluated electron data library, EEDL, and for the evaluated photon data library, EPDL,” Report IA-EA-NDS–159 (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1994).

25.

S. Incerti, B. Suerfu, J. Xu, V. Ivantchenko, A. Mantero, J. M. C. Brown, et al., “Simulation of Auger electron emission from nanometer-size gold targets using the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 372, 91–101 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2016.02.005CrossRef

26.

S. T. Perkins, D. E. Cullen, and S. M. Seltzer, “Tables and graphs of electron-interaction cross sections from 10 eV to 100 GeV derived from the LLNL Evaluated Electron Data Library (EEDL), Z= 1−100,” UCRL-50400, Vol. 31 (Lawrence Livermore National Lab., University of California, Livermore, CA, 1991). https://doi.org/10.2172/5691165

27.

S. Agostinelli, J. Allison, K. Amako, J. Apostolakis, H. Araujo, P. Arce, et al., “GEANT4—a simulation toolkit,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 506 (3), 250–303 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

28.

J. Allison, K. Amako, J. Apostolakis, P. Arce, M. Asai, T. Aso, et al., “Recent developments in Geant4,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 835, 186–225 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2016.06.125

29.

D. Lattuada, D. L. Balabanski, S. Chesnevskaya, M. Costa, V. Crucillà, G. L. Guardo, et al., “A fast and complete GEANT4 and ROOT Object-Oriented Toolkit: GROOT,” EPJ Web Conf. 165, 01034 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201716501034

30.

S. M. Goddu (Ed.), R. W. Howell, L. G. Bouchet, W. E. Bolch, and D. V. Rao, MIRD Cellular S Values: Self-Absorbed Dose Per Unit Cumulated Activity for Selected Radionuclides and Monoenergetic Electron and Alpha Particle Emitters Incorporated into Different Cell Compartments (Society of Nuclear Medicine, Reston, 1997).

31.

S. Zein, Z. Francis, G. Montarou, F. Chandez, M. Kane, and A. Chevrollier, “Microdosimetry in 3D realistic mitochondria phantoms: Geant4 Monte Carlo tracking of 250 keV photons in phantoms reconstructed from microscopic images,” Phys. Med. 42, 7–12 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.08.005CrossRef

32.

Y. Wang, Z. Li, A. Zhang, P. Gu, F. Li, X. Li, et al., “Microdosimetric calculations by simulating monoenergetic electrons in voxel models of human normal individual cells,” Radiat. Phys. 166, 108518 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108518CrossRef

33.

J. Bordes, S. Incerti, E. Mora-Ramirez, J. Tranel, C. Rossi, C. Bezombes, et al., “Monte Carlo dosimetry of a realistic multicellular model of follicular lymphoma in a context of radioimmunotherapy,” Med. Phys. 47 (10), 5222–5234 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14370CrossRef

34.

S. M. Goddu (Ed.), R. W. Howell, L. G. Bouchet, W. E. Bolch, and D. V. Rao, MIRD Cellular S Values (Society of Nuclear Medicine, Reston, 1997).

35.

A. I. Rubenstone and L. B. Fitch, “Radiation nephritis. A clinicopathologic study,” Am. J. Med. 33 (4), 545–554 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(62)90265-6CrossRef

36.

T. Blanc, N. Goudin, M. Zaidan, M. G. Traore, F. Bienaime, L. Turinsky, et al., “Three-dimensional architecture of nephrons in the normal and cystic kidney,” Kidney Int. 99 (3), 632–645 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2020.09.032CrossRef

37.

R. L. Jamison, J. Buerkert, and F. Lacy, “A microstructure study of Henle’s thin loop in Brattleboro rats,” Am. J. Physiol. 224 (1), 180–185 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplegacy.1973.224.1.180CrossRef

38.

G. Tamborino, M. De Saint-Hubert, L. Struelens, D. C. Seoane, E. A. M. Ruigrok, A. Aerts, et al., “Cellular dosimetry of [¹⁷⁷ Lu]Lu-DOTA-[Tyr ³]octreotate radionuclide therapy: the impact of modeling assumptions on the correlation with in vitro cytotoxicity,” EJNMMI Phys. 7 (1), 8 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-0276-5CrossRef

Titel: Hybrid Microscale Phantom of Kidney for Monte Carlo Simulation
verfasst von: Masoud Jabbary
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2022
Verlag: Pleiades Publishing
Erschienen in: Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations / Ausgabe 6/2022
Print ISSN: 2070-0482
Elektronische ISSN: 2070-0490
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070048222060102

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2022

Study of Filtration Processes in a Gas-Hydrate Reservoir Taking into Account Salinity and Solid-Phase Inclusions

The Influence of External Heat Exposure on the Stress State of Shell Molds by Smelting Models

Simulation of an Air Shock Wave Using the Equations of State for the Jones–Wilkins–Lee Detonation Products

Scenario Modeling of the Collapse of Red King Crab Stocks under the Expert Control of the Annual Catch

About One Numerical Method for Finding the Positions of Hydrogen and Oxygen Nuclei in a Water Cluster

An Alternative Formalism for the Single-Heated Channel Numerical Analysis

Premium Partner